Unraveling the Choice Format Effect: A Context-Dependent Random Utility Model

References

1. ↵
   1. Adamowicz Wiktor L.,
   2. Boxall Peter,
   3. Williams Michael,
   4. Louviere Jordan

   . 1998. “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1): 64–75.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Adamowicz Wiktor L.,
   2. Dupont Diane,
   3. Krupnick Alan,
   4. Zhang Jing

   . 2011. “Valuation of Cancer and Microbial Disease Risk Reductions in Municipal Drinking Water: An Analysis of Risk Context Using Multiple Valuation Methods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61 (2): 213–26.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Munro Alistair,
   3. Poe Gregory L.

   2008. “Decoy Effects in Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation: Asymmetric Dominance.” Land Economics 84 (1): 115–27.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   1. Boxall Peter,
   2. Moon A.,
   3. Adamowicz Wiktor L.

   2009. “Complexity in Decision Making: The Effect of Task Structure and Context on Participant Response.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 53 (4): 503–19.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Boyle Kevin J.,
   2. Özdemir Semra

   . 2009. “Convergent Validity of Attribute-Based, Choice Questions in Stated-Preference Studies.” Environmental and Resource Economics 42 (2): 247–64.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Breffle William S.,
   2. Rowe Robert D.

   2002. “Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs.” Land Economics 78 (2): 298–314.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   1. Cameron Trudy A.,
   2. Poe Gregory L.,
   3. Ethier Robert G.,
   4. Schulze William D.

   2002. “Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (3): 391–425.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Carmines Edward G.,
   2. Zeller Richard A.

   1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
9. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Groves Theodore

   . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Caussade Sebastián,
    2. Ortúzar Juan De Dios,
    3. Rizzi Luis I.,
    4. Hensher David A.

    2005. “Assessing the Influence of Design Dimensions on Stated Choice Experiment Estimates.” Transportation Research Part B 39 (7): 621–40.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Collins Jill P.,
    2. Vossler Christian A.

    2009. “Incentive Compatibility Tests of Choice Experiment Value Elicitation Questions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58 (2): 226–35.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. DeShazo J. R.,
    2. Cameron Trudy A.,
    3. Saenz Manrique

    . 2009. “The Effect of Consumers’ Real-World Choice Sets on Inferences from Stated Preference Surveys.” Environmental and Resource Economics 42 (3): 319–43.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. DeShazo J. R.,
    2. Fermo German

    . 2002. “Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: the Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (1): 123–43.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Dhar Ravi

    . 1997. “Context and Task Effects on Choice Deferral.” Marketing Letters 8 (1): 119–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Dhar Ravi,
    2. Nowlis Stephen M.,
    3. Sherman Steven J.

    2001. “Trying Hard or Hardly Trying: An Analysis of Context Effects in Choice.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 9 (4): 189–200.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Elrod Terry,
    2. Johnson Richard D.,
    3. White Joan

    . 2005. “A New Integrated Model of Noncompensatory and Compensatory Decision Strategies.” Organization Behavioral of Human Decision Processes 95 (1): 1–19.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Ferrini Silvia,
    2. Scarpa Riccardo

    . 2007. “Designs with A Priori Information for Nonmarket Valuation with Choice Experiments: A Monte Carlo Study.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53 (3): 342–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Garber-Yonts B.

    2000. “A Choice Experiment Analysis of Public Preferences for Conservation of Biological Diversity in the Oregon Coast Range.” Ph.D. diss., Oregon State University, Corvallis.
19. ↵
    1. Hensher David

    . 2006. “Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay Due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial Assessment.” Environmental and Resource Economics 34 (1): 7–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Holmes Thomas P.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.

    2005. “Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation Questions.” Land Economics 81 (1): 114–26.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Huber Joel,
    2. Payne John W.,
    3. Puto Christopher

    . 1982. “Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis.” Journal of Consumer Research 9 (1): 90–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Johnson Eric J.,
    2. Hardie Bruce G. S.,
    3. Meyer Robert J.,
    4. Walsh John

    . 2006. “Observing Unobserved Heterogeneity: Using Process Data to Enhance Choice Models.” Available at http://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/documents/research/Observing%20%20Unobserved%20Heterogeneity.pdf (accessed September 15, 2007).
23. ↵
    1. Louviere Jordan J.,
    2. Islam Towhidul,
    3. Wasi Nada,
    4. Street Deborah,
    5. Burgess Leonie

    . 2008. “Designing Discrete Choice Experiments: Do Optimal Designs Come at a Price?” Journal of Consumer Research 35 (2): 360–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Mazzotta Marisa J.,
    2. Opaluch James J.

    1995. “Decision Making When Choices Are Complex: A Test of Heiner’s Hypothesis.” Land Economics 71 (4): 500–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. McFadden Daniel

    . 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka Paul. New York: Academic Press.
26. ↵
    1. McFadden Daniel

    . 1999. “Rationality for Economists?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19 (1–3): 73–105.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Plous Scott

    . 1993. The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. ↵
    1. Rolfe John,
    2. Bennett Jeff

    . 2009. “The Impact of Offering Two versus Three Alternatives in Choice Modelling Experiments.” Ecological Economics 68 (4): 1140–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Samuelson William,
    2. Zeckhauser Richard

    . 1988. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 7–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. ↵
    1. Scarpa Riccardo,
    2. Silvia Ferrini,
    3. Willis Kenneth G.

    2005. “Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments.” In Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, ed. Scarpa Riccardo, Alberini Anna. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
31. ↵
    1. Schweitzer Maurice

    . 1995. “Multiple Reference Points, Framing, and the Status Quo Bias in Health Care Financing Decisions.” Organization Behavioral of Human Decision Processes 63 (1): 69–72.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Sen Amartya

    . 1982. Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.
33. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor L.

    2001a. “Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice.” Organization Behavioral of Human Decision Processes 86 (2): 141–67.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor L.

    2001b. “The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching.” Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 135–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor L.,
    3. Hanemann Michael,
    4. Diederich Adele,
    5. Krosnick Jon,
    6. Layton David,
    7. Provencher William,
    8. Schkade David,
    9. Tourangeau Roger

    . 2002. “Context Dependence and Aggregation in Disaggregate Choice Analysis.” Marketing Letters 13 (3): 195–205.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Louviere Jordan J.

    1993. “The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models.” Journal Marketing Research 30 (3): 305–14.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Train Kenneth,
    2. Weeks Melvyn

    . 2005. “Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space.” In Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, ed. Scarpa Riccardo, Alberini Anna. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
38. ↵
    1. Tversky Amos,
    2. Kahneman Daniel

    . 1991. “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1039–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Tversky Amos,
    2. Simonson Itamar

    . 1993. “Context-Dependent Preferences.” Management Science 39 (10): 1179–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. ↵
    1. Volinskiy Dimitriy,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor L.,
    3. Veeman Michele,
    4. Srivastava Lorie

    . 2009. “Does Choice Context Affect the Results from Incentive-Compatible Experiments? The Case of Non-GM and Country-of-Origin Premia in Canola Oil.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (2): 205–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science