Research ArticleArticles

Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes

Sahan T. M. Dissanayake and Amy W. Ando
Land Economics, May 2014, 90 (2) 237-259; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/le.90.2.237

References

  1. ↵
    1. Adamowicz Wiktor,
    2. Boxall Peter,
    3. Williams Michael,
    4. Louviere Jordan
    . 1998. “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1): 64–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Adamowicz Wiktor,
    2. Swait Joffre,
    3. Boxall Peter,
    4. Louviere Jordan,
    5. Williams Michael
    . 1997. “Perceptions Versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 (1): 65–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Adger W. Neil,
    2. Brown Katrin,
    3. Cervigni Raffaello,
    4. Moran Dominic
    . 1995. “Total Economic Value of Forests in Mexico.” Ambio 24 (5): 286–96.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Ajzen Icek.
    1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Anderson Roger C.
    1970. “Prairies in the Prairie State.” Illinois State Academy of Science Transactions 63 (2): 214–21.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Ando Amy,
    2. Camm Jeffrey,
    3. Polasky Stephen,
    4. Solow Andrew
    . 1998. “Species Distributions, Land Values, and Efficient Conservation.” Science 279 (5359): 2126–28.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Ando Amy W.,
    2. Shah Payal
    . 2010. “Demand-Side Factors in Optimal Land Conservation Choice.” Resource and Energy Economics 32 (2): 203–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Askins Robert A.,
    2. Zickefoose Julie
    2002. Restoring North America’s Birds: Lessons from Landscape Ecology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  9. ↵
    1. Bateman Ian J.,
    2. Day Brett H.,
    3. Georgiou Stavros,
    4. Lake Iain
    . 2006. “The Aggregation of Environmental Benefit Values: Welfare Measures, Distance Decay and Total WTP.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 450–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Birol Ekin,
    2. Karousakis Katia,
    3. Koundouri Phoebe
    . 2006. “Using a Choice Experiment to Account for Preference Heterogeneity in Wetland Attributes: The Case of Cheimaditida Wetland in Greece.” Ecological Economics 60 (1): 145–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Blaeij Arianne T. de,
    2. Nunes Paulo A. L. D.,
    3. van den Bergh Jeroen C. J. M.
    2007. “ ‘No-Choice’ Options within a Nested Logit Model: One Model Is Insufficient.” Applied Economics, 39: 1245–1252.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Bowles Samuel.
    1998. “Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 75–111.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Boxall Peter C.,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor L.,
    3. Swait Joffre,
    4. Williams Michael,
    5. Louviere Jordan
    . 1996. “A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation.” Ecological Economics 18 (3): 243–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Boyer Tracy,
    2. Polasky Stephen
    . 2004. “Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Review of Non-market Valuation Studies.” Wetlands 24 (4): 744–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Brander Luke M.,
    2. Florax Raymond J. G. M.,
    3. Vermaat Jan E.
    2006. “The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-analysis of the Literature.” Environmental and Resource Economics 33 (2): 223–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Brennan Leonard A.,
    2. Kuvlesky William P. Jr.
    2005. “Invited Paper: North American Grassland Birds: An Unfolding Conservation Crisis?”” Journal of Wildlife Management 69 (1):1–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Cabeza Mar,
    2. Araújo Miguel B.,
    3. Wilson Robert J.,
    4. Thomas Chris D.,
    5. Cowley Matthew J. R.,
    6. Moilanen Atte
    . 2004. “Combining Probabilities of Occurrence with Spatial Reserve Design.” Journal of Applied Ecology 41 (2): 252–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Cameron Trudy A.,
    2. Englin Jeffrey
    . 1997. “Respondent Experience and Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33 (3): 296–313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Carlsson Fredrik,
    2. Frykblom Peter,
    3. Liljenstolpe Carolina
    . 2003. “Valuing Wetland Attributes: An Application of Choice Experiments.” Ecological Economics 47 (1): 95–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Carlsson Fredrik,
    2. Raun Mørkbak Morten,
    3. Olsen Søreb Bøye
    . 2010. “The First Time is the Hardest: A Test of Ordering Effects in Choice Experiments.” Working Papers in Economics 470. Gothenburg, Sweden: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics, and Law, University of Gothenburg.
