On the Link Between Urban Form and Automobile Use: Evidence from German Survey Data

References

1. 1. Angrist J. D.,
   2. Krueger A. B.

   . 1995. “Split-Sample Instrumental Variables Estimates of the Return to Schooling”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13(2): 225–35.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Angrist J. D.,
   2. Krueger A. B.

   . 2001. “Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4): 69–85.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Baum C. F.,
   2. Schaffer M. E.,
   3. Stillman S.

   . 2002. “Instrumental Variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing.” Economics Working Paper 545. Boston: Boston College.
4. 1. Belsley D.,
   2. Kuh E.,
   3. Welsch R.

   . 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
5. 1. Bento A. M.,
   2. Cropper M. L.,
   3. Mobarak A. M.,
   4. Vinha K.

   . 2005. “The Impact of Urban Spatial Structure on Travel Demand in the United States”. The Review of Economics and Statistics 87(3): 466–78.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Boarnet M. G.,
   2. Sarmiento S.

   . 1998. “Can Land-use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link between Non-work Travel and Land-use Characteristics”. Urban Studies 35(7): 1155–69.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Bundesministerium für Raumordnung, Bauwesen und Städtebau (BBR)

   . 1993. Raumordnungspolitischer Orientierungsrahmen. Leitbild für die räumliche Entwicklung der Bunderepublik Deutschland. Bonn.
8. 1. Crane R.,
   2. Crepeau R.

   . 1998. “Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel? A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data”. Transportation Research D 3(4): 225–38.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 1. Deaton A.

   1997. The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. 1. Dee T.

    2004. “Are There Civic Returns to Education?” Journal of Public Economics 88(9): 1697–1720.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Dow W. H.,
    2. Norton E. C.

    . 2003. “Choosing Between and Interpreting the Heckman and Two-Part Models for Corner Solutions”. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 4(1): 5–18.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Duan N.,
    2. Manning W.,
    3. Morris C.,
    4. Newhouse J.

    . 1984. “Choosing Between the Sample-Selection Model and the Multi-part model”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2(3): 283–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. EC (Commission of the European Communities)

    . 2001. White Paper—European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide. http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/white_paper/
14. 1. Friedman B.,
    2. Gordon S.,
    3. Peers J.

    . 1994. “Effect of Neotraditional Design on Travel Characteristics”. Transportation Research Record 1466: 63–70.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Geoghegan J.,
    2. Wainger L. A.,
    3. Bockstael N. E.

    . 1997. “Spatial Landscape Indices in a Hedonic Framework: An Ecological Economics Analysis Using GIS”. Ecological Economics 23(3): 251–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Hall A. R.,
    2. Rudebusch G. D.,
    3. Wilcox D. W.

    . 1996. “Judging Instrument Relevance in Instrumental Variables Estimation”. International Economic Review 37(2): 283–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Handy S.

    1996. “Understanding the Link Between Urban Form and Nonwork Travel Behavior”. Journal of Planning Education and Research 15(3): 183–98.

    OpenUrlAbstract
18. 1. Hansen L.

    1982. “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators”. Econometrica 50(3): 1029–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Hautzinger H.,
    2. Stock W.

    . 2005. “Wer Fährt Eigentlich Wie Viel? Volumen und Struktur der Fahrleistung Deutscher Kraftfahrzeuge 1993/2002”. Internationales Verkehrswesen 57: 368–73.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Hay J.,
    2. Leu R.,
    3. Rohrer P.

    . 1987. “Ordinary Least Squares and Sample-Selection Models of Health-Care Demand”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 5(4): 499–506.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Heckman J.

    1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”. Econometrica 47(1): 153–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Holtzclaw J.

    1990. “Explaining Urban Density and Transit Impacts on Auto Use.” Report to Natural Resources Defense Council. San Francisco: Sierra Club.
23. 1. Irwin E. G.,
    2. Bockstael N. E.

    . 2002. “Interacting Agents, Spatial Externalities, and the Endogenous Evolution of Residential Land Use Pattern”. Journal of Economic Geography 2(1): 31–54.

    OpenUrlAbstract
24. 1. Jargowsky P. A.

    2001. “Sprawl, Concentration of Poverty, and Urban Inequality.” In Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences and Policy Responses, ed. Squires G.. Washington D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
25. 1. Krizek K. J.

    2003. “Neighborhood Services, Trip Purpose, and Tour-Based Travel”. Transportation 30(4): 387–410.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Kunstler J. H.

    1994. The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America’s Man-Made Landscape. New York: Touchstone Books.
27. 1. Landeshauptstadt Dresden (Dresden)

    . 2002. Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept. Dresden: Stadtplanungsamt der Landeshauptstadt Dresden.
28. 1. Lassen D.

    2005. “The Effect of Information on Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Natural Experiment”. American Journal of Political Science 49(1): 103–18.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Leung S. F.,
    2. Yu S.

    . 1996. “On the Choice between Sample Selection and Two-Part Models”. Journal of Econometrics 72(1–2): 197–229.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Manning W.,
    2. Duan N.,
    3. Rogers W.

    . 1987. “Monte Carlo Evidence on the Choice Between Sample Selection and Two-Part Models”. Journal of Econometrics 35(1): 59–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Miguel E.,
    2. Satyanath S.,
    3. Sergenti E.

    . 2004. “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach”. Journal of Political Economy 112(4): 725–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Milligan K.,
    2. Moretti E. N.,
    3. Oreopoulos P.

    . 2004. “Does Education Improve Citizenship? Evidence from the U.S. and the U.K.” Journal of Public Economics 88 (9–10): 1667–95.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Newey W.

    1987. “Efficient Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables”. Journal of Econometrics 36(3): 231–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Newman P.,
    2. Kenworthy J.

    . 1989. Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook. Aldershot, U.K.: Gower Publishing.
35. 1. Saha A.,
    2. Capps O.,
    3. Byrne P.

    . 1997. “Calculating Marginal Effects in Models for Zero Expenditures in Household Budgets Using a Heckman-type correction”. Applied Economics 29(10): 1311–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Shannon C. E.,
    2. Weaver W.

    . 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
37. 1. Siedentop S.,
    2. Stein S.,
    3. Wolf U.,
    4. Lanzendorf M.,
    5. Hesse M.

    . 2005. Mobilität im suburbanen Raum. Neue verkehrliche und raumordnerische Implikationen des räumlichen Strukturwandels. Dresden/Berlin/Leipzig.
38. 1. Sigelman L.,
    2. Zeng L.

    . 1999. “Analyzing Censored and Sample-Selected Data with Tobit and Heckman Models”. Political Analysis 8(2): 167–82.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
39. 1. Stock J. H.,
    2. Wright J. H.,
    3. Yogo M.

    . 2002. “A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20(4): 518–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Vance C.

    2006. “Marginal Effects and Significance Testing with Heckman’s Sample Selection Model: A Methodological Note.” RWI Discussion Paper 39. Essen: RWI. Available at http://www.rwi-essen.de/.