Effective Targeting and Additionality: Evaluating the D.L. 701 Reforms for Afforesting Erodible Land in Southern Chile

References

1. ↵
   1. Abadie, Alberto, and
   2. Guido W. Imbens

   . 2008. “On the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators.” Econometrica 76 (6): 1537–57. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6474.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Albaugh, Janine M.,
   2. Peter J. Dye, and
   3. John S. King

   . 2013. “Eucalyptus and Water Use in South Africa.” International Journal of Forestry Research 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/852540.
3. ↵
   1. Alix-Garcia, Jennifer,
   2. Elizabeth Shapiro, and
   3. Katharine Sims

   . 2012. “Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program.” Land Economics 88 (4): 613–38.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Amacher, Gregory S.,
   2. Markku Ollikainen, and
   3. Erkki Koskela

   . 2009. Economics of Forest Resources. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. ↵
   1. Babcock, Bruce A.,
   2. P. G. Lakshminarayan,
   3. Jun. Ji. Wu, and
   4. David Zilberman

   . 1997. “Targeting Tools for the Purchase of Environmental Amenities.” Land Economics 73 (3): 325. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147171.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Barbier, Edward B.

   2010. “Poverty, Development, and Environment.” Environmental and Development Economics 15 (6): 635–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X1000032X.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Brown, Alice E.,
   2. Lu Zhang,
   3. Thomas A. McMahon,
   4. Andrew Western, and
   5. Robert A. Vertessy

   . 2005. “A Review of Paired Catchment Studies for Determining Changes in Water Yield Resulting from Alterations in Vegetation.” Journal of Hydrology 310 (1): 28–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.010.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Calder, Ian R.

   1998. “Water Resource and Land Use Issues.” SWIM Paper 3. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute.
9. ↵
   1. Caliendo, Marco, and
   2. Sabine Kopeinig

   . 2008. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (1): 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Camus, Pablo, and
    2. Ernst R. Hajek

    . 1998. “Historia ambiental de Chile.” Working paper. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
11. ↵
    1. Centro de Información de Recursos Naturales

    . 2010a. “Determinación de la erosión actualy potencial de los suelos de Chile.” Publicación CIREN 139. Available at http://bibliotecadigital.ciren.cl/handle/123456789/2016.
12. ↵
    1. Centro de Información de Recursos Naturales

    . 2010b. “Determinación de la erosión actual y potencial de los suelos de Chile. Región de la Araucanía. Síntesis de resultados.” Publicación CIREN 149. Available at http://bibliotecadigital.ciren.cl/handle/123456789/2133.
13. ↵
    1. Claassen, Roger,
    2. Eric N. Duquette, and
    3. David J. Smith

    . 2018. “Additionality in U.S. Agricultural Conservation Programs.” Land Economics 94 (1): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.94.1.19.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    1. Clark, R.

    1996. “Methodologies for the Economic Analysis of Soil Erosion and Conservation.” Working Paper GEC 96–13. Norwich, UK: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment.
15. ↵
    1. Consultorías Agrarias Profesionales

    . 2005. “Evaluación de impacto programa bonificación forestal DL 701: informe final.” Available at http://www.dipres.gob.cl/597/articles-141063_informe_final.
16. ↵
    1. Corporación Nacional Forestal, Chile

    . 2009. “Catastro de uso del suelo y vegetación: período 1993–2007. Monitoreo y actualización región de la Araucanía.” Available at http://www.conaf.cl/cms/editorweb/catastro/actualizacion_Araucania.
17. ↵
    1. Corporación Nacional Forestal, Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente, and Banco Internacional de Reconstrucción y Fomento

    . 1999. “Catastro y evaluación de recursos vegetacionales nativos de Chile: informe nacional convariables ambientales.” Ministerio de Agricultura, Chile. Available at http://bibliotecadigital.ciren.cl/handle/123456789/10656.
18. ↵
    1. Dasgupta, Partha.