  21. ↵
    1. Carrión-Flores Carmen,
    2. Irwin Elena G.
    2004. “Determinants of Residential Land-Use Conversion and Sprawl at the Rural-Urban Fringe.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (4): 889–904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Flores Nicholas E.,
    3. Meade Norman F.
    2001. “Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence.” Environmental and Resource Economics 19 (2): 173–210.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Caula S.,
    2. Hvenegaard G. T.,
    3. Marty P.
    2009. “The Influence of Bird Information, Attitudes, and Demographics on Public Preferences toward Urban Green Spaces: The Case of Montpellier, France.” Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 8 (2): 117–28.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Christie Mike,
    2. Hanley Nick,
    3. Warren John,
    4. Murphy Kevin,
    5. Wright Robert,
    6. Hyde Tony
    . 2006. “Valuing the Diversity of Biodiversity.” Ecological Economics 58 (2): 304–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Copeland Tanya E.,
    2. Sluis William,
    3. Howe Henry F.
    2002. “Fire Season and Dominance in an Illinois Tallgrass Prairie Restoration.” Restoration Ecology 10 (2): 315–23.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Csuti Blair,
    2. Polasky Stephen,
    3. Williams Paul H.,
    4. Pressey Robert L.,
    5. Camm Jeffrey D.,
    6. Kershaw Melanie,
    7. Kiester A. Ross,
    8. Downs Brian,
    9. Hamilton Richard,
    10. Huso Manuela,
    11. Sahr Kevin
    . 1997. “A Comparison of Reserve Selection Algorithms using Data on Terrestrial Vertebrates in Oregon.” Biological Conservation 80 (1): 83–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Czajkowski Mikołaj,
    2. Hanley Nick
    . 2009. “Using Labels to Investigate Scope Effects in Stated Preference Methods.” Environmental and Resource Economics 44 (4): 521–35.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Desvousges William,
    2. Mathews Kristy,
    3. Train Kenneth
    . 2012. “Adequate Responsiveness to Scope in Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 84 (December): 121–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Dissanayake Sahan T. M.
    2014. Derivations of the Models to Estimate Discrete Choice Data. Unpublished manuscript. Available at http://sahan.org/files/working_papers/derivations_of_models_to_estimate_discrete_choice_data.pdf.
  30. ↵
    1. Earnhart Dietrich.
    2006. “Using Contingent-Pricing Analysis to Value Open Space and Its Duration at Residential Locations.” Land Economics 82 (1): 17–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Fletcher Robert J.,
    2. Koford Rolf R.
    2002. “Habitat and Landscape Associations of Breeding Birds in Native and Restored Grasslands.” Journal of Wildlife Management 66 (4): 1011–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Gourlay Deborah,
    2. Slee Bill
    . 1998. “Public Preferences for Landscape Features: A Case Study of Two Scottish Environmentally Sensitive Areas.” Journal of Rural Studies 14 (2): 249–63.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Gowdy John M.
    2004. “The Revolution in Welfare Economics and Its Implications for Environmental Valuation and Policy.” Land Economics 80 (2): 239–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Greene William H
    . 2007. NLOGIT Version 4.0. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software.
  35. ↵
    1. Haaijer Rinus,
    2. Kamakura Wagner,
    3. Wedel Michel
    . 2001. “The ‘No-Choice’ Alternative in Conjoint Choice Experiments.” International Journal of Market Research 43 (1): 93–106.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Haight Robert G.,
    2. Revelle Charles S.,
    3. Snyder Stephanie A.
    2000. “An Integer Optimization Approach to a Probabilistic Reserve Site Selection Problem.” Operations Research 48 (5): 697–708.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Hanley Nick,
    2. Mourato Susana,
    3. Wright Robert E.
    2001. “Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuation?”” Journal of Economic Surveys 15 (3): 435–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Hanley Nick,
    2. Wright Robert E.,
    3. Koop Gary
    . 2002. “Modelling Recreation Demand Using Choice Experiments: Climbing in Scotland.” Environmental and resource Economics 22 (3): 449–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Hatch Daphne A.,
    2. Bartolome James W.,
    3. Fehmi Jeffrey S.,
    4. Hillyard Deborah S.
    1999. “Effects of Burning and Grazing on a Coastal California Grassland.” Restoration Ecology 7 (4): 376–81.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Heaton Duane
    . 2000. Conserving Local Habitat for Declining Grassland Birds. Skokie, IL: Bird Conservation Network.
