Research ArticleArticles

Creating Voluntary Payment Programs: Effective Program Design and Ranchers’ Willingness to Conserve Florida Panther Habitat

Melissa M. Kreye, Elizabeth F. Pienaar, José R. Soto and Damian C. Adams
Land Economics, August 2017, 93 (3) 459-480; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/le.93.3.459

References

  1. ↵
    1. Agarwala Meghna,
    2. Kumar Satish,
    3. Treves Adrian,
    4. Naughton-Treves Lisa
    2010. “Paying for Wolves in Solapur, India, and Wisconsin, USA: Comparing Compensation Rules and Practice to Understand the Goals and Politics of Wolf Conservation.” Biological Conservation 143 (12): 2945–55.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Armstrong J. Scott,
    2. Overton Terry S.
    1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.” Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3): 396–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Auger Pat,
    2. Devinney Timothy M.,
    3. Louviere Jordan J.
    2007. “Using Best–Worst Scaling Methodology to Investigate Consumer Ethical Beliefs across Countries.” Journal of Business Ethics 70 (3): 299–326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Bangs Edward E.,
    2. Fontaine Joseph A.,
    3. Jimenez Michael D.,
    4. Meier Thomas J.,
    5. Bradley Elizabeth H.,
    6. Niemeyer Carter C.,
    7. Smith Douglas W.,
    8. Mack Curt M.,
    9. Asher Val,
    10. Oakleaf John K.
    2005. “Managing Wolf–Human Conflict in the Northwestern United States.” In People and Wildlife, Conflict or Co-existence?, ed. Woodroffe Rosie, Thirgood Simon, Rabinowitz Alan, 340–56. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  5. ↵
    1. Bjerke Tore,
    2. Reitan Ole,
    3. Kellert Stephen R.
    1998. “Attitudes toward Wolves in Southeastern Norway.” Society and Natural Resources 11 (2): 169–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Bowles Samuel,
    2. Polania-Reyes Sandra
    . 2012. “Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements?” Journal of Economic Literature 50 (2): 368–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Breck Stewart W.,
    2. Kluever Bryan M.,
    3. Panasci Michael,
    4. Oakleaf John,
    5. Johnson Terry,
    6. Ballard Warren,
    7. Howery Larry,
    8. Bergman David L.
    2011. “Domestic Calf Mortality and Producer Detection Rates in the Mexican Wolf Recovery Area: Implications for Livestock Management and Carnivore Compensation Schemes.” Biological Conservation 144 (2): 930–36.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Brook Amara,
    2. Zint Michaela,
    3. De Young Raymond
    2003. “Landowners’ Responses to an Endangered Species Act Listing and Implications for Encouraging Conservation.” Conservation Biology 17 (6): 1638–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Brown Gardner M.,
    2. Shogren Jason F.
    1998. “Economics of the Endangered Species Act.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (3): 3–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Campbell Danny,
    2. Erdem Seda
    . 2015. “Position Bias in Best-Worst Scaling Surveys: A Case Study on Trust in Institutions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97 (2): 526–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Coast Joanna,
    2. Salisbury Chris,
    3. Berker David De,
    4. Noble Alison,
    5. Horrocks Sue,
    6. Peters T. J.,
    7. Flynn T. N.
    2006. “Preferences for Aspects of a Dermatology Consultation.” British Journal of Dermatology 155 (2): 387–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Cook Karen S.,
    2. Hardin Russell,
    3. Levi Margaret
    2005. Cooperation without Trust? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  13. ↵
    1. Curtin Richard,
    2. Presser Stanley,
    3. Singer Eleanor
    2000. “The Effects of Response Rate Changes on the Index of Consumer Sentiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (4): 413–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Dan-Cohen Meir.
    1992. “Conceptions of Choice and Conceptions of Autonomy.” Ethics 102 (2): 221–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Davis Emily Jane,
    2. Gwin Lauren,
    3. Moseley Cassandra,
    4. Gosnell Hannah,
    5. Burright Harmony
    2015. “Beer, Beef, and Boards: the Role of Intermediaries in Payment for Ecosystem Services Arrangements in Northwestern Montana.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (9): 1562–76.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Dillman Don A.,
    2. Smyth Jolene D.,
    3. Melani Leah
    2011. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Toronto: Wiley and Sons.
