Economic Benefits of Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Risk

References

1. ↵
   1. Bergstrom, J. C.

   , and L. O Taylor. 2006. “Using Meta-Analysis for Benefits Transfer: Theory and Practice.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 351–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.015.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Bockarjova, M.

   , W. J. W. Botzen, and M. J. Koetse. 2020. “Economic Valuation of Green and Blue Nature in Cities: A Meta-Analysis.” Ecological Economics 169: 106448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106480.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Brander, L. M.

   2013. “Guidance Manual on Value Transfer Methods for Ecosystem Services.” Technical Report, Brander Environmental Economics. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4203.8569.
4. ↵
   1. Brander, L. M.

   , R. de Groot, V. Guisado Goñi, V. van’t Hoff, P. Schägner, S. Solomonides, A. McVittie, et al. 2024. “Ecosystem Services Valuation Database (ESVD).” Foundation for Sustainable Development and Brander Environmental Economics.
5. ↵
   1. Brander, L. M.

   , and M. J. Koetse. 2011. “The Value of Urban Open Space: Meta-Analyses of Contingent Valuation and Hedonic Pricing Results.” Journal of Environmental Management 92 (10): 2763–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Brouwer, R.

   2000. “Environmental Value Transfer: State of the Art and Future Prospects.” Ecological Economics 32 (1): 137–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Coventry, P. A.

   , J. E. Brown, J. Pervin, S. Brabyn, R. Pateman, J. Breedvelt, and P. C. White. 2021. “Nature-Based Outdoor Activities for Mental and Physical Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” SSM: Population Health 16: 100917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100917.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. ↵
   CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. 2022. “Do People Value Environmental Goods? Evidence from the Netherlands.” Available at https://www.cpb.nl/system/files/cpbmedia/omnidownload/CPB-Discussion-Paper-438-Do-people-value-environmental-goods.pdf.
9. ↵
   1. Dalhuisen, J. M.

   , R. J. G. M. Florax, H. L. F. de Groot, and P. Nijkamp. 2003. “Price and Income Elasticities of Residential Water Demand: A Meta-Analysis.” Land Economics 79 (2): 292–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146872.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. ↵
    1. Debele, S. E.

    , L. S. Leo, P. Kumar, J. Sahani, J. Ommer, E. Bucchignani, S. Vranić, et al. 2023. “Nature-Based Solutions Can Help Reduce the Impact of Natural Hazards: A Global Analysis of NBS Case Studies.” Science of the Total Environment 902: 165824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165824.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 1. Dundas, S. J.

    2017. “Benefits and Ancillary Costs of Natural Infrastructure: Evidence from the New Jersey Coast.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 85: 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.04.008.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    European Commission. 2019. “Nature-Based Solutions.” Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Available at https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/environment/nature-based-solutions_en.
13. ↵
    European Environment Agency. 2021. “Nature-Based Solutions in Europe: Policy, Knowledge and Practice for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction.” EEA Report 01/2021. Available at https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/nature-based-solutions-in-europe.
14. ↵
    1. Filho, W. L.

    , S. K. Tripathi, J. B. S. O. Andrade Guerra, R. Giné-Garriga, V. Orlovic Lovren, and J. Willats. 2021. “A Global Meta-Analysis for Estimating Local Ecosystem Service Value Functions.” Science of the Total Environment 783: 146722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146722.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. ↵
    1. Glass, G. V.

    1976. “Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research.” Educational Researcher 5 (10): 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Gössling, S.

    2002. “Human–Environmental Relations with Tourism.” Annals of Tourism Research 29 (2): 539–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00069-X.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Haidich, A. B.

    2010. “Meta-Analysis in Medical Research.” Hippokratia 14 (suppl. 1): 29–37. Available at https://www.hippokratia.gr/index.php/hippo/article/view/12.3.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. ↵
    IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2021. “Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. ↵
    1. Jensen, J. L. W. V

    . 1906. “Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes” [On Convex Functions and Inequalities Between Mean Values]. Acta Mathematica 30: 175–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02418571.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Jones, P.

    , and B. Doberstein. 2022. “Encouraging Co-Benefits in Climate-Affected Hazard Adaptation: Developing and Testing a Scorecard for Project Design and Evaluation.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 63: 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102487

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Kaul, S.

    , K. J. Boyle, N. V. Kuminoff, C. F. Parmeter, and J. C. Pope. 2013. “What Can We Learn from Benefit Transfer Errors? Empirical Evidence from 20 Years of Research.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 66 (3): 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.05.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. “Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis.” Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
23. ↵
    Munich Re. 2022. “Natural Catastrophe Review: Series of Disasters in 2021 Dominated by US Weather Extremes.” Available at https://www.munichre.com/en/company/media-relations/media-information-and-corporate-news/media-information/2022/natural-catastrophe-review-2021.html.
24. ↵
    1. Naumann, S.