  41. ↵
    1. Heimlich Ralph E.,
    2. Wiebe Keith D.,
    3. Claassen Roger,
    4. Gadsby Dwight,
    5. House Robert M.
    1998. Wetlands and Agriculture: Private Interests and Public Benefits. Agricultural Economics Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
  42. ↵
    1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Greene William H.
    2003. “The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice.” Transportation 30 (2): 133–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Rose John M.,
    3. Greene William H.
    2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  44. ↵
    1. Horne Paula,
    2. Petäjistö Leena
    . 2003. “Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach.” Land Economics 79 (4): 472–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Howe Henry F.
    1995. “Succession and Fire Season in Experimental Prairie Plantings.” Ecology 76 (6): 1917–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Howe H. F.,
    2. Brown J. S.
    1999. “Effects of Birds and Rodents on Synthetic Tallgrass Communities.” Ecology 80 (5): 1776–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Hoyos David
    . 2010. “The State of the Art of Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments.” Ecological Economics 69 (8): 1595–1603.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Huber Joel,
    2. Zwerina Klaus
    . 1996. “The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs.” Journal of Marketing Research 33 (3): 307–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    Illinois Department of Agriculture (IDA). 2003. Land Cover of Illinois, 1999–2000, Raster Digital Data, Version 2.0, September 2003. Springfield: State of Illinois Department of Agriculture. Available at http://www.agr.state.il.us/gis/landcover99-00.html.
  50. ↵
    1. Irwin Elena,
    2. Bockstael Nancy
    2004. “Endogenous Spatial Externalities: Empirical Evidence and Implications for the Evolution of Exurban Residential Land use Patterns.” In Advances in Spatial Econometrics: Methodology, Tools and Applications, ed. Anselin Luc, Florax Raymond J. G. M., Rey Sergio J., 359–80. Berlin: Springer.
  51. ↵
    1. Kaval Pamela,
    2. Roskruge Matthew
    2009. “The Value of Native Bird Conservation: A New Zealand Case Study.” Department of Economics Working Paper Series, Number 09/11. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
  52. ↵
    1. Kharouba Heather M.,
    2. Kerr Jeremy T.
    2010. “Just Passing Through: Global Change and the Conservation of Biodiversity in Protected Areas.” Biological Conservation 143 (5): 1094–1101.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Knopf Fritz L.
    1994. “Avian Assemblages on Altered Grasslands.” Studies in Avian Biology 15: 247–57.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Kuhfeld Warren F
    . 2010. Marketing Research Methods in SAS Experimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Available at http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010title.pdf.
  55. ↵
    1. Lancaster Kelvin J.
    1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74 (2): 132–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    1. Lehtonen Emmi,
    2. Kuuluvainen Jari,
    3. Pouta Eija,
    4. Rekola Mika,
    5. Li Chuan-Zhon
    . 2003. “Non-market Benefits of Forest Conservation in Southern Finland.” Environmental Science and Policy 6 (3): 195–204.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Liebe Ulf,
    2. Preisendörfer Peter,
    3. Meyerhoff Jürgen
    . 2011. “To Pay or Not to Pay: Competing Theories to Explain Individuals’ Willingness to Pay for Public Environmental Goods.” Environment and Behavior 43 (1): 106–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. Loomis J.,
    2. Ekstrand E.
    1997. “Economic Benefits of Critical Habitat for the Mexican Spotted Owl: A Scope Test using a Multiple-Bounded Contingent Valuation Survey.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22:356–66.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    1. Loomis John,
    2. Kent Paula,
    3. Strange Liz,
    4. Fausch Kurt,
    5. Covich Alan
    . 2000. “Measuring the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in an Impaired River Basin: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey.” Ecological Economics 33 (1): 103–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    1. Loomis John B.,
    2. Larson Douglas M.
    1994. “Total Economic Values of Increasing Gray Whale Populations: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey of Visitors and Households.” Marine Resource Economics 9 (3): 275–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. ↵
