Safety in Numbers: Cost-effective Endangered Species Management for Viable Populations

References

1. ↵
   1. Alais Jean-Christophe,
   2. Carpentier Pierre,
   3. De Lara Michel.

   2017. “Multi-usage Hydropower Single Dam Management: Chance-Constrained Optimization and Stochastic Viability.” Energy Systems 8 (1): 7–30.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Bair Lucas S.,
   2. Yackulic Charles B.,
   3. Springborn Michael R.,
   4. Reimer Matthew N.,
   5. Bond Craig A.,
   6. Coggins Lewis G.

   2018. “Identifying Cost-effective Invasive Species Control to Enhance Endangered Species Populations in the Grand Canyon, USA.” Biological Conservation 220: 12–20.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Baumgartner Stefan,
   2. Quaas Martin F.

   2009. “Ecological-Economic Viability as a Criterion of Strong Sustainability under Uncertainty.” Ecological Economics 68 (7): 2008–20.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Boyle Kevin J.,
   2. Bishop Richard C.

   1987. “Valuing Wildlife in Benefit-Cost Analyses: A Case Study Involving Endangered Species.” Water Resources Research 23 (5): 943–50.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Brown Gardner M.,
   2. Shogren Jason F.

   1998. “Economics of the Endangered Species Act.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (3): 3–20.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Costello Christopher J.,
   2. Adams Richard M.,
   3. Polasky Stephen.

   1998. “The Value of El Nino Forecasts in the Management of Salmon: A Stochastic Dynamic Assessment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (4): 765–77.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Coulson Tim,
   2. Mace Georgina M.,
   3. Hudson Elodie,
   4. Possingham Hugh.

   2001. “The Use and Abuse of Population Viability Analysis.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (5): 219–21.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. De Lara Michel,
   2. Doyen Luc.

   2008. Sustainable Management of Natural Resources: Mathematical Models and Methods. Berlin: Springer.
9. ↵
   1. Doyen Luc,
   2. De Lara Michel.

   2010. “Stochastic Viability and Dynamic Programming.” Systems and Control Letters 59 (10): 629–34.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Doyen L.,
    2. Thebaud O.,
    3. Bene C.,
    4. Martinet V.,
    5. Gourguet S.,
    6. Bertignac M.,
    7. Fifas S.,
    8. Blanchard F.

    2012. “A Stochastic Viability Approach to Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management.” Ecological Economics 75: 32–42.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Duffield John,
    2. Neher Chris,
    3. Patterson David.

    2016. Colorado River Total Value Study. Final report, prepared for the National Parks Service. Missoula: Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Montana.
12. ↵
    1. Finseth Ryan M.,
    2. Conrad Jon M.

    2014. “Cost-effective Recovery of an Endangered Species: The Red-cockaded Woodpecker.” Land Economics 90 (4): 649–67.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    1. Haight Robert G.

    1995. “Comparing Extinction Risk and Economic Cost in Wildlife Conservation Planning.” Ecological Applications 5 (3): 767–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Judd Kenneth L.

    1998. Numerical Methods in Economics. MIT Press.
15. ↵
    1. Korman Josh,
    2. Martell Steven J. D.,
    3. Walters Carl J.,
    4. Makinster Andrew S.,
    5. Coggins Lewis G.,
    6. Yard Michael D.,
    7. Persons William R.

    2012. “Estimating Recruitment Dynamics and Movement of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon Using an Integrated Assessment Model.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 69 (11): 1827–49.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Korman Josh,
    2. Yard Michael D.

    2017. “Effects of Environmental Covariates and Density on the Catchability of Fish Populations and Interpretation of Catch per Unit Effort Trends.” Fisheries Research 189: 18–34.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Korman Josh,
    2. Yard Michael D.,
    3. Yackulic Charles B.

    2015. “Factors Controlling the Abundance of Rainbow Trout in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon in a Reach Utilized by Endangered Humpback Chub.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 73 (1): 105–24.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Kotchen Matthew,
    2. Reiling Stephen.

    2000. “Environmental Attitudes, Motivations, and Contingent Valuation of Nonuse Values: A Case Study Involving Endangered Species.” Ecological Economics 32: 93–107.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Lampert Adam,
    2. Hastings Alan,
    3. Grosholz Edwin D.,
    4. Jardine Sunny L.,
    5. Sanchirico James N.

    2014. “Optimal Approaches for Balancing Invasive Species Eradication and Endangered Species Management.” Science 344 (6187): 1028–31.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    1. LaRiviere Jacob,
    2. Kling David,
    3. Sanchirico James N.,
    4. Sims Charles,
    5. Springborn Michael.

    2018. “The Treatment of Uncertainty and Learning in the Economics of Natural Resource and Environmental Management.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 12 (1): 92–112.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Loomis John B.,
    2. White Douglas S.

