Open Access

Protecting the Breadbasket with Trees? The Effect of the Great Plains Shelterbelt Project on Agriculture

Tianshu Li

Article Figures & Data

  • Table 1

    Comparison of Treated and Control Counties in 1930

    More TreatedLess (or Not) Treated
    Proportion within the
    100-Mile-Wide Shelterbelt
    Zone >50%
    Proportion within the
    100-Mile-Wide Shelterbelt
    Zone <50%
    VariablesaObs.MeanS.D.Obs.MeanS.D.Difference
    Proportion protected by shelterbelts1170.300.281170.190.280.11*
    Other Right-Hand-Side Variables
    Proportion medium-erodedb1170.410.351170.380.350.03
    Proportion high-erodedb1170.200.321170.130.260.07
    Proportion above the Ogallala Aquiferb1170.320.421170.370.45-0.05
    Total precipitation in recent 2 years (mm)1171,114.28166.051171,118.22239.92−3.94
    Average temperature in recent 2 years (°C)11710.514.351179.823.990.69
    Farmland/county area1170.910.071170.890.090.02
    Woodland/county area1170.010.021170.020.04−0.01
    Cropland/farmland1170.580.171170.570.180.00
    Population per 1,000 acres11721.2211.3811726.1529.24−4.93
    Fraction of rural population1170.900.161170.860.220.04
    Fraction of farming population1170.620.111170.580.160.04*
    Number of farms/1,000 acres1172.641.231172.631.500.01
    Average farm size (in acres)117443.19323.11117508.53460.90−65.33
    Area of corn/cropland1170.170.191170.170.170.00
    Area of wheat/cropland1170.290.271170.310.24−0.02
    Area of hay/cropland1170.110.131170.130.14−0.02
    Area of cotton/cropland1170.120.251170.050.150.07*
    Area of oat, barley, and rye/cropland1170.120.121170.150.12−0.03*
    Number of cows/1,000 acres11752.2417.4511753.8323.79−1.60
    Number of pigs/1,000 acres11752.3863.3111757.4076.20−5.03
    Number of chickens/1,000 acres117241.55159.19117245.50189.27−3.95
    • a Main data source from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Census of Agriculture and Population; see Appendix B for more detailed definition of variables

    • b Soil erosion data from Hornbeck (2012); data on the Ogallala Aquifer from Hornbeck and Keskin (2014)

    • * t-test with p-value < 0.05

  • Table 2

    The Effects of Shelterbelt-Planting on Land Use and Revenue (2SLS)

    VariablesCropland / (Cropland+ Pasture)
    (1)
    log(Revenue from Crops / Farmland)
    (2)
    log(Revenue from Animal Products / Farmland)
    (3)
    log(Total Revenue / Farmland)
    (4)
    First Stage: Proportion Protected by shelterbelts
    (5)
    Prop. protected by shelterbelts*−0.0156−0.819***0.1350.569***
    1945-1950(0.0330)(0.270)(0.176)(0.180)
    1954-1959−0.131***
    (0.0476)
    −1.196***
    (0.381)
    0.689**
    (0.301)
    −0.487**
    (0.206)
    1964-1969−0.245***
    (0.0625)
    −1.038***
    (0.365)
    0.986**
    (0.417)
    0.0246
    (0.252)
    1978-1982−0.318***
    (0.0779)
    −0.736*
    (0.384)
    1.312**
    (0.579)
    0.472
    (0.364)
    1987-1992−0.287***
    (0.0726)
    −0.587
    (0.398)
    1.317**
    (0.642)
    0.533
    (0.411)
    Prop. in the shelterbelt zone*
    Each post year
    0.170***
    (0.037)
    Year and county dummiesYesYesYesYesYes
    Outcome variables in 1910-1930aYesYesYesYesYes
    Other control variablesbYesYesYesYesYes
    Erosion from the Dust BowlbYesYesYesYesYes
    Prop. above the Ogallala AquiferbYesYesYesYesYes
    Observations2,4332,5682,5682,5742,574
    Number of counties234234234234234
    R-squared0.3200.9450.9450.9610.713
    • a Data from 1910 and 1920 are missing in column 1 because the area of cropland and pasture is not reported.

