Determinants of Local Public Policies for Farmland Preservation and Urban Expansion: A French Illustration

References

1. ↵
   1. Allaire Gilles,
   2. Cahuzac Eric,
   3. Maigné Elise,
   4. Poméon Thomas

   2013. Localisation de l’Agriculture Biologique et Accès aux Marchés. Report 3 of research project AgriBio3 PEPP “Rôle de la Performance Economique des Exploitations et des Filières, et des Politiques Publiques, dans le Développement de l’AB.” Auzeville, France: INRA.
2. ↵
   1. Alterman Rachelle

   1997. “The Challenge of Farmland Preservation: Lessons from a Six-Nation Comparison.” Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (2): 220–43.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bages Robert

   2004. “Les Configurations du Jeu Politique Local dans la Nouvelle Ruralité aux Elections Municipales de 1995 et 2001.” Économie Rurale 281 (1): 59–80.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Beauchesne Audric,
   2. Bryant Christopher

   1999. “Agriculture and Innovation in the Urban Fringe: The Case of Organic Farming in Quebec, Canada.” Journal of Economic and Social Geography 90 (3): 320–28.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Box George,
   2. Cox David

   1964. “An Analysis of Transformations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: 211–52.
6. ↵
   1. Brody Samuel,
   2. Carrasco Virginia,
   3. Highfield Wesley

   2006. “Measuring the Adoption of Local Sprawl: Reduction Planning Policies in Florida.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 (3): 294–310.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Brueckner Jan K.

   1998. “Testing for Strategic Interaction among Local Governments: The Case of Growth Controls.” Journal of Urban Economics 44 (3): 438–67.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Burchell Robert,
   2. Lowenstein George,
   3. Dolphin William,
   4. Galley Catherine,
   5. Downs Anthony,
   6. Seskin Samuel,
   7. Still Katherine,
   8. Moore Terry

   2002. Costs of Sprawl—2000. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 74. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
9. ↵
   1. Burchell Robert,
   2. Shad Naveen,
   3. Listokin David,
   4. Phillips Hilary,
   5. Downs Anthony,
   6. Seskin Samuel,
   7. Davis Judy,
   8. Moore Terry,
   9. Helton David,
   10. Gall Michelle

   1998. The Costs of Sprawl—Revisited. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 39. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
10. ↵
    1. Camagni Roberto,
    2. Gibelli Maria-Cristina,
    3. Rigamonti Paolo

    2002. “Urban Mobility and Urban Form: The Social and Environmental Costs of Different Patterns of Urban Expansion.” Ecological Economics 40 (2): 199–216.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Carruthers John,
    2. Ulfarsson Gudmundur

    2003. “Urban Sprawl and the Cost of Public Services.” Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design 30 (4): 503–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. CAS

    2011. Les Aides Publiques Dommageablesàla Biodiversité. Report for the French Government. Paris: Centre d’Analyse Stratégique.
13. ↵
    1. Castel Jean-Charles

    2007. “De l’Etalement Urbain à l’Emiettement Urbain. Deux Tiers des Maisons Construites en Diffus.” Annales de la Recherche Urbaine 102: 89–96.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Catalán Bibiana,
    2. Saurí David,
    3. Serra Pere

    2008. “Urban Sprawl in the Mediterranean? Patterns of Growth and Change in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region 1993–2000.” Landscape and Urban Planning 85 (3–4): 174–84.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Cavailhès Jean,
    2. Peeters Dominique,
    3. Sékeris Evangelos,
    4. Thisse Jacques-François

    2004. “The Periurban City: Why to Live between the Suburbs and the Countryside.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 34 (6): 681–703.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Chanel Olivier,
    2. M’Chirgui Zouhaïer

    2009. “Adoption et Utilisation du Porte-Monnaie Electronique Monéo: Essai Empirique sur un Echantillon Test.” Revue d’Economie Industrielle 126 (2): 53–76.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Charlot Sylvie,
    2. Paty Sonia

    2007. “Market Access Effect and Local Tax Setting: Evidence from French Panel Sata.” Journal of Economic Geography 7 (3): 247–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Charlot Sylvie,
    2. Paty Sonia,
    3. Visalli Michel

    2011. “Assessing the Impact of Local Taxation on Property Prices: A Spatial Matching Contribution.” Applied Economics 45 (9): 1151–66.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Charmes Eric

    2007. “Le Malthusianisme Foncier.” Etudes Foncières 125 (1): 12–16.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Charmes Eric

    2009. “L’Explosion Périurbaine.” Etudes Foncières 138 (1): 25–36.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Christensen Tove,
    2. Denver Sigrid,
    3. Krarup Signe

    2007. “How Vulnerable is Organic Consumption to Information?” Paper presented at the Nordic Consumer Policy Research Conference Helsinki, Finland, October 3–5.
22. ↵
    1. Comby Joseph,
    2. Renard Vincent

    1996. Les Politiques Foncières. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
23. ↵
    1. Commission of the European Communities

    1995. CORINE Land Cover. Part 2: Nomenclature. Available at www.eea.europa.eu/publications/COR0-part2 (accessed October 8, 2013).
24. ↵
    1. Cooley Thomas,
    2. LaCivita C. J.

