|
|
||||||||
This paper examines whether and how survey respondents react to spatial factors in stated preference surveys, and the ways in which preferences for spatial factors may influence welfare estimation. Alternative proposals to develop rural lands for residential purposes in southern New England were studied. Results illustrate that spatial attributes can influence estimated willingness to pay for development plans, even in cases where spatial attributes are only presented as cartographic details of maps used to clarify survey scenarios. Moreover, we find that subtle, and potentially unintended, spatial features presented in choice questions may influence marginal valuation of non-spatial attributes. (R52)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Brouwer, J. Martin-Ortega, and J. Berbel Spatial Preference Heterogeneity: A Choice Experiment Land Economics, August 1, 2010; 86(3): 552 - 568. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Gelso, J. A. Fox, and J. M. Peterson Farmers' Perceived Costs of Wetlands: Effects of Wetland Size, Hydration, and Dispersion Am. J. Agr. Econ., February 1, 2008; 90(1): 172 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. King and C. M. Anderson Marginal Property Tax Effects of Conservation Easements: A Vermont Case Study Am. J. Agr. Econ., November 1, 2004; 86(4): 919 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Johnston, S. K. Swallow, T. J. Tyrrell, and D. M. Bauer Rural Amenity Values and Length of Residency Am. J. Agr. Econ., November 1, 2003; 85(4): 1000 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |