Accounting for Response Biases in Latent-Class Models for Choices and Attitudes

References

1. 1. Anderson Kathryn H.,
   2. Burkhauser Richard V.

   1985. “The Retirement-Health Nexus: A New Measure of an Old Puzzle.” Journal of Human Resources 20 (3): 315–30.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Andrews Rick L.,
   2. Currim Imran S.

   2003. “A Comparison of Segment Retention Criteria for Finite Mixture Logit Models.” Journal of Marketing Research 40 (2): 235–43.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Bachman Jerald G.,
   2. O’Malley Patrick M.

   1984. “Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response Styles.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48 (2): 491–509.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 1. Bateman Ian,
   2. Carson Richard T.,
   3. Day Brett,
   4. Hanemann Michael,
   5. Hanley Nick,
   6. Hett Tannis,
   7. Jones-Lee Michael,
   8. Loomes Graham,
   9. Mourato Susana,
   10. Özdemiroglu Ece,
   11. Pearce David W.,
   12. Sugden Robert,
   13. Swanson John

   . 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated-Preference Techniques. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
5. 1. Baumgartner Hans,
   2. Steenkamp Jan-Benedict E. M.

   2001. “Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation.” Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2): 143–56.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Mahmassani Hani S.

   1. Ben-Akiva Moshe,
   2. Joan Walker,
   3. Adriana Bernardino,
   4. Gopinath Dinesh A.,
   5. Morikawa Taka,
   6. Polydoropoulou Amalia

   . 2002. “Integration of Choice and Latent Variable Models.” In In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges, ed. Mahmassani Hani S., 431–70. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
7. 1. Blamey Russell K.

   1998. “Decisiveness, Attitude Expression and Symbolic Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34 (4): 577–601.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Bollen Kenneth A

   . 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
9. 1. Bound John.

   1991. “Self-Reported versus Objective Measures of Health in Retirement Models.” Journal of Human Resources 26 (1): 106–38.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Chun Ki-Taek,
    2. Campbell John B.,
    3. Yoo Jong Hae

    . 1974. “Extreme Response Style in Cross-Cultural Research: A Reminder.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 5 (4): 465–80.

    OpenUrlAbstract
11. 1. Clarke Irvine.

    2000. “Extreme Response Style in Cross-Cultural Research: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 15 (1): 137–52.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
12. 1. Cunha-e-Sá Maria A.,
    2. Madureira Lívia,
    3. Nunes Luis C.,
    4. Otrachshenko Vladimir

    . 2012. “Protesting and Justifying: A Latent Class Model for Contingent Valuation with Attitudinal Data.” Environmental and Resource Economics 52 (4): 531–48.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. De Jong Martijn G.,
    2. Steenkamp Jan-Benedict E. M.,
    3. Fox Jean-Paul

    . 2007. “Relaxing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research Using a Hierarchical IRT Model.” Journal of Consumer Research 34 (2): 260–78.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 1. De Jong Martijn G.,
    2. Steenkamp Jan-Benedict E. M.,
    3. Fox Jean-Paul,
    4. Baumgartner Hans

    . 2008. “Using Item Response Theory to Measure Extreme Response Style in Marketing Research: A Global Investigation.” Journal of Marketing Research 45 (1): 104–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Dempster A. P.,
    2. Laird N. M.,
    3. Rubin D. B.

    1977. “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 39 (1): 1–38.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
16. 1. Dziegielewska Dominika A.,
    2. Mendelsohn Robert

    . 2007. “Does ‘No’ Mean ‘No’? A Protest Methodology.” Environmental and Resource Economics 38 (1): 71–87.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Gilbert Daniel T.,
    2. Fiske Susan T.,
    3. Lindzey Gardner

    1. Eagly Alice H.,
    2. Chaiken Shelly

    1998. “Attitude Structure and Function.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. Gilbert Daniel T., Fiske Susan T., Lindzey Gardner, 269–322. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. 1. Haab Timothy C.,
    2. McConnell Kenneth E.

    2002. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
19. 1. Hui C. Harry,
    2. Triandis Harry C.

    1989. “Effects of Culture and Response Format on Extreme Response Style.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 20 (3): 296–309.

    OpenUrlAbstract
20. 1. Jackson Douglas N.,
    2. Messick Samuel

    . 1958. “Content and Style in Personality Assessment.” Psychological Bulletin 55 (4): 243–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 1. Jakobsson Kristin M.,
    2. Dragun Andrew K.

    2001. “The Worth of a Possum: Valuing Species with the Contingent Valuation Method.” Environmental and Resource Economics 19 (3): 211–27.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Javaras Kristin N.,
    2. Ripley Brian D.