  17. ↵
    1. Dorow Malte,
    2. Beardmore Ben,
    3. Haider Wolfgang,
    4. Arlinghaus Robert
    2009. “Using a Novel Survey Technique to Predict Fisheries Stakeholders’ Support for European Eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) Con servation Programs.” Biological Conservation 142 (12): 2973–82.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Emery Steven B.
    2015. “Independence and Individualism: Conflated Values in Farmer Cooperation?” Agriculture and Human Values 32 (1): 47–61.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Finn Adam,
    2. Louviere Jordan J.
    1992. “Determining the Appropriate Response to Evidence of Public Concern: The Case of Food Safety.” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 11 (2): 12–25.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Florida Panther Recovery Implementation Team
    . 2015. Incentivizing Panther Conservation on Working Lands in the Florida Panther Focus Area. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region. Available at www.fws.gov/verobeach/FloridaPantherRIT/20150218%20Florida%20Panther%20PES%20Pilot%20Program.pdf (accessed November 14, 2016).
  21. ↵
    1. Flynn Terry N.,
    2. Louviere Jordan J.,
    3. Peters Tim J.,
    4. Coast Joanna
    2007. “Best–Worst Scaling: What It Can Do for Health Care Research and How to Do It.” Journal of Health Economics 26 (1): 171–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Flynn Terry N.,
    2. Louviere Jordan J.,
    3. Peters Tim J.,
    4. Coast Joanna
    2008. “Estimating Preferences for a Dermatology Consultation Using Best-Worst Scaling: Comparison of Various Methods of Analysis.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 8 (1): 1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-76.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Gangaas Kristin E.,
    2. Kaltenborn Bjørn P.,
    3. Andreassen Harry P.
    2015. “Environmental Attitudes Associated with Large-Scale Cultural Differences, Not Local Environmental Conflicts.” Environmental Conservation 42 (1): 41–50.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Goodman Steven,
    2. Lockshin Larry,
    3. Cohen Eli
    2005. “Best-Worst Scaling: A Simple Method to Determine Drinks and Wine Style Preferences.” Sonoma State University, School of Business and Economics, Wine Business Program. Presented at the 2nd International Wine Marketing Symposium, Sonoma, California, July 8–9.
  25. ↵
    1. Goyder John.
    1986. “Surveys on Surveys: Limitations and Potentialities.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 27–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Greiner Romy,
    2. Bliemer Michiel,
    3. Ballweg Julie
    2014. “Design Considerations of a Choice Experiment to Estimate Likely Participation by North Australian Pastoralists in Contractual Biodiversity Conservation.” Journal of Choice Modelling 10: 34–45.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Habron Geoffrey.
    2003. “Role of Adaptive Management for Watershed Councils.” Environmental Management 31 (1): 29–41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Hanley Nick,
    2. Banerjee Simanti,
    3. Lennox Gareth D.,
    4. Armsworth Paul R.
    2012. “How Should We Incentivize Private Landowners to ‘Produce’ More Biodiversity?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 28 (1): 93–113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Horne Paula.
    2006. “Forest Owners’ Acceptance of Incentive Based Policy Instruments in Forest Biodiversity Conservation: A Choice Experiment Based Approach.” Silva Fennica 40 (1): 169–78.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Innes Robert.
    2000. “The Economics of Takings and Compensation When Land and Its Public Use Value Are in Private Hands.” Land Economics 76 (2): 195–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Jacobson Michael G.
