Causes and Consequences of Perceived Land Tenure Insecurity: Survey Evidence from Burkina Faso

Benjamin Linkow

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • TABLE 1

    Summary Statistics

    CharacteristicValue
    Household Level
    Annual household income (dollars)415 (1,145)
    Nonagricultural income81.4%
    Household size8.48 (5.15)
    Number of parcels2.31 (0.85)
    Own cattle29.7%
    Female-headed households6.8%
    Migrant households16.5%
    Ever experienced land conflict19.2%
    Household head’s parents from same village75.5%
    Plot/Cultivator Level
    Parcel size, hectares1.62 (2.26)
    Length of tenure, years15.24 (13.68)
    Quality: sloped terrain6.5%
    Quality: lowland terrain20.4%
    Acquired through inheritance46.1%
    Acquired through allocation by household head23.2%
    Acquired through gift/allocation by traditional authority20.5%
    Acquired by purchase/rental0.2%
    Value of output per hectare (dollars)12.68 (189.48)
    Literacy of cultivator13.0%
    % of cultivators who are household heads65.9%
    % female cultivators34.6%
    Age of cultivator44.36 (15.58)
    • Note: Standard deviations in parentheses.

  • TABLE 2

    Perceived Conflict Measures, in Percent

    In Your Opinion, What Level of Risk Does Each of the Following Types of Conflict Present?
    For Your HouseholdIn the Village TodayIn the Village in the Near FutureIn the Village in the Far Future
    NoneSomewhatSeriousNoneSomewhatSeriousNoneSomewhatSeriousNoneSomewhatSerious
    Arrival of new migrants69.616.44.861.223.96.550.024.49.642.024.913.5
    Outsiders seeking land for73.314.94.466.119.45.554.921.47.748.321.810.5
    nonagricultural use Former residents returning71.114.97.661.821.88.752.622.811.446.623.014.3
    Inheritance71.316.55.259.125.66.650.526.29.444.625.312.6
    Livestock damage28.442.623.216.649.227.912.643.632.611.736.937.0
    Access to water for livestock62.524.26.853.930.58.246.030.811.141.529.914.1
    Conflicts in general41.633.919.233.439.322.027.938.528.124.434.835.4
  • TABLE 3

    Perceived Expropriation Risk Measures, in Percent

    Are You Concerned That You Could One Day Lose Your Land as a Result of the Following?
    Not at AllSomewhatYes
    Expropriation by the state34.319.246.5
    Expropriation by villager75.912.311.9
  • TABLE 4

    Average Correlations between Conflict Risk Reference Frames

    Your HouseholdIn the Village in GeneralIn the Village in the Near Future
    In the village in general0.812
    In the village in the near future0.7060.848
    In the village in the further future0.5710.6850.794
    • Note: Correlations are averaged over each conflict type.

  • TABLE 5

    Average Correlations between Tenure Insecurity Measures

    Arrival of New MigrantsOutsiders Seeking Nonagricultural LandFormer Residents ReturningInheritanceLivestock DamageAccess to water for LivestockConflicts in GeneralExpropriation by State
    Arrival of new migrants Outsiders seeking land for nonagricultural purposes0.538
    Former residents returning0.4310.360
    Inheritance0.2960.2860.361
    Livestock damage0.2250.1810.2600.297
    Access to water for livestock0.1770.1920.2440.2230.354
    Conflicts in general0.2940.2480.3050.4000.3740.242
    Expropriation by state0.07370.08540.11350.12340.07370.08020.151
    Expropriation by villager0.12260.08560.13250.09570.12430.14960.1470.196
    • Note: Correlations calculated for own household reference frame.

