Doing More with Less: Leveraging Social Norms and Status Concerns in Encouraging Conservation Farm Practices

References

1. ↵
   1. Akerlof, George A., and
   2. Rachel E. Kranton

   . 2000. “Economics and Identity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 715–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554881.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Anderson, Cameron, and
   2. Gavin J. Kilduff

   . 2009. “The Pursuit of Status in Social Groups.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 18 (5): 295–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01655.x.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Benabou, Roland, and
   2. Jean Tirole

   . 2006. “Incentives and Prosocial Behavior.” American Economic Review 96 (5): 27.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Benjamin, Daniel J.,
   2. James J. Choi, and
   3. A. Joshua Strickland

   . 2010. “Social Identity and Preferences.” American Economic Review 100 (4): 1913–28. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1913.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Brown, Terry J.,
   2. Sam H. Ham, and
   3. Michael Hughes

   . 2010. “Picking up Litter: An Application of Theory-Based Communication to Influence Tourist Behaviour in Protected Areas.” Journal of Sustainable Tourism 18 (7): 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669581003721281.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Burton, Rob J. F.

   2004a. “Seeing Through the ‘Good Farmer’s’ Eyes: Towards Developing an Understanding of the Social Symbolic Value of ‘Productivist’ Behaviour.” Sociologia Ruralis 44 (2): 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Burton, Rob J. F.

   . 2004b. “Reconceptualising the ‘Behavioural Approach’ in Agricultural Studies: A Socio-Psychological Perspective.” Journal of Rural Studies 20 (3): 359–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.12.001.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Burton, Rob J. F., and
   2. Geoff A. Wilson

   . 2006. “Injecting Social Psychology Theory into Conceptualisations of Agricultural Agency: Towards a Post-Productivist Farmer Self-Identity?” Journal of Rural Studies 22 (1): 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.07.004.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Carey, Peter D.,
   2. Sarah J. Manchester, and
   3. Les G. Firbank

   . 2005. “Performance of Two Agri-Environment Schemes in England: A Comparison of Ecological and Multi-Disciplinary Evaluations.” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 108 (3): 178–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.02.002.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Cary, John W., and
    2. Roger L. Wilkinson

    . 1997. “Perceived Profitability and Farmers’ Conservation Behaviour.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 48 (1–3): 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1997.tb01127.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Christensen, Tove,
    2. Anders Branth Pedersen,
    3. Helle Oersted Nielsen,
    4. Morten Raun Mørkbak,
    5. Berit Hasler, and
    6. Sigrid Denver

    . 2011. “Determinants of Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Subsidy Schemes for Pesticide-Free Buffer Zones: A Choice Experiment Study.” Ecological Economics 70 (8): 1558–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.021.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Cialdini, Robert B.,
    2. Raymond R. Reno, and
    3. Carl A. Kallgren

    . 1990. “A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (6): 1015.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. de Krom, Michiel P. M. M.

    2017. “Farmer Participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes: Regionalisation and the Role of Bridging Social Capital.” Land Use Policy 60: 352–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.026.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Dessart, François J.,
    2. Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé, and
    3. René van Bavel

    . 2019. “Behavioural Factors Affecting the Adoption of Sustainable Farming Practices: A Policy-Oriented Review.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 46 (3): 417–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Dillman, Don A.,
    2. Jolene D. Smyth, and
    3. Leah Melani Christian

    . 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16. ↵
    1. Edwards-Jones, G.

    2006. “Modelling Farmer Decision-Making: Concepts, Progress and Challenges.” Animal Science 82 (6): 783–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/ASC2006112.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Farrow, Katherine,
    2. Gilles Grolleau, and
    3. Lisette Ibanez

    . 2017. “Social Norms and Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence.” Ecological Economics 140: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Franks, Jeremy R.

