Abstract
This article investigates the value of reducing non-point-source pollution in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Using stated preference methods, we find the lower bound on the benefits of reducing runoff enough to universally increase water clarity by 4 ft is greater than $10 million annually. Using a unique survey design, we show that because current water clarity in Green Bay is spatially variable, the value that a household places on this universal improvement depends on the distance of the household’s residence from the bay and on the particular geospatial location of the residence. This has important implications for estimating aggregate benefits. (JEL Q51, Q53)
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Purchase access
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Convergent Validity of Satellite and Secchi Disk Measures of Water Clarity in Hedonic Models
- Multiscale Spatial Pattern in Nonuse Willingness to Pay: Applications to Threatened and Endangered Marine Species
- Estimation of Distance-Decay Functions to Account for Substitution and Spatial Heterogeneity in Stated Preference Research