Abstract
Agricultural conservation programs aim to improve environmental quality by using payments to support voluntary adoption of environmentally sound practices. Supported practices, however, yield additional environmental gain only if they would not have been adopted without payment. We estimate additionality for selected practices using propensity score matching to analyze data from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS). We find that greater than 95% of off-field structural practices (filter strips, riparian buffers) supported by payments are additional but that less than 50% of conservation tillage payments yield additional adoption. The effect of nutrient management payments varies across nutrient management practices and crops. (JEL Q28, Q52)
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Log in using your username and password
Purchase access
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Urbanizing Agriculture, Additionality, and the Adoption of Agricultural Conservation Practices
- Enrollment Restrictions and Conservation Practice Adoptions by Midwestern Farmers: Survey Evidence from Iowa
- The Nutrient Reduction Index: A minimalist and continuous measure of conservation practice adoption among farmers
- Effective Targeting and Additionality: Evaluating the D.L. 701 Reforms for Afforesting Erodible Land in Southern Chile
- Economic dimensions of soil health practices that sequester carbon: Promising research directions
- Additionality in Payment for Ecosystem Services Programs: Agricultural Conservation Subsidies in Maryland