    2016. “Some Implications of Brexit for UK Agricultural Environmental Policy.” Discussion Paper Series 36. Newcastle, UK: Centre for Rural Economy, Newcastle University. Available at https://www.ncl.ac.uk/media/wwwnclacuk/centreforruraleconomy/files/discussion-paper-36.pdf.
19. ↵
    1. Gasson, Ruth

    . 1973. “Goals and Values of Farmers.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 24 (3): 521–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1973.tb00952.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Gorton, Matthew,
    2. Elodie Douarin,
    3. Sophia Davidova, and
    4. Laure Latruffe

    . 2008. “Attitudes to Agricultural Policy and Farming Futures in the Context of the 2003 CAP Reform: A Comparison of Farmers in Selected Established and New Member States.” Journal of Rural Studies 24 (3): 322–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.10.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Grant, Wyn

    . 2016. “The Challenges Facing UK Farmers from Brexit.” EuroChoices 15 (2): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12127.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Hennessy, Thia C., and
    2. Fiona S. Thorne

    . 2005. “How Decoupled Are Decoupled Payments? The Evidence from Ireland.” EuroChoices 4 (3): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2005.00015.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Hill, Berkeley

    . 2017. “The United Kingdom’s Domestic Policy for Agriculture after Brexit.” EuroChoices 16 (2): 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12158.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Hodge, Ian, and
    2. Mark Reader

    . 2010. “The Introduction of Entry Level Stewardship in England: Extension or Dilution in Agri-Environment Policy?” Land Use Policy 27 (2): 270–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.03.005.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Hogg, Michael A., and
    2. John C. Turner

    . 1987. “Intergroup Behaviour, Self-Stereotyping and the Salience of Social Categories.” British Journal of Social Psychology 26 (4): 325–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Hornsey, Matthew J.

    2008. “Social Identity Theory and Self-Categorization Theory: A Historical Review.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 (1): 204–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Howley, Peter

    . 2015. “The Happy Farmer: The Effect of Nonpecuniary Benefits on Behavior.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97 (4): 1072–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aav020.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    1. Howley, Peter,
    2. James Breen,
    3. Cathal O. Donoghue, and
    4. Thia Hennessy

    . 2012. “Does the Single Farm Payment Affect Farmers’ Behaviour? A Macro and Micro Analysis.” International Journal of Agricultural Management 2 (1): 57–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Howley, Peter,
    2. Cathal Buckley,
    3. Cathal O. Donoghue, and
    4. Mary Ryan

    . 2015. “Explaining the Economic ‘Irrationality’ of Farmers’ Land Use Behaviour: The Role of Productivist Attitudes and Non-Pecuniary Benefits.” Ecological Economics 109: 186–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.015.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Howley, Peter,
    2. Lava Yadav,
    3. Stephen Hynes,
    4. Cathal O. Donoghue, and
    5. Stephen O. Neill

    . 2014. “Contrastring the Attitudes of Farmers and the General Public Regarding the ‘Multifunctional’ Role of the Agricultural Sector.” Land Use Policy 38: 248–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.020.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Jenni, Karen, and
    2. George Loewenstein

    . 1997. “Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14 (3): 235–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007740225484.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Kantelhardt, Jochen

    . 2006. “Impact of the European Common Agricultural Policy Reform on Future Research on Rural Areas.” Outlook on Agriculture 35 (2): 143–48. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000006777641534.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Karlan, Dean, and
    2. Margaret A. McConnell

    . 2014. “Hey Look at Me: The Effect of Giving Circles on Giving.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 106: 402–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.013.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Key, Nigel, and
    2. Michael J. Roberts

    . 2009. “Nonpecuniary Benefits to Farming: Implications for Supply Response to Decoupled Payments.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01180.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. ↵
    1. Kuhfuss, Laure,
    2. Raphaële Préget,
    3. Sophie Thoyer, and
    4. Nick Hanley

    . 2016a. “Nudging Farmers to Enrol Land into Agri-Environmental Schemes: The Role of a Collective Bonus.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 43 (4): 609–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbv031.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. ↵
    1. Kuhfuss, Laure,
    2. Raphaële Préget,
    3. Sophie Thoyer,
    4. Nick Hanley,
    5. Philippe Le Coent, and
    6. Mathieu Désolé

    . 2016b. “Nudges, Social Norms, and Permanence in Agri-Environmental Schemes.” Land Economics 92 (4): 641–55. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.92.4.641.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. ↵
    1. Lequin, Sonia,
    2. Gilles Grolleau, and
    3. Naoufel Mzoughi

    . 2019. “Harnessing the Power of Identity to Encourage Farmers to Protect the Environment.” Environmental Science & Policy 93: 112–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-vsci.2018.12.022.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Loewenstein, George, and
    2. Nick Chater

    . 2017. “Putting Nudges in Perspective.” Behavioural Public Policy 1 (1): 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.7.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Lokhorst, Anne Marike,
    2. Henk Staats,
    3. Jerry van Dijk,
    4. Eric van Dijk, and
    5. Geert de Snoo

