Measuring the Price Impact of Municipal Incorporation on Homeowner Associations

References

1. ↵
   Anselin, Luc. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. ↵
   1. Bell Kathleen P.,
   2. Bockstael Nancy E.

   2000. “Applying the Generalized-Moments Estimation Approach to Spatial Problems Involving Microlevel Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics 82 (1): 72–82.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bible Douglas S.,
   2. Hsieh Cheng-Ho

   2001. “Gated Communities and Residential Property Value.” Appraisal Journal 69 (2): 140–46.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Boudreaux Donald J.,
   2. Holcombe Randall G.

   2002. “Contractual Governments in Theory and Practice.” In The Voluntary City, ed. Beito David T., Gordon Peter, Tabarrok Alexander Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5. ↵
   1. Bryan Thomas B.,
   2. Colwell Peter F.

   1982. “Housing Price Indexes.” Research in Real Estate 2:57–84.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Cannaday Roger E.

   1994. “Condominium Covenants: Cats, Yes; Dogs, No.” Journal of Urban Economics 35 (1): 71–82.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Chattopadhyay Sudip

   1999. “Estimating the Demand for Air Quality: New Evidence Based on the Chicago Housing Market.” Land Economics 75 (1): 22–38.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Cheung Ron

   2008. “The Interaction between Public and Private Governments: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Urban Economics 63 (3): 885–901.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Cropper Maureen L.,
   2. Deck Leland B.,
   3. McConnell Kenneth E.

   1988. “On the Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Functions.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 70 (4): 668–75.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Dehring Carolyn A.,
    2. Lind Melissa S.

    2007. “Residential Land Use Controls and Land Values: Zoning and Covenant Interactions.” Land Economics 83 (4): 445–57.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. Deileman Frans M.

    1999. “The Impact of Housing Policy Changes on Housing Associations: Experiences in the Netherlands.” Housing Studies 14 (2): 251–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Ellickson Robert C.

    1982. “Cities and Homeowners Associations.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 130 (June): 1519–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Fischel William A.

    2003. “The Rise of Private Neighborhood Associations: Revolution or Evolution?” In The Property Tax, Land Use, and Land Use Regulation, ed. Netzer Dick Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
14. ↵
    1. Foldvary Fred E.

    1994. Public Goods and Private Communities. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
15. ↵
    1. Frug Gerald E.

    1980. “The City as a Legal Concept.” Harvard Law Review 93 (6): 1057–1154.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Glaeser Edward L.,
    2. Gyourko Joseph

    2003. “The Impact of Building Restriction on Housing Affordability.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Economic Policy Review 9 (2): 21–39.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Gordon Tracy M.

    2003. “Crowd Out or Crowd In? The Effects of Common Interest Developments on Political Participation in California.” Annals of Regional Science 37 (2): 203–33.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Groves Jeremy R.

    2006. “All Together Now? An Empirical Study of the Voting Behavior of Homeowner Association Members in St. Louis County.” Review of Policy Research 23 (6): 1199–1218.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Groves Jeremy R.

    2008. “Finding the Missing Premium: An Explanation of Home Values within Residential Community Associations.” Land Economics 84 (2): 188–208.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    1. Groves Jeremy R.,
    2. Helland Eric

    2002. “Zoning and the Distribution of Location Rents: An Empirical Analysis of Harris County, Texas.” Land Economics 78 (1): 28–44.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Guntermann Karl L.,
    2. Moon Seongman

    2002. “Age Restriction and Property Values.” Journal of Real Estate Research 24 (3): 263–78.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Halvorsen Robert,
    2. Pollakowski Henry O.

    1981. “Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Equations.” Journal of Urban Economics 10 (1): 37–49.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Helsley Robert W.,
    2. Strange William C.

    1998. “Private Government.” Journal of Public Economics 69 (2): 281–304.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Helsley Robert W.

    2000. “Social Interactions and the Institutions of Local Government.” American Economic Review 90 (5): 1477–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Hughes William T. Jr.,
    2. Turnbull Geoffrey K.

    1996. “Uncertainty Neighborhood Effects and Restrictive Covenants.” Journal of Urban Economics 39 (2): 160–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Hun Serim,
    2. Kwak Seung-Jun

    1997. “The Choice of Functional Form and Variables in the Hedonic Price Model in Seoul.” Urban Studies 34 (7): 989–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Ihlanfeldt Keith R.

    2004. “Exclusionary Land-Use Regulations within Suburban Communities: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Prescriptions.” Urban Studies 41 (2): 261–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Irwin Elena G.,
    2. Bockstael Nancy E.

    2004. “Land Use Externalities, Open Space Preservation, and Urban Sprawl.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 34 (6): 705–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Kelejian Harry H.,
    2. Prucha Ingmar R.

    1999. “A Generalized Moments Estimator for the Autoregressive Parameter in a Spatial Model.” International Economic Review 40 (2): 509–33.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Lhotka W. C.

    1992. “Residents Push for New City; November Vote Urged to Approve ‘Wildwood.’” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Dec. 21.
31. ↵
    1. Martin S. A.

    1993. “‘Wildwood’ City Planning Unrealistic, Report Says.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Nov. 6.
32. ↵
    1. McKenzie Evan

    1994. Privatopia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33. ↵
    1. Nelson Arthur C.,
    2. Dawkins Casey J.,
    3. Sanchez Thomas W.

    2004. “Urban Containment and Residential Segregation: A Preliminary Investigation.” Urban Studies 41 (2): 423–39.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Nelson Robert H.

    2005. Private Neighborhoods and the Transformation of Local Government. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
35. ↵
    1. Pendall Rolf,
    2. Puentes Robert,
    3. Martin Jonathan

    2006. From Traditional to Reformed: A Review of the Land Use Regulations in the Nation’s 50 Largest Metropolitan Areas. Research Brief, August. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
36. ↵
    1. Pogodzinski J. Michael,
    2. Sass Tim R.

    1990. “The Economic Theory of Zoning: A Critical Review.” Land Economics 66 (3): 294–314.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Pogodzinski J. Michael

    1994. “The Theory and Estimation of Endogenous Zoning.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 24 (5): 601–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Pompe Jeffrey

    2008. “The Effects of a Gated Community on Property and Beach Amenity Valuation.” Land Economics 84 (4): 423–33.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
39. ↵
    1. Quigley John M.,
    2. Rosenthal Larry A.

    2005. “The Effects of Land-Use Regulations on the Price of Housing: What Do We Know? What Can We Learn?” Cityscape 8 (1): 69–137.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Rogers William H.

    2006. “A Market for Institutions: Assessing the Impact of Restrictive Covenants on Housing.” Land Economics 82 (4): 500–12.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
41. ↵
    1. Rogers William H.

    2009. “The Housing Price Impact of Covenant Restrictions and other Subdivision Characteristics.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. forthcoming.
42. ↵
    1. Rosen Sherwin

    1974. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 82 (1): 34–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. Speyrer Janet F.

    1989. “The Effect of Land-Use Restrictions on Market Values of Single-Family Homes in Huston.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2 (2): 117–130.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Sutin P.

    1993. “Decision is Set on City of Wildwood Proposal.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Nov. 8.
45. ↵
    1. Sutin P.

    1994. “Boundary Panel Ruled Out of Bounds; Court Strikes Down County Commission.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, May 27.