    2002. “Ecosystem Management in the Southeast United States: Interest of Forest Landowners in Joint Management across Ownerships.” Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 1 (1): 71–92.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Kaltenborn Bjørn P.,
    2. Bjerke Tore,
    3. Vittersø Joar
    1999. “Attitudes toward Large Carnivores among Sheep Farmers, Wildlife Managers, and Research Biologists in Norway.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 4 (3): 57–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Kerr Jeremy T.,
    2. Deguise Isabelle
    . 2004. “Habitat Loss and the Limits to Endangered Species Recovery.” Ecology Letters 7 (12): 1163–69.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Knobloch Frieda,
    2. Cawley R. McGreggor
    . 2005. “Endangered Species Protection and Ways of Life: Beyond Economy and Ecology.” In Species at Risk: Using Economic Incentives to Shelter Endangered Species on Private Lands, ed. Shogren Jason F., 131–46. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  35. ↵
    1. Kreuter Urs P.,
    2. Nair Malini V.,
    3. Jackson-Smith Douglas,
    4. Richard Conner J.,
    5. Johnston Janis E.
    2006. “Property Rights Orientations and Rangeland Management Objectives: Texas, Utah, and Colorado.” Rangeland Ecology and Management 59 (6): 632–39.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Kreye Melissa M.,
    2. Adams Damian C.,
    3. Escobedo Francisco J.
    2014. “The Value of Forest Conservation for Water Quality Protection.” Forests 5 (5): 862–84.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Kreye Melissa M.,
    2. Pienaar Elizabeth F.
    2015. “A Critical Review of Efforts to Protect Florida Panther Habitat on Private Lands.” Land Use Policy 48: 428–36.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Kreye Melissa M.,
    2. Pienaar Elizabeth F.,
    3. Adams Alison E.
    2017. “The Role of Community Identity in Cattlemen Response to Florida Panther Recovery Efforts.” Society and Natural Resources 30(1): 79–94.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Lancaster Kelvin J.
    1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74 (2): 132–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Lancsar Emily,
    2. Louviere Jordan,
    3. Donaldson Cam,
    4. Currie Gillian,
    5. Burgess Leonie
    2013. “Best Worst Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: Methods and an Application.” Social Science and Medicine 76 (1): 74–82.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Langpap Christian.
    2004. “Conservation Incentives Programs for Endangered Species: An Analysis of Landowner Participation.” Land Economics 80 (3): 375–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Langpap Christian.
    2006. “Conservation of Endangered Species: Can Incentives Work for Private Landowners?” Ecological Economics 57 (4): 558–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Langpap Christian,
    2. Wu JunJie
    . 2004. “Voluntary Conservation of Endangered Species: When Does No Regulatory Assurance Mean No Conservation?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (3): 435–57.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Layton David F.,
    2. Siikamäki Juha
    . 2009. “Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs: Predicting Landowner Enrollment and Opportunity Cost Using a Beta-Binomial Model.” Environmental and Resource Economics 44 (3): 415–39.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Lindhjem Henrik,
    2. Mitani Yohei
    . 2012. “Forest Owners’ Willingness to Accept Compensation for Voluntary Conservation: A Contingent Valuation Approach.” Journal of Forest Economics 18 (4): 290–302.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Loureiro Maria L.,
    2. Arcos Fernando Dominguez
    . 2012. “Applying Best–Worst Scaling in a Stated Preference Analysis of Forest Management Programs.” Journal of Forest Economics 18 (4): 381–94.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Louviere Jordan J.,
    2. Flynn Terry N.,
    3. Marley A. A. J.
    2015. Best-Worst Scaling: Theory, Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  48. ↵
    1. Louviere Jordan J.,
    2. Hensher David A.,
    3. Swait Joffre D.
    2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  49. ↵
    1. Louviere Jordan J.,
    2. Islam Towhidul
    . 2008. “A Comparison of Importance Weights and Willingness-to-Pay Measures Derived from Choice-Based Conjoint, Constant Sum Scales and Best–Worst Scaling.” Journal of Business Research 61 (9): 903–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Lusk Jayson L.,
    2. Briggeman Brian C.
    2009. “Food Values.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (1): 184–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Lusk Jayson L.,
    2. Parker Natalie
    . 2009. “Consumer Preferences for Amount and Type of Fat in Ground Beef.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41 (1): 75–90.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Matta Jagannadha R.,
    2. Alavalapati Janaki R. R.,
    3. Evan Mercer D.
    2009. “Incentives for Biodiversity Conservation beyond the Best Management Practices: Are Forestland Owners Interested?” Land Economics 85 (1): 132–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Montag Jessica,
    2. Patterson Michael
    . 2001. Predator Compensation Programs: A State of Knowledge Report. Report submitted to USDA Forest Service. Billings: School of Forestry, University of Montana.
