Sample Selection, Individual Heterogeneity, and Regional Heterogeneity in Valuing Farmland Conservation Easements

References

1. ↵
   1. American Farmland Trust

   . 2013. Reforming the 2014 Farm Bill: Farm Policy for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: American Farmland Trust. Available at www.farmland.org/programs/federal/2014FB-Protect-FarmLand.asp (accessed May 13, 2014).
2. 1. Beasley Steven D.,
   2. Workman William G.,
   3. Williams Nancy A.

   1986. “Estimating Amenity Values of Urban Fringe Farmland: A Contingent Valuation Approach: Note.” Growth and Change 17 (4): 70–78.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Bell Kathleen P

   . 2007. “Public Preferences for Natural Resources: Evidence from Maine.” Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon, 2007.
4. 1. Bergstrom John C.,
   2. Dillman B. L.,
   3. Stoll John R.

   1985. “Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 17 (1): 139–49.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bergstrom John C.,
   2. Ready Richard C.

   2009. “What Have We Learned from Over 20 Years of Farmland Amenity Valuation Research in North America?” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 31 (1): 21–49.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Boyle Kevin,
   2. Özdemir Semra

   . 2009. “Convergent Validity of Attribute-Based, Choice Questions in Stated-Preference Studies.” Environmental and Resource Economics 42 (2): 247–64.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Cameron A. Colin,
   2. Trivedi Pravin K.

   2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. ↵
   1. Dorfman Jeffrey H.,
   2. Barnett Barry J.,
   3. Bergstrom John C.,
   4. Lavigno Bethany

   . 2009. “Searching for Farmland Preservation Markets: Evidence from the Southeastern U.S.” Land Use Policy 26 (1): 121–29.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Duke Joshua M.,
   2. Ilvento Thomas W.

   2004. “A Conjoint Analysis of Public Preferences for Agricultural Land Preservation.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33 (2): 209–19.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Duke Joshua M.,
    2. Johnston Robert J.,
    3. Campson Tammy W.

    2007. Preserving Farms and Forests in Sussex County, Delaware: Public Value. FREC Research Report. Newark: Department of Food and Resource Economics, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Delaware.
11. ↵
    1. Economic Research Service

    . 2003. Measuring Rurality: 1993 Urban Influence Codes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Available at http://webarchives.cdlib.org/sw1db7wq09/http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Rurality/urbaninf/1993UIC.htm (archived page).
12. ↵
    1. Economic Research Service

    . 2012a. Natural Amenities Scale: Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/natural-amenities-scale/documentation.aspx.
13. ↵
    1. Economic Research Service

    . 2012b. Rural-Urban Continuum Codes: Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes/documentation.aspx.
14. ↵
    1. Georgia Department of Natural Resources

    . 2003. Georgia Greenspace Program Description. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Available at www1.gadnr.org/greenspace/description.html (accessed May 13, 2013).
15. ↵
    1. Hall Clare,
    2. McVittie Alistair,
    3. Moran Dominic

    . 2004. “What Does the Public Want from Agriculture and the Countryside? A Review of Evidence and Methods.” Journal of Rural Studies 20 (2): 211–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Halstead John M.

    1984. “Measuring the Nonmarket Value of Massachusetts Agricultural Land: A Case Study.” Journal of Northeastern Agricultural Economics 13 (1): 12–18.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Heckman James J.

    1976. “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5 (4): 475–92.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Hellerstein Daniel,
    2. Nickerson Cynthia,
    3. Cooper Joseph,
    4. Feather Peter,
    5. Gadsby Dwight,
    6. Mullarkey Daniel,
    7. Tegene Abebayehu,
    8. Barnard Charles

    2002. Farmland Protection: The Role of Public Preferences for Rural Amenities. Agricultural Economic Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
19. ↵
    1. Holmes Thomas P.,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor L.

    2003. “Attribute-Based Methods.” In A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, ed. Champ Patricia A., Boyle Kevin J., Brown Thomas C., 171–219. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. ↵
    1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Bergstrom John C.

    2011. “Valuing Farmland Protection: Do Empirical Results and Policy Guidance Depend on the Econometric Fine Print?” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 33 (4): 639–60.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Duke Joshua M.

    2007. “Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Land Preservation and Policy Process Attributes: Does the Method Matter?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (4): 1098–1115.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Duke Joshua M.

    2009. “Willingness to Pay for Land Preservation across States and Jurisdictional Scale: Implications for Benefit Transfer.” Land Economics 85 (2): 217–37.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Opaluch James J.,
    3. Grigalunas Thomas A.,
    4. Mazzotta Marisa J.

    2001. “Estimating Amenity Benefits of Coastal Farmland.” Growth and Change 32 (3): 305–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Swallow Stephen K.,
    3. Bauer Dana M.,
    4. Anderson Christopher M.

    2003. “Preferences for Residential Development Attributes and Support for the Policy Process: Implications for Management and Conservation of Rural Landscapes.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32 (1): 65–82.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Kashian Russ,
    2. Skidmore Mark

    . 2002. “Preserving Agricultural Land via Property Assessment Policy and the Willingness to Pay for Land Preservation.” Economic Development Quarterly 16 (1): 75–87.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. Kline Jeffrey,
    2. Wichelns Dennis

    . 1994. “Using Referendum Data to Characterize Public Support for Purchasing Development Rights to Farmland.” Land Economics 70 (2): 223–33.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Kline Jeffrey,
    2. Wichelns Dennis

    . 1998. “Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Preserving Farmland and Open Space.” Ecological Economics 26 (2): 211–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Kotchen Matthew J.,
    2. Powers Shawn M.

