Incorporating Stated Consequentiality Questions in Stated Preference Research

References

1. ↵
   1. Baum Christopher F.

   2012. SSPECIALREG: Stata Module to Estimate Binary Choice Model with Discrete Endogenous Regressor via Special Regressor Method. Statistical Software Components SS457546. Boston: Department of Economics, Boston College.
2. ↵
   1. Bontemps Christophe,
   2. Nauges Celine.

   2016. “The Impact of Perceptions in Averting-Decision Models: An Application of the Special Regressor Method to Drinking Water Choices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98 (1): 297–313.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Budziski Wiktor,
   2. Czajkowski Mikołaj.

   2017. “Hybrid Choice Models vs. Endogeneity of Indicator Variables: A Monte Carlo Investigation.” Paper presented at the International Choice Modelling Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, April 3–5.
4. ↵
   1. Camerer Colin F.,
   2. Ho Teck-Hua,
   3. Chong Juin-Kuan.

   2004. “A Cognitive Hierarchy Theory of One-Shot Games.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (3): 861–98.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Carlsson Frederick.

   2010. “Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics?” Environmental and Resource Economics 46 (2): 167–77.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.,
   2. Groves Theodore.

   2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Carson Richard T.

   2011. “Incentive and Information Properties of Preference Questions: Commentary and Extensions.” In The International Handbook on Non-market Environmental Valuation, ed. Bennett Jeff, 181–210. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
8. ↵
   1. Czajkowski Mikołaj,
   2. Vossler Christian A.,
   3. Budziński Wiktor,
   4. Wiśniewska Aleksandra,
   5. Zawojska Ewa.

   2017. “Addressing Empirical Challenges Related to the Incentive Compatibility of Stated Preference Methods.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 142: 47–63.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Dellavigna Stefano,
   2. List John A.,
   3. Malmendier Ulrike,
   4. Rao Gautam.

   2017. “Voting to Tell Others.” Review of Economic Studies 84 (1): 143–81.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Groothuis Peter A.,
    2. Mohr Tanga M.,
    3. Whitehead John C.,
    4. Cockerill Kristan.

    2017. “Endogenous Consequentiality in Stated Preference Referendum Data: The Influence of the Randomly Assigned Tax Amount.” Land Economics 93 (2): 258–68.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. Herriges Joseph,
    2. Kling Catherine,
    3. Liu Chih-Chen,
    4. Tobias Justin.

    2010. “What Are the Consequences of Consequentiality?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (1): 67–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Horowitz Joel L.

    1992. “A Smoothed Maximum Score Estimator for the Binary Response Model.” Econometrica 60 (3): 505–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Interis Matthew,
    2. Petrolia Daniel.

    2014. “The Effects of Consequentiality in Binary- and Multinomial Choice Surveys.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 39 (2): 201–16.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.,
    3. Adamowicz Wiktor,
    4. Bennett Jeff,
    5. Brouwer Roy,
    6. Cameron Trudy Ann,
    7. Michael Hanemann W.,
    8. Hanley Nick,
    9. Ryan Mandy,
    10. Scarpa Riccardo.,
    11. et al.

    2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Kalisa Thierry,
    2. Riddel Mary,
    3. Douglass Shaw W.

    2016. “Willingness to Pay to Avoid Arsenic-Related Risks: A Special Regressor Approach.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 5 (2): 143–62.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Landry Craig E.,
    2. List John A.

    2007. “Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (2): 420–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Levitt Steven D.,
    2. List John A.

    2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal about the Real World?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (2): 153–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Lewbel Arthur.

    2000. “Semiparametric Qualitative Response Model Estimation with Unknown Heteroscedasticity or Instrumental Variables.” Journal of Econometrics 97 (1): 145–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Lewbel Arthur.

    2014. “An Overview of the Special Regressor Method.” In The Oxford Handbook of Applied Nonparametric and Semiparametric Econometrics and Statistics, ed. Racine Jeffrey S., Su Liangjun, Ullah Aman, 38–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. ↵
    1. Lewbel Arthur,
    2. McFadden Daniel,
    3. Linton Oliver.

    2011. “Estimating Features of a Distribution from Binomial Data.” Journal of Econometrics 162 (2): 170–88.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Lewbel Arthur,
    2. Schennach Susanne M.

    2007. “A simple ordered data estimator for inverse density weighted expectations.” Journal of Econometrics 136 (1): 189–211.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. McFadden Daniel L.

    1973. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka Paul, 105–42, New York: Wiley.
23. ↵
    1. Oehlmann Malte,
    2. Meyerhoff Jurgen.

    2017. “Stated Preferences towards Renewable Energy Alternatives in Germany: Do the Consequentiality of the Survey and Trust in Institutions Matter?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (1): 1–16.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Riddel Mary.

    2011. “Uncertainty and Measurement Error in Welfare Models for Risk Changes.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61 (3): 341–54.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Statistics Canada.

    2011. Focus on Geography Series, 2011 Census. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.
26. ↵
    1. Tourangeau Roger,
    2. Rips Lane J.,
    3. Rasinski Kenneth.

    2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. ↵
    1. Vossler Christian A.,
    2. Doyon Maurice,
    3. Rondeau Daniel.

    2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4 (4): 145–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Vossler Christian A.,
    2. Watson Sharon B.

    2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 86: 137–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Wooldridge Jeffrey M.

    2015. “Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics.” Journal of Human Resources 50 (2): 420–45.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text