    • b “Other control variables“ include rainfall and temperature for each year and all the other variables listed in Table 1 from 1910–1930; “Erosion from the Dust Bowl” from Hornbeck (2012) include proportions of high- and medium-eroded as in Table 1; “Proportion above the Ogallala Aquifer” is from Hornbeck and Keskin (2014). All these variables are time invariant and all interacted with year-dummies. Standard errors clustered at county level in parentheses

    • *** p < 0.01

    • ** p < 0.05

    • * p < 0.1

  • Table 3

    The Effects of Shelterbelt-Planting on Crop Production (2SLS)

    Variableslog(Yield of
    Wheat / Acre)
    (1)
    log(Yield of
    Corn / Acre)
    (2)
    log(Yield of
    Hays / Acre)
    (3)
    log(Irrigated
    Acreage)
    (4)
    log(Revenue from
    Crops / Cropland)
    (5)
    Prop. protected by shelterbelts*−1.147***−0.448**0.407−5.213**−0.748***
    1945-1950(0.350)(0.204)(0.438)(2.437)(0.283)
    1954-1959−1.132** (0.499)−0.256 (0.298)−0.380 (0.273)−3.572* (1.830)−1.377*** (0.435)
    1964-1969−0.422 (0.356)−0.705* (0.412)−0.104 (0.216)−5.867*** (2.144)−0.941*** (0.313)
    1978-19820.0558 (0.264)−0.515** (0.232)−0.128 (0.189)−1.938 (1.770)−0.321 (0.298)
    1987-19920.203 (0.233)−0.0711 (0.253)−0.102 (0.197)−1.425 (1.622)−0.0130 (0.290)
    Year and county dummiesYesYesYesYesYes
    Outcome variables in 1910-1930YesYesYesYesYes
    Other control variablesaYesYesYesYesYes
    Erosion from the Dust BowlaYesYesYesYesYes
    Proportion above the Ogallala AquiferaYesYesYesYesYes
    Observations2,4112,1222,3262,2642,427
    Number of counties222233233234234
    R-squared0.9040.9340.9180.8320.937
    • Note: Yield of corn in column 2 is missing for 1969 and 1974; yield of all hays in column 3 is missing for 1945; irrigated acreage in columns 4 is also missing for 1945 with its baseline year 1935 (1930 for other variables).

    • a “Other control variables” include rainfall and temperature for each year and all the other variables listed in Table 1 from 1910–1930; “Erosion from the Dust Bowl” from Hornbeck (2012) include proportions of high- and medium-eroded as in Table 1; “Proportion above the Ogallala Aquifer” is from Hornbeck and Keskin (2014). All these variables are time invariant and all interacted with year-dummies. Standard errors clustered at county level in parentheses:

    • *** p < 0.01

    • ** p < 0.05

    • * p < 0.1

  • Table 4

    The Effects of Shelterbelt-Planting on Livestock Production (2SLS)

    Variableslog(No. of
    Cattle/Acre)
    (1)
    log(No. of
    Pigs/Acre)
    (2)
    log(No. of
    Chickens/Acre)
    (3)
    log(Expenditure
    on Feed)
    (4)
    log(Revenue
    from Animal
    Products/Pasture)
    (5)
    Proportion protected by shelterbelts*0.197−0.3180.05760.173
    1945-1950(0.122)(0.196)(0.175)(0.211)
    1954-19590.562*** (0.187)−0.137 (0.243)−0.0726 (0.270)0.573** (0.290)
    1964-19690.854*** (0.249)−0.283 (0.346)0.588 (0.544)0.523 (0.537)0.655* (0.363)
    1978-19820.855*** (0.294)−0.729* (0.440)1.190 (1.115)0.660 (0.595)0.725 (0.554)
    1987-19921.004*** (0.352)−0.803 (0.522)0.987 (1.162)0.776 (0.646)0.783 (0.611)
    Year and county dummiesYesYesYesYesYes
    Outcome variables in 1910-1930YesYesYesYesYes
    Other control variablesaYesYesYesYesYes
    Erosion from the Dust BowlaYesYesYesYesYes
    Proportion above the Ogallala
    Aquifera
    YesYesYesYesYes
    Observations2,5742,5472,4001,6282,568
    Number of counties234234234234234
    R-squared0.7020.9720.9340.9020.940
    • note: Yield of corn in column 2 is missing for 1969 and 1974; yield of all hays in column 3 is missing for 1945; irrigated acreage in columns 4 is also missing for 1945 with its baseline year 1935 (1930 for other variables)

