Learning and Fatigue Effects Revisited: Investigating the Effects of Accounting for Unobservable Preference and Scale Heterogeneity

References

1. 1. Arentze Theo,
   2. Borgers Aloys,
   3. Timmermans Harry,
   4. DelMistro Romano

   . 2003. “Transport Stated Choice Responses: Effects of Task Complexity, Presentation Format and Literacy.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 39 (3): 229–44.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Ariely Dan,
   2. Loewenstein George,
   3. Prelec Drazen

   . 2003. “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves without Stable Preferences.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 73–105.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Burgess Diane,
   3. George Hutchinson W.,
   4. Matthews David I.

   2008a. “Learning Design Contingent Valuation (LDCV): NOAA Guidelines, Preference Learning and Coherent Arbitrariness.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2): 127–41.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Carson Richard T.,
   3. Day Brett,
   4. Dupont Diane,
   5. Louviere Jordan J.,
   6. Morimoto Sanae,
   7. Scarpa Riccardo,
   8. Wang Paul

   . 2008b. “Choice Set Awareness and Ordering Effects in Discrete Choice Experiments.” CSERGE Working Paper EDM 08-01. Norwich, UK: CSERGE, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.
5. 1. Ben-Akiva M.,
   2. Morikawa T.

   1990. “Estimation of Travel Demand Models from Multiple Data Sources.” In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, ed. Koshi Masaki. New York: Elsevier.
6. 1. Bjornstad David,
   2. Cummings Ronald,
   3. Osborne Laura

   . 1997. “A Learning Design for Reducing Hypothetical Bias in the Contingent Valuation Method.” Environmental and Resource Economics 10 (3): 207–21.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Bliemer Michiel C. J.,
   2. Rose John M.,
   3. Hess Stephane

   . 2008. “Approximation of Bayesian Efficiency in Experimental Choice Designs.” Journal of Choice Modelling 1 (1): 98–127.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Bradley Mark,
   2. Daly Andrew

   . 1994. “Use of the Logit Scaling Approach to Test for Rank-Order and Fatigue Effects in Stated Preference Data.” Transportation 21 (2): 167–84.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Braga Jacinto,
   2. Starmer Chris

   . 2005. “Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” Environmental and Resource Economics 32 (1): 55–89.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Brazell Jeff,
    2. Louviere Jordan

    1997. “Respondent’s Help, Learning and Fatigue.” Paper presented at the INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, University of California, Berkeley.
11. 1. Brouwer Roy,
    2. Dekker Thijs,
    3. Rolfe John,
    4. Windle Jill

    . 2010. “Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 46 (1): 93–109.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Brownstone David,
    2. Bunch David S.,
    3. Train Kenneth

    . 2000. “Joint Mixed Logit Models of Stated and Revealed Preferences for Alternative-FuelVehicles.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 34 (5): 315–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Carlsson Fredrik,
    2. Martinsson Peter

    . 2001. “Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments? Application to the Valuation of the Environment.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41 (2): 179–92.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Carlsson Fredrik,
    2. Mørkbak Morten Raun,
    3. Olsen Søren Bøye

    . 2012. “The First Time Is the Hardest: A Test of Ordering Effects in Choice Experiments.” Journal of Choice Modelling 5 (2): 19–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Czajkowski Mikolaj

    2014. “The Discrete Choice Experiment Approach to Environmental Contingent Valuation.” In Handbook of Choice Modelling, ed. Stephane Hess, Daly Andrew. Northhampton MA: Edward Elgar.
16. 1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Groves Theodore

    . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Caussade Sebatián,
    2. Ortúzar Juan de Dios,
    3. Rizzi Luis I.,
    4. Hensher David A.

    2005. “Assessing the Influence of Design Dimensions on Stated Choice Experiment Estimates.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 39 (7): 621–40.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Chung Chanjin,
    2. Boyer Tracy,
    3. Han Sungill

    . 2011. “How Many Choice Sets and Alternatives Are Optimal? Consistency in Choice Experiments.” Agribusiness 27 (1): 114–25.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Day Brett,
    2. Bateman Ian J.,
    3. Carson Richard T.,
    4. Dupont Diane,
    5. Louviere Jordan J.,
    6. Morimoto Sanae,
    7. Scarpa Riccardo,
    8. Wang Paul

    . 2012. “Ordering Effects and Choice Set Awareness in Repeat-Response Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 63 (1): 73–91.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Day Brett,
    2. Pinto Prades Jose-Luis

    . 2010. “Ordering Anomalies in Choice Experiments.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (3): 271–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Dellaert Benedict G. C.,
    2. Brazell Jeff D.,
    3. Louviere Jordan J.

