Valuing Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Control in Public Forests: Scope Effects with Attribute Nonattendance

References

1. ↵
   1. Ajzen Icek,
   2. Brown Thomas C.,
   3. Carvajal Franklin

   . 2004. “Explaining the Discrepancy between Intentions and Actions: The Case of Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (9): 1108–21.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Alemu Mohammed H.,
   2. Mørkbak Morten R.,
   3. Olsen Soren B.,
   4. Jensen Carsten L.

   2013. “Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 54 (3): 333–59.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Armitage Christopher J.,
   2. Conner Mark

   . 2001. “Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-analytic Review.” British Journal of Social Psychology 40 (4): 471–99.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Arrow Kenneth,
   2. Solow Robert,
   3. Portney Paul R.,
   4. Leamer Edward E.,
   5. Radner Roy,
   6. Schuman Howard

   . 1993. “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.” Federal Register 58 (10): 4601–14.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Baker Reg,
   2. Blumberg Stephen J.,
   3. Michael Brick J.,
   4. Couper Mick P.,
   5. Courtright Melanie,
   6. Michael Dennis J.,
   7. Dillman Don,
   8. Frankel Martin R.,
   9. Garland Philip,
   10. Groves Robert M.,
   11. et al.

   2010. “AAPOR Report on Online Panels.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (4): 711–81.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Boxall Peter C.,
   2. Adamowicz Wiktor L

   . 2002. “Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach.” Environmental and Resource Economics 23 (4): 421–46.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Boyle Kevin J.,
   2. Paterson Robert,
   3. Carson Richard,
   4. Leggett Christopher,
   5. Kanninen Barbara,
   6. Molenar John,
   7. Neumann James

   . 2016. “Valuing Shifts in the Distribution of Visibility in National Parks and Wilderness Areas in the United States.” Journal of Environmental Management 173: 10–22.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Campbell Danny,
   2. Hutchinson W. George,
   3. Scarpa Riccardo

   . 2008. “Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 41 (3): 401–17.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Caparros Alejandro,
   2. Oviedo Jose L.,
   3. Campos Pablo

   . 2008. “Would You Choose Your Preferred Option? Comparing Choice and Recoded Ranking Experiments.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (3): 843–55.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Carlsson Fredrik,
    2. Kataria Mitesh,
    3. Lampi Elina

    . 2010. “Dealing with Ignored Attributes in Choice Experiments on Valuation of Sweden’s Environmental Quality Objectives.” Environmental and Resource Economics 47 (1): 65–89.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Czajkowski Mikolaj

    . 2014. “The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation.” In Handbook of Choice Modelling, ed. Hess Stephanie, Daly Andrew, 202–235. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Co.
12. ↵
    1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Flores Nicholas E.,
    3. Meade Norman F.

    2001. “Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence.” Environmental and Resource Economics 19 (2): 173–210.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Groves Theodore

    . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Groves Theodore

    . 2011. “Incentive and Information Properties of Preference Questions: Commentary and Extensions.” In International Handbook of Non-market Environmental Valuation, ed. Bennett Jeff. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Co.
15. 1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Groves Theodore,
    3. List John A.

    2014. “Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1 (1–2): 171–207.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Hanemann W. Michael,
    3. Kopp Raymond J.,
    4. Krosnick Jon A.,
    5. Mitchell Robert C.,
    6. Presser Stanley,
    7. Rudd Paul A.,
    8. Smith V. Kerry,
    9. Conaway Michael,
    10. Martin Kerry

    . 1996. “Was the NOAA Panel Correct about Contingent Valuation?” Discussion Paper 96-20, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
17. 1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Louviere Jordan J

    . 2011. “A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches.” Environmental and Resource Economics 49 (4): 539–59.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Carson Richard T.,
    2. Mitchell Robert Cameron

    . 1995. “Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (2): 155–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Christie Mike,
    2. Azevedo Christopher D

    . 2009. “Testing the Consistency between Standard Contingent Valuation, Repeated Contingent Valuation and Choice Experiments.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 60 (1): 154–70.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Day Brett,
    2. Bateman Ian J.,
    3. Carson Richard T.,
    4. Dupont Diane,
    5. Louviere Jordan J.,
    6. Morimoto Sanae,
    7. Scarpa Riccardo,
    8. Wang Paul

