Preference Uncertainty, Preference Learning, and Paired Comparison Experiments

References

1. ↵
   1. Alberini Anna,
   2. Boyle Kevin J.,
   3. Welsh Michael P.

   2003. “Analysis of Contingent Valuation Data with Multiple Bids and Response Options Allowing Respondents to Express Uncertainty.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 (1): 40–62.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Burgess Diane,
   3. Hutchinson W. George,
   4. Matthews David I.

   2008. “Learning Design Contingent Valuation: NOAA Guidelines, Preference Learning and Coherent Arbitrariness.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2): 127–41.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Ben-Akiva Moshe,
   2. Lerman Steven R.

   1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. ↵
   1. Bock R.,
   2. Jones Lyle V.

   1968. The Measurement and Prediction of Judgment and Choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
5. ↵
   1. Bockstael Nancy E.,
   2. Strand Iver E. Jr.

   . 1987. “The Effect of Common Sources of Regression Error on Benefit Estimates.” Land Economics 63 (1): 11–20.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Braga Jacinto,
   2. Starmer Chris

   . 2005. “Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” Environmental and Resource Economics 32 (1): 55–89.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Brown Thomas C.,
   2. Kingsley David,
   3. Peterson George L.,
   4. Flores Nick,
   5. Clarke Andrea,
   6. Birjulin Andrej

   . 2008. “Reliability of Individual Valuations of Public and Private Goods: Response Time, Preference Learning, and Choice Consistency.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (7): 1595–1606.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Brown Thomas C.,
   2. Peterson George L.

   2003. “Multiple Good Valuation.” In A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, ed. Champ Patricia A., Boyle Kevin, Brown Thomas C. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. ↵
   1. Brown Thomas C.,
   2. Peterson George L.

   2009. An Enquiry into the Method of Paired Comparison: Reliability, Scaling, and Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-216WWW. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Research Station.
10. ↵
    1. Cameron Trudy Ann

    . 1988. “A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 (3): 355–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Cameron Trudy Ann,
    2. James Michelle D.

    1987. “Efficient Estimation Methods for “Closed-Ended” Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (2): 269–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Champ Patricia A.,
    2. Bishop Richard C.,
    3. Brown Thomas C.,
    4. McCollum Daniel W.

    1997. “Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Non-use Benefits from Public Goods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33:151–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Champ Patricia A.,
    2. Loomis John B.

    1998. “WTA Estimates Using the Method of Paired Comparison: Tests of Robustness.” Environmental and Resource Economics 12 (3): 375–86.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. David Herbert A.

    1988. The Method of Paired Comparisons, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. ↵
    1. DeShazo J. R.,
    2. Fermo German

    . 2002. “Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (1): 123–43.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Evans Mary F.,
    2. Flores Nicholas E.,
    3. Boyle Kevin J.

    2003. “Multiple-Bounded Uncertainty Choice Data as Probabilistic Intentions.” Land Economics 79 (4): 549–60.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    1. Fechner G. T.

    1860. Elemente Der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Hartel.
18. ↵
    1. Flores Nicholas E.

    2003. “A Complimentary Approach to the Law of Comparative Judgment and Random Utility Models.” Working Paper. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Department of Economics.
19. ↵
    1. Gregory Robin,
    2. Lichtenstein Sarah,
    3. Slovic Paul

    . 1993. “Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7 (2): 177–97.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Holmes Thomas P.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.

    2005. “Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation Questions.” Land Economics 81 (1): 114–26.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Kendall M. G.,
    2. Smith B. Babington

    . 1940. “On the Method of Paired Comparisons.” Biometrika 31 (3–4): 324–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Kingsley David A.

    2006. “Multiple Good Valuation Using Paired Comparison Choice Experiments.” Working Paper. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Department of Economics.
23. ↵
    1. Li Chuan-Zhong,
    2. Mattsson Leif

    . 1995. “Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (2): 256–69.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. List John A.

    2003. “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 41–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. List John A.

    2004. “Substitutability, Experience, and the Value Disparity: Evidence from the Marketplace.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (3): 486–509.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Loomis John,
    2. Peterson George,
    3. Champ Patricia,
    4. Brown Thomas,
    5. Lucero Beatrice

    . 1998. “Paired Comparison Estimates of Willingness to Accept versus Contingent Valuation Estimates of Willingness to Pay.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35 (4): 501–15.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Marschak Jocob

    . 1959. “Binary-Choice Constraints and Random Utility Indicators.” In Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, ed. Arrow Kenneth J., Karlin Samuel, Suppes Patrick. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
28. ↵
    1. McFadden Daniel

    . 2001. “Economic Choices.” American Economic Review 91 (3): 351–78.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Peterson George L.,
    2. Brown Thomas C.

    1998. “Economic Valuation by the Method of Paired Comparison, with Emphasis on Evaluation of the Transitivity Axiom.” Land Economics 74 (2): 240–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Plott Charles R.

    1996. “Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” In Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, ed. Arrow Kenneth J., Colombatto Enrico, Perleman Mark, Schmidt Christian. London: Macmillan and St. Martin’s.
31. ↵
    1. Savage Scott J.,
    2. Waldman Donald M.

    2008. “Learning and Fatigue During Choice Experiments: A Comparison of Online and Mail Survey Modes.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 23 (3): 351–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor

    . 1996. “The Effect of Choice Complexity on Random Utility Models: An Application to Combined Stated and Revealed Preference Models. Gainesville: Department of Marketing, University of Florida.
33. ↵
    1. Thurstone Louis L.

    1927. “A Law of Comparative Judgment.” Psychology Review 34:273–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Torgerson Warren S.

    1958. Theory and Methods of Scaling. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
35. ↵
    1. Wang H.

    1997. “Treatment of ‘Don’t-Know’ Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 (2): 219–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Welsh Michael P.,
    2. Poe Gregory L.

    1998. “Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 (2): 170–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science