HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jumbe, C. B. L. Articles by Angelsen, A. Search for Related Content

Do the Poor Benefit from Devolution Policies? Evidence from Malawi’s Forest Co-Management Program

Do local people, especially vulnerable households, benefit from devolution of forest management? We apply the propensity-score matching and decomposition techniques on household data from Chimaliro and Liwonde forest reserves under the pilot forest co-management program in Malawi. After controlling for selection bias, we find that while the program raises forest income for participants in Chimaliro, it reduces revenue for participants in Liwonde. Interestingly, results indicate that the program raises forest income for female and low-income participants, although male and richer participants capture more benefits due to discrimination and endowment differences accounting for 100% and 60% of the inter-group income disparity, respectively. (JEL Q23, O13)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Tachibana and S. Adhikari Does Community-Based Management Improve Natural Resource Condition? Evidence from the Forests in Nepal Land Economics, January 1, 2009; 85(1): 107 - 131. [Abstract] [PDF]