Research ArticleArticles

Agricultural Displacement and Deforestation Leakage in the Brazilian Legal Amazon

Fanny Moffette and Holly K. Gibbs
Land Economics, February 2021, 97 (1) 155-179; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/le.97.1.040219-0045R

References

  1. ↵
    1. Aguiar, Ana Paula Dutra,
    2. Ima Célia Guimarães Vieira,
    3. Talita Oliveira Assis,
    4. Eloi L. Dalla-Nora,
    5. Peter Mann Toledo,
    6. Roberto Araújo Oliveira Santos-Junior,
    7. Mateus Batistella, et al
    . 2016. “Land Use Change Emission Scenarios: Anticipating a Forest Transition Process in the Brazilian Amazon.” Global Change Biology 22 (5): 1821–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13134.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Alix-Garcia, Jennifer, and
    2. Holly K. Gibbs
    . 2017. “Forest Conservation Effects of Brazil’s Zero Deforestation Agreements Undermined by Leakage.” Global Environmental Change 47: 201–17.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Alix-Garcia, Jennifer M.,
    2. Elizabeth N. Shapiro, and
    3. Katharine R. E. Sims
    . 2012. “Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program.” Land Economics 88 (4): 613–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/lde.2012.0052.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Amin, A.,
    2. Johanna Choumert-Nkolo,
    3. Jean-Louis Combes,
    4. Pascale Combes Motel,
    5. Eric N. Kéré,
    6. Jean-Galbert Ongono-Olinga, and
    7. Sonia Schwartz
    . 2019. “Neighborhood Effects in the Brazilian Amazônia: Protected Areas and Deforestation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 93 (January): 272–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEEM.2018.11.006.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Anderson, Liana O.,
    2. Samantha, De Martino,
    3. Torfinn, Harding,
    4. Karlygash, Kuralbayeva, and
    5. Andre, Lima
    . 2016. “The Effects of Land Use Regulation on Deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon.” Oxford, UK: Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford. Available at https://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/materials/OxCarre/ResearchPapers/oxcarrerp2016172.pdf.
  6. ↵
    1. Andrade de Sá, Saraly,
    2. Charles, Palmer, and
    3. Salvatore, Di Falco
    . 2013. “Dynamics of Indirect Land-Use Change: Empirical Evidence from Brazil.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65 (3): 377–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.01.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Angelsen, Arild
    . 2010. “Policies for Reduced Deforestation and their Impact on Agricultural Production.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (46): 19639–44. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912014107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Arima, Eugenio Y.,
    2. Peter, Richards,
    3. Robert, Walker, and
    4. Marcellus M, Caldas
    . 2011. “Statistical Confirmation of Indirect Land Use Change in the Brazilian Amazon.” Environmental Research Letters 6 (2): 024010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Arriagada, Rodrigo A.,
    2. Paul J., Ferraro,
    3. Erin O., Sills,
    4. Subhrendu K., Pattanayak, and
    5. Silvia, Cordero-Sancho
    . 2012. “Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Forest Cover? A Farm-Level Evaluation from Costa Rica.” Land Economics 88 (2): 382–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/lde.2012.0019.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Assunção, Juliano,
    2. Clarissa, Gandour, and
    3. Romero, Rocha
    . 2013. DETERring Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Environmental Monitoring and Law Enforcement. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Climate Policy Initiative.
  11. ↵
    1. Assunção, Juliano,
    2. Clarissa, Gandour, and
    3. Rudi, Rocha
    . 2015. “Deforestation Slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon: Prices or Policies?” Environment and Development Economics 20 (6): 697–722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X15000078.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Assunção, Juliano,
    2. Molly, Lipscomb,
    3. Ahmed, Mushfiq Mobarak, and
    4. Dimitri, Szerman
    . 2017. Agricultural Productivity and Deforestation in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Climate Policy Initiative.
  13. ↵
    1. Assunção, Juliano,
    2. Robert, McMillan,
    3. Joshua, Murphy, and
    4. Eduardo, Souza-Rodrigues
    . 2019. “Optimal Environmental Targeting in the Amazon Rainforest.” Working paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  14. ↵
    1. Assunção, Juliano, and
    2. Romero, Rocha
    . 2014. Getting Greener by Going Black: The Priority Municipalities in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Climate Policy Initiative.
