The Aftermath of Flood Zone Remapping: The Asymmetric Impact of Flood Maps on Housing Prices

References

1. ↵
   1. AECOM

   . 2013. The Impact of Climate Change and Population Growth on the National Flood Insurance Program through 2100. Report prepared for Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration and Federal Emergency Management Agency. Los Angeles: AECOM. Available at www.aecom.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Climate_Change_Report_AECOM_2013-06-11.pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).
2. ↵
   1. American Institutes for Research

   . 2005. A Chronology of Major Events Affecting the National Flood Insurance Program. Report Completed for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Available at www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1602-20490-7283/nfip_eval_chronology.pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).
3. ↵
   1. Association of State Floodplain Managers

   . 2013. Flood Mapping for the Nation: A Cost Analysis for the Nation’s Flood Map Inventory. ASFPM Report. Madison, WI: Association of State Floodplain Managers. Available at www.floods.org/ace-files/documentlibrary/2012_NFIP_Reform/Flood_Mapping_for_the_Nation_ASFPM_Report_3-1-2013.pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).
4. ↵
   1. Atreya Ajita,
   2. Czajkowski Jeffrey

   2016. “Graduated Flood Risks and Property Prices in Galveston County.” Real Estate Economics, forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12163.
5. ↵
   1. Atreya Ajita,
   2. Ferreira Susana,
   3. Kriesel Warren

   . 2013. “Forgetting the Flood? An Analysis of the Flood Risk Discount over Time”. Land Economics 89 (4): 577–96, https://doi.org/10.3368/le.89.4.577.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Bin Okmyung,
   2. Kruse Jamie Brown,
   3. Landry Craig E.

   2008. “Flood Hazards, Insurance Rates, and Amenities: Evidence from the Coastal Housing Market”. Journal of Risk and Insurance 75 (1): 63–82, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2007.00248.x.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Bin Okmyung,
   2. Landry Craig E.

   2013. “Changes in Implicit Flood Risk Premiums: Empirical Evidence from the Housing Market”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65 (3): 361–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.12.002.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Bin Okmyung,
   2. Polasky Stephen

   . 2004. “Effects of Flood Hazards on Property Values: Evidence before and after Hurricane Floyd”. Land Economics 80 (4): 490–500, https://doi.org/10.2307/3655805.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   1. Buck Steven,
   2. Auffhammer Maximilian,
   3. Sunding David

   . 2014. “Land Markets and the Value of Water: Hedonic Analysis Using Repeat Sales of Farmland”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96 (4): 953–69, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau013.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Carbone Jared C.,
    2. Hallstrom Daniel G.,
    3. Kerry Smith V.

    2006. “Can Natural Experiments Measure Behavioral Responses to Environmental Risks?” Environmental and Resource Economics 33 (3): 273–97, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-3610-4.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. ↵
    1. Congressional Budget Office

    . 2009. The National Flood Insurance Program: Factors Affecting Actuarial Soundness. Pub. No. 4008. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office. Available at www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/106xx/doc10620/11-04-floodinsurance.pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).
12. ↵
    1. Coulson N. Edward.

    1991. “Really Useful Tests of the Monocentric Model”. Land Economics 67 (3): 299–307, https://doi.org/10.2307/3146425.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Daniel Vanessa E.,
    2. Florax Raymond J.G.M.,
    3. Rietveld Piet

    . 2009. “Flooding Risk and Housing Values: An Economic Assessment of Environmental Hazard”. Ecological Economics 69 (2): 355–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.018.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. de Koning Koen,
    2. Filatova Tatiana,
    3. Bin Okmyung

    . 2017. “Bridging the Gap between Revealed and Stated Preferences in Flood-Prone Housing Markets”. Ecological Economics 136: 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.022.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Dixon Lloyd,
    2. Clancy Noreen,
    3. Seabury Seth A.,
    4. Overton Adrian

    . 2006. The National Flood Insurance Program’s Market Penetration Rate: Estimates and Policy Implications. Report for the Evaluation of the National Flood Insurance Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Available at www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1602-20490-2804/nfip_eval_market_penetration_rate.pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).
16. ↵
    1. Donnelly William A.

    1989. “Hedonic Price Analysis of the Effect of a Floodplain on Property Values”. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (Water Resources Bulletin) 25 (3): 581–86, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1989.tb03095.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Federal Emergency Management Agency

    . 2002. National Flood Insurance Program: Program Description. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Available at www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1447-20490-2156/nfipdescrip_1_pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).
18. ↵
    1. Gallagher Justin.

    2014. “Learning about an Infrequent Event: Evidence from Flood Insurance Take-up in the United States”. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6 (3): 206–33, https://www.jstor.org/stable/43189495.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Hallstrom Daniel G.,
    2. Kerry Smith V.

