Research ArticleArticles

The Demand for Voluntary Carbon Dioxide Removal: Experimental Evidence from an Afforestation Project in Germany

Lara Bartels, Martin Kesternich and Andreas Löschel
Land Economics, November 2024, 100 (4) 621-638; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/le.100.4.070523-0060R1

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abildtrup, J.,
    2. S. Garcia,
    3. S. B. Olsen, and
    4. A. Stenger
    . 2013. “Spatial Preference Heterogeneity in Forest Recreation.” Ecological Economics 92: 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.001.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Achtnicht, M.
    2012. “German Car Buyers’ Willingness to Pay to Reduce CO2 Emissions.” Climatic Change 113: 679–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0362-8.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Anderson, B., and
    2. T. Bernauer
    . 2016. “How Much Carbon Offsetting and Where? Implications of Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Ethicality Considerations for Public Opinion Formation.” Energy Policy 94: 387–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.016.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Austin, K. G.,
    2. J. S. Baker,
    3. B. L. Sohngen,
    4. C. M Wade,
    5. A. Daigneault,
    6. S. B. Ohrel,
    7. S. Ragnauth, and
    8. A. Bean
    . 2020. “The Economic Costs of Planting, Preserving, and Managing the World’s Forests to Mitigate Climate Change.” Nature Communication 11: 5946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19578-z.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Bain, P. G.,
    2. T. L. Milfont,
    3. Y. Kashima,
    4. M. Bilewicz,
    5. G. Doron,
    6. R. B. Garðarsdóttir,
    7. V. V. Gouveia
    , et al. 2016. “Co-benefits of Addressing Climate Change Can Motivate Action around the World.” Nature Climate Change 6: 154–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2814.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Bakhtiari, F.,
    2. J. B. Jacobsen,
    3. B. J. Thorsen,
    4. T. H. Lundhede,
    5. N. Strange, and
    6. M. Boman
    . 2018. “Disentangling Distance and Country Effects on the Value of Conservation across National Borders.” Ecological Economics 147: 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.019.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Baranzini, A.,
    2. N. Borzykowski, and
    3. S. Carattini
    . 2018. “Carbon Offsets Out of the Woods? Acceptability of Domestic vs. International Reforestation Programmes in the Lab.” Journal of Forest Economics 32: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2018.02.004.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Barrio, M., and
    2. M. L. Loureiro
    . 2010. “A Meta-analysis of Contingent Valuation Forest Studies.” Ecological Economics 69 (5): 1023–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.016.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Bastin, J.-F.,
    2. Y. Finegold,
    3. C. Garcia,
    4. D. Mollicone,
    5. M. Rezende,
    6. D. Routh,
    7. C. M. Zohne, and
    8. T. W. Crowther
    . 2019. “The Global Tree Restoration Potential.” Science 365 (6448): 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0848.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Bateman, I. J.,
    2. B. H. Day,
    3. S. Georgiou, and
    4. I. Lake
    . 2006. “The Aggregation of Environmental Benefit Values: Welfare Measures, Distance Decay and Total WTP.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 450–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Bateman, I., and
    2. A. Lovett
    . 2000. “Estimating and Valuing the Carbon Sequestered in Softwood and Hardwood Trees, Timber Products and Forest Soils in Wales.” Journal of Environmental Management 60 (4): 301–23. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0388.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    BBSR (Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning, Bonn). 2020. “INKAR: Indikatoren und Karten zur Raum- und Stadtentwicklung.” Available at https://www.inkar.de.
  13. ↵
    1. Beißert, H.,
    2. M. Köhler,
    3. M. Rempel, and
    4. C. Beierlein
    . 2014. “Eine Deutschsprachige Kurzskala zur Messung des Konstrukts Need for Cognition (NFC-K).” Working paper. GESIS, Mannheim. Available at https://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/kurzskalen/working_papers/WorkingPapers_2014-32.pdf.
  14. ↵
    1. Bellamy, R.
    2022. “Mapping Public Appraisals of Carbon Dioxide Removal.” Global Environmental Change 76: 102593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102593.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Brey, R.,
    2. P. Riera, and
    3. J. Mogas
    . 2007. “Estimation of Forest Values Using Choice Modeling: An Application to Spanish Forests.” Ecological Economics 64 (2): 305–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.006.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Brouwer, R.,
    2. J. Martin-Ortega, and
    3. J. Berbel
    . 2010. “Spatial Preference Heterogeneity: A Choice Experiment.” Land Economics 86 (3): 552–68. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.86.3.552.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Buck, H. J.