  15. ↵
    1. Barona, Elizabeth,
    2. Navin, Ramankutty,
    3. Glenn, Hyman, and
    4. Oliver T., Coomes
    . 2010. “The Role of Pasture and Soybean in Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon.” Environmental Research Letters 5 (2): 024002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024002.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Becker, Randy, and
    2. Vernon Henderson
    . 2000. “Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries.” Journal of Political Economy 108 (2): 379–421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Benyishay, Ariel,
    2. Silke, Heuser,
    3. Daniel, Runfola, and
    4. Rachel, Trichler
    . 2017. “Indigenous Land Rights and Deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 86: 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.07.008.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Brainard, S. Lael
    . 1997. “An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Trade–Off Between Multinational Sales and Trade.” The American Economic Review 87 (4): 520–44.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE)
    . 2003. What Is a Biome?. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Available at https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/informacoes-ambientais/estudos-ambientais/15842-biomas.html?={&}t=o-que-e.
  20. ↵
    1. Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE)
    . 2004. Biomas. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Available at https://cnae.ibge.gov.br/en/component/content/94-7a12/7a12-vamos-conhecer-obrasil/nosso-territorio/1465-ecossistemas.html?Itemid=101{#}amazonia.
  21. ↵
    1. Burbidge, John B.,
    2. Lonnie, Magee, and
    3. A. Leslie, Robb
    . 1988. “Alternative Transformations to Handle Extreme Values of the Dependent Variable.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 83 (401): 123–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Bustos, Paula,
    2. Bruno, Caprettini, and
    3. Jacopo, Ponticelli
    . 2016. “Agricultural Productivity and Structural Transformation: Evidence from Brazil.” American Economic Review 106 (6): 1320–65. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131061.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Cisneros, Elías,
    2. Sophie, Lian Zhou, and
    3. Jan, Börner
    . 2015. “Naming and Shaming for Conservation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon.” PLoS ONE 10 (9): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Coe, Michael T.,
    2. Paulo M. Brando,
    3. Linda A. Deegan,
    4. Marcia N. Macedo,
    5. Christopher Neill, and
    6. Divino V. Silvério
    . 2017. “The Forests of the Amazon and Cerrado Moderate Regional Climate are the Key to the Future.” Tropical Conservation Science 10: 1940082917720671. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917720671.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Copeland, Brian R., and
    2. M. Scott Taylor
    . 2004. “Trade, Growth, and the Environment.” Journal of Economic Literature 42 (1): 7–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Delacote, Philippe,
    2. Elizabeth J. Z., Robinson, and
    3. Sébastien, Roussel
    . 2016. “Deforestation, Leakage and Avoided Deforestation Policies: A Spatial Analysis.” Resource and Energy Economics 45: 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.06.006.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Dube, Arindrajit,
    2. Oeindrila, Dube, and
    3. Omar, García-Ponce
    . 2013. “Cross-Border Spillover: U.S. Gun Laws and Violence in Mexico.” American Political Science Review 107 (3): 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000178.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Eskeland, Gunnar S., and
    2. Ann E., Harrison
    . 2003. “Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis.” Journal of Development Economics 70 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00084-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Foreign Agricultural Service
    . 2017. Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available at http://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/livestock_poultry.pdf.
  30. ↵
    1. Ferreira, Filho,
    2. Joaquim Bento, de Souza, and
    3. Mark, Horridge
    . 2014. “Ethanol Expansion and Indirect Land Use Change in Brazil.” Land Use Policy 36: 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Fowlie, Meredith L.
