Preference Refinement in Deliberative Choice Experiments for Ecosystem Service Valuation

References

1. ↵
   1. Aanesen Margrethe,
   2. Armstrong Claire,
   3. Czajkowski Mikołaj,
   4. Falk-Petersen Jannike,
   5. Hanley Nick,
   6. Navrud Stale

   . 2015. “Willingness to Pay for Unfamiliar Public Goods: Preserving Cold-water Coral in Norway”. Ecological Economics 112: 53–67.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Adamovicz Wiktor,
   2. Louviere Jordan,
   3. Swait Joffre

   1998. Introduction to Attribute-Based Stated Choice Methods. Final Report submitted to NOAA.
3. ↵
   1. Álvarez-Farizo Begoña,
   2. Hanley Nick

   . 2006. “Improving the Process of Valuing Non-market Benefits: Combining Citizens’ Juries with Choice Modelling”. Land Economics 82 (3): 465–78.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   1. Álvarez-Farizo Begoña,
   2. Hanley Nick,
   3. Barberán Ramón,
   4. Lázaro Angelina

   . 2007. “Choice Modelling at the ‘Market Stall’: Individual versus Collective Interest in Environmental Valuation”. Ecological Economics 60 (4): 743–51.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Amir On,
   2. Levav Jonathan

   . 2008. “Choice Construction versus Preference Construction: The Instability of Preferences Learned in Context”. Journal of Marketing Research 45 (2): 145–58.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Bateman Ian J.,
   2. Burgess Diane,
   3. George Hutchinson W.,
   4. Matthews David I.

   2008. “Learning Design Contingent Valuation (LDCV): NOAA Guidelines, Preferences Learning and Coherent Arbitrariness”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2): 127–41.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Bradley Mark,
   2. Daly Andrew

   . 1994. “Use of the Logit Scaling Approach to Test for Rank-Order and Fatigue Effects in Stated Preference Data”. Transportation 21 (2): 167–84.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Braga Jacinto,
   2. Starmer Chris

   . 2005. “Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis”. Environmental and Resource Economics 32 (1): 55–89.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Brouwer Roy,
   2. Dekker Thijs,
   3. Rolfe John,
   4. Windle Jill

   . 2010. “Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments”. Environmental and Resource Economics 46 (1): 93–109.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Brouwer Roy,
    2. Oosterhuis Frans H.,
    3. Ansink Erik J. H.,
    4. Barton David,
    5. Lienhoop Nele

    . 2011. Guidelines for Estimating Costs and Benefits of Policy Instruments for Biodiversity Conservation. Technical Brief Issue No. 6, The Policymix Project. Available at www.policymix.nina.no/DesktopModules/Bring2mind/DMX/Download.aspx?Command=Core_Download&EntryId=876&language=en-US&PortalId=51&TabId=3736 (accessed June 12, 2015).
11. ↵
    1. Christie Mike,
    2. Hanley Nick,
    3. Warren John,
    4. Murphy Kevin,
    5. Wright Robert,
    6. Hyde Tony

    . 2006. “Valuing the Diversity of Biodiversity”. Ecological Economics 58 (2): 304–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Christie Mike,
    2. Rayment Matt

    . 2012. “An Economic Assessment of the Ecosystem Service Benefits Derived from the SSSI Biodiversity Conservation Policy in England and Wales”. Ecosystem Services 1 (1): 70–84.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Colombo Sergio,
    2. Christie Michael,
    3. Hanley Nick

    . 2013. “What Are the Consequences of Ignoring Attributes in Choice Experiments? Implications for Ecosystem Service Valuation”. Ecological Economics 96: 25–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. Czajkowski Mikołaj,
    2. Hanley Nick,
    3. LaRiviere Jacob

    . 2014. “The Effects of Experience on Preferences: Theory and Empirics for Environmental Public Goods”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97 (1): 333–51.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Dahl Robert A

    . 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. ↵
    1. DeShazo J. R.,
    2. Fermo German

    . 2002. “Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (1): 123–43.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Dietz Thomas,
    2. Stern Paul C.