  • TABLE 6

    Regressions of Agricultural Productivity on Single Tenure Insecurity Measures

    For Your HouseholdIn the Village TodayIn the Village in the Near FutureIn the Village in the Far Future
    SomewhatSeriousSomewhatSeriousSomewhatSeriousSomewhatSerious
    Arrival of new migrants−0.002
    (0.084)
    −0.455**
    (0.181)
    0.068
    (0.075)
    −0.443***
    (0.148)
    0.191***
    (0.067)
    −0.379***
    (0.126)
    0.194**
    (0.069)
    −0.231**
    (0.102)
    Outsiders seeking land for nonagricultural purposes−0.155
    (0.084)
    −0.036
    (0.162)
    0.018
    (0.077)
    −0.073
    (0.144)
    0.093
    (0.071)
    −0.147
    (0.123)
    0.119
    (0.065)
    −0.087
    (0.108)
    Former residents returning−0.025
    (0.075)
    −0.422***
    (0.137)
    0.078
    (0.069)
    −0.355**
    (0.132)
    0.101
    (0.069)
    −0.356***
    (0.115)
    0.148**
    (0.066)
    −0.314***
    (0.094)
    Inheritance0.013
    (0.079)
    −0.044
    (0.134)
    0.094
    (0.065)
    −0.098
    (0.119)
    0.108
    (0.072)
    −0.071
    (0.117)
    0.115
    (0.067)
    −0.119
    (0.098)
    Livestock damage−0.117
    (0.068)
    −0.077
    (0.091)
    −0.181**
    (0.075)
    −0.165
    (0.094)
    −0.067
    (0.077)
    −0.092
    (0.090)
    −0.035
    (0.074)
    −0.058
    (0.084)
    Access to water for livestock−0.032
    (0.078)
    −0.229*
    (0.117)
    −0.021
    (0.073)
    −0.265**
    (0.115)
    0.005
    (0.071)
    −0.328***
    (0.098)
    0.025
    (0.070)
    −0.313***
    (0.102)
    Conflicts in general0.004
    (0.066)
    −0.015
    (0.090)
    0.071
    (0.062)
    −0.001
    (0.091)
    0.097
    (0.070)
    −0.078
    (0.090)
    0.017
    (0.072)
    −0.061
    (0.083)
    Expropriation by state0.063
    (0.081)
    0.002
    (0.085)
    Expropriation by villager0.099
    (0.072)
    −0.083
    (0.097)
    • Note: Coefficients, with robust clustered standard errors in parentheses. Each estimation includes the set of control variables described in Section IV; these results are omitted for brevity.

    • * p < 0.1;

    • ** p < 0.05;

    • *** p < 0.01.

  • TABLE 7

    Determinants of Perceived Tenure Insecurity

    Arrival of New MigrantsFormer Residents ReturningAccess to Water for Livestock
    Village: remote−0.0219 (0.0708)0.127* (0.0701)0.204*** (0.0711)
    Village: per capita income0.0778** (0.0391)0.0656* (0.0383)0.0403 (0.0420)
    Village: transhumance cattle route0.102 (0.0887)−0.00868 (0.0888)−0.0352 (0.0874)
    Village: livestock prevalence0.0474 (0.0907)0.0449 (0.0918)−0.199** (0.0880)
    Village: health clinic0.0158 (0.0841)0.0287 (0.0815)0.129 (0.0800)
    Male household head0.166*** (0.0456)0.0200 (0.0469)0.129*** (0.0408)
    Female household head−0.0150 (0.169)−0.162 (0.157)−0.0512 (0.136)
    Literacy0.235*** (0.0684)0.245*** (0.0646)0.142** (0.0562)
    Household head’s parents migrated0.0941 (0.0675)0.299*** (0.0775)0.271*** (0.0681)
    Log of household’s income0.0382** (0.0166)0.0432** (0.0171)0.0356** (0.0162)
    Log of number of cattle0.0484 (0.0310)0.0461 (0.0289)0.0724*** (0.0244)
    Household size0.0108 (0.00685)0.000686 (0.00484)0.00464 (0.00503)
    Irrigation−0.120 (0.148)0.154 (0.155)0.316* (0.164)
    Lowland0.145 (0.104)0.0983 (0.0936)−0.0951 (0.102)
    Sloped0.260* (0.137)0.477*** (0.128)−0.118 (0.133)
    Size of household landholding–0.0366*** (0.00907)−0.0169** (0.00836)0.00875 (0.00642)
    Constant 12.136*** (0.358)2.081*** (0.365)1.093*** (0.381)
    Constant 23.061*** (0.353)2.807*** (0.365)2.181*** (0.386)
    Number of observations6,1346,2835,930
    • Note: Clustered standard errors in parentheses. Commune-level dummy coefficients omitted.

    • * p < 0.1;

    • ** p < 0.05;

    • *** p < 0.01.

  • TABLE 8

    Determinants of Tenure Insecurity, Proxies for Social Capital Results

    Arrival of New MigrantsFormer Residents ReturningAccess to Water for Livestock
    Ethnic minority−0.0409 (0.0816)0.0291 (0.0743)0.119 (0.0793)
    Migrant household0.0422 (0.0767)0.168* (0.0890)0.0860 (0.0744)
    Household head’s parents migrated0.0941 (0.0675)0.299*** (0.0775)0.271*** (0.0681)
    • Note: Clustered standard errors in parentheses. Commune-level dummy coefficients omitted. Regressions include covariates from Table 7.

    • * p < 0.1;

    • *** p < 0.01.