    2006. “Explaining the Appearance and Success of Voter Referenda for Open-Space Conservation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52 (1): 373–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Lancaster Kelvin J.

    1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74 (2): 132–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Lee Christopher

    . 2008. From Good to Great to Best-in-Class: A Real Estate Leader’s Guide to Optimal Performance. Chicago: Institute of Real Estate Management.
31. ↵
    1. Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry

    . 2013. Farmland Protection Program. Augusta: Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. Available at www.maine.gov/dacf/ard/farmland_protection/index.shtml (accessed May 13, 2014).
32. ↵
    1. Maine Farmland Trust

    . 2013. Protected Farmland. Belfast: Maine Farmland Trust. Available at www.mainefarmlandtrust.org/about-maine-farmland-trust/protected-farmland/ (accessed May 13, 2014).
33. ↵
    1. McConnell Virginia D.,
    2. Walls Margaret A.

    2005. The Value of Open Space: Evidence from Studies of Nonmarket Benefits. RFF Report. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
34. 1. McLeod Donald,
    2. Inman Katherine,
    3. Coupal Roger,
    4. Gates Jonathan

    2002. Sheridan County Land Use and Planning Survey Results. Technical report. Laramie: University of Wyoming, Agricultural Experiment Station.
35. ↵
    1. Moon Wanki,
    2. Griffith Jacob W.

    2011. “Assessing Holistic Economic Value for Multifunctional Agriculture in the US.” Food Policy 36 (4): 455–65.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Natural Resources Conservation Service

    . 2008. At a Glance: Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available at www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs143_00.
37. ↵
    1. Nelson Erik,
    2. Uwasu Michinori,
    3. Polasky Stephen

    . 2007. “Voting on Open Space: What Explains the Appearance and Support of Municipal-Level Open Space Conservation Referenda in the United States?” Ecological Economics 62 (3–4): 580–93.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Nickerson Cynthia J.,
    2. Hellerstein Daniel

    . 2003. “Protecting Rural Amenities through Farmland Preservation Programs.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32 (1): 129–44.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Ohio Department of Agriculture

    . 2013. Office of Farmland Preservation Annual Report. Reynoldsburg: Ohio Department of Agriculture. Available at www.agri.ohio.gov/farmland/docs/2013_Farmland_Annual_Report.pdf.
40. ↵
    1. Özdemir Semra

    . 2003. “Convergent Validity of Conjoint Values for Farmland Conservation Easement Programs.” Master’s thesis, University of Maine.
41. ↵
    1. Paterson Robert W.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.,
    3. Ahearn Mary C.,
    4. Alberini Aanna,
    5. Bergstrom John C.,
    6. Libby Lawrence W.,
    7. Welsh Michael P.

    2005. “Public Preferences for Farmland Attributes in Conservation Easement Programs.” In Land Use Problems and Conflicts: Causes, Consequences and Solutions, ed. Goetz Stephen J., Shortle James S., Bergstrom John C., 165–85. London: Routledge.
42. ↵
    1. Paterson Robert W.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.,
    3. Parmeter Christopher F.,
    4. Neumann James E.,
    5. Civita Paul De

    . 2008. “Heterogeneity in Preferences for Smoking Cessation.” Health Economics 17 (12): 1363–77.

    OpenUrlPubMed
43. ↵
    1. Ready Richard C.,
    2. Berger Mark C.,
    3. Blomquist Glenn C.

    1997. “Measuring Amenity Benefits from Farmland: Hedonic Pricing vs. Contingent Valuation.” Growth and Change 28 (4): 438–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Roe Brian,
    2. Irwin Elena G.,
    3. Morrow-Jones Hazel A.

    2004. “The Effects of Farmland, Farmland Preservation, and Other Neighborhood Amenities on Housing Values and Residential Growth.” Land Economics 80 (1): 55–75.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
45. 1. Rosenberger Randall S.,
    2. Loomis John B.

    1999. “The Value of Ranch Open Space to Tourists: Combining Observed and Contingent Behavior Data.” Growth and Change 30 (3): 366–83.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. Rosenberger Randall S.,
    2. Walsh Richard G.

    1997. “Nonmarket Value of Western Valley Ranchland Using Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22 (2): 296–309.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Louviere Jordan

    . 1993. “The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models.” Journal of Marketing Research 30 (3): 305–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . 2012a. 2008 National Population Projections: Summary Tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2008/summarytables.html (accessed December 10, 2012).
49. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . 2012b. Statistical Abstract of the United States; Agriculture. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/agriculture.html.
50. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . 2013. United States Census 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html (accessed May 13, 2014).
51. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)

    . 2009. Summary Report: 2007 National Resources Inventory. Technical report. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Conservation Service.
52. ↵
    1. Vella Francis.

    1998. “Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey.” Journal of Human Resources 33 (1): 127–69.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. ↵
    1. Volinskiy Dmitriy,
    2. Bergstrom John C.

    2007. “Valuation of Farmland Conservation Easement Programs When Preferences Vary.” Faculty Series Working Paper. Athens: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia.
54. ↵
    1. Wooldridge Jeffrey M

    . 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.