    1995. “Toward Realistic Models of Individual Choice”. Journal of Socio-Economics 24 (2): 261–79.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Dietz Thomas,
    2. Stern Paul C.,
    3. Dan Amy

    . 2009. “How Deliberation Affects Stated Willingness to Pay for Mitigation of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Experiment”. Land Economics 85 (2): 329–47.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. European Commission

    . 2013. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and Their Services. An Analytical Framework for Ecosystem Assessment under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Technical Report No. 2013-067. Brussels: European Commission.
20. ↵
    1. Fiebig Denzil G.,
    2. Keane Michael P.,
    3. Louviere Jordan,
    4. Wasi Nada

    . 2010. “The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity”. Marketing Science 29 (3): 393–421.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Fishkin James S

    . 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. London: Yale University Press.
22. ↵
    1. Goodin Robert E.,
    2. Dryzek John S.

    2006. “Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics”. Politics and Society 34 (2): 219–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Greene William H.,
    2. Hensher David A.

    2010. “Does Scale Heterogeneity across Individuals Matter? An Empirical Assessment of Alternative Logit Models”. Transportation 37 (3): 413–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Gregory Robin,
    2. Slovic Paul

    . 1997. “A Constructive Approach to Environmental Valuation”. Ecological Economics 21 (3): 175–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Gu Yuanyuan,
    2. Hole Arne Risa,
    3. Knox Stephanie

    . 2013. “Fitting the Generalized Multinomial Logit Model in Stata”. Stata Journal 13 (2): 382–97.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Habermas Jürgen

    . 1984: The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.
27. ↵
    1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Louviere Jordan,
    3. Swait Joffre

    . 1998. “Combining Sources of Preference Data”. Journal of Econometrics 89 (1–2): 197–221.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Rose John M.,
    3. Greene William H.

    ^p 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. ↵
    1. Hole Arne Risa,
    2. Kolstad Julie Riise

    . 2012. “Mixed Logit Estimation of Willingness to Pay Distributions: A Comparison of Models in Preference and WTP Space Using Data from a Health-Related Choice Experiment”. Empirical Economics 42 (2): 445–69.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Holland Alan.

    1997. “The Foundations of Environmental Decision-making”. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 7 (4): 483–96.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Holmes Thomas P.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.

    2005. “Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation Questions”. Land Economics 81 (1): 114–126.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. ↵
    1. Jacobs Michael

    . 1997. “Environmental Valuation, Deliberative Democracy and Public Decision-making Institutions.” In: Valuing Nature? Ethics, Economics and the Environment, ed. Foster John, 211–31. London: Routledge.
33. ↵
    1. Kahneman Daniel,
    2. Slovic Paul,
    3. Tversky Amos

    1982. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. ↵
    1. Kanninen Barbara J.

    , ed. 2007. Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
35. ↵
    1. Kenter Jasper O.,
    2. O’Brien Liz,
    3. Hockley Neal,
    4. Ravenscroft Neil,
    5. Fazey Ioan,
    6. Irvine Katherine N.,
    7. Reed Mark S.,
    8. Cristie Michael,
    9. Brady Emily,
    10. Bryce Rosalind,
    11. et al

    . 2015. “What Are Shared and Social Values of Ecosystems?” Ecological Economics 111: 86–89.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Kenter Jasper O.,
    2. Hyde Tony,
    3. Christie Michael,
    4. Fazey Ioan

    . 2011. “The Importance of Deliberation in Valuing Ecosystem Services in Developing Countries: Evidence from the Solomon Islands”. Global Environmental Change 21 (2): 505–21.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Kenter Jasper O.,
    2. Reed Mark S.,
    3. Irvine Katherine N.,
    4. O’Brien Liz,
    5. Brady Emily,
    6. Bryce Rosalind,
    7. Christie Michael,
    8. Church Andrew,
    9. Cooper Nigel,
    10. Davies Althea,
    11. et al

    . 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on Phase. Work Package Report 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC. Available at www.lwec.org.uk/sharedvalues (accessed June 26, 2015).
38. ↵
    1. Lancaster Kevin J

    . 1991. Modern Consumer Theory. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
39. ↵
    1. LaRiviere Jacob,
    2. Czajkowski Mikołaj,
    3. Hanley Nick,
    4. Aanesen Margrethe,
    5. Falk-Petersen Jannike,
    6. Tinch Dugald

    . 2014. “The Value of Familiarity: Effects of Knowledge and Objective Signals on Willingness to Pay for a Public Good”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 68 (2): 376–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. Lienhoop Nele,
    2. Bartkowski Bartosz,
    3. Hansjürgens Bernd

    2015. “Informing Biodiversity Policy: The Role of Economic Valuation, Deliberative Institutions and Deliberative Monetary Valuation.” Environmental Science and Policy. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.007.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. ↵
    1. Lienhoop Nele,
    2. MacMillan Douglas C.