    2005. “Market Responses to Hurricanes”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50 (3): 541–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2005.05.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Harrison David,
    2. Smersh Greg T.,
    3. Schwartz Arthur

    . 2001. “Environmental Determinants of Housing Prices: The Impact of Flood Zone Status”. Journal of Real Estate Research 21 (1–2): 3–20.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Heintzelman Martin D.,
    2. Tuttle Carrie M.

    2012. “Values in the Wind: A Hedonic Analysis of Wind Power Facilities”. Land Economics 88 (3): 571–88, https://doi.org/10.3368/le.88.3.571.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    1. Kahneman Daniel,
    2. Tversky Amos

    . 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–92, https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Kousky Carolyn.

    2010. “Learning from Extreme Events: Risk Perceptions after the Flood”. Land Economics 86 (3): 395–422, https://doi.org/10.3368/le.86.3.395.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. ↵
    1. MacDonald Don N.,
    2. White Harry L.,
    3. Taube Paul M.,
    4. Huth William L.

    1990. “Flood Hazard Pricing and Insurance Premium Differentials: Evidence from the Housing Market”. Journal of Risk and Insurance 57 (4): 654–63, https://doi.org/10.2307/252950.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. MacDonald Don N.,
    2. Murdoch James C.,
    3. White Harry L.

    1987. “Uncertain Hazards, Insurance, and Consumer Choice: Evidence from Housing Markets”. Land Economics 63 (4): 361–71, https://doi.org/10.2307/3146293.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. McClelland Gary H.,
    2. Schulze William D.,
    3. Coursey Don L.

    1993. “Insurance for Low-Probability Hazards: A Bimodal Response to Unlikely Events”. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7 (1): 95–116, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2192-7_7.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Michel-Kerjan Erwann,
    2. de Forges Sabine Lemoyne,
    3. Kunreuther Howard

    . 2012. “Policy Tenure under the US National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)”. Risk Analysis 32 (4): 644–58, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01671.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
28. ↵
    1. National Research Council

    . 2009. Mapping the Zone: Improving Flood Map Accuracy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12573.
29. ↵
    1. National Research Council

    . 2015. Affordability of National Flood Insurance Program Premiums: Report 1. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21709.
30. ↵
    1. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information

    . 2018. Storm Events Database: Storm Data FAQ Page. Asheville, NC: National Centers for Environmental Information. Available at www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/faq.jsp (accessed September 20, 2018).
31. ↵
    1. Parmeter Christopher F.,
    2. Pope Jaren C.

    2011. “Quasi-experiments and Hedonic Property Value Methods.” In Handbook on Experimental Economics and the Environment, ed. List John A., Price Michael K. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
32. ↵
    1. Pope Jaren C.

    2008. “Do Seller Disclosures Affect Property Values? Buyer Information and the Hedonic Model”. Land Economics 84 (4): 551–72, https://doi.org/10.3368/le.84.4.551.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    1. Rambaldi Alicia N.,
    2. Fletcher Cameron S.,
    3. Collins Kerry,
    4. McAllister Ryan R.J.

    2013. “Housing Shadow Prices in an Inundation-Prone Suburb”. Urban Studies 50 (9): 1889–1905, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0042098012465904.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Samarasinghe Oshadhi,
    2. Sharp Basil

    . 2010. “Flood Prone Risk and Amenity Values: A Spatial Hedonic Analysis”. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54 (4): 457–75, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00483.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Tobin Graham A.,
    2. Newton Thomas G.

    1986. “A Theoretical Framework of Flood Induced Changes in Urban Land Values”. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (Water Resources Bulletin) 22 (1): 67–71, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1986.tb01861.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. ↵
    1. Troy Austin,
    2. Romm Jeff

    . 2004. “Assessing the Price Effects of Flood Hazard Disclosure under the California Natural Hazard Disclosure Law (AB 1195)”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47 (1): 137–62, https://doi.org/10.1080/0964056042000189844.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. ↵
    1. Tversky Amos,
    2. Kahneman Daniel

    . 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability”. Cognitive Psychology 5 (2): 207–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. U.S. Government Accountability Office

    . 2008. Flood Insurance: FEMA’s Rate-Setting Process Warrants Attention. Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate. GAO-09-12. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office. Available at www.gao.gov/assets/290/283035.pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).
39. ↵
    1. U.S. Government Accountability Office

    . 2010. FEMA Flood Maps: Some Standards and Processes in Place to Promote Map Accuracy and Outreach, but Opportunities Exist to Address Implementation Challenges. Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO-11-17. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office. Available at www.gao.gov/assets/320/312889.pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).
40. ↵
    1. U.S. Government Accountability Office

    . 2016. National Flood Insurance Program: Continued Progress Needed to Fully Address Prior GAO Recommendations on Rate-Setting Methods. Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Financial Services, House of Representatives. GAO-16-59. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office. Available at www.gao.gov/assets/680/675855.pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).