    . 2009. “Incomplete Environmental Regulation, Imperfect Competition, and Emissions Leakage.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 1 (2): 72–112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Garrett, Rachael D.,
    2. Eric F., Lambin, and
    3. Rosamond L., Naylor
    . 2013. “Land Institutions and Supply Chain Configurations as Determinants of Soybean Planted Area and Yields in Brazil.” Land Use Policy 31: 385–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Gibbs, Holly K.,
    2. Lisa Rausch,
    3. Jacob Munger,
    4. Ian Schelly,
    5. Douglas C. Morton,
    6. P. Noojipady,
    7. Britaldo Soares-Filho,
    8. Paulo Barreto,
    9. L. Micol, and
    10. Nathalie F. Walker
    . 2015. “Brazil’s Soy Moratorium.” Science 347 (6220): 377–78. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0181.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Gibbs, Holly K.,
    2. Jacob Munger,
    3. Jessica L’Roe,
    4. Paulo Barreto,
    5. Ritaumaria Pereira,
    6. Matthew Christie,
    7. Ticiana Amaral, and
    8. Nathalie F. Walker
    . 2015. “Did Ranchers and Slaughterhouses Respond to Zero-Deforestation Agreements in the Brazilian Amazon?” Conservation Letters 9 (1): 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12175.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Graesser, Jordan,
    2. T. Mitchell, Aide,
    3. H. Ricardo, Grau, and
    4. Navin, Ramankutty
    . 2015. “Cropland/Pastureland Dynamics and the Slowdown of Deforestation in Latin America.” Environmental Research Letters 10 (3): 034017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034017.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Greenpeace
    . 2009. Minimum Criteria for Industrial Scale Cattle Operations in the Brazilian Amazon Biome. Washington, DC: Greenpeace.
  37. ↵
    1. Greenstone, Michael
    . 2002. “The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of Manufactures.” Journal of Political Economy 110 (6): 1175–1219. https://doi.org/10.1086/342808.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Hanna, Rema
    . 2010. “US Environmental Regulation and FDI: Evidence from a Panel of US Based Multinational Firms.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2 (3): 158–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Hansen, M. C.,
    2. P. V. Potapov,
    3. R. Moore,
    4. M. Hancher,
    5. S. A. Turubanova,
    6. A. Tyukavina,
    7. D. Thau, et al
    . 2013. “High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change.” Science 342 (6160): 850–54. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Hargrave, Jorge, and
    2. Krisztina, Kis-Katos
    . 2013. “Economic Causes of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: A Panel Data Analysis for the 2000s.” Environmental and Resource Economics 54 (4): 471–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9610-2.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Heilmayr, Robert,
    2. Lisa L., Rausch,
    3. Jacob, Munger, and
    4. Holly K., Gibbs
    . 2020. “Brazil’s Amazon Soy Moratorium Reduced Deforestation.” Nature Food 1 (12): 801–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00194-5.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Herath, Deepananda P. B.,
    2. Alfons, Weersink, and
    3. Chantal L., Carpentier
    . 2005. “Spatial Dynamics of the Livestock Sector in the United States: Do Environmental Regulations Matter?” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30 (1): 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.002.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Imbens, Guido W., and
    2. Jeffrey M., Wooldridge
    . 2009. “Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (1): 5–86. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.1.5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Kastens, Jude H.,
    2. J. Christopher, Brown,
    3. Alexandre, Camargo Coutinho,
    4. Christopher R., Bishop, and
    5. Júlio César D. M., Esquerdo
    . 2017. “Soy Moratorium Impacts on Soybean and Deforestation Dynamics in Mato Grosso, Brazil.” PLoS ONE 12 (4): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Lambin, Eric F.,
    2. Holly K. Gibbs,
    3. Robert Heilmayr,
    4. Kimberly M. Carlson,
    5. Leonardo C. Fleck,
    6. Rachael D. Garrett,
    7. Polain De Waroux, et al
    . 2018. “The Role of Supply-Chain Initiatives in Reducing Deforestation.” Nature Climate Change 8 (February): 109–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0061-1.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Lapola, David M.,
    2. Ruediger Schaldach,
    3. Joseph Alcamo,
    4. Alberte Bondeau,
    5. Jennifer Koch,
    6. Christina Koelking, and
    7. Joerg A. Priess
    . 2010. “Indirect Land–Use Changes Can Overcome Carbon Savings from Biofuels in Brazil.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (8): 3388–93. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907318107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Le Polain de Waroux, Yann,
    2. Rachael D., Garrett,
    3. Robert, Heilmayr, and
    4. Eric F., Lambin
    . 2016. “Land–Use Policies and Corporate Investments in Agriculture in the Gran Chaco and Chiquitano.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (15): 4021–26. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602646113.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Lichtenberg, Erik, and
    2. Ricardo, Smith-Ramírez
    . 2011. “Slippage in Conservation Cost Sharing.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93 (1): 113–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaq124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. List, John A.,
    2. Daniel L., Millimet,
    3. Per G., Fredriksson, and
    4. W. Warren, McHone
    . 2003. “Effects of Environmental Regulations on Manufacturing Plant Births: Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (4): 944–52. Available at https://www-mitpressjournals-org.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/doi/pdf/10.1162/003465303772815844.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Macedo, Marcia N.,
    2. Ruth S. DeFries,
    3. Douglas C. Morton,
    4. Claudia M. Stickler,
    5. Gillian L. Galford, and
    6. Yosio E. Shimabukuro
    . 2012. “Decoupling of Deforestation and Soy Production in the Southern Amazon during the Late 2000s.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (4): 1341–46. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111374109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Mato Grosso COP21
    . 2015. “Produce, Conserve and Include: Strategy of Mato Grosso to Reduce Global Warming.”. Cuiaba, Brazil: Governo de Mato Grosso. Available at http://www.mt.gov.br/documents/21013/135265/Apresenta%C3%A7%C3%A3o+Estrat%C3%A9gia+MT+na+COP+21/5c4e363b-84e1-4cfa-88dd-aad5fb6000c7.
