Has Forest Certification Reduced Forest Degradation in Sweden?

References

1. ↵
   1. Abadie Alberto,
   2. Imbens Guido W.

   2006. “Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 74 (1): 235–67.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Abadie Alberto,
   2. Imbens Guido W.

   2011. “Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 29 (1): 1–11.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Becker Sascha O.,
   2. Caliendo Marco

   . 2007. “Mhbounds: Sensitivity Analysis for Average Treatment Effects.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 2542. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
4. ↵
   1. Blackman Allen,
   2. Goff Leonard,
   3. Rivera Planter Marisol

   2015. “Does Eco-certification Stem Tropical Deforestation? Forest Stewardship Council Certification in Mexico.” RFF Discussion Paper 15–36. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
5. ↵
   1. Blackman Allen,
   2. Rivera Jorge

   . 2011. “Producer-Level Benefits of Sustainability Certification.” Conservation Biology 25 (6): 1176–85.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Bütler R.,
   2. Angelstam P.,
   3. Ekelund P.,
   4. Schlaepfer R

   . 2004. “Dead Wood Threshold Values for the Three-Toed Woodpecker Presence in Boreal and Sub-alpine Forest.” Biological Conservation 119 (3): 305–18.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Caliendo Marco,
   2. Kopeinig Sabine

   . 2008. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (1): 31–72.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Chaplin-Kramer Rebecca,
   2. Ramler Ivan,
   3. Sharp Richard,
   4. Haddad Nick M.,
   5. Gerber James S.,
   6. West Paul C.,
   7. Mandle Lisa,
   8. Engstrom Peder,
   9. Baccini Alessandro,
   10. Sim Sarah,
   11. et al.

   2015. “Degradation in Carbon Stocks Near Tropical Forest Edges.” Nature Communications 6: 10158.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. European Commission

   . 2011. Buying Green! A Handbook on Green Public Procurement, 2nd ed. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/handbook.pdf (accessed October 7, 2015).
10. ↵
    1. Folke Carl,
    2. Carpenter Steve,
    3. Walker Brian,
    4. Scheffer Marten,
    5. Elmqvist Thomas,
    6. Gunderson Lance,
    7. Holling C. S.

    2004. “Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 557–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    . 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: How Are the World’s Forests Changing? Rome: FAO. Available at www.uncclearn.org/sites/default/files/inventory/a-i4793e.pdf.
12. ↵
    1. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)

    . 2009. FSC Standard for Group Entities in Forest Management Groups. Bonn, Germany: FSC. Available at https://se.fsc.org/preview.fsc-std-30-005-fm-group.a-605.pdf (accessed October 5, 2015).
13. ↵
    1. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)

    . 2010. Swedish FSC Standard for Forest Certification Including SLIMF Indicators. Bonn, Germany: FSC. Available at ic.fsc.org/download.fsc-std-swe-02-02-2010-en.1703.htm (accessed February 6, 2016).
14. ↵
    1. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)

    . 2013. Din skog syns bättre om den märks. Bonn, Germany: FSC. Available at https://se.fsc.org/preview.din-skog-syns-baettre-om-den-maerks-information-till-mindre-markaegare.a-682.pdf (accessed October 5, 2015).
15. ↵
    1. Gauthier S.,
    2. Bernier P.,
    3. Kuuluvainen T.,
    4. Shvidenko A.,
    5. Schepaschenko D

    . 2015. “Boreal Forest Health and Global Change.” Science 349 (6250): 819–22.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Haddad Nick M.,
    2. Brudvig Lars. A.,
    3. Clobert Jean,
    4. Davies Kendi F.,
    5. Gonzalez Andrew,
    6. Holt Robert D.,
    7. Lovejoy Thomas E.,
    8. Sexton Joseph O.,
    9. Austin Mike P.,
    10. Collins Cathy D.,
    11. et al.

    2015. “Habitat Fragmentation and Its Lasting Impact on Earth’s Ecosystems.” Science Advances 1 (2): e1500052.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
17. ↵
    1. Heckman James J

    . 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47 (1): 153–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Heilmayr Robert,
    2. Lambin Eric F.

    2016. “Impacts of Nonstate, Market-Driven Governance on Chilean Forests.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A 113 (11): 2910–15.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. Hirschberger Peter

    . 2005. The Effects of FSC-Certification in Sweden: An Analysis of Corrective Action Requests. WWF European Forest Programme. Gland, Switzerland: WWF.
20. ↵
    1. Imbens Guido W

    . 2015. “Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples.” Journal of Human Resources 50 (2): 373–419.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Imbens Guido W.,
    2. Rubin Donald B.

    2007. Causal Inference: Statistical Methods for Estimating Causal Effects in Biomedical, Social, and Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. ↵
    1. Johansson Johanna,
    2. Lidestav Gun

    . 2011. “Can Voluntary Standards Regulate Forestry? Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Forest Certification in Sweden.” Forest Policy and Economics 13 (3): 191–98.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Johansson Therese,
    2. Hjältén Joakim,
    3. de Jong Johnny,
    4. von Stedingk Henrik

    2013. “Environmental Considerations from Legislation and Certification in Managed Forest Stands: A Review of Their Importance for Biodiversity.” Forest Ecology and Management 303: 98–112.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Miteva Daniela A.,
    2. Loucks Colby J.,
    3. Pattanayak Subhrendu K.