  • TABLE 9

    Regression of Agriculture Productivity on Multiple Tenure Insecurity Measures

    Tenure Insecurity MeasuresCoef.ControlsCoef.
    Migration: somewhat0.0703
    (0.0893)
    Female−0.117
    (0.0979)
    Migration: serious−0.449**
    (0.194)
    Male non–household head0.105
    (0.137)
    Outsiders seeking nonagricultural land: somewhat−0.160
    (0.0910)
    Age0.00111
    (0.00210)
    Outsiders seeking nonagricultural land: serious0.276
    (0.180)
    Literate0.145*
    (0.0759)
    Former residents returning: somewhat−0.0134
    (0.0759)
    Plot size−0.209***
    (0.0257)
    Former residents returning: serious−0.334**
    (0.128)
    Length of tenure0.00229
    (0.00277)
    Inheritance: somewhat0.0655
    (0.0810)
    Irrigation0.208
    (0.142)
    Inheritance: serious0.118
    (0.138)
    Household resides on the parcel−0.0513
    (0.0368)
    Livestock damage: somewhat−0.0956
    (0.0695)
    Lowland terrain0.598***
    (0.0969)
    Livestock damage: serious0.0122
    (0.0942)
    Sloped terrain−0.0212
    (0.113)
    Water access: somewhat0.0101
    (0.0823)
    Household size0.0104
    (0.00741)
    Water access: serious−0.176
    (0.115)
    Log of nonagricultural household income−0.00686
    (0.00706)
    State expropriation: somewhat−0.0774
    (0.0846)
    Log of number of cattle−0.0708**
    (0.0305)
    State expropriation: serious0.0126
    (0.0867)
    Expropriation by villager: somewhat0.123
    (0.0768)
    Expropriation by villager: serious−0.0434
    (0.0957)
    Constant6.504***
    (0.177)
    Number of observations4,157
    R-squared0.301
    • Note: Clustered standard errors in parentheses. Commune-level dummy coefficients omitted.

    • * p < 0.1;

    • ** p < 0.05;

    • *** p < 0.01.

  • TABLE 10

    Aggregated Tenure Insecurity Measure Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Instrumental Variable (IV) Results

    OLSIV
    Perceived tenure insecurity−0.517*** (0.198)−8.755** (4.385)
    Female−0.116 (0.0977)−0.265* (0.159)
    Male non–household head0.0875 (0.133)0.191 (0.189)
    Age0.000988 (0.00208)−0.000556 (0.00315)
    Literate0.136* (0.0743)0.139 (0.125)
    Plot size−0.209*** (0.0256)−0.207*** (0.0264)
    Length of tenure0.00214 (0.00279)0.00110 (0.00351)
    Irrigation0.220 (0.141)0.313* (0.188)
    Household resides on the parcel−0.0494 (0.0369)−0.0552 (0.0518)
    Lowland terrain0.602*** (0.0970)0.581*** (0.119)
    Sloped terrain−0.0275 (0.112)0.0359 (0.186)
    Household size0.0110 (0.00758)0.0177* (0.00985)
    Log of nonagricultural household income– 0.00794 (0.00691)−0.000832 (0.0113)
    Log of number of cattle−0.0809*** (0.0300)−0.0536 (0.0506)
    Constant6.383*** (0.160)5.978*** (0.326)
    Number of observations4,1574,127
    R-squared0.2950.369
    • Note: Clustered standard errors in parentheses. Commune-level dummy coefficients omitted. d

    • * p < 0.1;

    • ** p < 0.05;

    • *** p < 0.01.

  • TABLE 11

    Regression of Agricultural Productivity on Principal Components Tenure Insecurity Measures

    PCA1PCA2PCA3
    Perceived tenure insecurity−0.0790 (0.0750)−0.160* (0.0883)−0.395*** (0.123)
    Female−0.0579 (0.102)−0.0590 (0.102)−0.0633 (0.101)
    Male non-household head0.0806 (0.137)0.0798 (0.136)0.0981 (0.137)
    Age0.000541 (0.00215)0.000491 (0.00215)0.000660 (0.00214)
    Literate0.123 (0.0780)0.126 (0.0782)0.128 (0.0781)
    Plot size−0.209*** (0.0256)−0.210*** (0.0255)−0.210*** (0.0255)
    Length of tenure0.00271 (0.00274)0.00268 (0.00272)0.00254 (0.00271)
    Irrigation0.211 (0.140)0.213 (0.140)0.210 (0.139)
    Household resides on the parcel−0.0685* (0.0376)−0.0681* (0.0374)−0.0694* (0.0372)
    Lowland terrain0.607*** (0.0951)0.608*** (0.0952)0.607*** (0.0952)
    Sloped terrain−0.0281 (0.111)−0.0250 (0.111)−0.0252 (0.112)
    Household size0.0102 (0.00765)0.0103 (0.00764)0.0102 (0.00757)
    Log of nonagricultural household income−0.00881 (0.00683)−0.00831 (0.00685)−0.00757 (0.00692)
    Log of number of cattle−0.0822*** (0.0305)−0.0807*** (0.0305)−0.0749** (0.0303)
    Constant6.498*** (0.161)6.539*** (0.163)6.535*** (0.163)
    Number of observations4,1584,1584,158
    R-squared0.2790.2790.282
    Mean of perceived tenure insecurity variable0.1950.3130.126
    Implied agricultural productivity loss5.0%5.0%
    • Note: Clustered standard errors in parentheses. Commune-level dummy coefficients omitted.

    • * p < 0.1;

    • ** p < 0.05;

    • *** p < 0.01.