    2003. “Population, Poverty, and the Natural Environment.” In Handbook of Environmental Economics, edited by K. G. Mäler and J. R. Vincent, 1:191–247. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Available at https://ideas.repec.org/h/eee/envchp/1-05.html.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Donoso, Claudio.

    2008. Ecología forestal. El bosque y su medio ambiente. 6th ed. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
20. ↵
    1. Duncan, M. J

    . 1995. “Hydrological Impacts of Converting Pasture and Gorse to Pine Plantation, and Forest Harvesting, Nelson, New Zealand.” Journal of Hydrology 34 (1): 15–41.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Dye, Peter, and
    2. Dirk Versfeld

    . 2007. “Managing the Hydrological Impacts of South African Plantation Forests: An Overview.” Forest Ecology and Management 251 (1): 121–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.013.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Elizalde Mac-Clure, R

    . 1970. La sobrevivencia de Chile: la conservación de sus recursos naturales renovables. 2nd ed. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Agricultura, Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero.
23. ↵
    1. Endlicher, W.

    1988. “El problema de la erosión del suelo en la cordillera de la costa de la Octava región.” Revista de Geografía Norte Grande 15: 11–27.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Evaristo, Jaivime, and
    2. Jeffrey J. McDonnell

    . 2019. “Global Analysis of Streamflow Response to Forest Management.” Nature 570 (7762): 455–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1306-0.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Ferraro, Paul.

    2004. “Targeting Conservation Investments in Heterogeneous Landscapes: A Distance-Function Approach and Application to Watershed Management.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (4): 905–18.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. Friedman, Jorge,
    2. Carlos Yévenes,
    3. Nanno Mulder,
    4. Sebastián Faúndez,
    5. Esteban Pérez Caldentey,
    6. Mario Velásquez,
    7. Fernando Baizán, and
    8. Gerhard Reinecke

    . 2012. “Openness, Wage Gaps and Unions in Chile: A Micro-econometric Analysis.” In Policy Priorities for International Trade and Jobs, edited by L. Lippoldt, 145–74. Paris: OECD.
27. ↵
    1. García-Ruiz, José M., and
    2. Noemí Lana-Renault

    . 2011. “Hydrological and Erosive Consequences of Farmland Abandonment in Europe, with Special Reference to the Mediterranean Region: A Review.” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 140 (3–4): 317–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.01.003.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Grainger, Alan.

    1988. “Estimating Areas of Degraded Tropical Lands Requiring Replenishment of Forest Cover.” International Tree Crops Journal 5 (1–2): 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01435698.1988.9752837.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Hartman, Richard.

    1976. “The Harvesting Decision When a Standing Forest Has Value.” Economic Inquiry 14 (1): 52–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Heckman, J. J.,
    2. H. Ichimura, and
    3. P. E. Todd

    . 1997. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme.” Review of Economic Studies 64 (4): 605–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2971733.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Horowitz, John K., and
    2. Richard E. Just

    . 2013. “Economics of Additionality for Environmental Services from Agriculture.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 66 (1): 105–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.04.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Huber, Anton,
    2. Andrés Iroumé, and
    3. James Bathurst

    . 2008. “Effect of Pinus radiata Plantations on Water Balance in Chile.” Hydrological Processes 22 (1): 142–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6582.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Imbens, Guido W.,
    2. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge

    . 2009. “Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (1): 5–86. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.1.5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas Chile

    . 2017. “Censos de población y vivienda.” Censo nacional de población y vivienda 2002. Santiago, Chile. Available at https://www.ine.cl/estadisticas/censos/censos-de-poblacion-y-vivienda.
35. ↵
    1. Jacobs, Keri,
    2. Walter Thurman, and
    3. Michele Marra

    . 2014. “The Effect of Conservation Priority Areas on Bidding Behavior in the Conservation Reserve Program.” Land Economics 90 (1): 1–25.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. ↵
    1. Lara, A.,
    2. L. Araya,
    3. J. Capella,
    4. M. Fierro, and
    5. A. Cavieres

