Abstract
We examine the persistence of cropland retirements induced by the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), the largest U.S. conservation program. We analyze micro data on observed land-use choices following CRP contract expiration over 1995–1997 and predict that 42% of CRP acres would not have been returned to crops within a year if the program had expired in 1997. These results indicate that temporary cropland retirement payments under CRP generate land-use changes that often extend beyond contract periods. The analysis suggests that targeted signing bonuses for first-time enrollees would increase the longer-term impacts of CRP and perhaps other incentive-based land-use programs. (JEL Q24)
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Log in using your username and password
Purchase access
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of Payment for Ecosystem Service Programs in Argentina
- Nudges, Social Norms, and Permanence in Agri-environmental Schemes
- Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexicos National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program
- Crowding Out Open Space: The Effects of Federal Land Programs on Private Land Trust Conservation
- What Drives Land-Use Change in the United States? A National Analysis of Landowner Decisions