    1982. “A Theory of Growth Controls.” Journal of Urban Economics 12 (2): 129–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Delattre Laurence,
    2. Chanel Olivier,
    3. Napoléone Claude

    2012. “Comment Modéliser les Déterminants Locaux de Préservation des Espaces Non-Artificialisés en France? L’Apport d’une Confrontation Littérature-Terrain.” Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine 5 (December): 805–29.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Derycke Pierre-Henri,
    2. Gilbert Guy

    1988. Économie Publique Locale. Paris: ERESA/Economica.
27. ↵
    1. DGUHC

    2003. Loi Urbanisme and Habitat. Volet urbanisme: Service après vote. Paris: Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport, Housing, Tourism, and the Sea.
28. ↵
    1. Donovan Todd,
    2. Neiman Max,
    3. Brumbaugh Susan

    1994. “Two Dimensions of Local Growth Strategies.” In Research in Community Sociology, Vol. 4, ed. Chekki Danesh A., 153–69.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Dura-Guimera Antoni

    2003. “Population Deconcentration and Social Restructuring in Barcelona, a European Mediterranean City.” Cities 20 (6): 387–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Eades Daniel,
    2. Brown Cheryl

    2006. “Identifying Spatial Clusters within U.S. Organic Agriculture.” Research paper 2006–10. Morgantown: Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
31. ↵
    1. European Commission

    2011. Overview of Best Practices for Limiting Soil Sealing and Mitigating Its Effects in EU-27. Technical Report 2011-050. Brussels: European Commision, Environment Directorate-General.
32. ↵
    1. Eurostat

    2011. Land Cover and Land Use Statistics at Regional Level. Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Land_cover_and_land_use_statistics_at_regional_level#Artificial_areas (accessed August 28, 2013).
33. ↵
    1. FAO

    2009. How to Feed the World in 2050. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf (accessed August 28, 2013).
34. ↵
    1. Fischel William

    1987. The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
35. ↵
    1. Fischel William

    2001. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. ↵
    1. Frederiksen Pia,
    2. Langer Vibeke

    2004. “Localisation and Concentration of Organic Farming in the 1990s: The Danish Case.” Journal of Economic and Social Geography 95 (5): 539–49.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Geniaux Ghislain,
    2. Ay Jean-Sauveur,
    3. Napoléone Claude

    2011. “A Spatial Hedonic Approach on Land Use Change Anticipations.” Journal of Regional Science 51 (5): 967–86.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Green Rhys,
    2. Cornell Stephen,
    3. Scharlemann Jörn,
    4. Balmford Andrew

    2005. “Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature.” Science 307 (5709): 550–55.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
39. ↵
    1. Guengant Alain

    1992. Les Coûts de la Croissance Périurbaine. L’Exemple de l’Agglomération Rennaise. Paris: ADEF Editions.
40. ↵
    1. Heckman James

    . 1976. “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models.” InAnnals of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 5 (4), NBER Chapters Series, 120–37.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Hilber Christian,
    2. Robert-Nicoud Frédéric

    2006. “Owners of Developed Land versus Owners of Undeveloped Land: Why Land Use Is More Constrained in the Bay Area Than in Pittsburgh.” CEP Discussion Paper No 760. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
42. ↵
    1. Hirt Sonia

    2012. “Mixed Use by Default: How the Europeans (Don’t) Zone.” Journal of Planning Literature 27 (4): 375–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. INSEE

    2009. La Population Légale des Communes: 63 235 568 Habitants au 1^er Janvier 2006. Report 1217. Paris: National Institute of Statistical and Economic Studies.
44. ↵
    1. Jacobs Harvey

    2008. “L’Engrenage de la Croissance Urbaine: La Place de la Propriété dans la Planification Urbaine.” Études Foncières 132: 12–16.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Jérôme-Speziari Véronique,
    2. Jérôme Bruno

    2002. “Les Municipales de Mars 2001: Vote Récompense ou Vote Sanction?” Revue Française de Science Politique 52 (2): 251–72.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Kahn Matthew

    2011. “Do Liberal Cities Limit New Housing Development? Evidence from California.” Journal of Urban Economics 69 (2): 223–28.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Kelejian Harry,
    2. Prucha Ingmar

    2001. “On the Asymptotic Distribution of the Moran I Test Statistic with Applications.” Journal of Econometrics 104 (2): 219–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. ↵
    1. Lecat Gabriel

    . 2006. “Analyse Economique de la Planification Urbaine.” Ph.D. thesis, Universitéde Bourgogne, France.
49. ↵
    1. Lewis Paul,
    2. Neiman Max

    2002. Cities under Pressure: Local Growth Controls and Residential Development Policy. San Fransisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
50. ↵
    1. Lubowski Ruben N.,
    2. Vesterby Marlow,
    3. Bucholtz Shawn,
    4. Baez Alba,
    5. Roberts Michael J.

