Location, Location, Habitat: How the Value of Ecosystem Services Varies across Location and by Habitat

References

1. ↵
   1. Adamowicz Wiktor,
   2. Boxall Peter,
   3. Williams Michael,
   4. Louviere Jordan

   . 1998. “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1): 64–75.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Bateman I.,
   2. Brouwer R.,
   3. Ferrini S.,
   4. Schaafsma M.,
   5. Barton D.,
   6. Dubgaard A.,
   7. Hasler B.,
   8. Hime S.,
   9. Liekens I.,
   10. Navrud S.,
   11. et al

   . 2011. “Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements across Europe.” Environmental and Resource Economics 50 (3): 365–87.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Boxall Peter,
   2. Adamowicz W. L.,
   3. Moon Aamanda

   . 2009. “Complexity in Choice Experiments: Choice of the Status Quo Alternative and Implications for Welfare Measurement.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 53 (4): 503–19.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Brander Luke M.,
   2. Florax Raymond J. G.,
   3. Vermaat Jan E.

   2006. “The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-analysis of the Literature.” Environmental and Resource Economics 33 (2): 223–50.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Cameron Trudy A.,
   2. DeShazo J. R.

   2013. “Demand for Health Risk Reductions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65 (1): 87–109.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Czajkowski Mikołaj

   . 2013. “A New Baseline Model for Estimating Willingness to Pay from Discrete Choice Models.” White Paper. Available at www.icmconference.org.uk/index.php/icmc/ICMC2013/paper/view/730/354 (accessed September 18, 2015).
7. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Groves Theodore

   . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. ChoiceMetrics

   . 2012. Ngene 1.1.1 User Manual and Reference Guide. Version 16/02/2012. Choice-Metrics Pty Ltd.
9. ↵
   1. Coen Loren D.,
   2. Brumbaugh Rrobert D.,
   3. Bushek David,
   4. Grizzle Ray,
   5. Luckenbach Mark W.,
   6. Posey Martin H.,
   7. Powers Sean P.,
   8. Gregory Tolley S.

   2007. “Ecosystem Services Related to Oyster Restoration.” Marine Ecology Progress Series 341: 303–7.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Colombo Sergio,
    2. Calatrava-Requena Javier,
    3. Hanley Nick

    . 2007. “Testing Choice Experiment for Benefit Transfer with Preference Heterogeneity.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (1): 135–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. DiSogra Charles.

    2007. “Weight, Weight, Don’t Tell Me!” GfK, Knowledge Networks. Available at www.knowledgenetworks.com/accuracy/summer2007/disogra.html (accessed September 18, 2015).
12. ↵
    1. Fieller E. C.

    1932. “The Distribution of the Index in a Normal Bivariate Population.” Biometrika 24 (3–4): 428–40.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Grabowski Jonathan H.,
    2. Peterson Charles H.

    2007. “Restoring Oyster Reefs to Recover Ecosystem Services.” In Ecosystem Engineers: Plants to Protists, ed. Cuddington K., Byers J. E., Wilson W. G., Hastings A., 281–98. Theoretical Ecology Series 4.Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
14. ↵
    1. Greene William H

    . 2012. Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. Boston: Prentice Hall.
15. ↵
    1. Haab Timothy C.,
    2. McConnell Kenneth E.

    2002. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-market Valuation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
16. ↵
    1. Hanley Nick,
    2. Colombo Sergio,
    3. Tinch Dugald,
    4. Black Andrew,
    5. Aftab Ashar

    . 2006. “Estimating the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements under the Water Framework Directive: Are Benefits Transferable?” European Review of Agricultural Economics 33 (3): 391–413.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Herriges Joseph,
    2. Kling Catherine,
    3. Liu Chih-Chen,
    4. Tobias Justin

    . 2010. “What Are the Consequences of Consequentiality?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (1): 67–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Jiang Yong,
    2. Swallow Stephen K.,
    3. McGonagle Michael P.