    . 1989. “Evaluación de la destrucción y disponibilidad de los recursos forestales nativos en la VII y VIII Región.” Informe técnico. Santiago, Chile: Comité Prodefensa Fauna y Flora.
37. ↵
    1. Laroze, Andr., and
    2. Edmundo Claro

    . 2009. “Estudio de opinión para la renovación del DL 701.” Santiago, Chile: Oficina de Estudios y Políticas Agrarias (ODEPA). Available at https://www.odepa.gob.cl/odepaweb/publicaciones/doc/2190.
38. ↵
    1. Lewis, David J.,
    2. Andrew J. Plantinga, and
    3. Jun Jie Wu

    . 2009. “Targeting Incentives to Reduce Habitat Fragmentation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (4): 1080–96.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01310.x

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Lima, W. P.,
    2. R. Laprovitera,
    3. S. F. B. Ferraz,
    4. C. B. Rodrigues, and
    5. M. M. Silva

    . 2012. “Forest Plantations and Water Consumption: A Strategy for Hydrosolidarity.” International Journal of Forestry Research 2012 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/908465

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. Lubowski, Ruben,
    2. Andrew Plantinga, and
    3. Robert Stavins

    . 2008. “What Drives Land-Use Change in the United States? A National Analysis of Landowner Decisions.” Land Economics 84 (4): 529–50.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
41. ↵
    1. Maclaren, J. P

    . 1996. “Environmental Effects of Planted Forests in New Zealand: The Implications of Continued Afforestation of Pasture.” FRI Bulletin 198. New Zealand Forest Research Institute.
42. ↵
    1. Meza-Lopehandía, Matías G

    . 2016. “Territorio indígena en el derecho chileno.” Santiago, Chile: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. Available at https://www.bcn.cl/obtienearchivo?id=repositorio/10221/22372/1/FINAL%20-%20Territorio%20ind%C3%ADgena%20en%20el%20derechos%20chileno
43. ↵
    1. Mezzatesta, Mariano,
    2. Davis Newburn, and
    3. Richard T. Woodward

    . 2013. “Additionality and the Adoption of Farm Conservation Practices.” Land Economics 89 (4): 722–42.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
44. ↵
    1. Ministerio de Agricultura, Chile

    . 1998. “Modifica el decreto ley no. 701, de 1974, sobre fomento forestal.” Ley 19,561, revised 1998. Available at https://www.leychile.cl/Navegar/index_html?idNorma=99208
45. ↵
    1. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Chile

    . 2011. “Informe del estado del medio ambiente.” Available at http://bibliotecadigital.ciren.cl/handle/123456789/6883
46. ↵
    1. Niklitschek, Mario.

    2007. “Trade Liberalization and Land Use Changes: Explaining the Expansion of Afforested Land in Chile.” Forest Science 53 (3): 385–94.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Niklitschek, Mario, and
    2. Eugenio Bobenrieth

    . 1992. “Incentivos económicos para una explotación eficiente del bosque.” Cuadernos de Economía 88: 463–80.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Niklitschek, Mario E., and
    2. Guillermo Trincado

    . 2011. “A Cost Effective Stratified Two-Stage Sampling Design to Estimate the Forest Land Area of Southern Chile.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41 (7): 1509–21 https://doi.org/10.1139/x11-040.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Nusser, S. M., and
    2. J. J. Goebel

    . 1997. “The National Resources Inventory: A Long Term Monitoring Program.” Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4 (3): 181–204 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018574412308.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Papke, Leslie E., and
    2. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge

    . 1996. “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(k) Plan Participation Rates.” Journal of Applied Economics 11 (6): 619–32 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6619::AID-JAE4183.0.CO;2-1.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

    . 2014. “Evaluación de resultados del decreto ley no. 701 de 1974, Ministerio de Agricultura: informe final.” Santiago, Chile: Pontificie Universidad Católica de Chile, Facultad de Agronomíae Ingeniería Forestal. Available at http://www.dipres.gob.cl/597/articles-141195_informe_final.
52. ↵
    1. Pufahl, A., and
    2. C. R. Weiss

