An Inferred Valuation Method

References

1. 1. Adamowicz W. L.

   2004. “What’s It Worth? An Examination of Historical Trends and Future Directions in Environmental Valuation”. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48 (3): 419–43.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. 1. Akerlof G. A.

   1983. “Loyalty Filters”. American Economic Review 73 (1): 54–63.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Andreoni J.

   1989. “Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence”. Journal of Political Economy 97 (6): 1447–58.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Becker G. S.

   1974. “A Theory of Social Interactions”. Journal of Political Economy 82 (6): 1630–93.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Bénabou R.,
   2. Tirole J.

   2006. “Incentives and Prosocial Behavior”. American Economic Review 96 (5): 1652–78.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Blackburn M.,
   2. Harrison G.,
   3. Rutström E.

   1994. “Statistical Bias Functions and Informative Hypothetical Surveys”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (5): 1084–88.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
7. 1. Boyce R. B.,
   2. Brown T. C.,
   3. McClelland G. H.,
   4. Peterson G. L.,
   5. Schulze W. D.

   1992. “An Experimental Examination of Intrinsic Values as a Source of the WTA-WTP Disparity”. American Economic Review 82 (5): 1366–73.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
8. 1. Breedlove J.

   1999. Natural Resources: Assessing Nonmarket Values through Contingent Valuation. Report RL30242. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
9. 1. Brekke K. A.,
   2. Kverndokk S.,
   3. Karine N.

   2003. “An Economic Model of Moral Motivation”. Journal of Public Economics 87 (9–10): 1967–83.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Carson R. T.,
    2. Groves T.

    2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions”. Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Champ P.,
    2. Bishop R. C.

    2001. “Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias”. Environmental and Resource Economics 19 (4): 383–402.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Crowne D. P.,
    2. Marlowe D.

    1960. “A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathalogy”. Journal of Consulting Psychology 24 (4): 349–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 1. Crowne D. P.,
    2. Marlowe D.

    1964. The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence. New York: Wiley.
14. 1. Cummings R. G.,
    2. Elliott S.,
    3. Harrison G. W.,
    4. Murphy J.

    1997. “Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?” Journal of Political Economy 105 (3): 609–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Cummings R. G.,
    2. Harrison G. W.

    1992. “A New Approach to Eliciting Incentive Compatible Values for Public Goods: The Inference Game.” Working paper, Department of Economics, University of South Carolina.
16. 1. Cummings R. G.,
    2. Taylor L. O.

    1999. “Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method”. American Economic Review 89 (3): 649–65.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Duggan M.,
    2. Levitt S.

    2002. “Winning Isn’t Everything: Corruption in Sumo Wrestling”. American Economic Review 92 (5): 1594–1605.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 1. Epley N.,
    2. Dunning D.

    2000. “Feeling ‘Holier Than Thou’: Are Self-Serving Assessments Produced by Errors in Self-or Social Prediction?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (6): 861–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 1. Fishbein M.,
    2. Ajzen I.

    1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. 1. Fisher R. J.

    1993. “Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning”. Journal of Consumer Research 20 (2): 303–15.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 1. Forsythe R.,
    2. Nelson F.,
    3. Neumann G. R.,
    4. Wright J.

    1992. “Anatomy of an Experimental Political Stock Market”. American Economic Review 82 (5): 1142–61.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
22. 1. Fox J. A.,
    2. Shogren J. F.,
    3. Hayes D. J.,
    4. Kliebenstein J. B.

    1998. “CVM-X: Calibrating Contingent Values with Experimental Auction Markets”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (3): 455–65.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 1. Hsee C. K.,
    2. Weber E. U.

    1997. “A Fundamental Prediction Error: Self-Others Discrepancies in Risk Preferences”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126 (1): 45–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Johannesson M.,
    2. Blomquist G. C.,
    3. Blumenschein K.,
    4. Johannsson P.,
    5. Liljas B.

    1999. “Calibrating Hypothetical Willingness to Pay Responses”. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18 (1): 21–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Johansson-Stenman O.,
    2. Martinsson P.

    2006. “Honestly, What Are You Driving a BMW?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60 (2): 129–46.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Kahneman D.,
    2. Tversky A.

    1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–91.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Kahneman D.,
    2. Wakker P. P.,
    3. Sarin R.

