Open Access

Farmland Rental Rates: Does Organic Certification Matter?

Kate Binzen Fuller, Joseph P. Janzen and B. Munkhnasan

Article Figures & Data

  • Table 1

    Summary Statistics for Farm-Level Variables in the ARMS by Organic Status, 2003-2011

    $1,000/FarmTotal SampleConventionalOrganic
    MeanSt. Dev.MeanSt. Dev.MeanSt. Dev.
    Production revenue3936953886757141,543***
    Variable costs2244202204054871,010***
    Fixed costs7310873106102184***
    ROVC165369165354184985
    $/Acre
    Land rental rate112114110108253294***
    Value of rented land4,1194,5764,0534,4168,93410,113***
    Production revenue6581,3076261,1932,9644,138***
    Variable costs4098873878122,0012,749***
    Fixed costs127218124206385617***
    ROVC2516462405921,0452,166***
    Livestock expenses6236231539*
    Crop insurance revenue9269261032
    Subsidy receipts192119211630
    Off-farm income3621,1023521,0531,1362,906*
    Conservation payments151514*
    Other
    Crop diversity Gini (0-1)0.910.030.910.030.910.04
    Debt-to-asset ratio0.181.870.181.880.221.34
    Operator age5212.6652134912.91**
    Acres operated9951,3069961,2999721,749
    Crop acres8391,0598401,0537851,438
    Rental ratio0.680.360.680.360.660.36
    N37,53536,4841,051
    • Note: Significance tests are conducted using Stata svy postestimation, which allows weighting (see www.stata.com/manuals13/rttest.pdf for details). All variables are from the USDA ARMS database, years 2003-2011. Summary statistics are weighted means and standard deviations using ARMS sampling weights and calculated after excluding farms without cash rental rate information, those with less than $5,000 in total value of production as well as farms that were predominantly livestock, woody tree, or nursery production, or located in a crop reporting district without observed organic farms. Land value is the estimated value for rented-not owned-land. Rental ratio is the ratio of rented to total operated acres. In ARMS, premiums are included in the fixed cost variable. Production revenue is revenue from commodity sales only; other sources of income are considered separately. ROVC is the return over variable cost equal to production revenue minus variable cost. All per acre variables are winsorized at the top 1%. ROVC per acre was winsorized at the bottom and top 1%. We inflate all dollar-denominated variables to 2011 (the last year of data we use) using the GDP deflator.

    • * p < 0.1; ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01 (from t-tests of organic versus conventional means).

  • Table 2

    Summary Statistics for County-Level Variables Applied to Farm-Level Observations by Organic Status

    Total SampleConventionalOrganic
    MeanSt. Dev.MeanSt. Dev.MeanSt. Dev.
    Organic farms in county4.529.384.399.0314.5521.34***
    Proportion irrigated0.140.280.140.270.340.40***
    Soil productivity index (0-1)0.550.210.550.210.420.22***
    Household income ($/1,000)37.537.3337.507.3039.519.22**
    Urban-rural index (1-9)5.062.495.072.484.272.49***
    N37,53536,4841,051
    • Note: Significance tests are conducted using Stata svy postestimation, which allows weighting (see www.stata.com/manuals13/rttest.pdf for details). All variables are from the USDA NASS Census of Agriculture, except the county soil productivity index, which is from the USDA NRCS Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO). The urban-rural index takes on values of one through nine, where nine is the most rural. The number of organic farms per county was estimated in 2002 and household income in 1999 using census data.

    • * p < 0.1; ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01 (from t-tests of organic versus conventional means).

