Modeling Shifts in Willingness to Pay from a Bayesian Updating Perspective

References

1. 1. Aadland D.,
   2. Caplan A.,
   3. Phillips O.

   2007. “A Bayesian Examination of Information and Uncertainty in Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 35 (2): 149–78.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Alberini A.,
   2. Kanninen B.,
   3. Carson R.

   1997. “Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data.” Land Economics 73 (3): 309–24.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Bateman I.,
   2. Carson R.,
   3. Day B.,
   4. Hanemann W. M.,
   5. Hanley N.,
   6. Hett T.,
   7. Jones A.,
   8. Loomes G.,
   9. Mourato S.,
   10. Ozdemiroglu E.,
   11. Pearce D. W.,
   12. Sugden R.,
   13. Swanson J.

   2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preferences Techniques. A Manual. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
4. 1. Cameron T.,
   2. Englin J.

   1997. “Respondent Experience and Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33 (3): 296–313.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Cameron T.,
   2. James J.

   1987. “Efficient Estimation Methods for Closed-Ended Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (2): 269–76.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Carson R.,
   2. Groves T.,
   3. Machina M.

   2000. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego.
7. 1. Carson R.,
   2. Mitchell R.,
   3. Hanemann W.,
   4. Kopp R.,
   5. Presser S.,
   6. Ruud P.

   1992. “A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.” Report to the attorney general of the state of Alaska.
8. 1. Carson R.,
   2. Mitchell R.,
   3. Hanemann W.,
   4. Kopp R.,
   5. Presser S.,
   6. Ruud P.

   2003. “Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.” Environmental and Resource Economics 25 (3): 257–86.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Flores N.,
   2. Strong A.

   2007. “Cost Credibility and the Stated Preference Analysis of Public Goods.” Resource and Energy Economics 29 (3): 195–205.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Haab T

    . 1997. “Analyzing Multiple Question Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Reconsideration of the Bivariate Probit.” Working Paper No. 9711, Department of Economics, East Carolina University.
11. 1. Hanemann W.,
    2. Loomis J.,
    3. Kanninen B.

    1991. “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (4): 1255–63.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 1. Herriges J.,
    2. Shogren J.

    1996. “Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (1): 112–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Horowitz J.

    1993. “A New Model of Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75 (5): 1268–72.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
14. 1. Li C.,
    2. Mattson L.

    1995. “Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (2): 256–69.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Loomis J.,
    2. Ekstrand E.

    1998. “Alternative Approaches for Incorporating Respondent Uncertainty When Estimating Willingness to Pay: The Case of the Mexican Spotted Owl.” Ecological Economics 27 (1): 29–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. McLeod D.,
    2. Bergland O.

    1999. “Willingness-to-Pay Estimates Using the Double-Bounded Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation Format: A Test for Validity and Precision in a Bayesian Framework.” Land Economics 75 (1): 115–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Park J.

    2003. “A Test of the Answering Mechanisms of the Double-Bounded Contingent Valuation Method.” Applied Economics Letters 10 (15): 975–84.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Ready R.,
    2. Whitehead J.,
    3. Blomquist G.

    1995. “Contingent Valuation When Respondents Are Ambivalent.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29 (2): 181–96.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Wang H.

    1997. “Treatment of ‘Don’t-Know’ Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 (2): 219–32.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. 1. Whitehead J.

    2002. “Incentive Incompatibility and Starting-Point Bias in Iterative Valuation Questions.” Land Economics 78 (2): 285–97.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text