    • a “Other control variables” include rainfall and temperature for each year and all the other variables listed in Table 1 from 1910–1930; “Erosion from the Dust Bowl” from Hornbeck (2012) include proportions of high- and medium-eroded as in Table 1; “Proportion above the Ogallala Aquifer” is from Hornbeck and Keskin (2014). All these variables are time invariant and all interacted with year-dummies. Standard errors clustered at county level in parentheses:

    • *** p < 0.01

    • ** p < 0.05

    • * p < 0.1

  • Table 5

    East versus West

    Eastern Half of the CountiesWestern Half of the Counties
    Cropland /
    (Cropland+
    Pasture)
    (1)
    log(Revenue
    from Crops/
    Farmland)
    (2)
    log(Revenue from
    Animal Products/
    Farmland)
    (3)
    log(Irrigated
    Acreage)
    (4)
    Cropland /
    (Cropland+
    Pasture)
    (5)
    log(Revenue
    from Crops/
    Farmland)
    (6)
    log(Revenue from
    Animal Products/
    Farmland)
    (7)
    log(Irrigated
    Acreage)
    (8)
    Panel A: First Stage
    Proportion in the shelterbelt zone
    Each post year*
    0.260**
    (0.100)
    0.137***
    (0.044)
    Panel B: Second Stage
    Proportion protected by shelterbelts*−0.02160.05360.05760.128−0.130−2.011***0.948−12.75
    1945-1950(0.0246)(0.275)(0.142)(2.037)(0.131)(0.775)(0.680)(9.207)
    1954-1959−0.0921**
    (0.0387)
    0.442 (0.375)0.617**
    (0.269)
    1.261
    (2.112)
    −0.225
    (0.163)
    −2.686**
    (1.181)
    2.533**
    (1.160)
    −9.994*
    (5.960)
    1964-1969−0.124**
    (0.0507)
    0.604
    (0.388)
    0.988**
    (0.392)
    0.298
    (2.355)
    −0.310*
    (0.179)
    −1.947**
    (0.948)
    2.487*
    (1.462)
    −10.26*
    (5.876)
    1978-1982−0.109*
    (0.0606)
    1.058**
    (0.536)
    1.764***
    (0.574)
    −0.134
    (1.449)
    −0.288
    (0.188)
    −1.595*
    (0.966)
    3.614*
    (2.168)
    1987-1992−0.147**
    (0.0706)
    1.262**
    (0.537)
    1.505***
    (0.529)
    −0.596
    (1.517)
    −0.358*
    (0.211)
    −1.838*
    (0.991)
    3.217
    (2.251)
    0.347
    (2.016)
    Year and county dummiesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    Outcome variables in 1910-1930aYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    Other control variablesbYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    Erosion from the Dust BowlbYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    Proportion above the Ogallala AquiferbYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    Observations1,2431,2631,2631,1101,1901,3051,3051,035
    Number of counties115115115115119119119119
    R-squared0.7620.9640.9570.9570.7340.9500.9450.945
    • a Data from 1910 and 1920 are missing in column 1 because the area of cropland and pasture is not reported.

    • b “Other control variables“ include rainfall and temperature for each year and all the other variables listed in Table 1 from 1910–1930; “Erosion from the Dust Bowl” from Hornbeck (2012) include proportions of high- and medium-eroded as in Table 1; ”Proportion above the Ogallala Aquifer” is from Hornbeck and Keskin (2014). All these variables are time invariant and all interacted with year-dummies. Standard errors clustered at county level in parentheses

    • *** p < 0.01

    • ** p < 0.05

    • * p < 0.1