Endogenous Consequentiality in Stated Preference Referendum Data: The Influence of the Randomly Assigned Tax Amount

References

1. ↵
   1. Bulte Erwin,
   2. Gerking Shelby,
   3. List John A.,
   4. de Zeeuw Aart

   2005. “The Effect of Varying the Causes of Environmental Problems on Stated WTP Values: Evidence from a Field Study.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49 (2): 330–42.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Cameron Trudy Ann,
   2. James Michelle D.

   1987. “Efficient Estimation Methods for ‘Closed-Ended’ Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (2): 269–76.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.

   2012. “Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative When Prices Aren’t Available.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 27–42.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Groves Theodore

   . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Groves Theodore

   . 2011. “Incentive and Information Properties of Preference Questions: Commentary and Extensions.” In The International Handbook on Non-market Environmental Valuation, ed. Bennett Jeff. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
6. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Groves Theodore,
   3. List John A.

   2014. “Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1 (1): 171–207.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Hanemann W. Michael,
   3. Kopp Raymond J.,
   4. Krosnick Jon A.,
   5. Mitchell Robert Cameron,
   6. Presser Stanley,
   7. Ruud Paul A.,
   8. Smith V. Kerry,
   9. Conaway Michael,
   10. Martin Kerry

   1998. “Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel’s No-Vote Recommendation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (2): 335–38.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Louviere Jordan J.

   2011. “A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches.” Environmental and Resource Economics 49 (4): 539–59.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Caudill Steven B.,
   2. Groothuis Peter A.

   2005. “Modeling Hidden Alternatives in Random Utility Models: An Application to Don’t Know Responses in Contingent Valuation.” Land Economics 81 (3): 445–54.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. ↵
    1. Cockerill Kristan,
    2. Groothuis Peter A.

    2014. “Last Settler’s Syndrome and Resource Use in Southern Appalachia.” Journal of Rural and Community Development 9 (3): 319–36.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Cummings Ronald G.,
    2. Taylor Laura Osborne

    . 1998. “Does Realism Matter in Contingent Valuation Surveys?” Land Economics 74 (2): 203–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Cunha-e-Sá Maria A.,
    2. Madureira Lívia,
    3. Nunes Luis C.,
    4. Otrachshenko Vladimir

    2012. “Protesting and Justifying: A Latent Class Model for Contingent Valuation with Attitudinal Data.” Environmental and Resource Economics 52 (4): 531–48.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Groothuis Peter A.,
    2. Miller Gail

    . 1997. “The Role of Social Distrust in Risk Benefit Analysis: A Study of the Siting of a Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 15 (3): 240–57.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Groothuis Peter A.,
    2. Whitehead John C.

    2002. “Does Don’t Know Mean No? Analysis of ‘Don’t Know’ Responses in Contingent Valuation Questions.” Applied Economics 34 (15): 1935–40.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Haab Timothy C.,
    2. McConnell Kenneth E.

    2002. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-market Valuation. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
16. ↵
    1. Hausman Jerry.

    2012. “Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 43–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Herriges Joseph,
    2. Kling Catherine,
    3. Liu Chih-Chen,
    4. Tobias Justin

    2010. “What Are the Consequences of Consequentiality?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (1): 67–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Interis Matthew,
    2. Petrolia Daniel

    . 2014. “The Effects of Consequentiality in Binary-and Multinomial-Choice Surveys.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 39 (2): 201–16.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Kling Catherine L.,
    2. Phaneuf Daniel J.,
    3. Zhao Jinhao

    2012. “From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better Than No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 3–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Landry Craig,
    2. List John

    . 2007. “Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (2): 420–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. List John A.,
    2. Gallet Craig A.

    2001. “What Experimental Protocol Influences Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?” Environmental and Resource Economics 20 (3): 241–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Little Joseph,
    2. Berrens Robert

    . 2004. “Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-analysis.” Economics Bulletin 3 (6): 1–13.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Murphy James J.,
    2. Allen P. Geoffrey,
    3. Stevens Thomas H.,
    4. Weatherhead Darryl

    2005. “A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 30 (3): 313–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Sabatier Paul A.,
    2. Focht Will,
    3. Lubell Mark,
    4. Trachtenberg Zev,
    5. Vedlitz Arnold,
    6. Matlock Marty

    2005. Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25. ↵
    1. Vossler Christian A.,
    2. Doyon Maurice,
    3. Rondeau Daniel

    2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economics Journal: Microeconomics 4 (44): 145–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Vossler Christian,
    2. Evans Mary

    . 2009. “Bridging the Gap between the Field and the Lab: Environmental Goods, Policy Maker Input, and Consequentiality.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58 (3): 338–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Vossler Christian,
    2. Poe Gregory

    . 2011. “Consequentiality and Contingent Values: An Emerging Paradigm.” In The International Handbook on Non-market Environmental Valuation, ed. Bennett Jeff, Ch. 7, 122–41. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
28. 1. Vossler Christian A.,
    2. Watson Sharon B.

    2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 86: 137–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Wilde Joachim.

    2000. “Identification of Multiple Equation Probit Models with Endogenous Dummy Regressors.” Economic Letters 69 (3): 309–12.

    OpenUrlCrossRef