Wetland Investment Support Schemes: Adoption and Spatial Interactions

References

1. ↵
   1. Anselin L.

   1995. “Local Indicators of Spatial Association: LISA.” Geographical Analysis 27 (2): 93–115.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Bandiera O.,
   2. Rasul I.

   . 2006. “Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern Mozambique.” Economic Journal 116 (514): 869–902.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Batáry P.,
   2. Dicks L. V.,
   3. Kleijn D.,
   4. Sutherland W. J.

   . 2015. “The Role of Agri-environment Schemes in Conservation and Environmental Management.” Conservation Biology 29 (4): 1006–16.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   Board of Agriculture. 2004a. “Kvalitetskriterier för våtmarker i odlingslandskapet: kriterier för rening av växtnäring med beaktande av biologisk mångfald och kulturmiljö.” [Quality Criteria for Wetlands in the Agricultural Landscape: Criteria for the Purification of Nutrients Taking into Account Biodiversity and Cultural Environment]. Available at https://www2.jordbruksverket.se/webdav/files/SJV/trycksaker/Pdf_rapporter/ra04_2.pdf.
5. ↵
   Board of Agriculture. 2004b. “Stöd för miljövänligt jordbruk 2004.” [Support for Agri-environment in 2004]. Available at http://www2.jordbruksverket.se/webdav/files/SJV/trycksaker/Euinfo/eu6_1.pdf.
6. ↵
   Board of Agriculture. 2010. “Kontrollinstruktion för arealbaserade kontroller 2010 version 2 (Dnr 91-2171/10).” [Control Instructions for Area-Based Controls 2010 Version 2 (Dnr 91-2171/10)]. Available at http://www.jordbruksverket.se.
7. ↵
   Board of Agriculture. 2019. “Kontrollinstruktion för arealbaserade kontroller: Stöden från och med 2015 (3.4.20–03669/2019).” [Control Instructions for Area-Based Controls: Support from 2015 (3.4.20–03669/2019)]. Available at http://www.jordbruksverket.se.
8. ↵
   1. Case A.

   1992. “Neighborhood Influence and Technological Change.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 22 (3): 491–508.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Conley T. G.,
   2. Udry C. R.

   . 2010. “Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana.” American Economic Review 100 (1): 35–69.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    County Administrative Board of Stockholm. 2020. “Regional handlingsplan för landsbygdsprogrammet och havsoch fiskeriprogrammet 2014-2020.” [Regional Action Plan for the Rural Development Program and the Sea and Fisheries Program 2014-2020]. Available at http://www.lansstyrelsen.se/stockholm/publikationer.
11. ↵
    1. Defrancesco E.,
    2. Gatto P.,
    3. Runge F.,
    4. Trestini S.

    2008. “Factors Affecting Farmers’ Participation in Agri-environmental Measures: A Northern Italian Perspective.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (1): 114–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Fleischer S.,
    2. Gustafson A.,
    3. Joelsson A.,
    4. Pansar J.,
    5. Stibe L.

    . 1994. “Nitrogen Removal in Created Ponds.” Ambio Journal of Human Environment Research and Management 23 (6): 349–57.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Foster A. D.,
    2. Rosenzweig M. R.

    . 1995. “Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture.” Journal of Political Economy 103 (6): 1176–209.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Franzén F.,
    2. Dinnétz P.,
    3. Hammer M.

    . 2016. “Factors Affecting Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Eutrophication Mitigation: A Case Study of Preferences for Wetland Creation in Sweden.” Ecological Economics 130: 8–15.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Gardner R. C.,
    2. Barchiesi S.,
    3. Beltrame C.,
    4. Finlayson C.,
    5. Galewski T.,
    6. Harrison I.,
    7. Paganini M.,
    8. et al

    . 2015. “State of the World’s Wetlands and Their Services to People: A Compilation of Recent Analyses.” Ramsar Briefing Note 7. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
16. ↵
    1. Geary R. C.

    1954. “The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping.” Incorporated Statistician 5 (3): 115–46.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Getis A.,
    2. Ord J. K.

    . 2010. “The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics.” In Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis, edited by Anselin L., and Rey S. J., 127–45. Berlin: Springer.
18. ↵
    1. Grenestam E.,
    2. Nordin M.

    . 2018. “Estimating the Impact of Agri-environmental Payments on Nutrient Runoff Using a Unique Combination of Data.” Land Use Policy 75: 388–98.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Grigoryan S.

    2018. “Våtmarker och dammar: en uppföljning inom landsbygdsprogrammet.” [Wetlands and Ponds: A Follow-Up within the Rural Development Program]. Available at https://webbutiken.jordbruksverket.se/sv/artiklar/upp192.html.
20. ↵
    1. Hansson A.,
    2. Pedersen E.,
    3. Weisner S. E.

    . 2012. “Landowners’ Incentives for Constructing Wetlands in an Agricultural Area in South Sweden.” Journal of Environmental Management 113: 271–78.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. ↵
    1. Ingemarson F.,
    2. Nylund J.-E.

    . 2013. From Common to Private Ownership: Forest Tenure Development in Sweden 1500–2010. Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry.
22. ↵
    1. Jansson M.,
    2. Andersson R.,
    3. Berggren H.,
    4. Leonardson L.