    2016. “Rapid Scale-Up of Negative Emissions Technologies: Social Barriers and Social Implications.” Climatic Change 139: 155–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1770-6.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Buntaine, M. T., and
    2. L. Prather
    . 2018. “Preferences for Domestic Action over International Transfers in Global Climate Policy.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 5 (2): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2017.34.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Canadell, J. G., and
    2. M. R. Raupach
    . 2008. “Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation.” Science 320 (5882): 1456–57. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155458.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Carattini, S.,
    2. A. Baranzini, and
    3. J. Roca
    . 2015. “Unconventional Determinants of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Role of Trust.” Environmental Research Letters 25 (4): 243–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1685.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Chaudhuri, A.
    2011. “Sustaining Cooperation in Laboratory Public Goods Experiments: A Selective Survey of the Literature.” Experimental Economics 14: 47–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-010-9257-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Cook-Patton, S. C.,
    2. S. M. Leavitt,
    3. D. Gibbs,
    4. N. L. Harris,
    5. K. Lister,
    6. K. J. Anderson-Teixeira,
    7. R. D. Briggs
    , et al. 2020. “Mapping Carbon Accumulation Potential from Global Natural Forest Regrowth.” Nature 585: 545–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Cox, E.,
    2. E. Spence, and
    3. N. Pidgeon
    . 2020. “Public Perceptions of Carbon Dioxide Removal in the United States and the United Kingdom.” Nature Climate Change 10: 744–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0823-z.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Czajkowski, M.,
    2. W. Budziński,
    3. D. Campbell,
    4. M. Giergiczny, and
    5. N. Hanley
    . 2017. “Spatial Heterogeneity of Willingness to Pay for Forest Management.” Environmental and Resource Economics 68 (3): 705–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0044-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Dabla-Norris, E.,
    2. T. Helbling,
    3. S. Khalid,
    4. H. Khan,
    5. G. Magistretti,
    6. A. Sollaci, and
    7. K. Srinivasan
    . 2023. “Public Perceptions of Climate Mitigation Policies: Evidence from Cross-Country Surveys.” Staff Discussion Note SDN2023/002. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
  26. ↵
    1. Del Saz Salazar, S., and
    2. L. García Menéndez
    . 2007. “Estimating the Non-market Benefits of an Urban Park: Does Proximity Matter?” Land Use Policy 24 (1): 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Diederich, J., and
    2. T. Goeschl
    . 2014. “Willingness to Pay for Voluntary Climate Action and Its Determinants: Field-Experimental Evidence.” Environmental and Resource Economics 57: 405–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9686-3.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Diederich, J., and
    2. T. Goeschl
    . 2018. “Voluntary Action for Climate Change Mitigation Does Not Exhibit Locational Preferences.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 90: 175–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.03.006.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Falk, A.,
    2. A. Becker,
    3. T. J. Dohmen,
    4. D. Huffman, and
    5. U. Sunde
    . 2016. “The Preference Survey Module: A Validated Instrument for Measuring Risk, Time, and Social Preferences.” Discussion Paper 9674. Bonn, Germany: IZA.
  30. ↵
    1. Falk, A.,
    2. A. Becker,
    3. T. Dohmen,
    4. B. Enke,
    5. D. Huffman, and
    6. U. Sunde
    . 2018. “Global Evidence on Economic Preferences.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (4): 1645–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Fekete, H.,
    2. T. Kuramochi,
    3. M. Roelfsema,
    4. M. den Elzen,
    5. N. Forsell,
    6. N. Höhne,
    7. L. Luna
    , et al. 2021. “A Review of Successful Climate Change Mitigation Policies in Major Emitting Economies and the Potential of Global Replication.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 137: 110602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110602.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Feldhaus, C.,
    2. M. Gleue,
    3. A. Löschel, and
    4. P. Werner
    . 2022. “Co-benefits Motivate Individual Donations to Mitigate Climate Change.” GSBE Research Memoranda 004. Graduate School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University.
  33. ↵
    Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace. 2022. “The Art of Integrity: State of Voluntary Carbon Markets.” Q3 Insights Briefing. Washington, DC: Forest Trends Association.
  34. ↵
    1. Forster, E. J.,
    2. J. R. Healey,
    3. C. Dymond, and
    4. D. Styles
    . 2021. “Commercial Afforestation Can Deliver Effective Climate Change Mitigation under Multiple Decarbonisation Pathways.” Nature Communication 12: 3831. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24084-x.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Freeman, A. M.
