Changing with the Tide: Semiparametric Estimation of Preference Dynamics

References

1. ↵
   1. Adamowicz Wiktor,
   2. Louviere Jordan,
   3. Williams M.

   1994. “Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities”.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (3): 271–92.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Ariely Dan,
   2. Loewenstein George,
   3. Prelec Drazen

   . 2003. “ ‘Coherent Arbitrariness’: Stable Demand Curves without Stable Preferences”.Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 73–105.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Ariely Dan,
   2. Loewenstein George,
   3. Prelec Drazen

   . 2006. “Tom Sawyer and the Construction of Value”.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60 (1): 1–10.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Balcombe Kelvin,
   2. Fraser Iain

   . 2011. “A General Treatment of Don’t Know Responses from Choice Experiments”.European Review of Agricultural Economics 38 (2): 171–91.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Burgess Diane,
   3. George Hutchinson W.,
   4. Matthews David I.

   2008. “Learning Design Contingent Valuation (LDCV): NOAA Guidelines, Preference Learning and Coherent Arbitrariness”.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2): 127–41.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Cole Matthew,
   3. Cooper Philip,
   4. Georgiou Stavros,
   5. Hadley David,
   6. Poe Gregory L.

   2004. “On Visible Choice Sets and Scope Sensitivity”.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (1): 71–93.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Bech Mickael,
   2. Kjaer Trine,
   3. Lauridsen Jørgen

   . 2011. “Does the Number of Choice Sets Matter? Results from a Web Survey Applying a Discrete Choice Experiment”.Health Economics 20 (3): 273–86.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Bouwer Laurens M.,
   2. Vellinga Pier

   2007. “On the Flood Risk in the Netherlands.” In Flood Risk Management in Europe, ed. Begum Selina, Stive Marcel J. F., Hall Jim W., 469–84. Dordrecht: Springer.
9. ↵
   1. Braga Jacinto,
   2. Starmer Chris

   . 2005. “Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis”.Environmental and Resource Economics 32 (1): 55–89.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Brouwer Roy,
    2. Dekker Thijs,
    3. Rolfe John,
    4. Windle Jill

    . 2010. “Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments”.Environmental and Resource Economics 46 (1): 93–109.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Brouwer Roy,
    2. Schaafsma Marije

    . 2013. “Modelling Risk Adaptation and Mitigation Behaviour under Different Climate Change Scenarios”.Climatic Change 117 (1): 11–29.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Brown Thomas C.,
    2. Kingsley David,
    3. Peterson George L.,
    4. Flores Nicholas E.,
    5. Clarke Andrea,
    6. Birjulin Andrej

    . 2008. “Reliability of Individual Valuations of Public and Private Goods: Choice Consistency, Response Time, and Preference Refinement”.Journal of Public Economics 92 (7): 1595–1606.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Brownstone David,
    2. Bunch David S.,
    3. Train Kenneth E.

    2000. “Joint Mixed Logit Models of Stated and Revealed Preferences for Alternative-Fuel Vehicles”.Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 34 (5): 315–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. Cameron Trudy A.,
    2. Poe Gregory L.,
    3. Ethier Robert G.,
    4. Schulze William D.

    2002. “Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (3): 391–425.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Carlsson Frederik,
    2. Martinsson Peter

    . 2008. “How Much Is Too Much?” Environmental and Resource Economics 40 (2): 165–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Carlsson Frederik,
    2. Mørkbak Morten Ruaun,
    3. Olsen Søren Bøye

    . 2012. “The First Time Is The Hardest: A Test of Ordering Effects in Choice Experiments”.Journal of Choice Modelling 5 (2): 19–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Charlton Martin,
    2. Stewart Fortheringham A.

    2009. Geographically Weighted Regression: A White Paper. Mynooth, Ireland: National Centre for Geocomputation, National University of Ireland Maynooth. Available at http://gwr.nuim.ie/downloads/GWR_WhitePaper.pdf.
18. ↵
    1. Colombo Sergio,
    2. Calatrava-Requena Javier,
    3. Hanley Nick

    . 2007. “Testing Choice Experiment for Benefit Transfer with Preference Heterogeneity”.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(1): 135–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Dekker Thijs

    . 2012. “Preference Uncertainty in Stated Choice Experiments.” Ph.D. thesis, VU University, Amsterdam.
20. ↵
    1. Fan Jianqing,
    2. Heckman Nancy E.,
    3. Wand M. P.

    1995. “Local Polynomial Kernel Regression for Generalized Linear Models and Quasi-likelihood Functions”.Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (429): 141–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Fischhoff Baruch,
    2. Welch Ned,
    3. Frederick Shane

    . 1999. “Construal Processes in Preference Assessment”.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19: 139–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Flachaire Emmanuel,
    2. Hollard Guillaume

    . 2006. “Controlling for Starting Point Bias in Double-Bounded Contingent Valuation Surveys”.Land Economics 82 (1): 103–11.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    1. Fosgerau Mogens.

    2007. “Using Nonparametrics to Specify a Model to Measure the Value of Travel Time”.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 41 (9): 842–56.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Freedman David A.

    2006. “On the So-Called Huber Sandwich Estimator and Robust Standard Errors”.American Statistician 60 (4): 299–302.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Fröhlich Markus.

    2006. “Non-parametric Regression for Binary Dependent Variables”.Econometrics Journal 9 (3): 511–40.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Groeneveld Rolf A.

    2010. “Framing and Training to Induce Preference Learning in Choice Experiments”.Marine Resource Economics 25 (2): 233–45.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Hanley Nick,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor,
    3. Wright Robert E.

    2005. “Price Vector Effects in Choice Experiments: An Empirical Test”.Resource and Energy Economics 27 (3): 227–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Hess Stephane,
    2. Rose John M.

