Is Water Policy Limiting Residential Growth? Evidence from California

References

1. 1. Altschuler A. A.,
   2. Gomez J. A.

   . 1993. Regulation for Revenue: The Political Economy of Land Use Exactions. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
2. 1. Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA)

   . 2002. Water Supply and Development: A User’s Guide to California Statutes Including SB 221 (Kuehl) and SB 610 (Costa). Prepared by McCormick, Kidman, and Behrens.
3. 1. Ben-Joseph E.

   2003. “Subdivision Regulations: Practices and Attitudes: A Survey of Public Officials and Developers in the Nation’s Fastest Growing Single Family Housing Markets.” Working paper. Cambridge, Mass.: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
4. 1. Biggs J. H.

   1990. “No Drip, No Flush, No Growth: How Cities Can Control Growth Beyond Their Boundaries by Refusing to Extend Utility Services”. The Urban Lawyer 22(2): 307–30.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Black,
   2. Veatch

   . 1993–2003. California Water Charge Survey. Irvine, Calif.: Management Consulting Division, Black and Veatch.
6. 1. Brueckner J. K.

   1997. “Infrastructure Financing and Urban Development: The Economics of Impact Fees”. Journal of Public Economics 66(3): 383–407.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Brueckner J. K.

   1998. “Testing for Strategic Interaction Among Local Governments: The Case of Growth Controls”. Journal of Urban Economics 44(3): 438–67.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Brueckner J. K.

   1999. “Modeling Urban Growth Controls.” In Environmental and Public Economics: Essays in Honor of Wallace E. Oates, ed. Panagariya A., Portney P. R., Schwab R. M.. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
9. 1. Brueckner J. K.

   2001. “Urban Sprawl: Lessons from Urban Economics”. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2001: 65–97.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Burge G.,
    2. Ihlanfeldt K.

    . 2006. “The Effects of Impact Fees on Multifamily Housing Construction”. Journal of Regional Science 46(1): 5–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. California Department of Water Resources

    . 2003. Guidebook for Implementation of Senate Bill 610 and Senate Bill 221 of 2001. Sacramento.
12. 1. California Department of Water Resources

    . 2005. California Water Plan Update (Bulletin 160-05). Sacramento.
13. 1. California Public Utilities Commission

    . 2005. Water Action Plan. San Francisco.
14. 1. Colorado Department of Local Affairs, Division of Housing

    . 1998. Growth Management or Regulatory Barriers? Denver.
15. 1. Dalhuisen J. M.,
    2. Florax R. J. G. M.,
    3. de Groot H. L. F.,
    4. Nijkamp P.

    . 2003. “Price and Income Elasticities of Residential Water Demand: A Meta-Analysis”. Land Economics 79(May): 292–308.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 1. Dresch M.,
    2. Sheffrin S. M.

    . 1997. Who Pays for Development Fees and Exactions? San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
17. 1. Engle R.,
    2. Navarro P.,
    3. Carson R.

    . 1992. “On the Theory of Growth Controls”. Journal of Urban Economics 32(3): 269–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Getches D. H

    . 1997. Water Law in a Nutshell, 3rd ed. St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
19. 1. Glickfeld M.,
    2. Levine N.

    . 1992. Regional Growth . . . Local Reaction: The Enactment and Effects of Local Growth Control and Management Measures in California. Cambridge, Mass.: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
20. 1. Griffin R. C.,
    2. Mjelde J. W.

    . 2000. “Valuing Water Supply Reliability”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(May): 414–26.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 1. Hanak E.

    2005a. Water for Growth: California’s New Frontier. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
22. 1. Hanak E.

    2005b. “Stopping the Drain: Third-Party Responses to California’s Water Market”. Contemporary Economic Policy 23(1): 59–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Hanak E.,
    2. Browne M. K.

    . 2006. “Linking Housing Growth to Water Supply: New Planning Frontiers in the American West”. Journal of the American Planning Association 72(2): 154–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Hanak E.,
    2. Chen A.

    . 2007. “Wet Growth: Effects of Water Policies on Land Use in the American West”. Journal of Regional Science 47(2): 85–108.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Hanak E.,
    2. Simeti A.