    2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  36. ↵
    1. Fuss, S.,
    2. J. G. Canadell,
    3. P. Ciais,
    4. R. B. Jackson,
    5. C. D. Jones,
    6. A. Lyngfelt,
    7. G. P. Peters, and
    8. D. P. van Vuuren
    . 2020. “Moving Toward Net-Zero Emissions Requires New Alliances for Carbon Dioxide Removal.” One Earth 3 (2): 145–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.002.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Fuss, S.,
    2. W. F. Lamb,
    3. M. W. Callaghan,
    4. J. Hilaire,
    5. F. Creutzig,
    6. T. Amann,
    7. T. Beringer
    , et al. 2018. “Negative Emissions: Part 2. Costs, Potentials and Side Effects.” Environmental Research Letters 13: 63002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Gifford, L.
    2020. “‘You Can’t Value What You Can’t Measure’: A Critical Look at Forest Carbon Accounting.” Climatic Change 161: 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02653-1.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Gregory, R.
    T. Satterfield, and A. Hasell. 2016. “Using Decision Pathway Surveys to Inform Climate Engineering Policy Choices.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (3): 560–65. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508896113.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Gren, I.-M., and
    2. A. Z. Aklilu
    . 2016. “Policy Design for Forest Carbon Sequestration: A Review of the Literature.” Forest Policy and Economics 70: 128–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.008.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Holl, K. D., and
    2. P. H. S. Brancalion
    . 2020. “Tree Planting Is Not a Simple Solution.” Science 368 (6491): 580–81. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba8232.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Shukla, P. R.,
    2. J. Skea,
    3. R. Slade,
    4. A. Al Khourdajie,
    5. R. van Diemen,
    6. D. McCollum,
    7. M. Pathak
    , et al. eds. 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
  43. ↵
    1. Jones, B., and
    2. H. Rachlin
    . 2006. “Social Discounting.” Psychological Science 17 (4): 283–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01699.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Klein, D.
    2009. “Wie viele Bäume sind nötig, um eine Tonne CO2 zu binden?” Available at https://www.handelsblatt.com/technik/energie-umwelt/klima-orakel-wie-viele-baeume-sind-noetig-um-eine-tonne-co2-zu-binden/3201340.html.
  45. ↵
    1. Lawrence, M. G.,
    2. S. Schäfer,
    3. H. Muri,
    4. V. Scott,
    5. A. Oschlies,
    6. N. E. Vaughan,
    7. O. Boucher,
    8. H. Schmidt,
    9. J. Haywood, and
    10. J. Scheffran
    . 2018. “Evaluating Climate Geoengineering Proposals in the Context of the Paris Agreement Temperature Goals.” Nature Communication 9: 3734. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Ledyard J.
    1995. “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research.” In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, edited by John H. Kagel and Alven E. Roth, 110–94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  47. ↵
    1. Lewis, S. L.,
    2. C. E. Wheeler,
    3. E. T. A. Mitchard, and
    4. A. Koch
    . 2019. “Restoring Natural Forests Is the Best Way to Remove Atmospheric Carbon.” Nature 568: 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01026-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Longo, A.,
    2. D. Hoyos, and
    3. A. Markandya
    . 2012. “Willingness to Pay for Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 51: 119–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9491-9.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Löschel, A.,
    2. J. Pei,
    3. R. Wang,
    4. B. Sturm,
    5. W. Buchholz, and
    6. Z. Zhao
    . 2021. “The Demand for Global and Local Environmental Protection: Experimental Evidence from Climate Change Mitigation in Beijing.” Land Economics 97 (1): 137–54. https://doi.org/10.3368/wple.97.1.061219-0076R1.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Löschel, A.,
    2. B. Sturm, and
    3. R. Uehleke
    . 2017. “Revealed Preferences for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation When the Purely Individual Perspective Is Relaxed: Evidence from a Framed Field Experiment.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 67: 149–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.12.007.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Löschel, A.,
    2. B. Sturm, and
    3. C. Vogt
    . 2013. “The Demand for Climate Protection: Empirical Evidence from Germany.” Economics Letters 118 (3): 415–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.12.007.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. MacKerron, G. J.,
    2. C. Egerton,
    3. C. Gaskell,
    4. A. Parpia, and
    5. S. Mourato
    . 2009. “Willingness to Pay for Carbon Offset Certification and Co-benefits among (High-)Flying Young Adults in the UK.” Energy Policy 37 (4): 1372–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.023.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Maréchal, K., and
    2. W. Hecq
    . 2006. “Temporary Credits: A Solution to the Potential Non-permanence of Carbon Sequestration in Forests?” Ecological Economics 58 (4): 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.08.017.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Matthews, H. D.,
    2. K. Zickfeld,
    3. M. Dickau,
    4. A. J. MacIsaac,
    5. S. Mathesius,
    6. C.-M. Nzotungicimpaye, and
    7. A. Luers
    . 2022. “Temporary Nature-Based Carbon Removal Can Lower Peak Warming in a Well-Below 2°C Scenario.” CommunicationsEarth and Environment 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00391-z.