    2015. “Social and Environmental Impacts of Forest Management Certification in Indonesia.” PLOS One 10 (7): e0129675.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. ↵
    1. Nordlind E.,
    2. Östlund L.

    2003. “Retrospective Comparative Analysis as a Tool for Ecological Restoration: A Case Study in a Swedish Boreal Forest.” Forestry 76 (2): 243–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. Panlasigui Stephanie,
    2. Rico-Straffon Jimena,
    3. Swenson Jennifer,
    4. Loucks Colby J.,
    5. Pfaff Alexander

    2015. “Early Days in the Certification of Logging Concessions: Estimating FSC’s Deforestation Impact in Peru and Cameroon.” Duke Environmental and Energy Economics Working Paper EE 15-05. Durham, NC: Duke University.
27. ↵
    1. Prosilva Skogscertifiering AB

    . 2015. Kostnader. Uppsala, Sweden: Prosilva Skogscertifiering AB. Available at http://skogscertifiering.se/valkommen-skogsagare/kostnader/ (accessed October 5, 2015).
28. ↵
    1. Rametsteiner Ewald,
    2. Simula Markku

    . 2003. “Forest Certification: An Instrument to Promote Sustainable Forest Management?” Journal of Environmental Management 67 (1): 87–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Ranius Thomas,
    2. Fahrig Lenore

    . 2006. “Targets for Maintenance of Dead Wood for Biodiversity Conservation Based on Extinction Thresholds.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 21 (3): 201–8.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Romero Claudia,
    2. Putz Francis E.,
    3. Guariguata Manuel R.,
    4. Sills Erin O.,
    5. Cerutti Paolo O.,
    6. Lescuyer Guillaume

    2013. An Overview of Current Knowledge about the Impacts of Forest Management Certification: A Proposed Framework for Its Evaluation, Vol. 99. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
31. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum Paul R

    . 2002. “Observational Studies.” In Observational Studies, 2nd ed., 1–17. NewYork: Springer-Verlag.
32. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum Paul R.,
    2. Rubin Donald B.

    1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry (RSAAF)

    . 2015. Forests and Forestry in Sweden. Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry.
34. ↵
    1. Söderström Bo

    . 2009. “Effects of Different Levels of Green- and Dead-Tree Retention on Hemi-boreal Forest Bird Communities in Sweden.” Forest Ecology and Management 257 (1): 215–22.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Swedish Forest Agency

    . 2010. Miljöhänsyn vid föryngringsavverkning: Resultat från Skogs-styrelsens rikspolytaxinventering (R0/R1), avverkningssäsongerna 1998/1999–2006/2009. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
36. ↵
    1. Swedish Forest Agency

    . 2014. Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
37. ↵
    1. Thompson Ian D.,
    2. Guariguata Manuel R.,
    3. Okabe Kimiko,
    4. Bahamondez Carlos,
    5. Nasi Robert,
    6. Heymell Victoria,
    7. Sabogal Cesar

    2013. “An Operational Framework for Defining and Monitoring Forest Degradation.” Ecology and Society 18 (2): 20.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Timonen Jonna,
    2. Gustafsson Lena,
    3. Kotiaho Janne S.,
    4. Mönkkönen Mikko

    . 2011. “Hotspots in Cold Climate: Conservation Value of Woodland Key Habitats in Boreal Forests.” Biological Conservation 144 (8): 2061–67.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (UNECE/FAO)

    . 2012. Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2011–2012. New York: UNECE/FAO. Available at www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/publications/FPAMR_2012.pdf.
40. ↵
    1. Van der Werf G. R.,
    2. Morton D. C.,
    3. DeFries R. S.,
    4. Olivier J.G.J.,
    5. Kasibhatla P. S.,
    6. Jackson R. B.,
    7. Collatz G. J.,
    8. Randerson J. T.

    2009. “CO₂ Emissions from Forest Loss.” Nature Geoscience 2 (11): 737–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. ↵
    1. Vincent Jeffrey R

    . 2016. “Impact Evaluation of Forest Conservation Programs: Benefit-Cost Analysis, without the Economics.” Environmental and Resource Economics 63 (2): 395–408.

    OpenUrl
42. 1. White Halbert

    . 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48 (4): 817–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. Wikberg Sofie,
    2. Perhans Karin,
    3. Kindstrand Claes,
    4. Djupström Line Boberg,
    5. Boman Mattias,
    6. Mattsson Leif,
    7. Schoeder Leif Martin,
    8. Weslien Jan,
    9. Gustafsson Lena

    2009. “Cost-effectiveness of Conservation Strategies Implemented in Boreal Forests: The Area Selection Process.” Biological Conservation 142 (3): 614–24.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Wooldridge Jeffrey M

    . 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.