Spatial and Temporal Variation in the Housing Market Values of Lot Size and Open Space

References

1. 1. Acharya G.,
   2. Bennett L. L.

   . 2001. “Valuing Open Space and Land-Use Patterns in Urban Watersheds.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 (2/3): 221–37.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Anderson S. T.,
   2. West S. E.

   . 2006. “Open Space, Residential Property Values, and Spatial Context.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 36 (6): 773–89.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Arendt R

   . 1992. “Open Space Zoning: What It Is and Why it Works.” Planning Commissioners Journal 5 (July/Aug.): 1–4.
4. 1. Arendt R

   .2004. “Linked Landscapes Creating Greenway Corridors thorough Conservation Subdivision Design Strategies in the Northeastern and Central United States.” Landscape and Urban Planning 68 (2/3): 241–69.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Bin O,
   2. Polasky S.

   . 2004. “Effects of Flood Hazards on Property Values: Evidence Before and After Hurricane Floyd.” Land Economics 80 (Nov.): 490–500.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 1. Brueckner J. K.

   1990. “Growth Controls and Land Values in an Open City.” Land Economics 66 (Aug.): 237–48.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Capozza D. R.,
   2. Helsley R. W.

   . 1989. “The Fundamentals of Land Prices and Urban Growth.” Journal of Urban Economics 26 (3): 295–306.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Cho S.,
   2. Roberts R. K.

   . 2007. “Cure for Urban Sprawl: Measuring the Ratio of Marginal Implicit Prices of Density-to-Lot-Size.” Review of Agricultural Economics 29 (3): 572–79.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Cho S.,
   2. Bowker J. M.,
   3. Park W. M.

   . 2006. “Measuring the Contribution of Water and Green Space to Housing Values: An Application and Comparison of Spatially-weighted Hedonic Models.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31 (3): 485–507.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
10. 1. Cleveland W. S.,
    2. Devlin S. J.

    . 1988. “Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 83 (403): 596–610.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Espey M.,
    2. Owusu-Edusei K.

    . 2001. “Neighborhood Parks and Residential Property Values in Greenville, South Carolina.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33 (3): 487–92.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Fotheringham A. S.,
    2. Brunsdon C.

    . 1999. “Local Forms of Spatial Analysis.” Geographical Analysis 31 (4): 340–58.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
13. 1. Fotheringham AS,
    2. Brunsdon C.,
    3. Charlton M.

    . 2000. Quantitative Geography. Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications, Ltd.
14. 1. Fotheringham A. S.,
    2. Brunsdon C.,
    3. Charlton M.

    . 2002. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Hoboken: Wiley.
15. 1. Geoghegan J.,
    2. Lynch L.,
    3. Bucholtz S.

    . 2003. “Capitalization of Open Space into Housing Values and the Residential Property Tax Revenue Impacts of Agricultural Easement Programs.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32 (1): 33–45.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Geoghegan J.,
    2. Waigner L.,
    3. Bockstael N.

    . 1997. “Spatial Landscape Indices in a Hedonic Framework: An Ecological Economics Analysis Using GIS.” Ecological Economics 23 (3): 251–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. GeoLytics

    . 2006. Census CD datasets. GeoLytics, IncAvailable at http://www.geolytics.com.
18. 1. Gordon P.,
    2. Richardson H. W.

    . 1998. “Prove It.” Brookings Review 16 (4): 23–26.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Gujarati D. N.

    1995. Basic Econometrics. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
20. 1. Irwin E.,
    2. Bockstael N.

    . 2001. “The Problem of Identifying Land Use Spillovers: Measuring the Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 (3): 698–704.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
21. 1. Irwin E.,
    2. Bockstael N.

    . 2004. “Land Use Externalities, Open Space Preservation, and Urban Sprawl.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 34 (6): 705–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Iwata S.,
    2. Murao H.,
    3. Wang Q.

    . 2000. “Nonparametric Assessment of the Effects of Neighborhood Land Uses on the Residential House Values.” In Advances in Econometrics: Applying Kernel and Nonparametric Estimation to Economic Topics, ed. Fomby T. B., Hill R. C.. 14th ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23. 1. Kane T.,
    2. Staiger D.,
    3. Samms G.

    . 2003. “School Accountability Ratings and Housing Values.” In Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, ed. Gale W., Pack J. R., 83–127. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24. 1. Knoxville, Knox County, Knoxville Utilities Board Geographic Information System (KGIS)

    . 2006. “KNOX net Where? ” Available at http://www.kgis.org/KnoxNetWhere.
25. 1. King D. A.,
    2. White J. L.,
    3. Shaw W. W.