    2005. “Context-Sensitive Benefit Transfer Using Stated Choice Models: Specification and Convergent Validity for Policy Analysis.” Environmental and Resource Economics 31 (4): 477–99.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Johnston Robert J.

    2007. “Choice Experiments, Site Similarity, and Benefits Transfer.” Environmental and Resource Economics 38 (3): 331–51.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Duke Joshua M.

    2010. “Socioeconomic Adjustments and Choice Experiment Benefit Function Transfer: Evaluating the Common Wisdom.” Resource and Energy Economics 32 (3): 421–38.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Koch Evamaria W.,
    2. Barbier Edward B.,
    3. Silliman Brian R.,
    4. Reed Denise J.,
    5. Perillo Gerardo M. E.,
    6. Hacker Sally D.,
    7. Granek Elise F.,
    8. Primavera Jurgenne H.,
    9. Muthiga Nyawira,
    10. Polasky Stephen,
    11. et al

    . 2009. “Non-linearity in Ecosystem Services: Temporal and Spatial Variability in Coastal Protection.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7 (1): 29–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Krinsky Itzhak,
    2. Leslie Robb A.

    1986. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (4): 715–19.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Kroeger Timm.

    2012. Dollars and Sense: Economic Benefits and Impacts from Two Oyster Reef Restoration Projects in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Report for The Nature Conservancy. Available at www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/oyster-restoration-study-kroeger.pdf (accessed September 18, 2015).
24. ↵
    1. Manski Charles F.,
    2. Lerman Steven R.

    1977. “The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples.” Econometrica 45 (8): 1977–88.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. McFadden Daniel

    . 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka P. New York: Academic Press.
26. ↵
    1. Meyerhoff Jürgen,
    2. Liebe Ulf

    . 2009. “Status Quo Effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity.” Land Economics 85 (3): 515–28.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    1. Moeltner Klaus,
    2. Woodward Richard

    . 2009. “Meta-functional Benefit Transfer of Wetland Valuation: Making the Most of Small Samples.” Environmental and Resource Economics 42 (1): 89–108.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Morrison Mark,
    2. Bennett Jeff,
    3. Blamey Russell,
    4. Louiviere Jordan

    . 2002. “Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 (1): 161–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Morrison Mark,
    2. Bergland Olvar

    . 2006. “Prospects for the Use of Choice Modelling for Benefit Transfer.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 420–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Patt Anthony,
    2. Zeckhauser Richard

    . 2000. “Action Bias and Environmental Decisions.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 21 (1): 45–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Petrolia Daniel R.,
    2. Interis Matthew G.,
    3. Hwang Joonghyun

    . 2014. “America’s Wetland? A National Survey of Willingness to Pay for Restoration of Louisiana’s Coastal Wetlands.” Marine Resource Economics 29 (1): 17–37.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Petrolia Daniel R.,
    2. Interis Matthew G.,
    3. Hwang Joonghyun

    . 2015. “Single-Choice, Repeated-Choice, and Best-Worst Elicitation Formats: Do Results Differ and by How Much?” Unpublished manuscript, Mississippi State University.
33. ↵
    1. Poe Gregory L.,
    2. Giraud Kelly L.,
    3. Loomis John B.

    2005. “Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2): 353–65.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Samuelson William,
    2. Zeckhauser Richard

    . 1988. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 (1): 7–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Strange Elizabeth,
    2. Galbraith Hector,
    3. Bickel Sarah,
    4. Mills Dave,
    5. Beltman Douglas,
    6. Lipton Joshua

    . 2002. “Determining Ecological Equivalence in Service-to-Service Scaling of Salt Marsh Restoration.” Environmental Management 29 (2): 290–300.

    OpenUrlPubMed
36. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Louviere Jordan

    . 1993. “The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models.” Journal of Marketing Research 30 (3): 305–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Zedler Joy B.,
    2. Kercher Suzanne

    . 2005. “Wetland Resources: Status, Trends, Ecosystem Services, and Restorability.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (1): 75–115.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science