Willingness to Pay for Land Preservation across States and Jurisdictional Scale: Implications for Benefit Transfer

References

1. 1. Barton David N.

   2002. “The Transferability of Benefit Transfer: Contingent Valuation of Water Quality Improvements in Costa Rica.” Ecological Economics 42 (1–2): 147–64.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Carson Richard T.,
   3. Day Brett,
   4. Hanemann Michael,
   5. Hanley Nick,
   6. Hett Tannis,
   7. Jones-Lee Michael,
   8. Loomes Graham,
   9. Mourato Susana,
   10. Ozdemiroglu Ece,
   11. Pierce David W.,
   12. Sugden Robert,
   13. Swanson John

   . 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Surveys: A Manual. Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.
3. 1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Day Brett H.,
   3. Georgiou Stavros,
   4. Lake Iain

   . 2006. “The Aggregation of Environmental Benefit Values: Welfare Measures, Distance Decay and Total WTP.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 450–60.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Bergstrom John C.,
   2. Civita Paul De

   . 1999. “Status of Benefits Transfer in the United States and Canada: A Review.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 47 (1): 79–87.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Bergstrom John C.,
   2. Dillman B. L.,
   3. Stoll John R.

   1985. “Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 17 (July): 139–49.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Bergstrom John C.,
   2. Ready Richard C.

   2009. “What Have We Learned from over 20 Years of Farmland Amenity Valuation Research in North America?” Review of Agricultural Economics (forthcoming).
7. 1. Boxall Peter C.,
   2. Adamowicz Wiktor L.,
   3. Swait Joffre,
   4. Williams Michael,
   5. Louviere Jordan

   . 1996. “A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation.” Ecological Economics 18 (3): 243–53.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Brown Thomas C.

   1993. “Measuring Nonuse Value: A Comparison of Recent Contingent Valuation Studies.” W-133 Sixth Interim Report. Athens, GA: Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics, University of Georgia.
9. 1. Brown Thomas,
   2. Champ Patricia,
   3. Bishop Richard,
   4. McCollum Daniel

   . 1996. “Which Response Format Reveals the Truth About Donations to a Public Good?” Land Economics 72 (2): 152–66.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Dillman Don A.

    2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
11. 1. Duke Joshua M.,
    2. Ilvento Thomas W.

    2004. “A Conjoint Analysis of Public Preferences for Agricultural Land Preservation.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33 (2): 209–19.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Greene W. H.

    2003. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. 1. Halstead John

    . 1984. “Measuring the Non-market Value of Massachusetts Agricultural Land: A Case Study.” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council 13 (1): 12–19.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Hanemann W. Michael

    . 1984. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (3): 332–41.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 1. Hanley Nick,
    2. Schläpfer Felix,
    3. Spurgeon James

    . 2003. “Aggregating the Benefits of Environmental Improvements: Distance-Decay Functions for Use and Non-Use Values.” Journal of Environmental Management 68 (3): 297–304.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Greene William H.

    2003. “The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice.” Transportation 30 (2): 133–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Hu Wuyang,
    2. Veeman Michele M.,
    3. Adamowicz Wiktor L.

    2005. “Labeling Genetically Modified Food: Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences and the Value of Information.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53 (1): 83–102.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Irwin Elena G.,
    2. Nickerson Cynthia J.,
    3. Libby Larry

    . 2003. “What Are Farmland Amenities Worth?” Choices (3rd qtr.): 21–23.
19. 1. Jiang Yong,
    2. Swallow Stephen K.,
    3. McGonagle Michael

    . 2005. “Context-Sensitive Benefit Transfer Using Stated Choice Models: Specification and Convergent Validity for Policy Analysis.” Environmental and Resource Economics 31 (4): 477–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Johnston Robert J.

    2007. “Choice Experiments, Site Similarity and Benefits Transfer.” Environmental and Resource Economics 38 (3): 331–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Besedin Elena Y.,
    3. Wardwell Ryan F.

    2003. “Modeling Relationships Between Use and Nonuse Values for Surface Water Quality: A Meta-Analysis.” Water Resources Research 39 (12): 1363–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Besedin Elena Y.,
    3. Iovanna Richard,
    4. Miller Christopher,
    5. Wardwell Ryan,
    6. Ranson Matthew

    . 2005. “Systematic Variation in Willingness to Pay for Aquatic Resource Improvements and Implications for Benefit Transfer: A Meta-Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53 (2–3): 221–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Duke Joshua M.

    2007. “Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Land Preservation and Policy Process Attributes: Does the Method Matter?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (4): 1098–1115.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. 1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Duke Joshua M.

    2008. “Benefit Transfer Equivalence Tests with Non-normal Distributions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 41 (1): 1–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Joshua Duke M.,
    3. Campson Tammy W.