    . 1991. “Influence of Urban Wildlife Habitats on the Value of Residential Properties.” In Wildlife Conservation in Metropolitan Environments: A National Symposium on Urban Wildlife, ed. Adams L. W., Leedy D. L. NIUW Symposium Series 2. Columbia, MD: National Institute for Urban Wildlife.
26. 1. Kling A.

    2004. “Bubble Bubble Is There Trouble?” Technology Commerce Society Daily, June 29.
27. 1. Land Trust Alliance (LTA)

    . 2004. “2003 National Land Trust Census.” Washington, DC: Land Trust Alliance. Available at http://www.lta.org/census.
28. 1. Lee C.,
    2. Linneman P.

    . 1998. “Dynamics of the Greenbelt Amenity Effect on the Land Market: The Case of Seoul’s Greenbelt.” Real Estate Economics 26 (1): 297–313.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Longman P. J.

    1998. “Who Pays for Sprawl: Hidden Subsidies Fuel the Growth of the Urban Fringe.” U.S. News and World Report. April 27.
30. 1. Lutzenhiser M.,
    2. Netusil N.

    . 2001. “The Effect of Open Space on a Home’s Sale Price.” Contemporary Economic Policy 19 (3): 291–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Maddala G. S.

    1992. Introduction to Econometrics. New York: Macmillan.
32. 1. Mahan B. L.,
    2. Polasky S.,
    3. Adams R. M.

    . 2000. “Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Property Price Approach.” Land Economics 76 (Feb.): 100–113.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. McConnell V.,
    2. Walls M.

    . 2005. “The Value of Open Space: Evidence from Studies of Non-market Benefits” Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, Available at http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-REPORT-Open%20Spaces.pdf.
34. 1. Peiser R. B.,
    2. Schwann G. M.

    . 1993. “The Private Value of Public Open Space within subdivisions.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 10 (2): 91–104.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
35. 1. Pope C.

    1999. “Solving Sprawl: 1999 Sierra Club Sprawl Report.” Sierra Club. Available at http://www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/report99.
36. 1. Riddel M.

    2001. “A Dynamic Approach to Estimating Hedonic Prices for Environmental Goods: An Application to Open Space Purchase.” Land Economics 77 (Nov.): 494–512.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. 1. Rosen S.

    . 1974. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 82 (1): 34–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Shultz S. D.,
    2. King D. A.

    . 2001. “The Use of Census Data for Hedonic Price Estimates of Open-Space Amenities and Land Use.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 (2/3): 239–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Skaburskis A.

    . 2000. “Housing Prices and Housing Density: Do Higher Prices Make Cities More Compact?” Canadian Journal of Regional Science 23 (3): 455–87.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Smith V.,
    2. Poulos C.,
    3. Kim H.

    . 2002. “Treating Open Space as an Urban Amenity.” Resource and Energy Economics 24 (1): 107–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Tennessee Department of Education (TDE)

    . 2004. “Report Card 2004”. Nashville: Tennessee Department of Education. Available at http://tennessee.gov/education/mreport.shtml.
42. 1. Thorsnes P.

    2002. “The Value of a Suburban Forest Preserve: Estimates from Sales of Vacant Residential Building Lots.” Land Economics 78 (Aug.): 426–41.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. 1. Tracy S.

    2003. Smart Growth Zoning Codes: A Resource Guide. Sacramento, CA: Local Government Commission.
44. 1. The Trust for Public Land and Land Trust Alliance

    . 2006. LandVote™ 2005: Americans Invest in Parks and Conservation. Available at http://www.lta.org/publicpolicy/landvote_2005.pdf.
45. 1. U.S. Census

    . 2007. “American Fact Finder.” Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau. Available at http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en.
46. 1. Walsh R.

    . 2007. “Endogenous Open Space Amenities in a Locational Equilibrium.” Journal of Urban Economics 61 (2): 319–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Weicher J. C.,
    2. Zerbst R.

    . 1973. “The Externalities of Neighborhood Parks: An Empirical Investigation.” Land Economics 49 (Feb.): 99–105.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Wichmann B. A.,
    2. Hill I. D.

    . 1982. “Algorithm AS 183: An Efficient and Portable Pseudo-Random Number Generator.” Applied Statistics 31 (2): 188–190.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Wichmann B. A.,
    2. Hill I. D.

    1984. “Correction: Algorithm AS 183: An Efficient and Portable Pseudo-Random Number Generator.” Applied Statistics 33 (1): 123.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Wooldridge J.

    2003. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 2d ed. Cincinnati: Thompson and Southwestern.