    . 2012. “Ordering Effects and Choice Set Awareness in Repeat-Response Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 63 (1): 73–91.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. DeShazo J. R.,
    2. Fermo G

    . 2004. “Implications of Rationally Adaptive Pre-choice Behavior for the Design and Estimation of Choice Models.” Working paper. University of California, Los Angeles, School of Public Policy and Social Research.
22. ↵
    1. Desvousges William,
    2. Mathews Kristy,
    3. Train Kenneth

    . 2012. “Adequate Responsiveness to Scope in Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 84 (1): 121–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Giraud Kelly L.,
    2. Loomis John B.,
    3. Lynn Johnson Richard

    . 1999. “Internal and External Scope in Willingness-to-Pay Estimates for Threatened and Endangered Wildlife.” Journal of Environmental Management 56 (3): 221–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Glenk Klaus,
    2. Martin-Ortega Julia,
    3. Pulido-Velazquez Manuel,
    4. Potts Jacqueline

    . 2015. “Inferring Attribute Non-attendance from Discrete Choice Experiments: Implications for Benefit Transfer.” Environmental and Resource Economics 60 (4): 497–520.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Gowdy John M.,
    2. Mayumi Kozo

    . 2001. “Reformulating the Foundations of Consumer Choice Theory and Environmental Valuation.” Ecological Economics 39 (2): 223–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Greene William H.,
    2. Hensher David A

    . 2008. “Ordered Choice, Heterogeneity Attribute Processing.” Working paper. University of Sydney, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies.
27. ↵
    1. Hays Ron D.,
    2. Liu Honghu,
    3. Kapetyn Arie

    . 2015. “Use of Internet Panels to Conduct Surveys.” Behavior Research Methods 47 (2): 685–90.

    OpenUrlPubMed
28. ↵
    1. Hensher David A

    . 2006. “How Do Respondents Process Stated Choice Experiments? Attribute Consideration under Varying Information Load.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 21 (6): 861–78.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Hensher David A

    . 2008. “Joint Estimation of Process and Outcome in Choice Experiments and Implications for Willingness to Pay.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 42 (2): 297–322.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Greene William H

    . 2003. “A Latent Class Model for Discrete Choice Analysis: Contrasts with Mixed Logit.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37 (8): 681–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Greene William H

    . 2010. “Non-attendance and Dual Processing of Common-Metric Attributes in Choice Analysis: A Latent Class Specification.” Empirical Economics 39 (2): 413–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Rose John M.,
    3. Bertoia Tony

    . 2007. “The Implications on Willingness-to-Pay of a Stochastic Treatment of Attribute Processing in Stated Choice Studies.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 43 (2): 73–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Rose John M.,
    3. Greene William H.

    2005. “The Implications on Willingness-to-Pay of Respondents Ignoring Specific Attributes.” Transportation 32 (3): 203–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Rose John M.,
    3. Greene William H.

    2012. “Inferring Attribute Non-attendance from Stated Choice Data: Implications for Willingness-to-Pay Estimates and a Warning for Stated Choice Experiment Design.” Transportation 39 (2): 235–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Hensher David A.,
    2. Rose John M.,
    3. Greene William H.

    2015. Applied Choice Analysis, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. ↵
    1. Hess Stephane,
    2. Hensher David A

    . 2010. “Using Conditioning on Observed Choices to Retrieve Individual-Specific Attribute Processing Strategies.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 44 (6): 781–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. ↵
    1. Hole Arne R

    . 2011. “A Discrete Choice Model with Endogenous Attribute Attendance.” Economics Letters 110 (3): 203–05.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. ↵
    1. Holmes Thomas P.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J

    . 2005. “Dynamic Learning and Context Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation Questions.” Land Economics 81 (1): 114–26.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
39. ↵
    1. Johnston Robert J.,
    2. Boyle Kevin J.,
    3. Adamowicz Wiktor,
    4. Bennett Jeff,
    5. Brouwer Roy,
    6. Cameron Trudy Ann,
    7. Michael Hanemann W.,
    8. Hanley Nick,
    9. Ryan Mandy,
    10. Scarpa Ricardo,
    11. et al.