    2007. “The Value of Farm and Forest Preservation in Connecticut.” Technical Report. Storrs, CT: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Connecticut.
26. 1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Swallow Stephen K.,
    3. Allen Chad W.,
    4. Smith Lynn A.

    2002. “Designing Multidimensional Environmental Programs: Assessing Tradeoffs and Substitution in Watershed Management Plans.” Water Resources Research 38 (7): 1099–1105.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Krinsky Itzhak,
    2. Robb A. Leslie

    1986. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (4): 715–19.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Kuhfeld Warren F.,
    2. Tobias Randall D.

    2005. “Large Factorial Designs for Product Engineering and Marketing Research Applications.” Technometrics 47 (2): 132–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Loomis John B.

    1992. “The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer.” Water Resources Research 28 (3): 701–5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Loomis John B.

    2000. “Vertically Summing Public Good Demand Curves: An Empirical Comparison of Economic versus Political Jurisdictions.” Land Economics 76 (2): 312–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Loomis John B.,
    2. Roach Brian,
    3. Ward Frank,
    4. Ready Richard

    . 1995. “Testing the Transferability of Recreation Demand Models across Regions: A Study of Corps of Engineers Reservoirs.” Water Resources Research 31 (3): 721–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Loomis John,
    2. Traynor Kerri,
    3. Brown Thomas

    . 1999. “Trichotomous Choice: A Possible Solution to Dual Response Objectives in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24 (2): 572–83.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
33. 1. Maddala G. S.

    1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. 1. Mazzotta Marisa J.,
    2. Opaluch James J.

    1995. “Decision Making When Choices Are Complex: A Test of Heiner’s Hypothesis.” Land Economics 71 (4): 500–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Donald McLeod,
    2. Inman Kathleen,
    3. Coupal Roger,
    4. Gates J.

    2002. “Sheridan Land Use and Planning Survey Results.” Working Paper B- 1107. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Wyoming.
36. 1. Morrison Mark,
    2. Bennett Jeff,
    3. Blamey Russell,
    4. Louviere Jordan

    . 2002. “Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 (1): 161–70.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. 1. Morrison Mark,
    2. Bergland Olvar

    . 2006. “Prospects for the Use of Choice Modelling for Benefit Transfer.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 420–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Semra Ozdemir,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.,
    3. Ahearn Mary,
    4. Alberini Anna,
    5. Bergstrom John,
    6. Libby Larry,
    7. Welsh Michael P.

    2004. “Preliminary Report: Farmland Conservation Easement Study for the United States, Georgia, Ohio and Maine Samples.” Working paper. Orono, ME: Department of Resource Economics and Policy, University of Maine.
39. 1. Parsons George R.,
    2. Kealy Mary J.

    1994. “Benefit Transfer in a Random Utility Model of Recreation.” Water Resources Research 30 (8): 2477–84.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Pate Jennifer,
    2. Loomis John

    . 1997. “The Effect of Distance on Willingness to Pay Values: A Case Study of Wetlands and Salmon in California.” Ecological Economics 20 (3): 199–207.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Piper Steven,
    2. Martin Wade E.

    2001. “Evaluating the Accuracy of the Benefit Transfer Method: A Rural Water Supply Application in the USA.” Journal of Environmental Management 63 (3): 223–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 1. Poe Gregory L.,
    2. Giraud Kelly L.,
    3. Loomis John B.

    2005. “Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference in Empirical Distributions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2): 353–65.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. 1. Rosenberger Randall S.,
    2. Loomis John B.

    2001. “Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Use Values: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan (2000 Revisions).” General Technical Report RMRSGTR- 72. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
44. 1. Rosenberger Randall S.,
    2. Phipps Timothy T.

    2007. “Correspondence and Convergence in Benefit Transfer Accuracy: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature.” In Environmental Values Transfer: Issues and Methods, ed. Navrud Stale, Ready Richard. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45. 1. Rosenberger Randall S.,
    2. Stanley Tom D.

    2006. “Measurement, Generalization and Publication: Sources of Error in Benefit Transfers and Their Management.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 372–78.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. 1. Silberman Jonathan,
    2. Gerlowski Daniel A.,
    3. Williams Nancy A.

    1992. “Estimating Existence Value for Users and Nonusers of New Jersey Beaches.” Land Economics 68 (2): 225–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Smith V. Kerry,
    2. van Houtven George,
    3. Pattanayak Subhrendu K.

    2002. “Benefit Transfer via Preference Calibration: Prudential Algebra for Policy.” Land Economics 78 (2): 132–52.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
48. 1. Vanden Berg Timothy P.,
    2. Poe Gregory L.,
    3. Powell John R.

    2001. “Assessing the Accuracy of Benefits Transfers: Evidence from a Multisite Contingent Valuation Study of Groundwater Quality.” In The Economic Value of Water Quality, ed. Bergstrom John C., Boyle Kevin J., Poe Gregory L. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.