How Deliberation Affects Stated Willingness to Pay for Mitigation of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Experiment

References

1. 1. Álvarez-Farizo Begoňa,
   2. Hanley Nick

   . 2006. “Improving the Process of Valuing Non-Market Benefits: Combining Citizens’ Juries with Choice Modeling.” Land Economics 82 (3): 465–78.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 1. Kenneth Arrow

   . 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
3. 1. Arvai Joseph L.,
   2. Gregory Robin,
   3. McDaniels Tim

   . 2001. “Testing a Structured Decision Approach: Value-Focused Thinking for Deliberative Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis 21 (6): 1065–76.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 1. Boyle Keven J.,
   2. Desvousges William H.,
   3. Reed Johnson F.,
   4. Dunford Richard,
   5. Hudson Sara P.

   1994. “An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent Valuation Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27 (3): 64–83.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Braga Jacinto,
   2. Starmer Chris

   . 2005. “Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” Environmental and Resource Economics 32 (1): 55–89.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Brouwer Roy,
   2. Powe Neil,
   3. Kerry Turner R.,
   4. Bateman Ian J.,
   5. Langford Ian H.

   1999. “Public Attitudes to Contingent Valuation and Public Consultation.” Environmental Values 8 (3): 325–47.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Brown Morton B.,
   2. Forsythe Alan B.

   1974. “Robust Tests for Equality of Variances.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 69 (345): 364–67.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Brown Thomas C.,
   2. Peterson George L.,
   3. Tonn Bruce E.

   1995. “The Values Jury to Aid Natural Resource Decisions.” Land Economics 71 (2): 250–60.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Bulte E.,
   2. Gerking S.,
   3. List J. A.,
   4. de Zeeuw A.

   2005. “The Effect of Varying the Causes of Environmental Problems on Stated WTP Values: Evidence from a Field Study.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49 (2): 330–42.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Chilton Susan M.,
    2. George Hutchinson W.

    1999. “Do Focus Groups Contribute Anything to the Contingent Valuation Process?” Journal of Economic Psychology 20 (4): 465–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Clark Judy,
    2. Burgess Jacquelin,
    3. Harrison Carolyn M.

    2000. “ ‘I Struggled with This Money Business”: Respondents’ Perspectives on Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 33:45–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Davis Jennifer,
    2. Whittington Dale

    . 1998. “‘Participatory’ Research for Development Projects: A Comparison of the Community Meeting and Household Survey Techniques.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 47 (1): 73–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Delbecq Andre L.,
    2. Van de Ven Andrew H.,
    3. Gustafson D. H.

    1975. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to the Nominal Group and Delphi Process. Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman.
14. 1. de Tocqueville Alexis

    . 1835–1840 [1946]. Democracy in America, trans. Reeve Henry. London: Oxford University Press.
15. 1. Dewey John

    . 1923. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Henry Holt.
16. 1. Diamond Peter A.,
    2. Hausman Jerry A.

    1994. “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (4): 45–64.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. 1. Dietz Thomas.

    1994. “ ‘What Should We Do?’ Human Ecology and Collective Decision Making.” Human Ecology Review 1 (2): 301–9.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Dietz Thomas,
    2. Stern Paul C.

    1995. “Toward Realistic Models of Individual Choice.” Journal of Socio-Economics 24 (2): 261–79.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Dietz Thomas,
    2. Stern Paul C.

    1998. “Science, Values and Biodiversity.” BioScience 48 (5): 441–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Florig H. Keith,
    2. Granger Morgan M.,
    3. Jenni K. E.,
    4. Fischoff Baruch,
    5. Fischbeck Paul S.,
    6. DeKay Michael L.

    2001. “A Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks. I: Overview and test-bed development.” Risk Analysis 21 (5): 913–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 1. Guagnano Gregory A.,
    2. Dietz Thomas,
    3. Stern Paul C.

    1994. “Willingness to Pay for Public Goods: A Test of the Contribution Model.” Psychological Science 5 (6): 411–15.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 1. Habermas Jürgen

    . 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
23. 1. Habermas Jürgen

    . 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. 1. Heberlein Thomas A.,
    2. Wilson Matthew A.,
    3. Bishop Richard C.,
    4. Cate Schaeffer Nora

    . 2005. “Rethinking the Scope Test as a Criterion for Validity in Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50 (1): 1–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Horowitz John K.,
    2. McConnell Kenneth E.

    2002. “A Review of WTA/WTP Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (3): 426–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Howarth Richard B.,
    2. Wilson Matthew A.

    2006. “A Theoretical Approach to Deliberative Valuation: Aggregation by Mutual Consent.” Land Economics 82 (1): 1–16.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. 1. Janis Irving

    . 1982. Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28. 1. Kahneman Daniel,
    2. Knetsch Jack L.

    1992. “Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 (1): 57–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Kaplowitz Michael D.