    2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. Koetse Mark J

    . 2017. “Effects of Payment Vehicle Non-attendance in Choice Experiments on Value Estimates and the WTA-WTP Disparity.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (3): 225–45.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Kragt Marit

    . 2013. “Stated and Inferred Attribute Attendance Models: A Comparison with Environmental Choice Experiments.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 64 (3): 719–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. ↵
    1. Lancsar Emily,
    2. Louviere Jordan J

    . 2006. “Deleting ‘Irrational’ Responses from Discrete Choice Experiments: A Case of Investigating or Imposing Preferences?” Health Economics 15 (8): 797–811.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. Lew Daniel K.,
    2. Wallmo Kristy

    . 2011. “External Tests of Scope and Embedding in Stated Preference Choice Experiments: An Application to Endangered Species Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 48 (1): 1–23.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Lindhjem Henrik,
    2. Navrud Ståle

    . 2011. “Are Internet Surveys an Alternative to Face-to-face Interviews in Contingent Valuation?” Ecological Economics 70 (9): 1628–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. ↵
    1. Mahieu Pierre-Alexandre,
    2. Andersson Henrik,
    3. Beaumais Olivier,
    4. Sourd Romain Crastes dit,
    5. Hess Stephanie,
    6. Wolff François-Charles

    . 2017. “Stated Preferences: A Unique Database Composed of 1657 Recent Published Articles in Journals Related to Agriculture, Environment, or Health.” Review of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Studies 98 (3): 1–20.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. McIntosh E.,
    2. Ryan M

    . 2002. “Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Derive Welfare Estimates for the Provision of Elective Surgery: Implications of Discontinuous Preferences.” Journal of Economic Psychology 23 (2): 367–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. ↵
    1. Meyerhoff J.,
    2. Liebe U

    . 2009. “Discontinuous Preferences in Choice Experiments: Evidence at the Choice Task Level.” Presented at the 17th Annual conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 2009.
48. ↵
    1. Moore Christopher C.,
    2. Holmes Thomas P.,
    3. Bell Katherine P.

    2011. “An Attribute-Based Approach to Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection Programs.” Journal of Forest Economics 17 (1): 35–52.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Nguyen Thanh Cong,
    2. Robinson Jackie,
    3. Kaneko Shinji

    . 2015. “Examining Ordering Effects in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Case Study in Vietnam.” Economic Analysis and Policy 45 (1): 39–57.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Petrolia Daniel R.,
    2. Interis Matthew G.,
    3. Hwang Joonghyun

    . 2014. “America’s Wetland? A National Survey of Willingness to Pay for Restoration of Louisiana’s Coastal Wetlands.” Marine Resource Economics 29 (1): 17–37.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Petrolia Daniel R.,
    2. Interis Matthew G.,
    3. Hwang Joonghyun

    . 2018. “Single-Choice, Repeated-Choice, and Best-Worst Scaling Elicitation Formats: Do Results Differ and by How Much?” Environmental and Resource Economics 69 (2): 365–93.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Provencher Bill,
    2. Baerenklau Kenneth A.,
    3. Bishop Richard C.

    2002. “A Finite Mixture Model of Recreational Angling with Serially Correlated Random Utility.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 (4): 1066–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. ↵
    1. Puckett Sean M.,
    2. Hensher David A

    . 2008. “The Role of Attribute Processing Strategies in Estimating the Preferences of Road Freight Stakeholders.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 44 (3): 379–95.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
54. ↵
    1. Ready Richard C.,
    2. Hu Dayuan

    . 1995. “Statistical Approaches to the Fat Tail Problem for Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” Land Economics 71 (4): 491–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. ↵
    1. Rose John M.,
    2. Hensher David A.,
    3. Greene William H.