    1996. “Economic Benefits of Rare and Endangered Species: Summary and Meta-analysis.” Ecological Economics 18 (3): 197–206.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Margolis Michael,
    2. Naevdal Eric.

    2008. “Safe Minimum Standards in Dynamic Resource Problems: Conditions for Living on the Edge of Risk.” Environmental and Resource Economics 40 (3): 401–23.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Marshall Elizabeth,
    2. Homans Frances,
    3. Haight Robert.

    2000. “Exploring Strategies for Improving the Cost Effectiveness of Endangered Species Management: The Kirtland’s Warbler as a Case Study.” Land Economics 76 (3): 462–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Montgomery Claire A.,
    2. Brown Gardner M. Jr.,
    3. Adams Darius M.

    1994. “The Marginal Cost of Species Preservation: The Northern Spotted Owl.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (2): 111–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Newbold Stephen C.,
    2. Siikamäki Juha.

    2009. “Prioritizing Conservation Activities Using Reserve Site Selection Methods and Population Viability Analysis.” Ecological Applications 19 (7): 1774–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Ono Masahiro,
    2. Pavone Marco,
    3. Kuwata Yoshiaki,
    4. Balaram J.

    2015. “Chance-Constrained Dynamic Programming with Application to Risk-Aware Robotic Space Exploration.” Autonomous Robots 39 (4): 555–71.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Oubraham Aichouche,
    2. Zaccour Georges.

    2018. “A Survey of Applications of Viability Theory to the Sustainable Exploitation of Renewable Resources.” Ecological Economics 145: 346–67.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Pe’er Guy,
    2. Matsinos Yiannis G.,
    3. Johst Karin,
    4. Franz Kamila W.,
    5. Turlure Camille,
    6. Radchuk Viktoriia,
    7. Malinowska Agnieszka H.,
    8. Curtis Janelle M. R.,
    9. Naujokaitis-Lewis Ilona,
    10. Wintle Brendan A.,
    11. Henle Klaus.

    2013. “A Protocol for Better Design, Application, and Communication of Population Viability Analyses.” Conservation Biology 27 (4): 644–56.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Richardson Leslie,
    2. Loomis John.

    2009. “The Total Economic Value of Threatened, Endangered and Rare Species: An Updated Meta-analysis.” Ecological Economics 68 (5): 1535–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Rout Tracy M.

    , Cindture, and Fish Prey Availability.” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140 (2): 471–86.
31. ↵
    1. Sagoff Mark.

    2009. “Regulatory Review and Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 29 (3–4): 21–26.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Springborn Michael R.,
    2. Faig Amanda,
    3. Baskett Marissa,
    4. Dedrick Allison.

    2018. “Beyond Biomass: Valuing Genetic Diversity in Natural Resource Management.” Working paper. Davis: University of California, Davis.
33. ↵
    1. Tahvonen Olli.

    2009. “Economics of Harvesting Age-Structured Fish Populations.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58 (3): 281–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.

    2016. Biological Assessment for the Glen Canyon Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
35. ↵
    1. Ward David L.,
    2. Morton-Starner Rylan,
    3. Vaage Ben.

    2016. “Effects of Turbidity on Predation Vulnerability of Juvenile Humpback Chub to Rainbow Trout and Brown Trout.” Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 7 (1): 205–12.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Welsh Michael P.,
    2. Bishop Richard C.,
    3. Phillips Marcia L.,
    4. Baumgartner Robert M.

    1995. GCES Non-use Value Study. Report prepared for the Glen Canyon Environmental Studies Non-use Value Committee, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Madison, WI: Hagler Bailly Consulting.
37. ↵
    1. Wilcove David S.,
    2. Rothstein David,
    3. Dubow Jason,
    4. Phillips Ali,
    5. Losos Elizabeth.

    1998. “Quantifying Threats to Imperiled Species in the United States.” BioScience 48 (8): 607–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Yackulic Charles B.,
    2. Korman Josh,
    3. Yard Michael D.,
    4. Dzul Maria.

    2018. “Inferring Species Interactions through Joint Mark-Recapture Analysis.” Ecology 99 (4): 812–21.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Yackulic Charles B.,
    2. Yard Michael D.,
    3. Korman Josh,
    4. Haverbeke David R.

    2014. “A Quantitative Life History of Endangered Humpback Chub That Spawn in the Little Colorado River: Variation in Movement, Growth, and Survival.” Ecology and Evolution 4 (7): 1006–18.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Yard Michael D.,
    2. Coggins Lewis G. Jr.,
    3. Baxter Colden V.,
    4. Bennett Glenn E.,
    5. Korman Josh.

    2011. “Trout Piscivory in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon: Effects of Turbidity, Temperature, and Fish Prey Availability.” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140 (2): 471–86.

    OpenUrl