Making Markets for Development Rights Work: What Determines Demand?

References

1. 1. American Farmland Trust (AFT).

   . 2001. “Transfer of Development Rights: Fact Sheet.”
2. 1. Anselin L.

   1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub.
3. 1. Archarya G.,
   2. Bennett L. L.

   . 2001. “Valuing Open Space and Land Use Patterns in Urban Watersheds”. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22(2): 221–38.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. Calvert County Planning Commission. 1997. 1997 Comprehensive Plan, Calvert County, Maryland. http://www.co.cal.md.us/planning/compplan/compmain.htm.
5. 1. Cannaday R. E.,
   2. Colwell P. F.

   . 1990. “Optimization of Subdivision Development”. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 3(2): 195–206.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Carpenter B. E.,
   2. Heffley D. R.

   . 1981. “A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis of Flexible Zoning and the Demand for Development Rights”. Environment and Planning A 13(2): 273–84.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Carpenter B. E.,
   2. Heffley D. R.

   . 1982. “Spatial-Equilibrium Analysis of Transferable Development Rights”. Journal of Urban Economics 12(3): 238–61.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Fulton W.,
   2. Mazurek J.,
   3. Pruetz R.,
   4. Williamson C.

   . 2004. “TDRs and Other Market-Based Land Mechanisms: How They Work and Their Role in Shaping Metropolitan Growth.” Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
9. 1. Irwin E. G.

   2002. “The Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values.” Land Economics 78 (Nov.): 465–80.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. Johnston R. A.,
    2. Madison M. E.

    . 1997. “From Landmarks to Landscapes: A Review of Current Practices in the Transfer of Development Rights”. Journal of the American Planning Association 63(3): 365–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Kelejian H.,
    2. Prucha I.

    . 1999. “A Generalized Moments Estimator for the Auto-Regressive Parameter in a Spatial Model”. International Economics Review 40(2): 509–33.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Levine J.

    2006. Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land Use. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future Press.
13. 1. Maddala G. S.

    1983. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
14. 1. McConnell V.,
    2. Walls M.,
    3. Kelly N.

    . 2007. “Markets for Preserving Farmland in Maryland: Making TDR Programs Work Better.” Final Report Queenstown, Md.: Maryland Center for Agro-Ecology.
15. 1. McConnell V.,
    2. Walls M.,
    3. Kopits E.

    . 2006. “Zoning, TDRs and the Density of Development”. Journal of Urban Economics 59(3): 440–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. McDonald J. F.,
    2. Moffitt R.

    . 1980. “The Uses of Tobit Analysis”. Review of Economics and Statistics 62(2): 318–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. McMillen D.,
    2. McDonald F. J.

    1990. “A Two-Limit Tobit Model of Suburban Land-Use Zoning.” Land Economics 66 (Aug.): 272–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. McMillen D.

    . 1991. “Urban Land Value Functions with Endogenous Zoning”. Journal of Urban Economics 29(1): 14–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Mills D. E.

    . 1980. “Transferable Development Rights Markets”. Journal of Urban Economics 7(1): 63–74.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. 1. Mills D. E.

    1989. “Is Zoning a Negative Sum Game?” Land Economics 65 (Feb.): 1–12.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Pruetz R.

    2003. Beyond Takings and Givings: Saving Natural Areas, Farmland and Historic Landmarks with Transfer of Development Rights and Density Transfer Charges. Burbank, Calif.: Arje Press.
22. 1. Rolleston B.

    1987. “Determinants of Restrictive Suburban Zoning: An Empirical Analysis”. Journal of Urban Economics 21(1): 1–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Thorsnes P.,
    2. Simon G. P. W.

    . 1999. “Letting the Market Preserve Land: The Case for a Market-Driven Transfer of Development Rights Program”. Contemporary Economic Policy 17(2): 256–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science