  52. ↵
    1. Mendonça, Mário Jorge,
    2. Paulo R. A., Loureiro, and
    3. Adolfo, Sachsida
    . 2012. “The Dynamics of Land-Use in Brazilian Amazon.” Ecological Economics 84: 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.014.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Millimet, Daniel L., and
    2. Jayjit, Roy
    . 2015. “Empirical Tests of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis when Environmental Regulation is Endogenous.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 31 (4): 652–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Moffette, Fanny
    . 2018. “Forest Conservation and Agriculture: Essays on Land Use Trade-Offs and Spillovers.” Ph.D dissertation: University of Wisconsin–Madison.
  55. ↵
    1. Moffette, Fanny,
    2. Marin, Skidmore, and
    3. Holly, Gibbs
    . 2021. “Environmental Policies That Shape Productivity: Evidence from Cattle Ranching in the Amazon.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102490.
  56. ↵
    1. Mulatu, Abay, and
    2. Ada, Wossink
    . 2014. “Environmental Regulation and Location of Industrialized Agricultural Production in Europe.” Land Economics 90 (3): 509–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Nepstad, Daniel,
    2. David Mcgrath,
    3. Claudia Stickler,
    4. Ane Alencar,
    5. Andrea Azevedo,
    6. Briana Swette,
    7. Tathiana Bezerra, et al
    . 2014. “Slowing Amazon Deforestation through Public Policy and Interventions in Beef and Soy Supply Chains.” Science 344 (6188): 1118–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Nunn, Nathan, and
    2. Nancy, Qian
    . 2011. “The Potato’s Contribution to Population and Urbanization: Evidence from a Historical Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (2): 593–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    1. Pfaff, Alexander,
    2. Juan, Robalino,
    3. Catalina, Sandoval, and
    4. Diego, Herrera
    . 2015. “Protected Area Types, Strategies and Impacts in Brazil’s Amazon: Public Protected Area Strategies Do Not Yield a Consistent Ranking of Protected Area Types by Impact.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370 (1681). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0273.
  60. ↵
    1. Rausch, Lisa, and
    2. Holly, Gibbs
    . 2016. “Property Arrangements and Soy Governance in the Brazilian State of Mato Grosso: Implications for Deforestation-Free Production.” Land 5 (2): 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/land5020007.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Rausch, Lisa L.,
    2. Holly K. Gibbs,
    3. Ian Schelly,
    4. Amintas Brandão,
    5. Douglas C. Morton,
    6. Arnaldo Carneiro Filho,
    7. Bernardo Strassburg, et al
    . 2019. “Soy Expansion in Brazil’s Cerrado.” Conservation Letters 12 (6).
  62. ↵
    1. Richards, Peter,
    2. Eugenio Arima,
    3. Leah VanWey,
    4. Avery Cohn, and
    5. Nishan Bhattarai
    . 2017. “Are Brazil’s Deforesters Avoiding Detection?” Conservation Letters 10 (4). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12310.