    1. Louviere Jordan J.,
    2. Hensher David A.,
    3. Swait Joffre D.
    2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  62. ↵
    1. Macmillan D. C.,
    2. Duff E. I.
    1998. “Estimating the Non-market Costs and Benefits of Native Woodland Restoration Using the Contingent Valuation Method.” Forestry 71 (3): 247–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. ↵
    1. Manski Charles F.,
    2. McFadden Daniel
    , eds. 1981. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  64. ↵
    1. Margules C. R.,
    2. Pressey R. L.
    2000. “Systematic Conservation Planning.” Nature 405 (May 11): 243–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    1. Martin Leanne M.,
    2. Moloney Kirk A.,
    3. Wilsey Brian J.
    2005. “An Assessment of Grassland Restoration Success using Species Diversity Components.” Journal of Applied Ecology 42 (2): 327–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Martin Leanne M.,
    2. Wilsey Brian J.
    2006. “Assessing Grassland Restoration Success: Relative Roles of Seed Additions and Native Ungulate Activities.” Journal of Applied Ecology 43 (6): 1098–1109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. Meyerhoff Jürgen,
    2. Dehnhardt Alexandra
    . 2007. “The European Water Framework Directive and Economic Valuation of Wetlands: The Restoration of Floodplains along the River Elbe.” European Environment 17 (1): 18–36.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Meyerhoff Jürgen,
    2. Liebe Ulf,
    3. Hartje Volkmar
    . 2009. “Benefits of Biodiversity Enhancement of Nature-Oriented Silviculture: Evidence from Two Choice Experiments in Germany.” Journal of Forest Economics 15 (1–2): 37–58.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Milon J. Walter,
    2. Scrogin David
    . 2006. “Latent Preferences and Valuation of Wetland Ecosystem Restoration.” Ecological Economics 56 (2): 162–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. ↵
    1. Muller S.,
    2. Dutoit T.,
    3. Alard D.,
    4. Grévilliot F.
    1998. “Restoration and Rehabilitation of Species- Rich Grassland Ecosystems in France: A Review.” Restoration Ecology 6 (1): 94–101.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Murdoch William,
    2. Ranganathan Jai,
    3. Polasky Stephen,
    4. Regetz James
    . 2010. “Using Return on Investment to Maximize Conservation Effectiveness in Argentine Grasslands.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:20855–20862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Noss Reed F.,
    2. LaRoe Edward T.,
    3. Michael Scott J.
    1995. Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradation. Biological Report 28. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service.
  73. ↵
    1. O’Hara Sabine U.,
    2. Stagl Sigrid
    . 2002. “Endogenous Preferences and Sustainable Development.” Journal of Socio-Economics 31 (5): 511–27.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Önal Hayri.
    2004. “First-Best, Second-Best, and Heuristic Solutions in Conservation Reserve Site Selection.” Biological Conservation 115 (1): 55–62.
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Önal Hayri,
    2. Briers Robert A.
    2005. “Designing a Conservation Reserve Network with Minimal Fragmentation: A Linear Integer Programming Approach.” Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10 (3): 193–202.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. ↵
    1. Pressey Robert L.,
    2. Cabeza Mar,
    3. Watts Matthew E.,
    4. Cowling Richard M.,
    5. Wilson Kerrie A.
    2007. “Conservation Planning in a Changing World.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22 (11): 583–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  77. ↵
    1. Primack Richard B.
    1993. Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  78. ↵
    1. Pywell Richard F.,
    2. Bullock James M.,
    3. Hopkins Alan,
    4. Walker Kevin J.,
    5. Sparks Tim H.,
    6. Burke Mike J. W.,
    7. Peel Steve
    . 2002. “Restoration of Species- Rich Grassland on Arable Land: Assessing the Limiting Processes using a Multisite Experiment.” Journal of Applied Ecology 39 (2): 294–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  79. ↵
    1. Roe Brian,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.,
    3. Teisl Mario F.
    1996. “Using Conjoint Analysis to Derive Estimates of Compensating Variation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 (2): 145–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  80. ↵
    1. Samson Fred,
    2. Knopf Fritz
    . 1994. “Prairie Conservation in North America.” Bioscience 44 (6): 418–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  81. ↵
    1. Sauer J. R.,
    2. Hines J. E.,
    3. Fallon J.
    2003. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966–2002. Laurel, MD: Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey.
