WTA-WTP Disparity: The Role of Perceived Realism of the Valuation Setting

References

1. 1. Andor, Mark A.,
   2. Manuel Frondel, and
   3. Colin Vance

   . 2014. “Hypothetische Zahlungsbereitschaft für Grünen Strom: Bekundete Präferenzen Privater Haushalte für das Jahr 2013.” Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 15 (4): 355–66.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Arrow, Kenneth,
   2. Robert Solow,
   3. Paul R. Portney,
   4. Edward E. Leamer,
   5. Roy Radner, and
   6. Howard Schuman

   . 1993. “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.” Federal Register 58 (10): 4601–14.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Beenstock, Michael,
   2. Ephraim Goldin, and
   3. Yoel Haitovsky

   . 1998. “Response Bias in a Conjoint Analysis of Power Outages.” Energy Economics 20 (2): 135–56.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Bishop, Richard C., and
   2. Thomas A. Heberlein

   . 1979. “Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61 (5): 926–30.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Blass, Asher A.,
   2. Saul Lach, and
   3. Charles F. Manski

   . 2010. “Using Elicited Choice Probabilities to Estimate Random Utility Models: Preferences for Electricity Reliability.” International Economic Review 51 (2): 421–40.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Blumenschein, Karen,
   2. Glenn C. Blomquist,
   3. Magnus Johannesson,
   4. Nancy Horn, and
   5. Patricia Freeman

   . 2008. “Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” The Economic Journal 118 (525): 114–37.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Buckland, Stephen T.,
   2. Douglas C. MacMillan,
   3. Elizabeth I. Duff, and
   4. Nick Hanley

   . 1999. “Estimating Mean Willingness to Pay from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 48 (1): 109–24.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Bundesnetzagentur

   . 2019. Kennzahlen der Versorgungsunterbrechungen Strom. Bonn: Bundesnetzagentur.
9. 1. Carlsson, Fredrik, and
   2. Peter Martinsson

   . 2008. “Does It Matter When a Power Outage Occurs? A Choice Experiment Study on the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Power Outages.” Energy Economics 30 (3): 1232–45.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Carlsson, Fredrik,
    2. Peter Martinsson, and
    3. Alpaslan Akay

    . 2011. “The Effect of Power Outages and Cheap Talk on Willingness to Pay to Reduce Outages.” Energy Economics 33 (5): 790–98.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Carson, Richard T.,
    2. Nicholas E. Flores, and
    3. Norman F. Meade

    . 2001. “Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence.” Environmental and Resource Economics 19 (2): 173–210.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Carson, Richard T., and
    2. Theodore Groves

    . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Carson, Richard T.,
    2. Theodore Groves, and
    3. John A. List

    . 2014. “Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1 (1/2): 171–207.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Champ, Patricia A.,
    2. Richard C. Bishop,
    3. Thomas C. Brown, and
    4. Daniel W. McCollum

    . 1997. “Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33 (2): 151–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Czajkowski, Mikołaj,
    2. Christian A. Vossler,
    3. Wiktor Budziński,
    4. Aleksandra Wiśniewska, and
    5. Ewa Zawojska

    . 2017. “Addressing Empirical Challenges Related to the Incentive Compatibility of Stated Preferences Methods.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 142: 47–63.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Haab, Timothy C., and
    2. Kenneth E. McConnell

    . 1997. “Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 (2): 251–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Hanemann, W. Michael

    . 1984. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (3): 332–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Hanemann, W. Michael

    . 1989. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Reply.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (4): 1057–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Hanemann, W. Michael

    . 1991. “Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?” American Economic Review 81 (3): 635–47.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
20. 1. Hanemann, W. Michael. and
    2. Barbara Kanninen

    . 2001. “The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response CV Data.” In Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, edited by Ian J. Bateman and Kenneth George Willis, 302–441. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. 1. Hensher, David A.,
    2. Nina Shore, and
    3. Kenneth Train

    . 2014. “Willingness to Pay for Residential Electricity Supply Quality and Reliability.” Applied Energy 115: 280–92.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Horowitz, John K., and
    2. Kenneth E. McConnell

    . 2002. “A Review of WTA/WTP Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (3): 426–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Interis, Matthew G., and
    2. Daniel R. Petrolia

    . 2014. “The Effects of Consequentially in Binary-And Multinomial-Choice Surveys.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 39 (2): 201–16.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Johnston, Robert J.,
    2. Kevin J. Boyle,
    3. Wiktor Adamowicz,
    4. Jeff Bennett,
    5. Roy Brouwer,
    6. Trudy Ann Cameron,
    7. W. Michael Hanemann,
    8. Nick Hanley,
    9. Mandy Ryan,
    10. Riccardo Scarpa,
    11. Roger Tourangeau, and
    12. Christian A. Vossler

    . 2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Kahneman, Daniel,
    2. Jack L. Knetsch, and
    3. Richard H. Thaler

    . 1990. “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (6): 1325–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Knetsch, Jack L

    . 2010. “Values of Gains and Losses: Reference States and Choice of Measure.” Environmental and Resource Economics 46 (2): 179–88.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Lloyd-Smith, Patrick, and
    2. Wiktor Adamowicz

    . 2018. “Can Stated Measures of Willingness-to-Accept Be Valid? Evidence from Laboratory Experiments.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 91: 133–49.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Parzen, Emanuel

    . 1960. Modern Probability Theory and Its Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
29. 1. Plott, Charles R., and
    2. Kathryn Zeiler

    . 2005. “The Willingness to Pay: Willingness to Accept Gap, the ‘Endowment Effect,’ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations.” American Economic Review 95 (3): 530–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Praktiknjo, Aaron J

    . 2014. “Stated Preferences Based Estimation of Power Interruption Costs in Private Households: An Example from Germany.” Energy 76: 82–90.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Thaler, Richard

    . 1980. “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1 (1): 39–60.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Tunçel, Tuba, and
    2. James K. Hammitt

    . 2014. “A New Meta-Analysis on the WTP/WTA Disparity.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 68 (1): 175–87.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Vossler, Christian A.,
    2. Stephane Bergeron,
    3. Maurice Doyon, and
    4. Daniel Rondeau

    . 2017. “Revisiting the Gap Between the Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept for Public Goods.” Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Athens, Greece, June 28–July 1.
34. 1. Vossler, Christian A.,
    2. Maurice Doyon, and
    3. Daniel Rondeau

    . 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4 (4): 145–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Vossler, Christian A., and
    2. Sharon B. Watson

    . 2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 86: 137–47.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Willig, Robert D

    . 1976. “Consumer’s Surplus without Apology.” American Economic Review 66 (4): 589–97.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
37. 1. Wolf, André, and
    2. Lars Wenzel

    . 2016. “Regional Diversity in the Costs of Electricity Outages: Results for German Counties.” Utilities Policy 43: 195–205.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Zhao, Jinhua, and
    2. Catherine L. Kling

    . 2001. “A New Explanation for the WTP/WTA Disparity.” Economics Letters 73: 293–300.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science