    . 2011. “What’s in It for Me? Motivational Differences between Farmers’ Subsidised and Non-Subsidised Conservation Practices.” Applied Psychology 60 (3): 337–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00438.x.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Marr, Eric Joseph, and
    2. Peter Howley

    . 2019. “The Accidental Environmentalists: Factors Affecting Farmers’ Adoption of Pro-Environmental Activities in England and Ontario.” Journal of Rural Studies 68: 100–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.013.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Marr, Eric Joseph,
    2. Peter Howley, and
    3. Charlotte Burns

    . 2016. “Sparing or Sharing? Differing Approaches to Managing Agricultural and Environmental Spaces in England and Ontario.” Journal of Rural Studies 48: 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.002.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Maybery, Darryl,
    2. Lin Crase, and
    3. Chris Gullifer

    . 2005. “Categorising Farming Values as Economic, Conservation and Lifestyle.” Journal of Economic Psychology 26 (1): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2003.10.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. McGuire, Jean M.,
    2. Lois Wright Morton,
    3. J. Gordon Arbuckle, and
    4. Alicia D. Cast

    . 2015. “Farmer Identities and Responses to the Social-Biophysical Environment.” Journal of Rural Studies 39: 145–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.011.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. McGuire, Jean,
    2. Lois Wright Morton, and
    3. Alicia D. Cast

    . 2013. “Reconstructing the Good Farmer Identity: Shifts in Farmer Identities and Farm Management Practices to Improve Water Quality.” Agriculture and Human Values 30 (1): 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9381-y.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Michel-Guillou, Elisabeth, and
    2. Gabriel Moser

    . 2006. “Commitment of Farmers to Environmental Protection: From Social Pressure to Environmental Conscience.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 26 (3): 227–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.004.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. ↵
    1. Mills, Jane,
    2. Peter Gaskell,
    3. Matt Reed,
    4. Christopher J. Short,
    5. Julie Ingram,
    6. Nigel Boatman,
    7. Naomi Jones, et al

    . 2013. Farmer Attitudes and Evaluation of Outcomes to On-Farm Environmental Management. Report to Defra. Gloucestershire, UK: Countryside and Community Research Institute. Available at http://www.ccri.ac.uk/farmerattitudes-2/.
47. ↵
    1. Musshoff, Oliver,
    2. Martin Odening,
    3. Christian Schade,
    4. Syster Christin Maart-Noelck, and
    5. Serena Sandri

    . 2013. “Inertia in Disinvestment Decisions: Experimental Evidence.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 40 (3): 463–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbs032.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Oakes, Penelope J.,
    2. John C. Turner, and
    3. S. Alexander Haslam

    . 1991. “Perceiving People as Group Members: The Role of Fit in the Salience of Social Categorizations.” British Journal of Social Psychology 30 (2): 125–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00930.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. ↵
    1. Pannell, David J.,
    2. Graham R. Marshall,
    3. Neil Barr,
    4. Allan Curtis,
    5. Frank Vanclay, and
    6. Roger Wilkinson

    . 2006. “Understanding and Promoting Adoption of Conservation Practices by Rural Landholders.” Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46 (11): 1407–24. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05037.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. ↵
    1. Pellegrin, Claire,
    2. Gilles Grolleau,
    3. Naoufel Mzoughi, and
    4. Claude Napoleone

    . 2018. “Does the Identifiable Victim Effect Matter for Plants? Results from a Quasi-experimental Survey of French Farmers.” Ecological Economics 151: 106–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.001.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Reimer, Adam P.,
    2. Aaron W. Thompson, and
    3. Linda S. Prokopy

    . 2012. “The Multi-Dimensional Nature of Environmental Attitudes among Farmers in Indiana: Implications for Conservation Adoption.” Agriculture and Human Values 29 (1): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9308-z.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
52. ↵
    1. Ribaudo, Marc

    . 2015. “The Limits of Voluntary Conservation Programs.” Choices 30 (2): 1–5.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Salhi, Salima,
    2. Gilles Grolleau,
    3. Naoufel Mzoughi, and
    4. Angela Sutan

    . 2012. “How Can Positional Concerns Prevent the Adoption of Socially Desirable Innovations?” Journal of Economic Issues 46 (3): 799–810. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460311.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Schultz, P. Wesley,
    2. Jessica M. Nolan,
    3. Robert B. Cialdini,
    4. Noah J. Goldstein, and
    5. Vladas Griskevicius

    . 2007. “The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms.” Psychological Science 18 (5): 429–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
55. ↵
    1. Sexton, Steven E., and
    2. Alison L. Sexton

    . 2014. “Conspicuous Conservation: The Prius Halo and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Bona Fides.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 67 (3): 303–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.11.004.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Sulemana, Iddisah, and
    2. Harvey S. James

    . 2014. “Farmer Identity, Ethical Attitudes and Environmental Practices.” Ecological Economics 98: 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.011.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Sunstein, Cass R.