    2007. “An Unfolding Latent Variable Model for Likert Attitude Data: Drawing Inferences Adjusted for Response Style.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 102 (478): 454–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Johnson Timothy R.

    2003. “On the Use of Heterogeneous Thresholds Ordinal Regression Models to Account for Individual Differences in Response Style.” Psychometrika 68 (4): 563–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Jorgensen Bradley S.,
    2. Syme Geoffrey J.,
    3. Bishop Brian J.,
    4. Nancarrow Blair E.

    1999. “Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 14 (1): 131–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Marin Gerardo,
    2. Gamba Raymond J.,
    3. Marin Barbara V.

    1992. “Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence among Hispanics: The Role of Acculturation and Education.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 23 (4): 498–509.

    OpenUrlAbstract
26. 1. Zarembka Paul

    1. McFadden Daniel

    . 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers of Econometrics, ed. Zarembka Paul. New York: Academic Press.
27. 1. McKelvey Richard D.,
    2. Zavoina William

    . 1975. “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4 (1): 103–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. McLachlan Geoffrey,
    2. Peel David

    2000. Finite Mixture Models. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
29. 1. Meyerhoff Jürgen,
    2. Bartczak Anna,
    3. Liebe Ulf

    . 2012. “Protester or Non-protester: A Binary State? On the Use (and Non-use) of Latent Class Models to Analyse Protesting in Economic Valuation.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 56 (3): 438–54.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Meyerhoff Jürgen,
    2. Liebe Ulf

    . 2006. “Protest Beliefs in Contingent Valuation: Explaining Their Motivation.” Ecological Economics 57 (4): 583–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. 1. Meyerhoff Jürgen,
    2. Liebe Ulf

    . 2010. “Determinants of Protest Responses in Environmental Valuation: A Meta-Study.” Ecological Economics 70 (2): 366–74.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Mitchell Robert Cameron,
    2. Carson Richard T.

    1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
33. 1. Morren Meike,
    2. Gelissen John P.T.M.,
    3. Vermunt Jeroen K.

    2011. “Dealing with Extreme Response Style in Cross-Cultural Research: A Restricted Latent Class Factor Analysis Approach.” Sociological Methodology 41 (1): 13–47.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
34. 1. Morrison M. D.,
    2. Blamey R. K.,
    3. Bennett J. W.

    2000. “Minimising Payment Vehicle Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies.” Environmental and Resource Economics 16 (4): 407–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Robinson John P.,
    2. Shaver Phillip R.,
    3. Wright Lawrence S.

    1. Paulhus Delroy L

    . 1991. “Measurement and Control of Response Bias.” In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, ed. Robinson John P., Shaver Phillip R., Wright Lawrence S., 17–59. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. 1. Polomé Philippe.

    2003. “Experimental Evidence on Deliberate Misrepresentation in Referendum Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52 (3): 387–401.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Polydoropoulou Amalia,
    2. Gopinath Dinesh,
    3. Ben-Akiva Moshe

    . 1997. “Willingness to Pay for Advanced Traveler Information Systems.” Transportation Research Record 1588: 1–9.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Provencher Bill,
    2. Baerenklau Kenneth,
    3. Bishop Richard C.

    2002. “A Finite Mixture Logit Model of Recreational Angling with Serially Correlated Random Utility.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 (4): 1066–75.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
39. 1. Rossi Peter E.,
    2. Gilula Zvi,
    3. Allenby Greg M.

    2001. “Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 96 (453): 20–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Söderqvist Tore.

    1998. “Why Give Up Money for the Baltic Sea?: Motives for People’s Willingness (or Reluctance) to Pay.” Environmental and Resource Economics 12 (2): 249–54.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Strazzera Elisabetta,
    2. Genius Margarita,
    3. Scarpa Riccardo,
    4. Hutchinson George

    . 2003. “The Effect of Protest Votes on the Estimates of WTP for Use Values of Recreational Sites.” Environmental and Resource Economics 25 (4): 461–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. 1. Van Rosmalen Joost,
    2. Van Herk Hester,
    3. Groenen Patrick J. F.

    2010. “Identifying Response Styles: A Latent-Class Bilinear Multinomial Logit Model.” Journal of Marketing Research 47 (1): 157–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Watkins David,
    2. Cheung Steven

    . 1995. “Culture, Gender, and Response Bias: An Analysis of Responses to the Self-description Questionnaire.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 26 (5): 490–504.

    OpenUrlAbstract
44. 1. Whitehead John C.,
    2. Groothuis Peter A.,
    3. Blomquist Glenn C.

    1993. “Testing for Non-response and Sample Selection Bias in Contingent Valuation.” Economics Letters 41 (2): 215–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science