  82. ↵
    1. Schramm Peter
    . 1990. “Prairie Restoration: A Twenty-Five Year Perspective on Establishment and Management.” In Proceedings of the 12th North American Prairie Conference, ed. Smith Daryl D., Jacobs Carol A., 169–78. Cedar Falls: University of Northern Iowa.
  83. ↵
    1. Solon Gary,
    2. Haider Steven J.,
    3. Wooldridge Jeffery
    . 2013. “What Are We Weighting For?” NBER Working Paper 18859. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  84. ↵
    1. Stone Kathy,
    2. Bhat Mahadev,
    3. Bhatta Ramachandra,
    4. Mathews Andrew
    . 2008. “Factors Influencing Community Participation in Mangroves Restoration: A Contingent Valuation Analysis.” Ocean and Coastal Management 51 (6): 476–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  85. ↵
    1. Török Péter,
    2. Vida Enikő,
    3. Deák Balázs,
    4. Lengyel Szabolcs,
    5. Tóthmérész Béla
    . 2011. “Grassland Restoration on Former Croplands in Europe: An Assessment of Applicability of Techniques and Costs.” Biodiversity and Conservation 20 (11): 2311–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  86. ↵
    1. Train Kenneth E.
    2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  87. ↵
    1. Vermeulen Bart,
    2. Goos Peter,
    3. Vandebroek Martina
    . 2008. “Models and Optimal Designs for Conjoint Choice Experiments Including a No- Choice Option.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 25 (2): 94–103.
    OpenUrl
  88. ↵
    1. Vickery Peter D.,
    2. Herkert James R.
    eds. 1999. Ecology and Conservation of Grassland Birds of the Western Hemisphere. Studies in Avian Biology 19. Berkeley: University of California Press, Cooper Ornithological Society.
  89. ↵
    1. Vogl Richard J.
    1979. “Some Basic Principles of Grassland Fire Management.” Environmental Management 3 (1): 51–57.
    OpenUrl
  90. ↵
    1. Walker Kevin J.,
    2. Stevens Paul A.,
    3. Stevens David P.,
    4. Owen Mountford J.,
    5. Manchester Sarah J.,
    6. Pywell Richard F.
    2004. “The Restoration and Re-Creation of Species-Rich Lowland Grassland on Land Formerly Managed for Intensive Agriculture in the UK.” Biological Conservation 119 (1): 1–18.
    OpenUrl
  91. ↵
    1. Wang Xuehong,
    2. Bennett Jeff,
    3. Xie Chen,
    4. Zhang Zhitao,
    5. Liang Dan
    . 2007. “Estimating Nonmarket Environmental Benefits of the Conversion of Cropland to Forest and Grassland Program: A Choice Modeling Approach.” Ecological Economics 63: 114–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  92. ↵
    1. Warziniack Travis
    . 2010. “Efficiency of Public Goods Provision in Space.” Ecological Economics 69 (8): 1723–30.
    OpenUrl
  93. ↵
    1. Weber Matthew A.,
    2. Stewart Steven
    . 2009. “Public Values for River Restoration Options on the Middle Rio Grande.” Restoration Ecology 17 (6): 762–71.
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    1. Woodward Richard T.,
    2. Wui Yong-Suhk
    . 2001. “The Economic Value of Wetland Services: A Meta-Analysis.” Ecological Economics 37 (2): 257–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  95. ↵
    1. Wooldridge Jeffrey M.
    1999. “Asymptotic Properties of Weighted M-Estimators for Variable Probability Samples.” Econometrica 67 (6): 1385–1406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  96. ↵
    1. Wu JunJie.
    2006. “Environmental Amenities, Urban Sprawl, and Community Characteristics.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52 (2): 527–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  97. ↵
    1. Zhongmin Xu,
    2. Guodong Cheng,
    3. Zhiqiang Zhang,
    4. Zhiyong Su,
    5. Loomis John
    . 2003. “Applying Contingent Valuation in China to Measure the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in Ejina Region.” Ecological Economics 44 (2–3): 345–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  98. ↵
    1. Zizzo Daniel J.
    2003. “Empirical Evidence on Interdependent Preferences: Nature or Nurture?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (6): 867–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes
Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, Amy W. Ando
Land Economics May 2014, 90 (2) 237-259; DOI: 10.3368/le.90.2.237
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section