Who Can Be Trusted to Manage the Fish? A Study Comparing Trust between Stakeholders

References

1. ↵
   1. Alpizar Francisco,
   2. Carlsson Fredrik,
   3. Martinsson Peter

   . 2003. “Using Choice Experiments for Non-market Valuation.” Economic Issues 8 (1): 83–110.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Barber Brad M.,
   2. Odean Terrance

   . 2001. “Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1): 261–92.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bengtsson Claes,
   2. Persson Mats,
   3. Willenhag Peter

   . 2005. “Gender and Overconfidence.” Economic Letters 86 (2): 199–203.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Benoît Jean-Pierre,
   2. Dubra Juan

   . 2011. ”Apparent Overconfidence.” Econometrica 79 (5): 1591–25.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Benoît Jean-Pierre,
   2. Dubra Juan,
   3. Moore Don A.

   2015. “Does the Better-Than-Average Effect Show That People Are Overconfident? Two Experiments.” Journal of the European Economic Association 13 (2): 293–29.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Beyer Sylvia,
   2. Bowden Edward M.

   1997. “Gender Differences in Self-Perceptions: Convergent Evidence from Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (2): 157–72.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Bruine de Bruin Wändi,
   2. Parker Andrew M.,
   3. Fischhoff Baruch

   . 2012. “Explaining Adult Age Differences in Decision-Making Competence.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 25 (4): 352–60.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Carlsson Fredrik,
   2. Kataria Mitesh,
   3. Lampi Elina

   . 2011. ”Do EPA Administrators Recommend Environmental Policies That Citizens Want?” Land Economics 87 (1): 60–74.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   1. Christy Francis T

   . 1996. “The Death Rattle of Open Access and the Advent of Property Rights Regimes in Fisheries.” Marine Resource Economics 11 (4): 287–304.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. De Vos Birgit I.,
    2. van Tatenhove Jan P. M.

    2011. “Trust Relationships between Fishers and Government: New Challenges for the Co-management Arrangements in the Dutch Flatfish Industry.” Marine Policy 35 (2): 218–25.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Dunning David,
    2. Johnson Kerri,
    3. Ehrlinger Joyce,
    4. Kruger Justin

    . 2003. “Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 12 (3): 83–87.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Eggert Håkan,
    2. Kataria Mitesh,
    3. Lampi Elina

    . 2016. “Difference in Preferences or in Preference Orderings? Comparing Choices of EPA Bureaucrats, Recreational Anglers, and the Public.” EfD Discussion Paper 16–20. Gothenburg, Sweden: Environment for Development.
13. ↵
    1. Folke Carl,
    2. Hahn Thomas,
    3. Olsson Per,
    4. Norberg Jon

    . 2005. ”Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (1): 441–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Gilmour Patrick W.,
    2. Dwyer Peter D.,
    3. Day Robert W.

    2011. “Beyond Individual Quotas: The Role of Trust and Cooperation in Promoting Stewardship of Five Australian Abalone Fisheries.” Marine Policy 35 (5): 692–702.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Glenn Helen,
    2. Tingley Diana,
    3. Marono Sonia Sánchez,
    4. Holm Dennis,
    5. Kell Laurence,
    6. Padda Gurpreet,
    7. Edvardsson Ingi Runar,
    8. Asmundsson Johann,
    9. Conides Alexis,
    10. Kapiris Kostas,
    11. et al

    . 2012. “Trust in the Fisheries Scientific Community.” Marine Policy 36 (1): 54–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Grafton R. Quentin

    . 2005. “Social Capital and Fisheries Governance.” Ocean and Coastal Management 48 (9–10): 753–66.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Patrik Hansson,
    2. Rönnlund Michael,
    3. Juslin Peter,
    4. Nilsson Lars-Göran

    . 2008. “Adult Age Differences in the Realism of Confidence Judgments: Overconfidence, Format Dependence, and Cognitive Predictors.” Psychology and Aging 23 (3): 531–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    1. Hausman Jerry

    . 2012. “Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 43–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. ICES

    . 2010. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee. ICES Advice 2010, Book 8. Copenhagen: ICES.
20. ↵
    1. Jagers Sverker C.,
    2. Berlin Daniel,
    3. Jentoft Svein

    . 2012. “Why Comply? Attitudes towards Harvest Regulations among Swedish Fishers.” Marine Policy 36 (5): 969–76.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Jentoft Svein

    . 1989. “Fisheries Co-management: Delegating Government Responsibility to Fishermen´s Organizations.” Marine Policy 13 (2): 137–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Jonker Cathalijn M.,
    2. Treur Jan

