Sequence Effects in the Valuation of Multiple Environmental Programs Using the Contingent Valuation Method

References

1. ↵
   1. Arrow Kenneth,
   2. Solow Robert,
   3. Portney Paul R.,
   4. Leamer Edward E.,
   5. Radner Roy,
   6. Shuman Howard

   . 1993. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register 58: 4601–14.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Burgess Diane,
   3. George Hutchinson W.,
   4. Matthews David I.

   2008. “Learning Design Contingent Valuation (LDCV): NOAA Guidelines, Preference Learning and Coherent Arbitrariness.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2): 127–41.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Cole Matthew,
   3. Cooper Philip,
   4. Georgiou Stavros,
   5. Hadley David,
   6. Poe Gregory L.

   2004. “On Visible Choice Sets and Scope Sensitivity.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (1): 71–93.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Langford I. H.

   1997. “Budget-Constraint, Temporal, and Question-Ordering Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies.” Environment and Planning A 28: 1215–28.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Braga Jacinto,
   2. Starmer Chris

   . 2005. “Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” Environmental and Resource Economics 32 (1): 55–89.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Flores Nicholas E.,
   3. Michael Hanemann W.

   1998. “Sequencing and Valuing Public Goods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 (3): 314–23.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Michael Hanemann W.

   2005. “Contingent Valuation.” In Handbook of Environmental Economics, Vol. 2, ed. Mäler Karl-Göran, Vincent Jeffrey R., 821–936. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Mitchell Robert C.

   1995. “Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (2): 155–73.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Day Brett,
   2. Pinto Prades Jose-Luis

   . 2010. “Ordering Anomalies in Choice Experiments.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (3): 271–85.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    DECC. 2011. The Carbon Plan: Delivering Our Low Carbon Future. London: Department of Energy and Climate Change.
11. ↵
    1. Haab Timothy C.,
    2. McConnell Kenneth E

    . 2002. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.
12. ↵
    1. Hanemann Michael,
    2. Loomis John,
    3. Kanninen Barbara

    . 1991. “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (4): 1255–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Hoehn John P.,
    2. Loomis John B.

    1993. “Substitution Effects in the Valuation of Multiple Environmental Programs.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 (1): 56–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Hoehn John P.,
    2. Randall Alan

    . 1989. “Too Many Proposals Pass the Benefit Cost Test.” American Economics Review 79 (3): 544–51.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Loomis John B

    . 1997. “Panel Estimators to Combine Revealed and Stated Preference Dichotomous Choice Data.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22 (2): 233–45.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Loomis John,
    2. Brown Thomas,
    3. Lucero Beatrice,
    4. Peterson George

    . 1997. “Evaluating the Validity of the Dichotomous Choice Question Format in Contingent Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 10 (2): 109–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Mitton Craig,
    2. Donaldson Cam

    . 2001. “Twenty-five Years of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis in the Health Sector, 1974–1999.” Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 6 (4): 239–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Park Timothy,
    2. Loomis John

    . 1996. “Joint Estimation of Contingent Valuation Survey Responses.” Environmental and Resource Economics 7 (2): 149–62.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Payne John W.,
    2. Schkade David A.,
    3. Desvousges William H.,
    4. Aultman Chris

    . 2000. “Valuation of Multiple Environmental Programs.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 21 (1): 95–115.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Plott Charles R

    . 1996. “Rational Individual Behaviour in Markets and Social Choice Processes: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” In The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, ed. Arrow Kenneth J., Colombatto Enrico, Perlman Mark, Schmidt Christian, 225–50. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
21. ↵
    1. Poe Gregory L.,
    2. Giraud Kelly L.,
    3. Loomis John B.

    2005. “Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2): 353–65.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Poe Gregory L.,
    2. Severance-Lossin Eric K.,
    3. Welsh Michael P.

    1994. “Measuring the Difference (X−Y) of Simulated Distributions: A Convolutions Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (4): 904–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Powe N. A.,
    2. Bateman I. J.

    2003. “Ordering Effects in Nested ‘Top-Down’ and ‘Bottom-Up’ Contingent Valuation Designs.” Ecological Economics 45 (2): 255–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Rowe Robert D.,
    2. Schulze William D.,
    3. Breffle William S.

    1996. “A Test for Payment Card Biases.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 (2): 178–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Tsourapas Angelos,
    2. Frew Emma

    . 2011. “Evaluating ‘Success’ in Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis: A Literature Review.” Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 16 (3): 177–83.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Veisten Knut,
    2. Fredrik Hoen Hans,
    3. Strand Jon

    . 2004. “Sequencing and the Adding-up Property in Contingent Valuation of Endangered Species: Are Contingent Non-use Values Economic Values?” Environmental and Resource Economics 29 (4): 419–33.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Veronesi Marcella,
    2. Alberini Anna,
    3. Cooper Joseph C.

    2011. “Implications of Bid Design and Willingness-to-Pay Distribution for Starting Point Bias in Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Environmental and Resource Economics 49 (2): 199–215.

    OpenUrl