    1999. “The Effect of Attribute Variation on Consumer Choice Consistency.” Marketing Letters 10 (2): 139–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. DeSarbo Wayne S.,
    2. Lehmann Donald R.,
    3. Hollman France Galliano

    . 2004. “Modeling Dynamic Effects in Repeated-Measures Experiments Involving Preference/Choice: An Illustration Involving Stated Preference Analysis.” Applied Psychological Measurement 28 (3): 186–209.

    OpenUrlAbstract
23. 1. Ferrini Silvia,
    2. Scarpa Riccardo

    . 2007. “Designs with A Priori Information for Nonmarket Valuation with Choice Experiments: A Monte Carlo Study.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53 (3): 342–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Fiebig Denzil G.,
    2. Keane Michael P.,
    3. Louviere Jordan,
    4. Wasi Nada

    . 2010. “The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity.” Marketing Science 29 (3): 393–421.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Fosgerau Mogens.

    2006. “Investigating the Distribution of the Value of Travel Time Savings.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40 (8): 688–707.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Fosgerau Mogens,
    2. Nielsen Søren F.

    2010. “Deconvoluting Preferences and Errors: A Model for Binomial Panel Data.” Econometric Theory 26 (6): 1846–54.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Guilkey David K.,
    2. Murphy James L.

    1993. “Estimation and Testing in the Random Effects Probit Model.” Journal of Econometrics 59 (3): 301–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Haaijer Rinus,
    2. Kamakura Wagner,
    3. Wedel Michel

    . 2000. “Response Latencies in the Analysis of Conjoint Choice Experiments.” Journal of Marketing Research 37 (3): 376–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Hanley Nick,
    2. Wright Robert E.,
    3. Koop Gary

    . 2002. “Modelling Recreation Demand Using Choice Experiments: Climbing in Scotland.” Environmental and Resource Economics 22 (3): 449–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Heiner Ronald A.

    1983. “The Origin of Predictable Behavior.” American Economic Review 73 (4): 560–95.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
31. 1. Hensher David A.

    2001. “Measurement of the Valuation of Travel Time Savings.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 35 (1): 71–98.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
32. 1. Hensher David A.

    2004. “Identifying the Influence of Stated Choice Design Dimensionality on Willingness to Pay for Travel Time Savings.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 38 (3): 425–46.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
33. 1. Hensher David A.

    2006a. “How Do Respondents Process Stated Choice Experiments? Attribute Consideration under Varying Information Load.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 21 (6): 861–78.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Hensher David A.

    2006b. “Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay Due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial Assessment.” Environmental and Resource Economics 34 (1): 7–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Greene William H.

    2003. “The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice.” Transportation 30 (2): 133–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Hensher David,
    2. Louviere Jordan,
    3. Swait Joffre

    . 1998. “Combining Sources of Preference Data.” Journal of Econometrics 89(1–2): 197–221.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Rose John M.

    2005. “Respondent Behavior in Discrete Choice Modeling with a Focus on the Valuation of Travel Time Savings.” Journal of Transportation and Statistics 8 (2): 17–30.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Hess Stephane,
    2. Hensher David A.,
    3. Daly Andrew

    . 2012. “Not Bored Yet: Revisiting Respondent Fatigue in Stated Choice Experiments.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46 (3): 626–44.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Hess Stephane,
    2. Rose John M.

    2012. “Can Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity Be Separated in Random Coefficients Models?”” Transportation 39 (6): 1225–39.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Hess Stephane,
    2. Rose John M.,
    3. Polak John

    . 2010. “Non-trading, Lexicographic and Inconsistent Behaviour in Stated Choice Data.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 15 (7): 405–17.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Hess Stephane,
    2. Train Kenneth

    . 2011. “Recovery of Inter-and Intra-personal Heterogeneity Using Mixed Logit Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45 (7): 973–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Holmes Thomas P.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.

    2005. “Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation Questions.” Land Economics 81 (1): 114–26.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. 1. Kahneman Daniel,
    2. Slovic Paul,
    3. Tversky Amos

    1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. 1. Kahneman Daniel,
    2. Tversky Amos

    2000. Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. 1. Keppel Geoffrey,
    2. Wickens Thomas D.

    2004. Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46. 1. Ladenburg Jacob,
    2. Olsen Søren Bøye

    . 2008. “Gender-Specific Starting Point Bias in Choice Experiments: Evidence from an Empirical Study.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56 (3): 275–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
47. 1. Liechty John C.,
    2. Fong Duncan K. H.,
    3. DeSarbo Wayne S.