  54. ↵
    1. Moon Katie,
    2. Marshall Nadine,
    3. Cocklin Chris
    2012. “Personal Circumstances and Social Characteristics as Determinants of Landholder Participation in Biodiversity Conservation Programs.” Journal of Environmental Management 113: 292–300.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Moore Danna L.,
    2. Tarnai John
    . 2002. “Evaluating Nonresponse Error in Mail Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, ed. Groves Robert M., Dillman Don A., Eltinge John L., Little Roderick J. A., 197–211. Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.
  56. ↵
    1. National Association of Homebuilders
    . 1996. Developer’s Guide to Endangered Species Regulation. Washington, DC: Home Builder Press.
  57. ↵
    1. Naughton-Treves Lisa,
    2. Grossberg Rebecca,
    3. Treves Adrian
    2003. “Paying for Tolerance: Rural Citizens’ Attitudes toward Wolf Depredation and Compensation.” Conservation Biology 17 (6): 1500–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. Nie Martin A.
    2001. “The Sociopolitical Dimensions of Wolf Management and Restoration in the United States.” Human Ecology Review 8 (1): 1–12.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Pienaar Elizabeth F.,
    2. Kreye Melissa M.,
    3. Jacobs Caitlin
    2015. “Conflicts between Cattlemen and the Florida Panther: Insights and Policy Recommendations from Interviews with Florida Cattlemen.” Human Ecology 43 (4): 577–88.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Polasky Stephen.
    2008. “Investment, Information Collection and Endangered Species Conservation on Private Land.” In Protecting Endangered Species in the United States: Biological Needs, Political Realities, Economic Choices, ed. Shogren Jason F., Tschirhart John, 312–25. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  61. ↵
    1. Potoglou Dimitris,
    2. Burge Peter,
    3. Flynn Terry,
    4. Netten Ann,
    5. Malley Juliette,
    6. Forder Julien,
    7. Brazier John E.
    2011. “Best–Worst Scaling vs. Discrete Choice Experiments: An Empirical Comparison Using Social Care Data.” Social Science and Medicine 72 (10): 1717–27.
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. Pretty Jules,
    2. Smith David
    . 2004. “Social Capital in Biodiversity Conservation and Management.” Conservation Biology 18 (3): 631–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    1. Raymond Leigh.
    2006. “Cooperation without Trust: Overcoming Collective Action Barriers to Endangered Species Protection.” Policy Studies Journal 34 (1): 37–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    1. Rosas-Rosas Octavio C.,
    2. Bender Louis C.,
    3. Valdez Raul
    2008. “Jaguar and Puma Predation on Cattle Calves in Northeastern Sonora, Mexico.” Rangeland Ecology and Management 61 (5): 554–60.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Rudd Murray A.,
    2. Fleishman Erica
    . 2014. “Policymakers’ and Scientists’ Ranks of Research Priorities for Resource-Management Policy.” BioScience doi: 10.1093/biosci/bit035.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. ↵
    1. Ruhl J. B.
    1999. “How to Kill Endangered Species, Legally: The Nuts and Bolts of Endangered Spe cies Act ‘HCP’ Permits for Real Estate Development.” Environmental Lawyer 5 (2): 345–405.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Scarpa Riccardo,
    2. Notaro Sandra,
    3. Louviere Jordan,
    4. Raffaelli Roberta
    2011. “Exploring Scale Effects of Best-Worst Rank Ordered Choice Data to Estimate Benefits of Tourism in Alpine Grazing Commons.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93 (3): 809–24.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Severin Franziska,