  • Table 3

    Farmland Rental Rate Regression Results

    Equation(2)(3)(4a)(4b)(5)
    Organic status0.723***
    (0.157)
    0.354***
    (0.115)
    0.366***
    (0.111)
    0.346***
    (0.102)
    0.273***
    (0.079)
    Soil productivity1.072***
    (0.097)
    1.051***
    (0.094)
    0.821***
    (0.087)
    Organic farms in county0.001
    (0.001)
    0.001
    (0.001)
    0.001
    (0.001)
    County percent irrigated0.675***
    (0.064)
    0.625***
    (0.064)
    0.363***
    (0.057)
    County household income0.257***
    (0.068)
    0.248***
    (0.068)
    0.181***
    (0.066)
    Crop diversity Gini1.323***
    (0.227)
    1.192***
    (0.208)
    Fixed costs0.053***
    (0.009)
    0.004
    (0.009)
    Subsidy receipts0.035***
    (0.005)
    0.022***
    (0.005)
    Off-farm income0.026***
    (0.003)
    0.024***
    (0.003)
    Debt-to-asset ratio0.005***
    (0.001)
    0.004***
    (0.001)
    Operator age0.004***
    (0.001)
    0.003***
    (0.001)
    Conservation payments0.046***
    (0.006)
    0.018***
    (0.006)
    Production revenue0.295***
    (0.016)
    Variable costs0.118***
    (0.017)
    Crop insurance indemnities0.014***
    (0.003)
    R-squared0.0040.4850.4970.5150.560
    • Note: The dependent variable for all regressions is the cash rental rate. The sample size for all regressions is 37,535. Tables 1 and 2 provide variable descriptions. Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors are in parentheses. We suppress output for the following sets of fixed effects that are included in regressions corresponding to columns (3)-(5): year, farm type, crop reporting district, and urban proximity index.

    • * p < 0.1;

    • ** p < 0.05;

    • *** p < 0.01.

  • Table 4

    Elasticities of Farmland Rental Rates with Respect to Changes in Observed Variables

    Semi-elasticities
    Organic status0.255***
    (0.070)
    Soil productivity0.659***
    (0.068)
    Organic farms in county0.000
    (0.001)
    County percent irrigated0.307***
    (0.049)
    Crop diversity Gini0.856***
    (0.148)
    Debt-to-asset ratio0.004***
    (0.001)
    Operator age0.000***
    (0.000)
    Elasticities
    County household income0.195***
    (0.060)
    Fixed costs0.008
    (0.475)
    Off-farm income0.019***
    (0.002)
    Conservation payments0.003***
    (0.001)
    Production revenue0.300***
    (0.014)
    Variable costs0.129***
    (0.014)
    Crop insurance indemnities0.004***
    (0.001)
    • Note: Tables 1 and 2 provide variable descriptions. Standard errors are in parentheses. Year, farm type, crop reporting district, and urban proximity index fixed effects are included in the regressions used to compute the elasticities shown above, in addition to variables listed.

    • * p < 0.1;

    • ** p < 0.05;

    • *** p < 0.01.

  • Table 5

    Elasticities of Profit Measures with Respect to Changes in Observed Variables

    Dependent VariableRevenueVariable CostROVC
    Semielasticities
    Organic status0.154
    (0.117)
    0.229
    (0.113)
    −0.795
    (0.791)
    Soil productivity0.579***
    (0.074)
    0.318***
    (0.082)
    1.226***
    (0.550)
    Organic farms in county0.000
    (0.001)
    0.001
    (0.001)
    −0.006*
    (0.005)
    County percent irrigated0.647***
    (0.058)
    0.525***
    (0.058)
    0.772***
    (0.354)
    Crop diversity Gini0.457***
    (0.165)
    −0.257
    (0.180)
    0.938
    (1.175)
    Debt-to-asset ratio0.003***
    (0.001)
    0.005***
    (0.001)
    0.000
    (0.009)
    Operator age0.000***
    (0.000)
    0.000***
    (0.000)
    0.000***
    (0.000)
    Elasticities
    County household income0.122**
    (0.057)
    0.278***
    (0.069)
    −0.359
    (0.402)
    Fixed costs0.103***
    (0.008)
    0.208***
    (0.011)
    −0.248***
    (0.050)
    Subsidy receipts0.018***
    (0.004)
    0.034***
    (0.004)
    0.004
    (0.030)
    Off-farm income−0.007***
    (0.002)
    0.005**
    (0.003)
    −0.064***
    (0.017)
    Conservation payments−0.013***−0.008***−0.029***
    R-squared0.6260.6360.151
    • Note: Tables 1 and 2 provide variable descriptions. Standard errors are in parentheses. R2 refers to goodness-of-fit for the regression corresponding to the given elasticity calculations. Year, farm type, crop reporting district, and urban proximity index fixed effects are included in the regressions used to compute the elasticities shown above, in addition to variables listed.

    • * p < 0.1;

    • ** p < 0.05;

    • *** p < 0.01.