    2002. Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib14.aspx#.UhW_pn-Az0x (accessed August 28, 2013).
51. ↵
    1. Madden David

    2008. “Sample Selection versus Two-Part Models Revisited: The Case of Female Smoking and Drinking.” Journal of Health Economics 27 (2): 300–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. ↵
    1. McMillen Daniel,
    2. McDonald John

    1989. “Selectivity Bias in Urban Land Value Functions.” Land Economics 65 (4): 341–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. ↵
    1. McMillen Daniel,
    2. McDonald John

    1991a. “Urban Land Value Functions with Endogenous Zoning.” Journal of Urban Economics 29: 14–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. ↵
    1. McMillen Daniel,
    2. McDonald John

    1991b. “A Simultaneous Equations Model of Zoning and Land Values.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 21 (1): 55–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. ↵
    1. Michelat Guy,
    2. Tiberj Vincent

    2007. “Gauche, Centre, Droite et Vote.” Revue Française de Science Politique 57 (3): 371–92.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. ↵
    1. Nevers Jean-Yves

    1992. “Entre Consensus et Conflits: La Configuration des Compétitions aux Elections Municipales dans les Communes Rurales.” Revue Française de Sociologie 33 (3): 391–416.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Nguyen Mai Thi

    2009. “Why Do Communities Mobilize against Growth: Growth Pressures, Community Status, Metropolitan Hierarchy, or Strategic Interaction?” Journal of Urban Affairs 31 (1): 25–43.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Nivola Pietro

    1999. Laws of the Landscape: How Policies Shape Cities in Europe and America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
59. ↵
    1. Pendall Rolf

    1999. “Do Land-Use Controls Cause Sprawl?” Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design 26 (4): 555–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
60. 1. Pinkse Joris,
    2. Slade Margaret

    1998. “Contracting in Space: An Application of Spatial Statistics to Discrete-Choice Models.” Journal of Econometrics 85 (1): 125–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. ↵
    1. Pirotte Alain,
    2. Madre Jean-Loup

    2011. “Determinants of Urban Sprawl in France.” Urban Studies 48 (13): 2865–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
62. ↵
    1. Pogodzinski J. M.,
    2. Sass Tim

    1994. “The Theory and Estimation of Endogenous Zoning.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 24 (5): 601–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
63. ↵
    1. Protash William,
    2. Baldassare Mark

    1983. “Growth Policies and Community Status.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 18 (3): 397–412.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Richer Jerrell

    1995. “Explaining the Vote for Slow Growth.” Public Choice 82 (3–4): 207–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
65. ↵
    1. Rolleston Barbara

    1987. “Determinants of Restrictive Suburban Zoning: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Urban Economics 21 (1): 1–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. ↵
    1. Schläpfer Felix,
    2. Hanley Nick

    2003. “Do Local Landscape Patterns Affect the Demand for Landscape Amenities Protection?” Journal of Agricultural Economics 54 (1): 21–34.

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    1. Schmidt Stephan,
    2. Paulsen Kurt

    2009. “Is Open-Space Preservation a Form of Exclusionary Zoning?” Urban Affairs Review 45 (1): 92–118.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
68. ↵
    1. Schone Katharina

    . 2010. “Strategies d’Influences et Politiques de Maîtrise de la Croissance Locale.” Ph.D. thesis, Université de Bourgogne, France.
69. ↵
    1. Solé-Ollé Albert,
    2. Viladecans-Marsal Elisabet

    2012. “Lobbying, Political Competition, and Local Land Supply: Recent Evidence from Spain.” Journal of Public Economics 96 (1–2): 10–19.

    OpenUrl
70. ↵
    1. Stagl Sigrid

    2002. “Local Organic Food Markets: Potentials and Limitations for Contributing to Sustainable Development.” Empirica 29 (2): 145–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
71. ↵
    1. Thorson James

    1994. “Zoning Policy Changes and the Urban Fringe Land Market.” Real Estate Economics 22 (3): 527–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
72. ↵
    1. Tobin James

    1958. “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables.” Econometrica 26 (1): 24–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
73. ↵
    1. Uhel Ronan

    2006. Urban Sprawl in Europe: The Ignored Challenge. EAA Report 10/2006. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
74. ↵
    1. UN-Habitat

    2010. Urban Trends: Urban Sprawl Now a Global Problem. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-Habitat. Available at www.unhabitat.org/documents/SOWC10/R4.pdf.
75. ↵
    1. United Nations

    . 2010. Unprecedented Pressures on Farmland—with 30 Million Hectares Lost Annually—Poses “Direct Threat to the Right to Food of Rural Populations.”Press release, 65th General Assembly, Third Committee, 24th and 25th Meetings (AM and PM). New York: United Nations.
76. ↵
    1. Vilmin Thierry

    . 2002. Le Système Local de l’Urbanisation en Maisons Individuelles, Étude de Cas en Île-de-France. Logiville, PUCA report 296. Rabat, Morocco: Ministèredel’Équipement.
77. ↵
    1. Wallace Nancy

    1988. “The Market Effects of Zoning Undeveloped Land: Does Zoning Follow the Market?” Journal of Urban Economics 23 (3): 307–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science