    . 1999. “Formal Analysis of Models for the Dynamics of Trust Based on Experiences.” In European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-agent World, ed. Garijo Francisco J., Boman Magnus, 221–23. Berlin: Springer.
23. ↵
    1. Kling Catherine L.,
    2. Phaneuf Daniel J.,
    3. Zhao Jinhua

    . 2012. “From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better Than No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 3–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Kontoleon Andreas,
    2. Macrory Richard,
    3. Swanson Timothy

    . 2001. “Individual Preferences, Expert Opinions and Environmental Decision Making: An Overview of the Issues.” Paper presented at the Symposium on Law and Economics of Environmental Policy, University College London, September 6–7.
25. ↵
    1. Kruger Justin,
    2. Dunning David

    . 1999. “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Louviere Jordan J.,
    2. Hensher David A.,
    3. Swait Joffre D.

    2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. ↵
    1. Metlay Daniel

    . 1999. “Institutional Trust and Confidence: A Journey into a Conceptual Quagmire.” In Social Trust and the Management, ed. Cvetkovich George, Löfstedt Rägner, 100–16. London: Earthscan.
28. ↵
    1. Moore Dan A.,
    2. Healy Paul J.

    2008. “The Trouble with Overconfidence.” Psychological Review 115 (2): 502–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Pálsson Gìsli

    . 1995. “Learning by Fishing: Practical Science and Scientific Practice.” In Property Rights in a Social and Ecological Context; Case Studies and Design Principles, ed. Hanna Susan, Munasinghe Mohan, 85–98. Washington, DC: Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics and the World Bank.
30. ↵
    1. Pliske Rebecca M.,
    2. Mutter Sharon A.

    1996. “Age Differences in the Accuracy of Confidence Judgments.” Experimental Aging Research 22 (2): 199–216.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. ↵
    1. Raakjaer Nielsen Jesper,
    2. Mathiesen Christoph

    . 2003. “Important Factors Influencing Rule Compliance in Fisheries Lessons from Denmark.” Marine Policy 27 (5): 409–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Rova Carl

    . 2004. “The Importance of Trust and Legitimacy in the Management of Common Pool Resources (CPR): Lessons Learned from Implementation of a Fishery Co-management System in a Complex Society.” Working Paper in Political Science. Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology.
33. ↵
    1. Scott Anthony D

    . 1989. “Conceptual Origins of Rights Based Fishing.” In Rights Based Fishing, ed. Neher Philip A., Arnason Ragnar, Mollett Nina, 1–38. Boston: Kluwer.
34. ↵
    1. Statistics Sweden

    . 2016a. Population 1 November by Region, Age and Sex. Year 2002–2016. Available at www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/en/ssd/START__BE__BE0101__BE0101A/FolkmangdNov/?rxid=2d019cd9-551b-4095-be5b-519a3d69ff28 (accessed November 9, 2017).
35. 1. Statistics Sweden

    . 2016b. Table 4e: The Population 16–74 Years of Age by Region, Highest Level of Education, Age and Sex. Year 1985–2016. Available at www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/en/ssd/START__UF__UF0506/Utbildning/?rxid=36382a87-2d9c-4caf-9c42-c585ee85006b (accessed November 9, 2017).
36. ↵
    1. Statistics Sweden

    . 2016c. Average Age of Population by Region and Sex. Year 1998–2014. Available at www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/en/ssd/START__BE__BE0101__BE0101B/BefolkningMedelAlder/?rxid=3709c9eb-af57-426ba4ce-67468eaaf218 (accessed November 9, 2017).
37. ↵
    1. Svedäng Henrik,
    2. Stål Johan,
    3. Sterner Thomas,
    4. Cardinale Max

    . 2010. “Consequences of Sub-population Structure on Fisheries Management: Cod (Gadus morhua) in the Kattegat and Öresund (North Sea).” Reviews in Fisheries Science 18 (2): 139–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA)

    . 2004. “Ekonomiska konsekvensanalyser i myndighetens miljöarbete—förslag till förbättringar.” [The use of economic impact assessments by environmental authorities. Includes a short English summary.] Report 5398, July 2004. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
39. ↵
    1. Townsend Ralph E

    . 1998. “Beyond ITQs: Property Rights as a Management Tool.” Fisheries Research 37 (1–3): 203–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. ↵
    1. Tyler Tom R

    . 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. ↵
    1. Young Oran R

    . 1979. Compliance and Public Authority, a Theory with International Applications. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
42. ↵
    1. Wilson Douglas Clyde,
    2. Pascoe Sean

    . 2006. “Chapter 13 Delivering Complex Scientific Advice to Multiple Stakeholders.” Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science 36: 329–53.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Wooldridge Jeffrey M

    . 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.