Land Economics
Landscape Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Land Economics 84(4):652-666 (2008);
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kompas, T.
Right arrow Articles by Grafton, R. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Fisheries Instrument Choice under Uncertainty

Tom Kompas, Tuong Nhu Che, and R. Quentin Grafton

This paper uses data from an actual fishery to construct a tractable, dynamic model to compare expected profit and its variance, optimal stock size, optimal harvest rate, and optimal fishing effort under different management regimes under uncertainty. The results provide a comparison of instrument choice between a total harvest control and a total effort control under uncertainty, an original method to evaluate the tradeoffs between profits and other criteria in a dynamic context, and insights regarding the relative merits of catch and effort controls in fisheries management. (JEL Q22, D81)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
A. E. Punt, R. A. Deng, C. M. Dichmont, T. Kompas, W. N. Venables, S. Zhou, S. Pascoe, T. Hutton, R. Kenyon, T. van der Velde, et al.
Integrating size-structured assessment and bioeconomic management advice in Australia's northern prawn fishery
ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 3, 2010; (2010) fsq037v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2008 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System