  55. ↵
    1. Mengist, W., and
    2. T. Soromessa
    . 2019. “Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Service Research Trends and Methodological Approaches at Global Level: A Meta-analysis.” Environmental Systems Research 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-019-0150-4.
  56. ↵
    1. Merk, C.,
    2. U. Liebe,
    3. J. Meyerhoff, and
    4. K. Rehdanz
    . 2023. “German Citizens’ Preference for Domestic Carbon Dioxide Removal by Afforestation Is Incompatible with National Removal Potential.” Communications Earth and Environment 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00713-9.
  57. ↵
    1. Neumann, M.,
    2. A. Moreno,
    3. V. Mues,
    4. S. Härkönen,
    5. M. Mura,
    6. O. Bouriaud,
    7. M. Lang
    , et al. 2016. “Comparison of Carbon Estimation Methods for European Forests.” Forest Ecology and Management 361: 397–420.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Newell, R. G., and
    2. R. N. Stavins
    . 2000. “Climate Change and Forest Sinks: Factors Affecting the Costs of Carbon Sequestration.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40 (3): 211–35. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    1. Nieto, J.,
    2. Ó. Carpintero, and
    3. L. J. Miguel
    . 2018. “Less Than 2°C? An Economic-Environmental Evaluation of the Paris Agreement.” Ecological Economics 146: 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.007.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Ninan, K. N., and
    2. M. Inoue
    . 2013. “Valuing Forest Ecosystem Services: What We Know and What We Don’t.” Ecological Economics 93: 137–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.005.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Núñez, D.,
    2. L. Nahuelhual, and
    3. C. Oyarzún
    . 2006. “Forests and Water: The Value of Native Temperate Forests in Supplying Water for Human Consumption.” Ecological Economics 58: 606–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.08.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Obersteiner, M.,
    2. H. Böttcher, and
    3. Y. Yamagata
    . 2010. “Terrestrial Ecosystem Management for Climate Change Mitigation.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2 (4): 271–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.006.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Pires, J. C. M.
    , 2019. “Negative Emissions Technologies: A Complementary Solution for Climate Change Mitigation.” Science of the Total Environment 672: 502–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Profft, I.,
    2. M. Mund,
    3. G.-E. Weber,
    4. E. Weller, and
    5. E.-D. Schulze
    . 2009. “Forest Management and Carbon Sequestration in Wood Products.” European Journal of Forest Research 128: 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009-0283-5.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Rhodes, E.,
    2. J. Axsen, and
    3. M. Jaccard
    . 2017. “Exploring Citizen Support for Different Types of Climate Policy.” Ecological Economics 137: 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Richards, K. R., and
    2. C. Stokes
    . 2004. “A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies: A Dozen Years of Research.” Climatic Change 63: 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000018503.10080.89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. Rodríguez-Entrena, M.,
    2. J. Barreiro-Hurlé,
    3. J. A. Gómez-Limón,
    4. M. Espinosa-Goded, and
    5. J. Castro-Rodríguez
    . 2012. “Evaluating the Demand for Carbon Sequestration in Olive Grove Soils as a Strategy Toward Mitigating Climate Change.” Journal of Environmental Management 112: 368–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Rodríguez-Entrena, M.,
    2. M. Espinosa-Goded, and
    3. J. Barreiro-Hurlé
    . 2014. “The Role of Ancillary Benefits on the Value of Agricultural Soils Carbon Sequestration Programmes: Evidence from a Latent Class Approach to Andalusian Olive Groves.” Ecological Economics 99: 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.006.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Schaafsma, M.,
    2. R. Brouwer,
    3. A. Gilbert,
    4. J. van den Bergh, and
    5. A. Wagtendonk
    . 2013. “Estimation of Distance-Decay Functions to Account for Substitution and Spatial Heterogeneity in Stated Preference Research.” Land Economics 89 (3): 514–37. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.89.3.514.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Shrestha, A.,
    2. S. Eshpeter,
    3. N. Li,
    4. J. Li,
    5. J. O. Nile, and
    6. G. Wang
    . 2022. “Inclusion of Forestry Offsets in Emission Trading Schemes: Insights from Global Experts.” Journal of Forestry Research 33:279–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01329-5.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Smith, S. M.,
    2. O. Geden,
    3. G. Nemet,
    4. M. Gidden,
    5. W. F. Lamb,
    6. C. Powis,
    7. R. Bellamy
    , et al. 2023. The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W3B4Z.