    2005. “Recovering Costs through Price and Service Differentiation: Accounting for Exogenous Information on Attribute Processing Strategies in Airline Choice.” Journal of Air Transport Management 11 (6): 400–07.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Rosenberger Randall S.,
    2. Peterson George L.,
    3. Clarke Andrea,
    4. Brown Thomas C.

    2003. “Measuring Dispositions for Lexicographic Preferences of Environmental Goods: Integrating Economics, Psychology and Ethics.” Ecological Economics 44 (1): 63–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
57. ↵
    1. Sælensminde Kjartan

    . 2002. “The Impact of Choice Inconsistencies in Stated Choice Studies.” Environmental and Resource Economics 23 (4): 403–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
58. ↵
    1. Scarpa Riccardo,
    2. Gilbride Timothy J.,
    3. Campbell Danny,
    4. Hensher David A.

    2009. “Modelling Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments for Rural Landscape Valuation.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 36 (2): 151–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. ↵
    1. Scarpa Riccardo,
    2. Raffaelli Roberta,
    3. Notaro Sandra,
    4. Louviere Jordan J.

    2011. “Modelling the Effects of Stated Attribute Non-attendance on Its Inference: An Application to Visitors Benefits from the Alpine Grazing Commons.” Presented at the International Choice Modelling Conference, Oulton, Leeds, U.K., July 4–6.
60. ↵
    1. Scarpa Riccardo,
    2. Thiene Mara

    . 2005. “Destination Choice Models for Rock Climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A Latent-Class Approach Based on Intensity of Preference.” Land Economics 81 (3): 426–44.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
61. ↵
    1. Scarpa Riccardo,
    2. Zanoli Raffaele,
    3. Bruschi Viola,
    4. Naspetti Simona

    . 2012. “Inferred and Stated Attribute Non-attendance in Food Choice Experiments.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95 (1): 165–80.

    OpenUrl
62. 1. Schuman Howard

    . 1996. “The Sensitivity of CV Outcomes to CV Survey Methods.” In The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs, ed. Bjornstad David J., Kahn James R. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Co.
63. ↵
    1. Siikamäki Juha,
    2. Larson Douglas M.

    2015. “Finding Sensitivity to Scope in Nonmarket Valuation.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 30 (2): 333–49.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Swait Joffre D

    . 2001. “A Non-compensatory Choice Model Incorporating Attribute Cutoffs.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 35 (10): 903–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
65. ↵
    1. Thiene Mara,
    2. Scarpa Riccardo,
    3. Louviere Jordan J.

    2015. “Addressing Preference Heterogeneity, Multiple Scales and Attribute Attendance with a Correlated Finite Mixing Model of Tap Water Choice.” Environment and Resource Economics 62 (3): 637–56.

    OpenUrl
66. ↵
    1. Train Kenneth

    . 2003. Discrete Choice Methods and Simulation, 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. ↵
    1. Veisten Knut,
    2. Hoen Hans Fredrik,
    3. Navrud Ståle,
    4. Strand Jon

    . 2004. “Scope Insensitivity in Contingent Valuation of Complex Environmental Amenities.” Journal of Environmental Management 73 (4): 317–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
68. ↵
    1. Vossler Christian A.,
    2. Doyon Maurice,
    3. Rondeau Daniel

    . 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4 (4): 145–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
69. ↵
    1. Whitehead John C

    . 2002. “Incentive Incompatibility and Starting-Point Bias in Iterative Valuation Questions.” Land Economics 78 (2): 285–97.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
70. ↵
    1. Whitehead John C

    . 2016. “Plausible Responsiveness to Scope in Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 128: 17–22.

    OpenUrl
71. ↵
    1. Yeager David S.,
    2. Krosnick Jon A.,
    3. Chang Linchiat,
    4. Javitz Harold S.,
    5. Levendusky Matthew S.,
    6. Simpser Alberto,
    7. Wang Rui

    . 2011. “Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-probability Samples.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (4): 709–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
72. ↵
    1. Zawojska Ewa,
    2. Czajkowski Mikołaj

    . 2017. “Re-examining Empirical Evidence on Contingent Valuation–Importance of Incentive Compatibility.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (4): 374–403.

    OpenUrl