    2020. “The Underinvestment in Nature-Based Solutions: Evidence from a Systematic Review.” Journal of Environmental Management 260: 110076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110076.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Nelson, J. P.

    , and P. E. Kennedy. 2009. “The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: An Assessment.” Environmental and Resource Economics 42 (3): 345–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9253-5.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. Nobel, A.

    , S. Lizin, R. Brouwer, S. B. Bruns, D. I. Stern, and R. Malina. 2020. “Are Biodiversity Losses Valued Differently When They Are Caused by Human Activities? A Meta-Analysis of the Non-Use Valuation Literature.” Environmental Research Letters 15 (7): 073003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8ec2.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Ojijo, A.

    , and R. Steiger. 2024. “Resident Perceptions of Tourism Development and Land-Use Change in Protected Areas: Evidence from East Africa.” Journal of Sustainable Tourism 32 (5): 845–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-10-2023-0713.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Page, M. J.

    , J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” BMJ 372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
29. ↵
    1. Reynaud, A.

    , and D. Lanzanova. 2017. “A Global Meta-Analysis of the Value of Ecosystem Services Provided by Lakes.” Ecological Economics 137: 184–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.001.
30. ↵
    1. Sanz-Blas, S.

    , D. Buzova, and F. J. Garrigos-Simon. 2024. “Understanding Crowding Perceptions and Their Impact on Place Experience: Insights from a Mixed-Methods Study.” Psychology and Marketing 41 (5): 1022–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21964.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Spash, C. L.

    , and A. Vatn. 2006. “Transferring Environmental Value Estimates: Issues and Alternatives.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 379–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.010.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Staccione, A.

    , G. García Alvarez, M. Tesselaar, A. Arneth, and W. J. W. Botzen. 2023. “Methods for Assessing Risk Reduction and Co-Benefits by Nature-Based Solutions.” Open Science Framework Registries. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FUT97.
33. ↵
    1. Staccione A.

    , G. Garcia Alvarez, M. Tesselaar, W. J. W. Botzen, and A. Arneth. n.d. “Nature-Based Solutions’ Co-Benefits Beyond Risk Reduction: A Review of Assessment Methods.” Under review at Journal of Environmental Management.
34. ↵
    1. Stanley, T. D.

    2013. “Meta-Regression Methods for Detecting and Estimating Empirical Effects in the Presence of Publication Selection.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 75 (1): 103–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00652.x.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Stanley, T. D.

    , and H. Doucouliagos. 2014. “Meta-Regression Approximations to Reduce Publication Selection Bias.” Research Synthesis Methods 5 (1): 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1095.

    OpenUrlPubMed
36. ↵
    1. Su, J.

    , D. A. Friess, and A. Gasparatos. 2021. “A Meta-Analysis of the Ecological and Economic Outcomes of Mangrove Restoration.” Nature Communications 12: 5050. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25349-1.

    OpenUrlPubMed
37. ↵
    1. Sudmeier-Rieux, K.

    , T. Arce-Mojica, H. J. Boehmer, N. Doswald, L. Emerton, D. A. Friess, and Y. Walz. 2021. “Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction: An Overview of Risk and Policy.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 50: 101798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101798.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Tantiwat, W.

    , C. Gan, and W. Yang. 2021. “The Estimation of the Willingness to Pay for Air‑Quality Improvement in Thailand.” Sustainability 13 (21): 12313. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112313.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    TEEB. 2011. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making. Edited by Patrick ten Brink. London: Earthscan.
40. ↵
    1. Travisi, C. M.

    , and P. Nijkamp. 2004. “Are Italians Willing to Pay for Agricultural Environmental Safety? A Stated Choice Approach.” Paper presented at the European Association of Agricultural Economists 84th Conference, Zeist, Netherlands, February 8–11. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.24988.
41. 1. Viti, M.

    , R. Löwe, H. J. D. Sørup, J. Ladenburg, O. Gebhardt, S. Iversen, U. S. McKnight, and K. Arnbjerg-Nielsen. 2023. “Holistic Valuation of Nature-Based Solutions Accounting for Human Perceptions and Nature Benefits.” Journal of Environmental Management 334: 117498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117498.

    OpenUrlPubMed
42. ↵
    World Bank. 2023. “Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Resilience: A Guideline for Project Developers.” Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39811.