The Impact of Agri-environmental Schemes on Farm Performance in Five E.U. Member States: A DID-Matching Approach

References

1. ↵
   1. Aakkula Jyrki,
   2. Kuussaari Mikko,
   3. Rankinen Katri,
   4. Ekholm Petri,
   5. Heliölä Janne,
   6. Hyvönen Terho,
   7. Kitti Laura,
   8. Salo Tapio

   2012. “Follow-up Study on the Impacts of Agri-environmental Measures in Finland.” In Evaluation of Agri-environmental Policies: Selected Methodological Issues and Case Studies, 111–28. Paris: OECD Publishing.
2. ↵
   1. Abadie Alberto,
   2. Imbens Giudo W.

   2006. “Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 74 (1): 235–67.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Abadie Alberto,
   2. Imbens Giudo W.

   2008. “Notes and Comments on the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators.” Econometrica 76 (6): 1537–57.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Bryson Alex,
   2. Dorsett Richard,
   3. Purdon Susan

   2002. “The Use of Propensity Score Matching in the Evaluation of Labour Market Policies.” Working Paper n. 4. London: Department for Work and Pensions.
5. ↵
   1. Caliendo Marco,
   2. Kopeinig Sabine

   2008. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of the Propensity Score Matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (1): 31–72.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Chabé-Ferret Sylvain,
   2. Subervie Julie

   2013. “How Much Green for the Buck? Estimating Additional and Windfall Effects of French Agro-environmental Schemes by DID-matching.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65 (1): 12–27.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. De Francesco Edi,
   2. Gatto Paola,
   3. Runge Ford,
   4. Trestini Samuele

   2007. “Factors Affecting Farmers’ Participation in Agri-environmental Measures: A Northern Italian perspective.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (1): 114–31.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

   . 2007. Rural Development Policy, 2000–2006: Monitoring and Evaluation. Brussels: European Commission. Available at http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?=cache:2z7NPkGln4oJ:ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rur/eval/index_en.htm+&cd=3&hl=it&ct=clnk&gl=it.
9. ↵
   1. Eichler Martin,
   2. Lechner Michael

   2002. “An Evaluation of Public Employment Programmes in the East German State of Sachsen-Anhalt.” Labour Economics 9 (2): 143–86.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. European Commission

    . 2008. Farm Accounting and Data Network. Brussels: Directorate-General Agriculture. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/index_en.cfm (accessed February 2013).
11. ↵
    1. Heckman James J.,
    2. Ichimura Hidehiko,
    3. Todd Petra E.

    1997. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme.” Review of Economic Studies 64 (4): 605–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Jaraitė Jurate,
    2. Kažukauskas Andrius

    2012. “The Effect of Mandatory Agro-environmental Policy on Farm Fertiliser and Pesticide Expenditure.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 63 (3): 656–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Kantor Management Consultants and Institute for Rural Development Research (KMC-IRDR)

    . 2012. Ex-post Evaluation of Rural Development Programmes, 2000–2006. Final Deliverable to the European Commission. Brussels: European Commission, Agriculture and Rural Development. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/evaluation/rural-development-reports/ex-post-evaluation-rdp-2000-2006_en.htm (accessed May 2014).
14. ↵
    1. Lawley Chad,
    2. Towe Charles

    2014. “Capitalized Costs of Habitat Conservation Easements.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96 (3): 657–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Liu Xiangping,
    2. Lynch Lori

    2011. “Do Agricultural Land Preservation Programs Reduce Farmland Loss? Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator.” Land Economics 87 (2): 183–201.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

    . 2004. Environmental Performance Reviews: Spain. Paris: OECD Publishing.
17. ↵
    1. Peco Begoña,
    2. Suárez Francisco,
    3. Juan J. Oñate,
    4. Malo Juan E.,
    5. Aguirre Javier

    . 2000. “Spain: First Tentative Steps Towards an Agri-environmental Programme.” In Agri-Environmental Policy in the European Union, ed. Buller H., Wilson G. A., Höll A., 145–68. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate Publishing.
18. ↵
    1. Princé Karine,
    2. Jiguet Frédéric

    2013. “Ecological Effectiveness of French Grassland Agri-environment Schemes for Farmland Bird Communities.” Journal of Environmental Management 121 (May 30): 110–16.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. ↵
    1. Pufahl Andrea,
    2. Weiss Christoph

    2009. “Evaluating the Effects of Farm Programmes: Results from Propensity Score Matching.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 36 (1): 79–101.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum Paul R.,
    2. Rubin Donald B.

    1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Rubin Donald B.,
    2. Thomas Neal

    1996. “Matching Using Estimated Propensity Scores: Relating Theory to Practice.” Biometrics 52 (1): 249–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 1. Rural Development Network

    . 2014. Programme und deren Bewertung im Zeitraum, 2000–2006. [Programs and Their Evaluation, 2000–2006.] Bonn, Germany: DVS. Available at www.netzwerk-laendlicher-raum.de/themen/eler-2007-2013/evaluation-und-monitoring/programme-2000-2006/ (in German, accessed September 15, 2014).
23. ↵
    1. Sauer Johannes,
    2. Walsh John,
    3. Zilberman David

    2012. “The Identification and Measurement of Behavioural Effects from Agri-environmental Policies: An Empirical Analysis.” Paper presented at the 14th Annual BIOECON, Kings College Cambridge, U.K., September 18–20.
24. ↵
    1. Smith Jeffrey A.,
    2. Todd Petra E.

    2005. “Does Matching Overcome LaLonde’s Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?” Journal of Econometrics 125 (1–2): 305–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Tamini Lota D.

    2011. “A Non-parametric Analysis of the Impact of Agri-environmental Advisory Activities on Best Management Practice Adoption: A Case Study of Québec.” Ecological Economics 70 (7): 1363–74.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Udagawa Chihiro,
    2. Hodge Ian,
    3. Reader Mark

    2014. “Farm Level Costs of Agri-environment Measures: The Impact of Entry Level Stewardship on Cereal Farm Incomes.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (1): 212–33.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Vanslembrouck Isabel,
    2. Van Huylenbroeck Guido,
    3. Verbeke Wim

    2002. “Determinants of the Willingness of Belgian Farmers to Participate in Agri-environmental Measures.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 53 (3): 489–511.

    OpenUrlCrossRef