    . 2009. “Evaluating the Effects of Farm Programmes: Results from Propensity Score Matching.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 36 (1): 79–101 https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbp001.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. ↵
    1. Ribaudo, Marc,
    2. Richard Horan, and
    3. Mark Smith

    . 1999. “Economics of Water Quality Protection from Nonpoint Sources: Theory and Practice.” Agricultural Economic Report. Washington, DC: Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=41066.
54. ↵
    1. Robalino, Juan, and
    2. Alexander Pfaff

    . 2013. “Ecopayments and Deforestation in Costa Rica: A Nationwide Analysis of PSA’s Initial Years.” Land Economics 89 (3): 432–48.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
55. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum, Paul R., and
    2. Donald B. Rubin

    . 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55 https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. ↵
    1. Schlatter, Juan, and
    2. Victor Gerding

    . 1995. “Método de clasificación de sitios para la producción forestal, ejemplo en Chile.” Bosque 16 (2): 13–20.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Senado de Chile

    . 2002. “Informe de la Comisión de Constitución, Legislación, Justicia y Reglamento, recaído en el encargo que le hiciera el Senado respecto del conflicto mapuche en relación con el orden público y la seguridad ciudadana en determinadas regiones.” Boletín no. 680–12. Senado de Chile.
58. ↵
    1. Servicio de Impuestos Internos

    . 2018. “Cartografía digital SII mapas.” Santiago, Chile: Servicio de Impuestos Internos (SII).
59. ↵
    1. Smith, Jeffrey, and
    2. Petra Todd

    . 2005. “Does Matching Overcome LaLonde’s Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?” Journal of Econometrics 125 (1–2): 305–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
60. ↵
    1. Smith, R. E., and
    2. D. F. Scott

    . 1992. “The Effects of Afforestation on Low Flows in Various Regions of South Africa.” Water SA 18 (3): 185–94.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Southgate, Douglas, and
    2. Robert Macke

    . 1989. “The Downstream Benefits of Soil Conservation in Third World Hydroelectric Watersheds.” Land Economics 65 (1): 38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146262

    OpenUrlCrossRef
62. ↵
    1. Toro, Jorge, and
    2. Stanley Gessel

    . 1999. “Radiata Pine Plantation in Chile.” New Forests 18 (1): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006597823190

    OpenUrlCrossRef
63. ↵
    1. UNESCO

    . 2013. “Soil Erosion and Sediment Production on Watershed Landscapes. Processes and Control.” Documento técnico del PHILAC, no. 32. Available at http://www.unesco.org.uy/phi
64. ↵
    1. Wischmeier, W. H., and
    2. D. D. Smith

    . 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning. Agricultural Handbook 537. Silver Springs, MD: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
65. ↵
    1. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.

    2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. ↵
    1. World Bank

    . 2008. World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5990.
67. ↵
    1. Wu, Jun.Jie,
    2. Richard M. Adams,
    3. Catherine L. Kling, and
    4. Katsuya Tanaka

    . 2004. “From Microlevel Decisions to Landscape Changes: An Assessment of Agricultural Conservation Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (1): 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00560.x..

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
68. ↵
    1. Xu, J.,
    2. R. Tao,
    3. Z. Xu, and
    4. M. T. Bennett

    . 2010. “China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program: Does Expansion Equal Success?” Land Economics 86 (2): 219–44 https://doi.org/10.3368/le.86.2.219.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
69. ↵
    1. Yang, Wanhong,
    2. Khanna Madhu, and
    3. Richard Farnsworth

    . 2005. “Effectiveness of Conservation Programs in Illinois and Gains from Targeting.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (5): 1248–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
70. ↵
    1. Zhang, L.,
    2. W. R. Dawes, and
    3. G. R. Walker

    . 2001. “Response of Mean Annual Evapotranspiration to Vegetation Changes at Catchment Scale.” Water Resources Research 37 (3): 701–8 https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900325.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science