Additionality in U.S. Agricultural Conservation Programs

References

1. ↵
   1. Black Dan A.,
   2. Smith Jeffrey A

   . 2004. “How Robust Is the Evidence on the Effects of College Quality? Evidence from Matching.” Journal of Econometrics 121 (1–2): 99–124

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Baumgart-Getz Adam,
   2. Prokopy Linda S.,
   3. Floress Kristin

   2012. “Why Farmers Adopt Best Management Practice in the United States: A Meta-analysis of the Adoption Literature.” Journal of Environmental Management 96 (1): 17–25.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Caliendo Marco,
   2. Kopeinig Sabine

   . 2008. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (1): 31–72.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Chabé-Ferret Sulvain,
   2. Subervie Julie

   . 2013. “How Much Green for the Buck? Estimating Additional and Windfall Effects of French Agro-environmental Schemes by DID-Matching.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65 (1): 12–27.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Chouinard Hayley H.,
   2. Paterson Tobias,
   3. Wandschneider Phillip R.,
   4. Ohler Adrienne M

   . 2008. “Will Farmers Trade Profits for Stewardship? Heterogeneous Motivations for Farm Practice Selection.” Land Economics 84 (1): 66–82.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Claassen Roger,
   2. Horowitz John,
   3. Duquette Eric,
   4. Udea Kohei

   2014. Additionality in U.S. Agricultural Conservation and Regulatory Offset Programs. Economic Research Report, ERR-170. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
7. ↵
   1. Dehejia Rajeev H

   . 2005a. “Does Matching Overcome Lalonde’s Critique of Non-experimental Estimators? A Postscript.” Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University and National Bureau of Economic Research.
8. ↵
   1. Dehejia Rajeev H

   . 2005b. “Practical Propensity Score Matching: A Reply to Smith and Todd.” Journal of Econometrics 125 (1–2): 355–64

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Dobos R. R.,
   2. Sinclair H. R. Jr.,
   3. Robotham M. P

   . 2012. NCCPI User Guide for the National Commodity Crop Productivity Index (NCCPI), Version 2.0. National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
10. ↵
    1. Ervin Christine A.,
    2. Ervin David E

    . 1982. “Factors Affecting the Use of Soil Conservation Practices: Hypotheses, Evidence, and Policy Implications.” Land Economics 58 (3): 277–92.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Featherstone Allen M.,
    2. Goodwin Barry K

    . 1993. “Factors Influencing a Farmer’s Decision to Invest in Long-Term Conservation Improvements.” Land Economics 69 (1): 67–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Fitzenberger Bernd,
    2. Lechner Michael,
    3. Smith Jeffrey

    2013. “Estimation of Treatment Effects: Recent Developments and Applications.” Empirical Economics 44 (1): 1–11.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Firth David

    . 1993. “Bias Reduction of Maximum Likelihood Estimates.” Biometrika 80 (1): 27–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Fuglie Keith O.,
    2. Kascak Catherine A

    . 2001. “Adoption and Diffusion of Natural-Resource-Conserving Agricultural Technology.” Review of Agricultural Economics 23 (3): 386–403.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Galdo Jose C.,
    2. Smith Jeffrey,
    3. Black Dan

    2008. “Bandwidth Selection and the Estimation of Treatment Effects with Unbalanced Data.” Annales d’Economie et Statistique 91–92: 189–216.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Genskow K. D

    . 2012. “Taking Stock of Voluntary Nutrient Management: Measuring and Tracking Change.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 67 (1): 51–58.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    1. Heckman James J.,
    2. Ichimura Hidehiko,
    3. Todd Petra E

    . 1997. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme.” Review of Economic Studies 64 (4): 605–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Heckman James J.,
    2. Ichimura Hidehiko,
    3. Todd Petra E

    . 1998. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator.” Review of Economic Studies 65 (2): 261–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Heinze Georg,
    2. Schemper Michael

    . 2002. “A Solution to the Problem of Separation in Logistic Regression.” Statistics in Medicine 21 (16): 2409–19.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Imbens Guido W

    . 2004. “Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects under Exogeneity: A Review.” Review of Econometrics and Statistics 86 (1): 4–29.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Jeffreys Harold

    . 1946. “An Invariant Form for the Prior Probability in Estimation Problems.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 186 (1007): 453–61.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Lambert Dayton,
    2. Sullivan Patrick,
    3. Claassen Roger,
    4. Foreman Linda