    2009. “Allowing for Intra-respondent Variations in Coefficients Estimated on Repeated Choice Data”.Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43 (6): 708–19.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Hole Arne R.

    2007. “A Comparison of Approaches to Estimating Confidence Intervals for Willingness to Pay Measures”.Health Economics 16 (8): 827–40.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Holmes Thomas P.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.

    2005. “Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation Questions”.Land Economics 81 (1): 114–26.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    1. Hurvich Clifford M.,
    2. Simonoff Jeffrey S.,
    3. Tsai Chih-Ling

    . 1998. “Smoothing Parameter Selection in Nonparametric Regression Using an Improved Akaike Information Criterion”.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 60 (2): 271–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Johnston Robert J.

    2007. “Choice Experiments, Site Similarity and Benefits Transfer”.Environmental and Resource Economics 38 (3): 331–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Kabat Pavel,
    2. van Vierssen Wim,
    3. Veraart Jeroen,
    4. Vellinga Pier,
    5. Aerts Jeroen

    . 2005. “Climate Proofing the Netherlands”.Nature 438 (November 17): 283–84.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Kingsley David C.,
    2. Brown Thomas C.

    2010. “Preference Uncertainty, Preference Learning, and Paired Comparison Experiments”.Land Economics 86 (3): 530–44.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    1. Koster Paul,
    2. Koster Hans

    2013. “Commuters’ Preferences for Fast and Reliable Travel.” Tinbergen Discussion Paper 13-075/VIII. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.
36. ↵
    1. Ladenburg Jacob,
    2. Olsen Søren B.

    2008. “Gender-Specific Starting Point Bias in Choice Experiments: Evidence from an Empirical Study”.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56 (3): 275–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. ↵
    1. Loomes Graham,
    2. Orr Shepley,
    3. Sugden Robert

    . 2009. “Taste Uncertainty and Status Quo Effects in Consumer Choice”.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 39 (2): 113–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. ↵
    1. Lusk Jayson L.,
    2. Roosen Jutta,
    3. Fox John A.

    2003. “Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States”.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (1): 16–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Maaskant Bob,
    2. Jonkman Sebastian N.,
    3. Bouwer Laurens M.

    2009. “Future Risk of Flooding: An Analysis of Changes in Potential Loss of Life in South Holland (The Netherlands)”.Environmental Science and Policy 12 (2): 157–69.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. McFadden Daniel

    . 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zermbka Paul, 105–42. New York: Academic Press.
41. ↵
    1. McFadden Daniel.

    1999. “Rationality for Economists?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19 (1–3): 73–105.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. McFadden Daniel.

    2001. “Economic Choices”.American Economic Review 91 (3): 351–78.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. Meyerhoff Jürgen,
    2. Liebe Ulf

    . 2009. “Status Quo effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity”.Land Economics 85 (3): 515–28.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
44. ↵
    1. Moolgavkar Suresh H.,
    2. Lustbader Edward D.,
    3. Venzon David J.

    1984. “A Geometric Approach to Nonlinear Regression Diagnostics with Application Matched Case-Control Studies”.Annals of Statistics 12 (3): 816–26.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Mørkbak Morten,
    2. Christensen Tove,
    3. Gyrd-Hansen Dorte

    . 2010. “Choke Price Bias in Choice Experiments”.Environmental and Resource Economics 45 (4): 537–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. ↵
    1. Nagel Herbert,
    2. Hatzinger Richard

    . 1992. “Diagnostics in Some Discrete Choice Models”.Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 13 (4): 407–14.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Ngene.

    2010. Ngene 1.0.2 User Manual and Referefence Guide. Sydney, Australia: Choice Metrics. Available at www.choice-metrics.com/documentation.html.
48. ↵
    1. Ohler Tobias,
    2. Le Aihong,
    3. Louviere Jordan,
    4. Swait Joffre

    . 2000. “Attribute Range Effects in Binary Response Tasks”.Marketing Letters 11 (3): 249–60.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. PBL.

    2010. Evaluatie van een IPCC-klimaatrapport: een analyse van conclusies over de mogelijke gevolgen van klimaatverandering [in Dutch]. Bilthoven, Netherlands: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.
50. ↵
    1. Plott Charles R

    . 1996. “Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” In Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, ed. Arrow Kenneth, et al., 225–50. London: Macmillan and St. Martin’s.
51. ↵
    1. Racine Jeffrey S.,
    2. Hart Jeffrey,
    3. Li Qi

    . 2006. “Testing the Significance of Categorical Predictor Variables in Nonparametric Regression Models”.Econometric Reviews 25 (4): 523–44.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Rose John M.,
    2. Bliemer Michiel C. J.

    2009. “Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs”.Transport Reviews 29 (5): 587–617.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. ↵
    1. Samuelson William,
    2. Zeckhauser Richard J.

    1988. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making”.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 (1): 7–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
54. ↵
    1. Scarpa Riccardo,
    2. Ferrini Silvia,
    3. Willis Kenneth G.

    2005. “Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments.” In Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, 6th ed., ed. Scarpa Riccardo, Alberini Anna, 247–73. Dordrecht: Springer.
55. ↵
    1. Slovic Paul.

    1995. “The Construction of Preference”.American Psychologist 50 (5): 364–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor

    . 2001. “The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching”.Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 135–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
57. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Louviere Jordan

    . 1993. “The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models”.Journal of Marketing Research 30 (3): 305–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
58. ↵
    1. Train Kenneth E

    . 2009. Discrete Choice Models with Simulation, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. ↵
    1. Whitehead John C.

    2002. “Incentive Incompatibility and Starting-Point Bias in Iterative Valuation Questions”.Land Economics 78 (2): 285–97.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text