An Adding-up Test on Contingent Valuations of River and Lake Quality

References

1. ↵
   1. Alvarez-Farizo Begoña,
   2. Hanley Nick,
   3. Wright Robert E.,
   4. Macmillan Douglas

   . 1999. “Estimating the Benefits of Agri-environmental Policy: Econometric Issues in Open-ended Contingent Valuation Studies.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42 (1): 23–43.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Arrow Kenneth,
   2. Leamer Edward E.,
   3. Schuman Howard,
   4. Solow Robert

   . 1994. “Comments of Proposed NOAA Scope Test.” Appendix D of Comments of Proposed NOAA/Regulations on Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
3. ↵
   1. Arrow K.,
   2. Solow R.,
   3. Portney P. R.,
   4. Leamer E. E.,
   5. Radner R.,
   6. Schuman H.

   1993. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. 58 Federal Register 4601 et. seq. Jan. 15.
4. ↵
   1. Ayer Miriam,
   2. Brunk H. D.,
   3. Ewing G. M.,
   4. Reid W. T.,
   5. Silverman Edward

   . 1955. “An Empirical Distribution Function for Sampling with Incomplete Information.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 26 (4): 641–47.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Banzhaf H. Spencer,
   2. Burtraw Dallas,
   3. Evans David,
   4. Krupnick Alan

   . 2006. “Valuation of Natural Resource Improvements in the Adirondacks.” Land Economics 82 (3): 445–64.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J

   . 2011. “Valid Value Estimates and Value Estimate Validation: Better Methods and Better Testing for Stated Preference Research.” In The International Handbook on Non-market Environmental Valuation, ed. Bennett Jeff. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
7. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Cameron Michael P.,
   3. Tsoumas Antreas

   . 2008. “Investigating the Characteristics of Stated Preferences for Reducing the Impacts of Air Pollution: A Contingent Valuation Experiment.” In Environmental Economics, Experimental Methods, ed. Cherry Todd L., Kroll Stephan, Shogren Jason F. London: Routledge.
8. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Cole Matthew,
   3. Cooper Philip,
   4. Georgiou Stavros,
   5. Hadley David,
   6. Poe Gregory L.

   2004. “On Visible Choice Sets and Scope Sensitivity.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (1): 71–93.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian,
   2. Munro Alistair,
   3. Rhodes Bruce,
   4. Starmer Chris,
   5. Sugden Robert

   . 1997. “Does Part Whole Bias Exist? An Experimental Investigation.” Economic Journal 107 (441): 322–32.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Berrens Robert P.,
    2. Bohara Alok K.,
    3. Jenkins-Smith Hank C.,
    4. Silva Carol L.,
    5. Weimer David L.

    2004. “Information and Effort in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Application to Global Climate Change Using National Internet Samples.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (2): 331–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Binger Brian,
    2. Copple Robert,
    3. Hoffman Elizabeth

    . 1995a. “Contingent Valuation Methodology in the Natural Resource Damage Regulatory Process: Choice Theory and the Embedding Phenomenon.” Natural Resources Journal 35 (3): 443–59.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Binger Brian,
    2. Copple Robert,
    3. Hoffman Elizabeth

    . 1995b. “The Use of Contingent Valuation Methodology in Natural Resource Damage Assessments: Legal Fact and Economic Fiction.” Northwestern University Law Review 89 (3): 1029–53.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Boyle Kevin J.,
    2. Desvousges William H.,
    3. Reed Johnson F.,
    4. Dunford Richard W.,
    5. Hudson Sara P.

    1994. “An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent Valuation Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27 (1): 64–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Carson Richard T

    . 1997. “Contingent Valuation and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope.” In Determining the Value of Non-marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods, ed. Kopp Raymond J., Pommerhene Werner W., Schwartz Norbert. Boston: Kluwer.
15. ↵
    1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Groves Theodore

    . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1):181–210.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Carson Richard,
    2. Michael Hanemann W.

    2005. “Contingent Valuation.” In Handbook of Environmental Economics, Vol. 2, ed. Mäler Karl-Goran, Vincent Jeffrey R. , 822–935. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Michael Hanemann W.,
    3. Kopp Raymond J.,
    4. Krosnick Jon A.,
    5. Mitchell Robert C.,
    6. Presser Stanley,
    7. Ruud Paul A.,
    8. Kerry Smith V.

    1994. Prospective Interim Lost Use Value Due to DDT and PCB Contamination in the Southern California Bight. Report prepared for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, September 30. La Jolla, CA: Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc.
18. ↵
    1. Chapman David J.,
    2. Bishop Richard C.,
    3. Michael Hanemann W.,
    4. Kanninen Barbara J.,
    5. Krosnick Jon A.,
    6. Morey Edward R.,
    7. Tourangeau Roger

    . 2009. Natural Resource Damages Associated with Aesthetic and Ecosystem Injuries to Oklahoma’s Illinois River System and Tenkiller Lake. Expert report for state of Oklahoma, Vol. I. Available at https://pcl.uscourts.gov/search (Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods Inc., No. 4:05-cv-329 (N.D. Okla. Feb. 13, 2009), Docket No. 1853–4, exhibit D). The public-use copy from this site is also available at http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~train/chapman.pdf.
19. ↵
    1. Christie Michael.

    2001. “A Comparison of Alternative Contingent Valuation Elicitation Treatments for the Evaluation of Complex Environmental Policy.” Journal of Environmental Management 62 (3): 255–69.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. ↵
    1. Davison A. C.,
    2. Hinkley D. V.