    2005. “Dynamic Models Incorporating Individual Heterogeneity: Utility Evolution in Conjoint Analysis.” Marketing Science 24 (2): 285–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. 1. Louviere Jordan,
    2. Street Deborah,
    3. Carson Richard,
    4. Ainslie Andrew,
    5. Deshazo J. R.,
    6. Cameron Trudy,
    7. Hensher David,
    8. Kohn Robert,
    9. Marley Tony

    . 2002. “Dissecting the Random Component of Utility.” Marketing Letters 13 (3): 177–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Luce R. Duncan,
    2. Tukey John W.

    1964. “Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1 (1): 1–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. McFadden Daniel.

    1986. “The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research.” Marketing Science 5 (4): 275–97.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
51. 1. McFadden Daniel,
    2. Train Kenneth

    . 2000. “Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 (5): 447–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. Meyerhoff Jürgen,
    2. Liebe Ulf

    . 2009. “Status Quo Effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity.” Land Economics 85 (3): 515–28.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
53. 1. Oppewal Harmen,
    2. Morrison Mark,
    3. Wang Paul,
    4. Waller David

    2010. “Preference Stability: Modeling how Consumer Preferences Shift after Receiving New Product Information.” In: Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-art and the State-ofpractice, ed. Stephane Hess, Daly Andrew, 449–516. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
54. 1. Orr S.,
    2. Hess S.,
    3. Sheldon R. R.

    2010. “Fungibility of Monetary Valuations in a Transport Context: An Empirical Investigation of the Transferability of Willingness to Pay Measures.” Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Glasgow.
55. 1. Ortúzar Juan de Dios,
    2. Willumsen Luís G.

    2001. Modelling Transport. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
56. 1. André de Palma,
    2. Myers Gordon M.,
    3. Papageorgiou Yorgos Y.

    1994. “Rational Choice under an Imperfect Ability to Choose.” American Economic Review 84 (3): 419–40.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
57. 1. Payne John W.,
    2. Bettman James R.,
    3. Johnson Eric J.

    1992. “Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 43: 87–131.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
58. 1. Payne John W.

    1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. 1. Plott Charles R

    . 1999. “Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes.” In: The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, ed. Arrow Kenneth J., Colombatto Enrico, Perlman Mark, Schmidt Christian, 225–50. Basingstoke, UK:Palgrave Macmillan, 225–50.
60. 1. Revelt David,
    2. Train Kenneth

    . 1998. “Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households’ Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (4): 647–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. 1. Rose John,
    2. Black Iain

    . 2006. “Means Matter, but Variance Matter Too: Decomposing Response Latency Influences on Variance Heterogeneity in Stated Preference Experiments.” Marketing Letters 17 (4): 295–310.

    OpenUrl
62. 1. Rose John M.,
    2. Hensher David A.,
    3. Caussade Sebastian,
    4. Ortúzar Juan de Dios,
    5. Jou Rong-Chang

    . 2009. “Identifying Differences in Willingness to Pay Due to Dimensionality in Stated Choice Experiments: A Cross Country Analysis.” Journal of Transport Geography 17 (1): 21–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
63. 1. Ruud Paul A

    . 1996. “Approximation and Simulation of the Multinomial Probit Model: An Analysis of Covariance Matrix Estimation.” Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
64. 1. Sándor Zsolt,
    2. Wedel Michel

    . 2001. “Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers’ Prior Beliefs.” Journal of Marketing Research 38 (4): 430–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
65. 1. Savage Scott J.,
    2. Waldman Donald M.

    2008. “Learning and Fatigue during Choice Experiments: A Comparison of Online and Mail Survey Modes.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 23 (3): 351–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. 1. Scarpa Riccardo,
    2. Rose John M.

    2008. “Design Efficiency for Non-Market Valuation with Choice Modelling: How to Measure it, What to Report and Why.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52 (3): 253–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
67. 1. Scheufele Gabriela,
    2. Bennett Jeff

    2010. “Effects of Alternative Elicitation Formats in Discrete Choice Experiments.” Paper presented at the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society conference, Adelaide, Australia.
68. 1. Simon Herbert A.

    1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (1): 99–118.

    OpenUrlAbstract
69. 1. Slovic Paul.

    1995. “The Construction of Preference.” American Psychologist 50 (5): 364–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
70. 1. Small Kenneth A.,
    2. Winston Clifford,
    3. Yan Jia

    . 2005. “Uncovering the Distribution of Motorists’ Preferences for Travel Time and Reliability.” Econometrica 73 (4): 1367–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
71. 1. Street Anne Penfold,
    2. Street Debora J.

    1987. Combinatorics of Experimental Design. Cambridge, UK: Oxford University Press.
72. 1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor

    . 2001a. “Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 (2): 141–67.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
73. 1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor

    . 2001b. “The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching.” Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 135–48.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
74. 1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Louviere Jordan

    . 1993. “The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models.” Journal of Marketing Research 30 (3): 305–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
75. 1. von Neumann John,
    2. Morgenstern Oskar

    . 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.