    2007. “Contingent Valuation: Comparing Participant Performance in Group-Based Approaches and Personal Interviews”. Environmental Values 16 (2): 209–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Lo Alex Y.,
    2. Spash Clive L.

    2012. “Deliberative Monetary Valuation: In Search of a Democratic and Value Plural Approach to Environmental Policy”. Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (4): 768–89.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Loomis John B.

    1989. “Test-retest Reliability of the Contingent Valuation Method: A Comparison of General Population and Visitor Responses”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (1): 76–84.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
44. ↵
    1. Louviere Jordan,
    2. Street Deborah,
    3. Carson Richard,
    4. Ainslie Andrew,
    5. Deshazo J. R.,
    6. Cameron Trudy,
    7. Marley Tony

    . 2002. “Dissecting the Random Component of Utility”. Marketing Letters 13 (3): 177–93.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. MacMillan Douglas,
    2. Hanley Nick,
    3. Lienhoop Nele

    . 2006: “Contingent Valuation: Environmental Polling or Preference Engine?” Ecological Economics 60 (1): 299–307.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. MacMillan Douglas,
    2. Philip Lorna,
    3. Hanley Nick,
    4. Álvarez-Farizo Begoña

    2002. “Valuing the Non-market Benefits of Wild Goose Conservation: A Comparison of Interview and Group Based Approaches”. Ecological Economics 43 (1): 49–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. ↵
    1. McFadden Daniel

    . 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In: Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka Paul, 105–42. New York: Academics.
48. ↵
    1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA)

    . 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: General Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
49. ↵
    1. Naturkaptial: TEEB DE

    . 2012. Der Wert der Natur für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Eine Einführung. Münster, Germany: Landwirtschaftsverlag.
50. ↵
    1. Niemeyer Simon,
    2. Spash Clive L.

    2001. “Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation and Their Pragmatic Synthesis: A Critical Appraisal”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19: 567–85.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. O’Neill John.

    2001. “Representing People, Representing Nature, Representing the World”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19: 483–500.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Pedersen Line B.,
    2. Riise Julie,
    3. Hole Arne Risa,
    4. Gyrd-Hansen Dorte

    . 2014. “GPs’ Shifting Agencies in Choice of Treatment”. Applied Economics 46 (7): 750–61.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Plott Charles R

    . 1996. “Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” In: Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, ed. Arrow Kenneth J., Colombatto Enrico, Perleman Mark, Schmidt Christian, 225–50. London: Macmillan Press.
54. ↵
    1. Raymond Christopher M.,
    2. Kenter Jasper O.,
    3. Plieninger Tobias,
    4. Turner Nanzy J.,
    5. Alexander Karen A.

    2014. “Comparing Instrumental and Deliberative Paradigms Underpinning the Assessment of Social Values for Cultural Ecosystem Services”. Ecological Economics 107: 145–56.

    OpenUrl
55. ↵
    1. Regional Plan West Saxony

    . 2008. Regionalplan Westsachsen 2008. Leipzig: Regionaler Planungsverband Leipzig-Westsachsen. Available at www.rpv-westsachsen.de/regionalplanung/der-regionalplan.html (accessed March 11, 2013).
56. ↵
    1. Robinson Jackie,
    2. Clouston Beth,
    3. Suh Jungho,
    4. Chaloupka Milani

    . 2008. “Are Citizens’ Juries a Useful Tool for Assessing Environmental Value?” Environmental Conservation 35 (4): 351–60.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Sächs WaldG

    (Forest Law Saxony). 2008. Waldgesetz für den Freistaat Sachsen. Vom 10. April 1992, rechtsbereinigt mit Stand vom 1. August 2008. Dresden, Germany: Saxonia Verlag für Recht, Wirtschaft, und Kultur.
58. ↵
    1. Sagoff Mark.

