Land Economics Ecological Restoration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Land Economics 78(4):617-623 (2002); doi:10.3368/le.78.4.617
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, J.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, V. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

COMMENT AND REPLY

Monte Carlo Benchmarks for Discrete Response Valuation Methods: Reply

Ju-Chin Huang, and V. Kerry Smith

This response to a comment by Poe and Vossler on our earlier research (Huang and Smith 1998) agrees that our test of the equality of the Turnbull lower bound mean and English Auction mean was incorrect. However, this result was part of the review of literature and did not affect any of the primary conclusions of our earlier research. Moreover, further analysis of the sampling experiments suggests that the selection of true model specifications, hypothesized values for key preference parameters, and choice of estimating equations did not preclude negative biases in the estimates of willingness to pay from discrete response models. (JEL C93, D12, Q2)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2002 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System