    2006. Conservation Compatible Practices and Programs: Who Participates? Economic Research Report ERR-14. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
23. ↵
    1. Lee Wang-Sheng

    . 2013. “Propensity Score Matching and Variations on the Balancing Test.” Empirical Economics 44 (1): 47–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Liu Xiangping,
    2. Lynch Lori

    . 2011. “Do Agricultural Land Preservation Programs Reduce Farmland Loss? Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator.” Land Economics 87 (2): 183–201.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    1. Lynch Lori,
    2. Gray Wayne,
    3. Geoghegan Jacqueline

    2007. “Are Farmland Preservation Program Easement Restrictions Capitalized into Farmland Prices? What Can a Propensity Score Matching Analysis Tell Us?” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 29 (3): 502–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. McCann Laura M. J

    . 2009. “Transaction Costs of Environmental Policies and Returns to Scale: The Case of Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans.” Review of Agricultural Economics 31 (3): 561–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Mezzatesta Mariano,
    2. Newburn David A.,
    3. Woodward Richard T

    . 2013. “Additionality and the Adoption of Farm Conservation Practices.” Land Economics 89 (4): 722–42.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    1. Prokopy Linda S.,
    2. Floress Kristin,
    3. Klotthor-Weinkauf Denise,
    4. Baumgart-Getz Adam

    2008. “Determinants of Agricultural Best Management Practice Adoption: Evidence from the Literature.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63 (5): 300–11.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    1. Pufahl Andrea,
    2. Weiss Christoph R

    . 2009. “Evaluating the Effects of Farm Programmes: Results from Propensity Score Matching.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 36 (1): 79–101.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Ribaudo Marc,
    2. Gollehon Noel,
    3. Aillery Marcel,
    4. Kaplan Jonathan,
    5. Johansson Robert,
    6. Agapoff Jean,
    7. Christensen Lee,
    8. Breneman Vince,
    9. Peters Mark

    2003. Manure Management for Water Quality: Costs to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Land. Agricultural Economic Report AER-824. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
31. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum Paul R.,
    2. Rubin Donald B

    . 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum Paul R.,
    2. Rubin Donald B

    . 1985. “Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score.” American Statistician 39 (1): 33–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Smith Katherine,
    2. Weinberg Marca

    . 2004. “Measuring the Success of Conservation Programs.” Amber Waves 2 (4): 14–21.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Smith Jeffrey A.,
    2. Todd Petra E

    . 2005a. “Does Matching Overcome Lalonde’s Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators.” Journal of Econometrics 125 (1–2): 305–53

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. ↵
    1. Smith Jeffrey A.,
    2. Todd Petra E

    . 2005b. “Rejoinder.” Journal of Econometrics 125 (1–2): 365–75

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Soule Meredith J.,
    2. Tegene Abebayehu,
    3. Wiebe Keith D

    . 2000. “Land Tenure and the Adoption of Conservation Practices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (4): 993–1005.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Tjur Tue

    . 2009. “Coefficients of Determination in Logistic Regression Models—A New Proposal: The Coefficient of Discrimination.” American Statistician 63 (4): 366–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Traoré Namatié,
    2. Landry Réjean,
    3. Amara Nabil

    1998. “On-Farm Adoption of Conservation Practices: The Role of Farm and Farmer Characteristics, Perceptions, and Health Hazards.” Land Economics 74 (1): 114–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Traoré Namatié,
    2. Landry Réjean,
    3. Amara Nabil

    . 2009–2012. Agricultural Resource and Management Survey (ARMS), Farm Financial and Crop Production Practices Data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ (accessed April 7, 2017)
40. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS)

    . 2000. Farm Resource Regions. Agricultural Information Bulletin 760, September. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture
41. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS)

    . 2016. Ag and Food Statistics: Charting the Essentials. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/land-and-natural-resources.aspx (accessed April 7, 2017)
42. ↵
    1. Wooldridge Jeffrey M

    . 2009. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning
43. ↵
    1. Wu JunJie,
    2. Babcock Bruce A

    . 1998. “The Choice of Tillage, Rotation, and Soil Testing Practices: Economic and Environmental Implications.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (3): 494–511.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Zhao Zhong

    . 2008. “Sensitivity of Propensity Score Methods to the Specifications.” Economic Letters 98 (3): 309–19.

    OpenUrl