    . 1994. “Wetlands and Lakes as Nitrogen Traps.” Ambio 23 (6): 320–25.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Konrad M. T.,
    2. Elofsson K.

    . 2019. “Drivers of Farmers’ Investments in Nutrient Abatement Technologies in Five Baltic Sea Countries.” Ecological Economics 159: 91–100.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Krishnan P.,
    2. Patnam M.

    . 2014. “Neighbors and Extension Agents in Ethiopia: Who Matters More for Technology Adoption?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96 (1): 308–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Lastra-Bravo X. B.,
    2. Hubbard C.,
    3. Garrod G.,
    4. Tolón-Becerra A.

    . 2015. “What Drives Farmers’ Participation in EU Agri-environmental Schemes? Results from a Qualitative Meta-analysis.” Environmental Science and Policy 54: 1–9.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Lawley C.,
    2. Yang W.

    . 2015. “Spatial Interactions in Habitat Conservation: Evidence from Prairie Pothole Easements.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 71: 71–89.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. LeSage J.,
    2. Pace R. K.

    . 2009. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
28. ↵
    1. Lewis D. J.,
    2. Barham B. L.,
    3. Robinson B.

    . 2011. “Are There Spatial Spillovers in the Adoption of Clean Technology? The Case of Organic Dairy Farming.” Land Economics 87 (2): 250–67.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    1. Lynch L.,
    2. Lovell S. J.

    . 2003. “Combining Spatial and Survey Data to Explain Participation in Agricultural Land Reservation Programs.” Land Economics 79 (2): 259–76.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
30. ↵
    1. Manski C. F.

    1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies 60 (3): 531–42.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Mettepenningen E.,
    2. Vandermeulen V.,
    3. Delaet K.,
    4. Van Huylenbroeck G.,
    5. Wailes E. J.

    . 2013. “Investigating the Influence of the Institutional Organisation of Agri-environmental Schemes on Scheme Adoption.” Land Use Policy 33: 20–30.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Moran P. A.

    1948. “The Interpretation of Statistical Maps.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 10 (2): 243–51.
33. ↵
    1. Morris C.

    2004. “Networks of Agri-environmental Policy Implementation: A Case Study of England’s Countryside Stewardship Scheme.” Land Use Policy 21 (2): 177–91.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Neill S. P.,
    2. Lee D. R.

    . 2001. “Explaining the Adoption and Disadoption of Sustainable Agriculture: The Case of Cover Crops in Northern Honduras.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 49 (4): 793–820.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. 2018. Global Wetland Outlook: State of the World’s Wetlands and Their Services to People. Available at https://www.global-wetland-outlook.ramsar.org/outlook.
36. ↵
    Statistics Sweden. 2013. “Dränering av jordbruksmark 2013.” [Drainage of Agricultural Land 2013]. Available at https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/jord-och-skogsbruk-fiske/jordbrukets-struktur/dranering-av-jordbruksmark/pong/publikationer/dranering-av-jordbruksmark-2013/.
37. ↵
    1. Strand J. A.,
    2. Weisner S. E.

    . 2013. “Effects of Wetland Construction on Nitrogen Transport and Species Richness in the Agricultural Landscape: Experiences from Sweden.” Ecological Engineering 56: 14–25.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. “Environmental Objectives on a New Basis (6433).” Available at http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Om-Naturvardsverket/Publikationer/ISBN/6400/978-91-620-6433-4/.
39. ↵
    Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. “Sweden’s Environmental Objectives.” Available at http://www.swedishepa.se/Environmental-objectives-and-cooperation/Swedens-environmental-objectives/The-environmental-objectives-system/.
40. ↵
    Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. 2019. “Myllrande våtmarker: Underlag till den fördjupade utvärderingen av miljömålen 2019.” [Multitudous Wetlands: Basis for the In-Depth Evaluation of the Environmental Goals 2019]. Available at http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:naturvardsverket:diva-8582.
41. ↵
    1. Vanslembrouck I.,
    2. Van Huylenbroeck G.,
    3. Verbeke W.

    . 2002. “Determinants of the Willingness of Belgian Farmers to Participate in Agri-environmental Measures.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 53 (3): 489–511.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. ↵
    1. Warren J.,
    2. Lawson C.,
    3. Belcher K.

    . 2007. The Agri-environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. ↵
    1. Wauters E.,
    2. Bielders C.,
    3. Poesen J.,
    4. Govers G.,
    5. Mathijs E.

    . 2010. “Adoption of Soil Conservation Practices in Belgium: An Examination of the Theory of Planned Behaviour in the Agri-environmental Domain.” Land Use Policy 27 (1): 86–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Yu J.,
    2. De Jong R.,
    3. Lee L.-f.

    . 2008. “Quasi-maximum Likelihood Estimators for Spatial Dynamic Panel Data with Fixed Effects When Both n and T Are Large.” Journal of Econometrics 146 (1): 118–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. ↵
    1. Zedler J. B.,
    2. Kercher S.

    . 2005. “Wetland Resources: Status, Trends, Ecosystem Services, and Restorability.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 39–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. Żmihorski M.,
    2. Pärt T.,
    3. Gustafson T.,
    4. Berg Å

    . 2016. “Effects of Water Level and Grassland Management on Alpha and Beta Diversity of Birds in Restored Wetlands.” Journal of Applied Ecology 53 (2): 587–95.

    OpenUrl