  72. ↵
    1. Strombach, T.,
    2. J. Jin,
    3. B. Weber,
    4. P. Kenning,
    5. Q. Shen,
    6. Q. Ma, and
    7. T. Kalenscher
    . 2014. “Charity Begins at Home: Cultural Differences in Social Discounting and Generosity.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 27 (3): 235–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1802.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Taye, F. A.,
    2. M. V. Folkersen,
    3. C. M. Fleming,
    4. A. Buckwell,
    5. B. Mackey,
    6. K. C. Diwakar,
    7. D. Le,
    8. S. Hasan, and
    9. C. S. Ange
    . 2021. “The Economic Values of Global Forest Ecosystem Services: A Meta-analysis.” Ecological Economics 189: 107145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107145.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Tolunay, A., and
    2. Ç. Başsüllü
    . 2015. “Willingness to Pay for Carbon Sequestration and Co-benefits of Forests in Turkey.” Sustainability 7 (3): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7033311.
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Torres, A. B.,
    2. D. C. MacMillan,
    3. M. Skutsch, and
    4. J. C. Lovett
    . 2015. “‘Yes-in-My-Backyard’: Spatial Differences in the Valuation of Forest Services and Local Co-benefits for Carbon Markets in México. Ecological Economics 109: 130–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.008.
    OpenUrl
  76. ↵
    1. Uehleke, R., and
    2. B. Sturm
    . 2017. “The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations.” Environmental and Resource Economics 67: 429–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0.
    OpenUrl
  77. ↵
    1. van der Horst, D.
    2006. “Spatial Cost-Benefit Thinking in Multi-Functional Forestry: Towards a Framework for Spatial Targeting of Policy Interventions.” Ecological Economics 59: 171–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.005.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. van Kooten, G. C.
    2017. “Forest Carbon Offsets and Carbon Emissions Trading: Problems of Contracting.” Forest Policy and Economics 75: 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.006.
    OpenUrl
  79. ↵
    1. van Kooten, G.,
    2. A. J. Eagle,
    3. J. Manley, and
    4. T. Smolak
    . 2004. “How Costly Are Carbon Offsets? A Meta-analysis of Carbon Forest Sinks.” Environmental Science and Policy 7 (4): 239–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.05.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  80. ↵
    1. van Kooten, G. C., and
    2. C. M. Johnston
    . 2016. “The Economics of Forest Carbon Offsets.” Annual Review of Resource Economics 8: 227–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095548.
    OpenUrl
  81. ↵
    1. Wenger, A.,
    2. M. Stauffacher, and
    3. I. Dallo
    . 2021. “Public Perception and Acceptance of Negative Emission Technologies: Framing Effects in Switzerland.” Climatic Change 167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03150-9.
  82. ↵
    1. Wolske, K. S.,
    2. K. T. Raimi,
    3. V. Campbell-Arvai, and
    4. P. S. Hart
    . 2019. “Public Support for Carbon Dioxide Removal Strategies: The Role of Tampering with Nature Perceptions. Climatic Change 152: 345–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02375-z.
    OpenUrl
  83. ↵
    1. Zickfeld, K.,
    2. D. Azevedo,
    3. S. Mathesius, and
    4. H. D. Matthews
    . 2021. “Asymmetry in the Climate-Carbon Cycle Response to Positive and Negative CO2 Emissions.” Nature Climate Change 11: 613–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01061-2.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
The Demand for Voluntary Carbon Dioxide Removal: Experimental Evidence from an Afforestation Project in Germany
Lara Bartels, Martin Kesternich, Andreas Löschel
Land Economics Nov 2024, 100 (4) 621-638; DOI: 10.3368/le.100.4.070523-0060R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords