How Can We Reduce the Errors from Benefits Transfer? An Investigation Using the Choice Experiment Method

References

1. 1. Adamowicz W.,
   2. Boxall P.,
   3. Williams M.,
   4. Louviere J.

   1998. “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1): 64–75.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 1. Bergland O.,
   2. Magnussen K.,
   3. Navrud S.

   . 1995. “Benefit Transfer: Testing for Accuracy and Reliability.” Discussion Paper, #D-03/1995. Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.
3. 1. Brouwer R.

   2000. “Environmental Value Transfer: State of the Art and Future Prospects”. Ecological Economics 32(1): 137–52.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Bueren M.,
   2. Bennett J.

   . 2004. “Towards the Development of a Transferable Set of Value Estimates for Environmental Attributes”. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48(1): 1–32.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Colombo S.,
   2. Hanley N.,
   3. Calatrava-Requena J.

   . 2005. “Designing Policy for Reducing the Off-farm Effects of Soil Erosion using Choice Experiments”. Journal of Agricultural Economics 56(1): 81–96.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Colombo S.,
   2. Calatrava-Requena J.,
   3. Hanley N.

   . 2007. “Testing Choice Experiment for Benefit Transfer with Preference Heterogeneity”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(1): 135–51.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. Cumulus Consultants Ltd. 2005. “Assessment of the Impact of CAP Reform and Other Key Policies on Upland Farms and Land Use Implications in Both Severely Disadvantaged & Disadvantaged Areas of England.” Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
8. DEFRA. 2006. Rural Development Programme for England 2007–2013: Uplands Rewards Structure Consultation Document. London: Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
9. 1. DeShazo J. R.,
   2. Fermo G.

   . 2002. “Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44(1): 123–43.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Desvousges W. H.,
    2. Johnson F. R.,
    3. Banzhaf H. S.

    . 1998. Environmental Policy Analysis with Limited Information: Principles and Application of the Transfer Method. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
11. 1. Downing M.,
    2. Ozuna T.

    . 1996. “Testing the Reliability of the Benefit Function Transfer Approach” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30(3): 316–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. Environment Agency. 2004. “Assessment of the Costs and Benefits of the PR04 Schemes.” London: Environment Agency.
13. 1. Haines-Young R. H.,
    2. Barr C. J.,
    3. Black H. I. J.,
    4. Briggs D. J.,
    5. Bunce R. G. H.,
    6. Clarke R. T.,
    7. Cooper A.,
    8. Dawson F. H.,
    9. Firbank L. G.,
    10. Fuller R. M.,
    11. Furse M. T.,
    12. Gillespie M. K.,
    13. Hill R.,
    14. Hornung M.,
    15. Howard D. C.,
    16. McCann T.,
    17. Morecroft M. D.,
    18. Petit S.,
    19. Sier A. R. J.,
    20. Smart S. M.,
    21. Smith G. M.,
    22. Stott A. P.,
    23. Stuart R. C.,
    24. Watkins J. W.

    . 2000. “Accounting for Nature: Assessing Habitats in the UK Countryside.” Report to the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London
14. 1. Hanley N.,
    2. Wright R.,
    3. Alvarez-Farizo B.

    . 2006. “Estimating the Economic Value of Improvements in River Ecology Using Choice Experiments: An Application to the Water Framework Directive”. Journal of Environmental Management 78(2): 183–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 1. Hensher D. A.,
    2. Rose J. M.,
    3. Greene W. H.

    . 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
16. 1. Horne P.,
    2. Petajisto L.

    . 2003. “Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach.” Land Economics 79 (Nov.): 472–82.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 1. Jiang Y.,
    2. Swallow S. K.,
    3. McGonagle M. P.

    . 2005. “Context-Sensitive Benefit Transfer Using Stated Choice Models: Specification and Convergent Validity for Policy Analysis”. Environmental and Resource Economics 31(4): 477–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 1. Kirchhoff S.,
    2. Colby B.G.,
    3. LaFrance J. T.

    . 1997. “Evaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer: An Empirical Inquiry”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33(1): 75–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Loomis J. B.

    1992. “The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer”. Water Resources Research 28(3): 701–5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Louviere J. J.,
    2. Hensher D. A.,
    3. Swait J.

    . 2000. Stated Choice Methods, Analysis and Applications. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
21. 1. Morrison M.,
    2. Bennett J.

    . 2004. “Valuing New South Wales Rivers for Use in Benefit Transfer”. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48(4): 591–611.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Morrison M.,
    2. Bennett J.,
    3. Blamey R.,
    4. Louviere J.

    . 2002. “Choice Modelling and Tests of Benefit Transfer”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(1): 161–70.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 1. Muthke T.,
    2. Holm-Muller K.

    . 2004. “National and International Benefit Transfer Testing with a Rigorous Test Procedure”. Environmental and Resource Economics 29(3): 323–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Oglethorpe D.,
    2. Hanley N.,
    3. Hussain S.,
    4. Sanderson R.

    . 2000. “Modelling the Transfer of the Socio-Economic Benefits of Environmental Management”. Environmental Modelling and Software 15(4): 343–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Poe G.,
    2. Severance-Lossin E.,
    3. Welsh M.

    . 1994. “Measuring the Difference (X-Y) of Simulated Distribution: A Convolution Approach”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(94): 904–15.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 1. Rozan A.

    2004. “Benefit Transfer: A Comparison of WTP for Air Quality between France and Germany”. Environmental and Resource Economics 29(3): 295–306.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Street D.,
    2. Burgess L.,
    3. Louviere J.

    . 2005. “Quick and Easy Choice Sets: Constructing Optimal and Nearly Optimal Stated Choice Experiments”. International Journal of Research in Marketing 22(4): 459–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Train K.

    1998. “Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences over People”. Land Economics 74(May): 230–39.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. WATECO. 2004. “Economics and the Environment—The Implementation Challenge of the Water Framework Directive.” Luxembourg: European Commission. Available at: http://forum.europa.eu.int.