    1997. “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 375–405.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. 1. Leggett C. G.,
    2. Kleckner N. S.,
    3. Boyle K. J.,
    4. Duffield J. W.,
    5. Mitchell R. C.

    2003. “Social Desirability Bias in Contingent Valuation Surveys Administered through In-Person Interviews”. Land Economics 79 (4): 561–75.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. 1. Levitt S. D.,
    2. List J. A.

    2005. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Tell Us about the Real World?” Working paper, Sept. 20. Department of Economics, University of Chicago.
30. 1. Levitt S. D.,
    2. List J. A.

    2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal about the Real World?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2): 153–74.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Linstone H.,
    2. Turoff M.

    1979. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. 3rd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32. 1. List J. A.

    2001. “Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sports Cards”. American Economic Review 91 (5): 1498–1507.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. List J. A.

    2004. “Neoclassical Theory versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace”. Econometrica 72 (2): 615–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. List J.,
    2. Berrens R.,
    3. Bohara A.,
    4. Kerkvliet J.

    2004. “Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated Preferences”. American Economic Review 94 (3): 741–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. List J. A.,
    2. Gallet C. A.

    2001. “What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?” Environmental and Resource Economics 20 (3): 241–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Little J. M.,
    2. Berrens R.

    2004. “Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-Analysis”. Economics Bulletin 3 (6): 1–12.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Loewenstein G.,
    2. O’Donoghue T.,
    3. Rabin M.

    2003. “Projection Bias in Predicting Future Utility”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1209–48.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
38. 1. Lusk J. L.,
    2. Norwood F. B.

    In press. “Bridging the Gap between Laboratory Experiments and Naturally Occurring Markets: An Inferred Valuation Method.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
39. 1. McConnell K. E.

    1997. “Does Altruism Undermine Existence Value?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 (1): 22–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Murphy J.,
    2. Allen P. G.,
    3. Stevens T. H.,
    4. Wheatherhead D.

    2005. “A Meta-Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation”. Environmental and Resource Economics 30 (3): 313–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Norwood B.,
    2. Lusk J. L.,
    3. Boyer T.

    2008. “Forecasting Hypothetical Bias: A Tale of Two Calibrations.” In Experimental Methods, Environmental Economics, ed. Cherry T. L., Kroll S., Shogren J. F. New York: Routledge.
42. 1. Plant E. A.,
    2. Devine P. G.,
    3. Brazy P. C.

    2003. “The Bogus Pipeline and Motivations to Respond without Prejudice: Revisiting the Fading and Faking of Racial Prejudice”. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6 (2): 187–200.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Plott C. R.,
    2. Zeiler K.

    2005. “The Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap, The ‘Endowment Effect,’ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations”. American Economic Review 95 (3): 530–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Pronin E.

    2006. “Perception and Misperception of Bias in Human Judgment”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (1): 37–43.

    OpenUrlPubMed
45. 1. Rasmusen R.

    1989. Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. New York: Blackwell.
46. 1. Reed D.,
    2. van Leeuwen B.

    1998. “Predicting Hunger: The Effects of Appetite and Delay on Choice”. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76 (2): 189–205.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Rowe G.,
    2. Wright G.

    1999. “The Delphi Technique as a Forecasting Tool: Issues and Analysis”. International Journal of Forecasting 15 (4): 353–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Schechter L.

    2007. “Theft, Gift-Giving, and Trustworthiness: Honesty Is Its Own Reward in Rural Paraguay”. American Economic Review 97 (5): 1560–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Tversky A.,
    2. Kahneman D.

    1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability”. Cognitive Psychology 5 (2): 207–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Van Boven L. D. Dunning,
    2. Loewenstein G.

    2000. “Egocentric Empathy Gaps between Owners and Buyers: Misperceptions of the Endowment Effect”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (1): 66–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 1. Van Boven L. G. Loewenstein,
    2. Dunning D.

    2003. “Mispredicting the Endowment Effect: Underestimation of Owner’s Selling Prices by Buyer’s Agents”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51 (3): 351–65.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. Van Boven L. G. Loewenstein,
    2. Dunning D.

    2005. “The Illusion of Courage in Social Predictions: Underestimating the Impact of Fear of Embarrassment on Other People”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 96 (2): 130–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Videras J. R.,
    2. Owen A. L.

    2006. “Public Goods Provision and Well-being: Empirical Evidence Consistent with the Warm Glow Theory”. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy 5 (1): 1531.

    OpenUrl