    . 2004. Water Supply and Growth in California: A Survey of City and County Land-Use Planners. Occasional Paper. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
26. 1. Harberg R. J.

    1997. Planning and Managing Reliable Urban Water Systems. Denver: American Water Works Association.
27. 1. Helsley R. W.,
    2. Strange W. C.

    . 1995. “Strategic Growth Controls”. Regional Science and Urban Economics 25(4): 435–60.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Hewitt J. A.

    2000. “An Investigation into the Reasons Why Water Utilities Choose Particular Residential Rate Structures.” In The Political Economy of Water Pricing Reforms, ed. Dinar A.. New York: Oxford University Press and World Bank.
29. 1. Hundley N.

    2001. The Great Thirst: Californians and Water: A History. Rev. ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30. 1. Ihlanfeldt K. R.,
    2. Shaughnessy T. M.

    . 2004. “An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Impact Fees on Housing and Land Markets”. Regional Science and Urban Economics 34(6): 639–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Levine N.

    1999. “The Effects of Local Growth Controls on Regional Housing Production and Population Redistribution in California”. Urban Studies 36(12): 2047–68.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. 1. Lewis P.,
    2. Neiman M.

    . 2000. Residential Development and Growth Control Policies: Survey Results from Cities in Three California Regions. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
33. 1. Mayer C. J.,
    2. Tsuriel Somerville C.

    . 2000a. “Land Use Regulation and New Construction”. Regional Science and Urban Economics 30(6): 639–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Mayer C. J.,
    2. Tsuriel Somerville C.

    . 2000b. “Residential Construction: Using the Urban Growth Model to Estimate Housing Supply”. Journal of Urban Economics 48(1): 85–109.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Mayhew D.

    1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
36. 1. Mays L. W.

    , ed. 2004. Urban Water Supply Management Tools. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37. 1. Mercer L.,
    2. Douglas Morgan W.

    . 1982. “An Estimate of Residential Growth Controls’ Impact on House Prices.” In Resolving the Housing Crisis, ed. Bruce Johnson M.. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Co.
38. 1. Mullin M.

    2008. “The Conditional Effect of Specialized Governance on Public Policy”. American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 124–40.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Olmstead S. M.,
    2. Michael Hanemann W.,
    3. Stavins R. N.

    . 2005. “Do Consumers React to the Shape of Supply? Water Demand under Heterogeneous Price Structures.” Discussion Paper 05–29, Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
40. 1. Pendall R.

    1993. The Residential Approval Process: Development Regulation in the Bay Area. San Francisco: Bay Area Council.
41. 1. Quigley J. M.,
    2. Raphael S.

    . 2004. “Regulation and the High Cost of Housing in California.” Berkeley, Mimeo: University of California.
42. 1. Singell L. D.,
    2. Lillydahl J. H.

    . 1990. “An Empirical Examination of the Effect of Impact Fees on the Housing Market.” Land Economics 66 (Feb.): 82–92.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Skaburskis A.,
    2. Qadeer M.

    . 1992. “An Empirical Estimation of the Price Effects of Development Impact Fees”. Urban Studies 29(5): 653–67.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
44. 1. Tarlock A. D.,
    2. Van de Wetering S. B.

    . 1999. “Growth Management and Western Water Law: From Urban Oases to Archipelagos”. Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 5(Winter): 163–87.

    OpenUrl
45. 1. Timmins C.

    2002. “Does the Median Voter Consume Too Much Water?” Analyzing the Redistributive Role of Residential Water Bills,” National Tax Journal 55(4): 687–702.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Timmins C.

    2003. “Demand-Side Technology Standards under Inefficient Pricing Regimes: Are They Effective Water Conservation Tools in the Long-Run?” Environmental and Resource Economics 26(1): 107–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
47. 1. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (US HUD)

    . 1991. “Not In My Backyard”: Removing Barriers to Affordable Housing. HUD report 5806. Washington D.C.
48. 1. Yinger J.

    1998. “The Incidence of Development Fees and Special Assessments,” National Tax Journal 51(1): 23–41.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science