    2000. “Identifying Ecosystem Services Using Multiple Methods: Lessons from the Mangrove Wetlands of Yucatan, Mexico.” Agriculture and Human Values 17 (2): 169–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Kaplowitz Michael D.,
    2. Hoehn John

    . 2001. “Do Focus Groups and Personal Interviews Reveal the Same Information for Natural Resource Valuation?” Ecological Economics 36 (2): 237–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Kontogianni Areti,
    2. Skourtous Mihalis S.,
    3. Langford Ian H.,
    4. Bateman Ian J.,
    5. Georgiou Stavros

    . 2001. “Integrating Stakeholder Analysis in Non-market Valuation of Environmental Assets.” Ecological Economics 37 (1): 123–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Larson James R. Jr.,
    2. Christensen Caryn,
    3. Franz Timothy M.,
    4. Abbott Ann S.

    1998. “Diagnosing Groups: The Pooling, Management, and Impact of Shared and Unshared Case Information in Team-Based Medical Decision Making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1): 93–108.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 1. Maier Norman R. F.

    1967. “Assets and Liabilities in Group Problem Solving: The Need for an Integrative Function.” Psychological Review 74 (4): 239–49.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 1. Marglin S.

    1963. “The Social Rate of Discount and the Optimal Rate of Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 77 (1): 95–111.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. 1. McCauley Clark.

    1998. “Group Dynamics in Janis’s Theory of Groupthink: Backward and Forward.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73 (2/3): 142–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 1. McDaniels Timothy R.,
    2. Gregory Robin,
    3. Arvai Joseph,
    4. Chuenpagdee R.

    2003. “Decision Structuring to Alleviate Embedding in Environmental Valuation.” Ecological Economics 46 (1): 33–46.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Morgan David L.

    1997. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38. 1. Morgan Kara M.,
    2. DeKay Michael L.,
    3. Fischbeck Paul S.,
    4. Granger Morgan M.,
    5. Fischoff Baruch,
    6. Keith Florig H.

    2001. “A Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks. II: Evaluation of Validity and Agreement among Risk Managers.” Risk Analysis 21 (5): 923–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 1. Myers David G.

    1982. “Polarizing Effects of Social Interaction.” In Group Decision Making, ed. Brandstatter H., Davis J. H., Stocker-Kreichgauer G., 125–61. London: Academic Press.
40. 1. Myers David G.,
    2. Lamm Helmut

    . 1976. “The Group Polarization Phenomenon.” Psychological Bulletin 83 (4): 602–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. National Research Council,
    2. Committee on Risk Characterization

    . 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, ed. Stern Paul C., Fineberg Harvey V. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. 1. Painter Kathleen M.,
    2. Douglas Scott R.,
    3. Wandschneider Philip R.,
    4. Casavant Kenneth L.

    2000. “Using Contingent Valuation to Measure User and Nonuser Benefits: An Application to Public Transit.” Review of Agricultural Economics 24 (2): 394–409.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
43. 1. Persky Joseph

    . 2001. “Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Classical Creed.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (4): 199–208.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
44. 1. Plott Charles R.,
    2. Zeiler Kathryn

    . 2005. “The Willingness to Pay/Willingness to Accept Gap, the ‘Endowment Effect,’ Subject Misconceptions and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations.” American Economic Review 95 (3): 530–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 1. Renn Ortwin,
    2. Webler Thomas,
    3. Wiedemann Peter

    , eds. 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
46. 1. Sagoff Mark

    . 1988. The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
47. 1. Sagoff Mark.

    1998. “Aggregation and Deliberation in Valuing Environmental Public Goods: A Look beyond Contingent Pricing.” Ecological Economics 24 (2–3): 213–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Schkade David A.,
    2. Payne John W.

    1994. “How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (1): 88–109.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Sen Amartya

    . 2002. “Environmental Evaluation and Social Choice.” In Rationality and Freedom, ed. Sen A.531–52. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
50. 1. Spash Clive L.

    2007a. “Deliberative Monetary Valuation (DMV) in Practice.” In Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion. CSIRO Working Paper 2007-04. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO.
51. 1. Spash Clive L.

    2007b. “Deliberative Monetary Valuation (DMV): Issues in Combining Economic and Political Processes to Value Environmental Change.” Ecological Economics 63 (4): 690–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. Stata Corporation

    . 2007. Basic Reference Manual, Vol. 3. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
53. 1. Stern Paul C

    . 1990. “The Social Construction of the Economy.” Challenge: The Magazine of Economic Affairs 33 (1): 38–45.

    OpenUrl
54. 1. Svedsater H.

    2003. “Economic Valuation of the Environment: How Citizens Make Sense of Contingent Valuation Questions.” Land Economics 79 (1): 88–109.

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Van de Ven Andrew H.,
    2. Delbecq Andrew A.

    1974. “The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi and Interacting Group Decision Making Process.” Academy of Management Journal 17 (4): 605–21.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
56. 1. Whittington Dale,
    2. Kerry Smith V.,
    3. Okorafor Apia,
    4. Okore Augustine,
    5. Liu Jin Long,
    6. McPhail Alexander

    . 1992. “Giving Respondents Time to Think in Contingent Valuation Studies: A Developing Country Application.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 (3): 205–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
57. 1. Wilson Matthew A.,
    2. Howarth Richard B.

    2002. “Discourse-Based Valuation of Ecosystem Services: Establishing Fair Outcomes through Group Deliberation.” Ecological Economics 21:431–43.

    OpenUrl
58. 1. Winquist Jennifer,
    2. Larson James R. Jr.

    . 1998. “Information Pooling: When It Impacts Group Decision Making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (2): 371–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science