    1998. “Aggregation and Deliberation in Valuing Environmental Public Goods: A Look beyond Contingent Pricing”. Ecological Economics 24 (2–3): 213–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. ↵
    1. Scarpa Riccardo,
    2. Rose John M.

    2008. Design Efficiency for Non-market Valuation with Choice Modeling: How to Measure It, What to Report and Why. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52 (3): 253–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
60. ↵
    1. Scheufele Gabriela,
    2. Bennett Jeff

    . 2012. “Response Strategies and Learning in Discrete Choice Experiments”. Environmental and Resource Economics 52 (3): 435–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
61. ↵
    1. Schkade David A.,
    2. Payne John W.

    1994. “How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (1): 88–109.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
62. ↵
    1. Shapansky Bradford,
    2. Adamowicz Wiktor L.,
    3. Boxall Peter C.

    2008. “Assessing information provision and respondent involvement effects on preferences”. Ecological Economics 65 (3): 626–635.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. SMUL (Ministry for Environment and Agriculture Saxony)

    . 2007. Forstbericht der Sächsischen Staatsregierung. Berichtszeitraum: 1 Januar bis 31 Dezember 2007. Dresden: SMUL.
64. ↵
    1. Söderholm Patrik.

    2001. “The Deliberative Approach in Environmental Valuation”. Journal of Economic Issues 35 (2): 487–95.

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Spash Clive L.

    2007. “Deliberative Monetary Valuation (DMV): Issues in Combining Economic and Political Processes to Value Environmental Change”. Ecological Economics 63 (4): 690–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. ↵
    1. Svedsäter Henrik.

    2003. “Economic Valuation of the Environment: How Citizens Make Sense of Contingent Valuation Questions”. Land Economics 79 (1): 122–35.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
67. ↵
    1. Svedsäter Henrik.

    2007. “Ambivalent Statements in Contingent Valuation Studies: Inclusive Response Formats and Giving Respondents Time to Think”. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 51 (1): 91–107.

    OpenUrl
68. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre,
    2. Louviere Jordan

    . 1993. “The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models”. Journal of Marketing Research 30 (3): 305–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
69. ↵
    1. Szabó Zoltán.

    2011. “Reducing Protest Responses by Deliberative Monetary Valuation: Improving the Validity of Biodiversity Valuation”. Ecological Economics 72: 37–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
70. ↵
    1. TEEB

    . 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Geneva: TEEB.
71. ↵
    1. Teisl Mario F.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.,
    3. McCollum Daniel W.,
    4. Reiling Stephen D.

    1995. “Test-retest of Contingent Valuation with Independent Sample Pretests and Posttest Control Groups”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77 (3): 613–19.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
72. ↵
    1. Torres Arturo B.,
    2. MacMillan Douglas C.,
    3. Skutsch Margaret,
    4. Lovett Jon C.

    2013. “Payments for Ecosystem Services and Rural Development: Landowners’ Preferences and Potential Participation in Western Mexico”. Ecosystem Services 6: 72–81.

    OpenUrl
73. ↵
    1. Train Kenneth

    . 2009: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. ↵
    1. Train Kenneth,
    2. Weeks Melvyn

    . 2005. “Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-pay Space: Applications of Simulation Methods”. Environmental and Resource Economics 6: 1–16.

    OpenUrl
75. ↵
    1. Vatn Arild.

    2009. “An Institutional Analysis of Methods for Environmental Appraisal”. Ecological Economics 68: 2207–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
76. ↵
    1. Völker Marc,
    2. Lienhoop Nele

    . 2016. “Assessing Group Dynamics in Deliberative Choice Experiments”. Ecological Economics 123: 57–67.

    OpenUrl
77. ↵
    1. Wilson Matthew A.,
    2. Howarth Richard B.

    2002. “Discoursed-Based Valuation of Ecosystem Services: Establishing Fair Outcomes through Group Deliberation”. Ecological Economics 41: 431–43.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science