  63. ↵
    1. Robalino, Juan,
    2. Alexander, Pfaff, and
    3. Laura, Villalobos
    . 2017. “Heterogeneous Local Spillovers from Protected Areas in Costa Rica.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. 4 (3): 795–820. https://doi.org/10.1086/692089.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Roberts, Michael J., and
    2. Shawn, Bucholtz
    . 2005. “Slippage in the Conservation Reserve Program or Spurious Correlation: A Comment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (February): 244–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    1. Roberts, Michael J., and
    2. Shawn, Bucholtz
    . 2006. “Slippage in the Conservation Reserve Program or Spurious Correlation: A Comment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88 (May): 512–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Rudorff, Bernardo Friedrich Theodor,
    2. Marcos Adami,
    3. Daniel Alves Aguiar,
    4. Maurício Alves Moreira,
    5. Marcio Pupin Mello,
    6. Leandro Fabiani,
    7. Daniel Furlan Amaral, and
    8. Bernardo Machado Pires
    . 2011. “The Soy Moratorium in the Amazon Biome Monitored by Remote Sensing Images.” Remote Sensing 3 (1): 185–202. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3010185.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Santos, Ana Beatriz, and
    2. Marcos, Heil Costa
    . 2018. “Do Large Slaughterhouses Promote Sustainable Intensification of Cattle Ranching in Amazonia and the Cerrado?” Sustainability 10 (9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093266.
  68. ↵
    1. Soares-Filho, Britaldo,
    2. Raoni Rajão,
    3. Marcia Macedo,
    4. Arnaldo Carneiro,
    5. William Costa,
    6. Michael Coe,
    7. Hermann Rodrigues, and
    8. Ane Alencar
    . 2014. “Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code.” Science 344 (6182): 363–64. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.124663.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Spera, Stephanie A.,
    2. Gillian L. Galford,
    3. Michael T. Coe,
    4. Marcia N. Macedo, and
    5. John F. Mustard
    . 2016. “Land–Use Change Affects Water Recycling in Brazil’s Last Agricultural Frontier.” Global Change Biology 22 (10): 3405–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13298.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Strassburg, Bernardo B. N.,
    2. Thomas Brooks,
    3. Rafael Feltran-Barbieri,
    4. Alvaro Iribarrem,
    5. Renato Crouzeilles,
    6. Rafael Loyola,
    7. Agnieszka E. Latawiec, et al
    . 2017. “Moment of Truth for the Cerrado Hotspot.” Nature Ecology and Evolution 1: 0099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0099.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Svahn, Joakim, and
    2. Dominik, Brunner
    . 2018. “Did the Soy Moratorium Reduce Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?”. Ph.D. thesis. Norwegian School of Economics. Available at https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2560493/masterthesis.PDF?sequence=1{\&}isAllowed=y.
  72. ↵
    1. Vale, Ricardo,
    2. Petterson Vale,
    3. Holly Gibbs,
    4. Daniel Pedrón,
    5. Jens Engelman,
    6. Paulo Barreto,
    7. Ritaumaria Pereira
    . 2019. “Expansion and Market Concentration of Brazil’s Beef Industry, 1966–2017.” Under Review Available at http://www.gibbs-lab.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Vale_etal_2019_Expansion_and_market_concentration_of_Brazils_beef_industry.pdf.
  73. ↵
    1. Vieira, Raísa Romênia S.,
    2. Bruno R. Ribeiro,
    3. Fernando M. Resende,
    4. Fernanda T. Brum,
    5. Nathália Machado,
    6. Lilian Patrícia Sales,
    7. Lara Macedo,
    8. Britaldo Soares-Filho, and
    9. Rafael Loyola
    . 2018. “Compliance to Brazil’s Forest Code Will Not Protect Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” Diversity and Distributions 24 (4): 434–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12700.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Villoria, Nelson B.,
    2. Derek, Byerlee, and
    3. James, Stevenson
    . 2014. “The Effects of Agricultural Technological Progress on Deforestation: What Do We Really Know?” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 36 (2): 211–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppu005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. ↵
    1. Wear, David N., and
    2. Brian C., Murray
    . 2004. “Federal Timber Restrictions, Interregional Spillovers, and the Impact on US Softwood Markets.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (2): 307–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00081-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  76. ↵
    1. Wu, Junjie
    . 2000. “Slippage Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (4): 979–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  77. ↵
    1. Wu, Junjie
    . 2005. “Slippage Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program: Reply.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (February): 251–54. Available at http://ajae.oxfordjournals.org/content/87/1/251.short.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Agricultural Displacement and Deforestation Leakage in the Brazilian Legal Amazon
Fanny Moffette, Holly K. Gibbs
Land Economics Feb 2021, 97 (1) 155-179; DOI: 10.3368/le.97.1.040219-0045R
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords