Payment and Policy Consequentiality in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation: Experimental Design Effects on Self-Reported Perceptions

References

1. 1. Abate, Tenaw G.,
   2. Tobias Börger,
   3. Margrethe Aanesen,
   4. Jannike Falk-Andersson,
   5. Kayleigh J. Wyles, and
   6. Nicola J. Beaumont

   . 2020. “Valuation of Marine Plastic Pollution in the European Arctic: Applying an Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Model to Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 169: 106521.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Beaumont, Nicola J.,
   2. Margrethe Aanesen,
   3. Melanie C. Austen,
   4. Tobias Börger,
   5. James R. Clark,
   6. Matthew Cole,
   7. Tara Hooper,
   8. Penelope K. Lindeque,
   9. Christine Pascoe, and
   10. Kayleigh J. Wyles

   . 2019. “Global Ecological, Social and Economic Impacts of Marine Plastic.” Marine Pollution Bulletin 142: 189–195.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Bergmann, Melanie,
   2. Nadja Sandhop,
   3. Ingo Schewe, and
   4. Diederik DHert

   . 2016. “Observations of Floating Anthropogenic Litter in the Barents Sea and Fram Strait, Arctic.” Polar Biology 39 (3): 553–60.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Bergmann, Melanie,
   2. Birgit Lutz,
   3. Mine B. Tekman, and
   4. Lars Gutow

   . 2017. “Citizen Scientists Reveal: Marine Litter Pollutes Arctic Beaches and Affects Wild Life.” Marine Pollution Bulletin 125 (1–2): 535–40.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Budzi´nski, Wiktor, and
   2. Mikołaj Czajkowski

   . 2018. “Hybrid Choice Models vs. Endogeneity of Indicator Variables: A Monte Carlo Investigation.” Working paper 21/2018. Warsaw, Poland: University of Warsaw. Available at https://www.wne.uw.edu.pl/files/6215/3933/4572/WNE_WP280.pdf.
6. 1. Budzi´nski, Wiktor,
   2. Mikołaj Czajkowski, and
   3. Ewa Zawojska

   . 2019. “Endogeneity of Self-Reported Consequentiality in Stated Preference Studies.” Paper presented at the International Choice Modelling Conference, Kobe, Japan, August 19–21.
7. 1. Carson, Richard T., and
   2. Theodore Groves

   . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Carson, Richard T.,
   2. W. Michael Hanemann,
   3. Raymond J. Kopp,
   4. Jon A. Krosnick,
   5. Robert Cameron Mitchell,
   6. Stanley Presser,
   7. Paul A. Ruud,
   8. V. Kerry Smith,
   9. Michael Conaway, and
   10. Kerry Martin

   . 1998. “Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panels No-Vote Recommendation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (2): 335–38.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Champ, Patricia A.,
   2. Nicholas E. Flores,
   3. Thomas C. Brown, and
   4. James Chivers

   . 2002. “Contingent Valuation and Incentives.” Land Economics 78 (4): 591–604.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. Czajkowski, Mikołaj,
    2. Christian A. Vossler,
    3. Wiktor Budzi´nski,
    4. Anna Wi´sniewska, and
    5. Ewa Zawojska

    . 2017. “Addressing Empirical Challenges Related to the Incentive Compatibility of Stated Preferences Methods.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 142: 47–63.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Flores, Nicholas E., and
    2. Aaron Strong

    . 2007. “Cost Credibility and the Stated Preference Analysis of Public Goods.” Resource and Energy Economics 29 (3): 195–205.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Forbes, Keldi,
    2. Peter Boxall,
    3. Wiktor L. Adamowicz, and
    4. Alejandro De Maio Sukic

    . 2015. “Recovering Pacific Rockfish at Risk: The Economic Valuation of Management Actions.” Frontiers in Marine Science 2 (71). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00071.
13. 1. Groothuis, Peter A.,
    2. Tanga M. Mohr,
    3. John C. Whitehead, and
    4. Kristan Cockerill

    . 2017. “Endogenous Consequentiality in Stated Preference Referendum Data: The Influence of the Randomly Assigned Tax Amount.” Land Economics 93 (2): 258–68.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 1. He, Jie,
    2. Jérôme Dupras,
    3. Franck Ndefo, and
    4. Thomas Poder

    . 2020. “Payment and Provision Consequentiality in Voluntary Contribution Mechanism: Separate or Joint Effects?” Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences 13: 11–36.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Herriges, Joseph,
    2. Catherine Kling,
    3. Chih-Chen Liu, and
    4. Justin Tobias

    . 2010. “What Are the Consequences of Consequentiality?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (1): 67–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Hwang, Joonghyun,
    2. Daniel R. Petrolia, and
    3. Matthew G. Interis

    . 2014. “Consequentiality and Opt-Out Responses in Stated Preference Surveys.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 43 (3): 471–88.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Interis, Matthew G., and
    2. Daniel R. Petrolia

    . 2014. “The Effects of Consequentiality in Binary-and Multinomial-Choice Surveys.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 39 (2): 201–16.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Johnston, Robert J.,
    2. Kevin J. Boyle,
    3. Wiktor Adamowicz,
    4. Jeff Bennett,
    5. Roy Brouwer,
    6. Trudy A. Cameron,
    7. W. Michael Hanemann,
    8. Nick Hanley,
    9. Mandy Ryan,
    10. Ricardo Scarpa,
    11. Roger Tourangeau, and
    12. Christian A. Vossler

    . 2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Li, Xiaogu,
    2. Kimberley L. Jensen,
    3. Dayton M. Lambert, and
    4. Christopher D. Clark

    . 2018. “Consequentiality Beliefs and Consumer Valuation of Extrinsic Attributes in Beef.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 50 (1): 1–26.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Lloyd-Smith, Patrick,
    2. Wiktor Adamowicz, and
    3. Diane Dupont

    . 2019. “Incorporating Stated Consequentiality Questions in Stated Preference Research.” Land Economics 95 (3): 293–306.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 1. Lusher, Amy

    . 2015. “Microplastics in the Marine Environment: Distribution, Interactions, and Effects.” In Marine Anthropogenic Litter, edited by Melanie Bergmann, Lars Gutow, and Michael Klages, 245–307. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
22. 1. Lusher, Amy L.,
    2. Valentina Tirelli,
    3. Ian OConnor, and
    4. Rick Officer

    . 2015. “Microplastics in Arctic Polar Waters: The First Reported Values of Particles in Surface and Sub-Surface Samples.” Scientific Reports 5 (1): 14947.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Mitani, Yohei, and
    2. Nicholas E. Flores

    . 2010. “Public Goods Referenda without Perfectly Correlated Prices and Quantities.” Paper presented at the 4th World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, Montreal, Canada, June 28–July 2.
24. 1. Mitani, Yohei, and
    2. Nicholas E. Flores

    . 2014. “Hypothetical Bias Reconsidered: Payment and Provision Uncertainties in a Threshold Provision Mechanism.” Environmental and Resource Economics 59 (3): 433–54.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Needham, Katherine, and
    2. Nick Hanley

    . 2019. “Prior Knowledge, Familiarity and Stated Policy Consequentiality in Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 9 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2019.1611481.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Oehlmann, Malte, and
    2. Jürgen Meyerhoff

    . 2017. “Stated Preferences towards Renewable Energy Alternatives in Germany: Do the Consequentiality of the Survey and Trust in Institutions Matter?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (1): 1–16.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Stafford, Richard, and
    2. Peter J. S. Jones

    . 2019 “Viewpoint: Ocean Plastic Pollution: A Convenient but Distracting Truth?” Marine Policy 103: 187–91.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Trevail, Alice M.,
    2. Geir W. Gabrielsen,
    3. Susanne Kühn, and
    4. Jan A. Van Franeker

    . 2015. “Elevated Levels of Ingested Plastic in a High Arctic Seabird, the Northern Fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis).” Polar Biology 38 (7): 975–81.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Vossler, Christian A.,
    2. Maurice Doyon, and
    3. Daniel Rondeau

    . 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4 (4): 145–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Vossler, Christian A., and
    2. J. Scott Holladay

    . 2018. “Alternative Value Elicitation Formats in Contingent Valuation: Mechanism Design and Convergent Validity.” Journal of Public Economics 165: 133–45.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Vossler, Christian A., and
    2. Sharon B. Watson

    . 2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 86: 137–47.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Wilde, Joachim

    . 2000. “Identification of Multiple Equation Probit Models with Endogenous Dummy Regressors.” Economics Letters 69 (3): 309–12.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Zawojska, Ewa,
    2. Anna Bartczak, and
    3. Mikołaj Czajkowski

    . 2019. “Disentangling the Effects of Policy and Payment Consequentiality and Risk Attitudes on Stated Preferences.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 93: 63–84.

    OpenUrl