    1997. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. ↵
    1. Desvousges William,
    2. Mathews Kristy,
    3. Train Kenneth

    . 2012. “Adequate Responsiveness to Scope in Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 84 (December): 121–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. de Zoysa A.,
    2. Dimanta N.

    1995. “A Benefit Valuation of Programs to Enhance Groundwater Quality, Surface Water Quality, and Wetland Habitat in Northwest Ohio.” Ph.D. dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus.
23. ↵
    1. Diamond Peter A.

    1996. “Testing the Internal Consistency of Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (3): 337–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Diamond Peter A.,
    2. Hausman Jerry A.,
    3. Leonard Gregory K.,
    4. Denning Mike A.

    1993. “Does Contingent Valuation Measure Preferences? Experimental Evidence.” In Contingent Valuation, A Critical Assessment, ed. Hausman Jerry A. , 41–89. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25. ↵
    1. Efron Bradley

    . 1982. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans. CBMS-NSF Monographs. Philadelphia: Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
26. ↵
    1. Fleming Christopher M.,
    2. Bowden Mark

    . 2009. “Web-Based Surveys as an Alternative to Traditional Mail Methods.” Journal of Environmental Management 90 (1): 284–92.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Haab Timothy C.,
    2. Interis Matthew G.,
    3. Petrolia Daniel,
    4. Whitehead John C.

    2013. “From Hopeless to Curious? Thoughts on Hausman’s ‘Dubious to Hopeless’ Critique of Contingent Valuation.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 35 (4): 593–612.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    1. Hanemann W. Michael.

    1994. “Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (4): 19–43.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Heberlein Thomas A.,
    2. Wilson Matthew A.,
    3. Bishop Richard C.,
    4. Schaeffer Nora Cate

    . 2005. “Rethinking the Scope Test as a Criterion for Validity in Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50 (1): 1–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Hoevengel Ruud.

    1996. “The Validity of the Contingent Valuation Method: Perfect and Regular Embedding.” Environmental and Resource Economics 7 (1): 57–78.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Loomis John B.,
    2. González-Cabán Armando

    . 1998. “A Willingness-to-Pay Function for Protecting Acres of Spotted Owl Habitat from Fire.” Ecological Economics 25 (3): 315–22.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Macmillan D. C.,
    2. Duff E. I.

    1998. “Estimating the Non-market Costs and Benefits of Native Woodland Restoration Using the Contingent Valuation Method.” Forestry 71 (3): 247–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Nunes Paulo A. L. D.,
    2. Schokkaert Erik

    . 2003. “Identifying the Warm Glow Effect in Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 (2): 231–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Powe Neil A.,
    2. Bateman Ian J.

    2004. “Investigating Insensitivity to Scope: A Split-Sample Test of Perceived Scheme Realism.” Land Economics 80 (2): 258–71.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    1. Riddel Mary,
    2. Loomis John

    . 1998. “Joint Estimation of Multiple CVM Scenarios under a Double Bounded Questioning Format.” Environmental and Resource Economics 12 (1): 77–98.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Rollins Kimberly,
    2. Lyke Audrey

    . 1998. “The Case for Diminishing Marginal Existence Values.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 (3): 324–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Samples Karl C.,
    2. Hollyer James R.

    1990. “Contingent Valuation of Wildlife Resources in the Presence of Substitutes and Complements.” In Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory, and Applications, ed. Johnson Rebecca L., Johnson Gary V. , 177–92. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
38. ↵
    1. Stevens Thomas H.,
    2. Benin Samuel,
    3. Larson Joseph S.

    1995. “Public Attitudes and Economic Values for Wetland Conservation in New England.” Wetlands 15 (3): 226–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Streever W. J.,
    2. Callaghan-Perry M.,
    3. Searles A.,
    4. Stevens T.,
    5. Svoboda P.

    1998. “Public Attitudes and Values for Wetland Conservation in New South Wales, Australia.” Journal of Environmental Management 54 (1): 1–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. ↵
    1. Veisten Knut,
    2. Hoen Hans Fredrik,
    3. Strand Jon

    . 2004. “Sequencing and the Adding Up Property in Contingent Valuation of Endangered Species: Are Contingent Non-use Values Economic Values?” Environmental and Resource Economics 29 (4): 419–23.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. White Piran C. L.,
    2. Gregory Keith W.,
    3. Lindley Patrick J.,
    4. Richards Glenn

    . 1997. “Economic Values of Threatened Mammals in Britain: A Case Study of the Otter Lutra lutra and the Water Vole Arvicola terrestris.” Biological Conservation 82 (3): 345–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. ↵
    1. Whitehead John C.,
    2. Haab Timothy C.,
    3. Huang Ju-Chin

    . 1998. “Part-Whole Bias in Contingent Valuation: Will Scope Effects Be Detected with Inexpensive Survey Methods?” Southern Economic Journal 65 (1): 160–68.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. Windle Jill,
    2. Rolfe John

    . 2011. “Comparing Responses from Internet and Paper-Based Collection Methods in More Complex Stated Preference Environmental Valuation Surveys.” Economic Analysis and Policy 41 (1): 83–97.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Wu Pei-Ing

    . 1993. “Substitution and Complementarity in Commodity Space: Benefit Evaluation of Multidimensional Environmental Policy.” Academia Economic Papers 21 (1): 151–82.

    OpenUrl