    2. Schmidtke Jörg,
    3. Mühlbacher Axel,
    4. Rogowski Wolf H.
    2013. “Eliciting Preferences for Priority Setting in Genetic Testing: A Pilot Study Comparing Best-Worst Scaling and Discrete-Choice Experiments.” European Journal of Human Genetics 21 (11): 1202–8.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Shogren Jason F.,
    2. Tschirhart John,
    3. Anderson Terry,
    4. Ando Amy Whritenour,
    5. Beissinger Steven R.,
    6. Brookshire David,
    7. Brown Gardner M. Jr.,
    8. Coursey Don,
    9. Innes Robert,
    10. Meyer Stephen M.,
    11. Polasky Stephan
    1999. “Why Economics Matters for Endangered Species Protection.” Conservation Biology 13 (6): 1257–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  70. ↵
    1. Singer Eleanor,
    2. Hoewyk John Van,
    3. Maher Mary P.
    2000. “Experiments with Incentives in Telephone Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (2): 171–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    1. Smith Rodney B. W.,
    2. Shogren Jason F.
    2002. “Voluntary Incentive Design for Endangered Species Protection.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43 (2): 169–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  72. ↵
    1. Sorice Michael G.,
    2. Haider Wolfgang,
    3. Richard Conner J.,
    4. Ditton Robert B.
    2011. “Incentive Structure of and Private Landowner Participation in an Endangered Species Conservation Program.” Conservation Biology 25 (3): 587–96.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Sorice Michael G.,
    2. Oh Chi-Ok,
    3. Gartner Todd,
    4. Snieckus Mary,
    5. Johnson Rhett,
    6. Josh Donlan C.
    2013. “Increasing Participation in Incentive Programs for Biodiversity Conservation.” Ecological Applications 23 (5): 1146–55.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Soto José R.,
    2. Adams Damian C.,
    3. Escobedo Francisco J.
    2016. “Landowner Attitudes and Willingness to Accept Compensation from Forest Carbon Offsets: Application of Best–Worst Choice Modeling in Florida USA.” Forest Policy and Economics 63: 35–42.
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Stainback G. Andrew,
    2. Alavalapati Janaki RR
    . 2002. “Economic Analysis of Slash Pine Forest Carbon Sequestration in the Southern US.” Journal of Forest Economics 8 (2): 105–17.
    OpenUrl
  76. ↵
    1. Street Deborah J.,
    2. Burgess Leonie,
    3. Louviere Jordan J.
    2005. “Quick and Easy Choice Sets: Constructing Optimal and Nearly Optimal Stated Choice Experiments.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 22 (4): 459–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. ↵
    1. Thornton Clarisse,
    2. Quinn Michael S.
    2009. “Coexisting with Cougars: Public Perceptions, Attitudes, and Awareness of Cougars on the Urban-Rural Fringe of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.” Human–Wildlife Conflicts 3 (2): 282–95.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Train Kenneth E.
    2002. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  79. ↵
    1. Tyler Tom R.
    2003. “Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law.” Crime and Justice 30: 283–357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  80. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
    . 2014. 2012 Census of Agriculture: Florida State and County Data. Washington, DC: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Available at www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Florida/flv1.pdf (accessed November 14, 2016).
  81. ↵
    1. Whitty Jennifer A.,
    2. Ratcliffe Julie,
    3. Chen Gang,
    4. Scuffham Paul A.
    2014. “Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.” Medical Decision Making 34 (5): 638–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Wilcove David S.,
    2. Lee Joon
    . 2004. “Using Economic and Regulatory Incentives to Restore Endangered Species: Lessons Learned from Three New Programs.” Conservation Biology 18 (3): 639–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  83. ↵
    1. Wilcove David S.,
    2. Rothstein David,
    3. Dubow Jason,
    4. Phillips Ali,
    5. Losos Elizabeth
    1998. “Quantifying Threats to Imperiled Species in the United States.” BioScience 48 (8): 607–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Creating Voluntary Payment Programs: Effective Program Design and Ranchers’ Willingness to Conserve Florida Panther Habitat
Melissa M. Kreye, Elizabeth F. Pienaar, José R. Soto, Damian C. Adams
Land Economics Aug 2017, 93 (3) 459-480; DOI: 10.3368/le.93.3.459
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section