    2015. “The Ethics of Nudging.” Yale Journal on Regulation 32: 413.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Sweikert, Lily A., and
    2. Larry M. Gigliotti

    . 2019. “A Values-Based Private Landowner Typologyto Improve Grassland Conservation Initiatives.” Society & Natural Resources 32 (2): 167–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1501526.

    OpenUrl
59. ↵
    1. Swinbank, Alan

    . 2017. “Brexit, Trade Agreements and CAP Reform.” EuroChoices 16 (2): 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12156.

    OpenUrl
60. ↵
    1. Tajfel, Henri

    . 1974. “Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour.” Social Science Information 13 (2): 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. ↵
    1. Thaler, Richard

    . 1985. “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice.” Marketing Science 4 (3): 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
62. ↵
    1. Thoyer, Sophie, and
    2. Raphaële Préget

    . 2019. “Enriching the CAP Evaluation Toolbox with Experimental Approaches: Introduction to the Special Issue.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 46 (3): 347–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz024.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Vanclay, F.

    2004. “Social Principles for Agricultural Extension to Assist in the Promotion of Natural Resource Management.” Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44 (3): 213–22. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea02139.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
64. ↵
    1. van Dijk, William F. A.,
    2. Anne Marike Lokhorst,
    3. Frank Berendse, and
    4. Geert R. de Snoo

    . 2016. “Factors Underlying Farmers’ Intentions to Perform Unsubsidised Agri-Environmental Measures.” Land Use Policy 59 (December): 207–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.003.

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Vanslembrouck, Isabel,
    2. Guido Van Huylenbroeck, and
    3. Wim Verbeke

    . 2002. “Determinants of the Willingness of Belgian Farmers to Participate in Agri-Environmental Measures.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 53 (3): 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2002.tb00034.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
66. ↵
    1. van Vugt, Mark, and
    2. Charlotte L. Hardy

    . 2010. “Co-operation for Reputation: Wasteful Contributions as Costly Signals in Public Goods.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 13 (1): 101–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209342258.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
67. ↵
    1. Walford, Nigel

    . 2003. “Productivism Is Allegedly Dead, Long Live Productivism. Evidence of Continued Productivist Attitudes and Decision-Making in South-East England.” Journal of Rural Studies 19 (4): 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00030-5.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
68. ↵
    1. Werch, Chudley E.,
    2. Deborah M. Pappas,
    3. Joan M. Carlson,
    4. Carlo C. DiClemente,
    5. Pamela S. Chally, and
    6. Jacqueline A. Sinder

    . 2000. “Results of a Social Norm Intervention to Prevent Binge Drinking Among First-Year Residential College Students.” Journal of American College Health 49 (2): 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448480009596288.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
69. ↵
    1. Willock, Joyce,
    2. Ian J. Deary,
    3. Gareth Edwards-Jones,
    4. Gavin J. Gibson,
    5. Murray J. McGregor,
    6. Alistair Sutherland,
    7. J. Barry Dent,
    8. Oliver Morgan, and
    9. Robert Grieve

    . 1999. “The Role of Attitudes and Objectives in Farmer Decision Making: Business and Environmentally-Oriented Behaviour in Scotland.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 50 (2): 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00814.x.

    OpenUrl
70. ↵
    1. Willock, Joyce,
    2. Ian J. Deary,
    3. Murray M. McGregor,
    4. Alister Sutherland,
    5. Gareth Edwards-Jones,
    6. Oliver Morgan,
    7. Barry Dent,
    8. Robert Grieve,
    9. Gavin Gibson, and
    10. Elizabeth Austin

    . 1999. “Farmers’ Attitudes, Objectives, Behaviors, and Personality Traits: The Edinburgh Study of Decision Making on Farms.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 54 (1): 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1642.

    OpenUrlCrossRef